Trends and outcomes of lytic-based therapies for high-risk pulmonary embolism: A nationwide analysis.

BACKGROUND: Systemic thrombolysis (ST) is the guideline-recommended treatment for high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE), although catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) may provide a treatment alternative associated with lower rates of bleeding. Furthermore, the treatment trends and outcomes among those with high-risk PE according to treatment assignments of no lytic therapy (NLT), ST, and CDT are underreported. METHODS: Patients hospitalized for high-risk PE between 2016 and 2019 were identified by administrative claims codes from the National Readmission Database. Therapy assignment was similarly defined by administrative codes, then stratified into NLT, ST, and CDT cohorts to report patient characteristics, care settings, and clinical outcomes. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality with rates adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics using multivariable logistic regression. Secondary outcomes included intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), and 90-day readmission. Over the years of interest, trends in lytic treatment along with concomitant use of mechanical or surgical thrombectomy were reported. RESULTS: Among 74,516 patients with high-risk PE, 61,569 (82.6%) received NLT, 8445 (11.3%) received ST, and 4502 (6.04%) received CDT. The NLT subgroup, relative to ST and CDT, tended to be older (66.1 ± 15.4, 62.8 ± 15.3, and 63.4 ± 14.4; p < 0.001) and more frequently women (56.0%, 54.4%, and 51.3%; p < 0.001), respectively. The unadjusted in-hospital mortality rate was highest for ST (18.8%, 34.1%, and 18.3% for NLT, ST, and CDT, respectively; p < 0.001) and persisted after multivariable adjustment (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.43; 95% CI 0.38-0.49; p < 0.0001) of in-hospital mortality for CDT relative to ST. The unadjusted rate of ICH or GIB was lowest for NLT (1.0%, 2.0%, and 0.6% for NLT, ST, and CDT, respectively; p < 0.001). CDT, relative to ST, was associated with reduced odds of ICH (aOR 0.32; 95% CI 0.18-0.55; p < 0.0001) and GIB (aOR 0.78; 95% CI 0.62-0.98; p < 0.0001). Readmissions were highest for NLT (21.7%, 9.6%, and 12.1% for NLT, ST, and CDT, respectively; p < 0.001). CDT was associated with a higher incidence of 90-day readmission relative to ST (aOR 1.32; 95% CI 1.10-1.57; p < 0.001). From 2016 to 2019, individual treatment trends were not significantly different, although NLT tended to be offered among smaller and rural hospitals. Rates of concomitant thrombectomy were low in all three treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among a large, contemporary, US cohort with high-risk PE, over 80% of patients did not receive any form of thrombolysis. High-risk PE that did receive systemic thrombolysis was associated with the highest rates of in-hospital mortality, suggesting opportunities to study the implementation of lytic and nonlytic-based treatments to improve outcomes for those presenting with high-risk PE.

Multidisciplinary Approach to Pulmonary Embolism and the Role of the Pulmonary Embolism Response Team.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a leading cause of cardiovascular death and morbidity, and presents a major burden to healthcare systems. The field has seen rapid growth with development of innovative clot reduction technologies, as well as ongoing multicenter trials that may completely revolutionize care of PE patients. However, current paucity of robust clinical trials and guidelines often leave individual physicians managing patients with acute PE in a dilemma. RECENT FINDINGS: The pulmonary embolism response team (PERT) was developed as a platform to rapidly engage multiple specialists to deliver evidence-based, organized and efficient care and help address some of the gaps in knowledge. Several centers investigating outcomes following implementation of PERT have demonstrated shorter hospital and intensive-care unit stays, lower use of inferior vena cava filters, and in some instances improved mortality. Since the advent of PERT, early findings demonstrate promise with improved outcomes after implementation of PERT. Incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI) into PERT has also shown promise with more streamlined care and reducing response times. Further clinical trials are needed to examine the impact of PERT model on care delivery and clinical outcomes.

Comparison of interventions for intermediate to high-risk pulmonary embolism: A network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Multiple interventions, including catheter-directed therapy (CDT), systemic thrombolysis (ST), surgical embolectomy (SE), and therapeutic anticoagulation (AC) have been used to treat intermediate to high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE), but the most effective and safest treatment remains unclear. Our study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety outcomes of each intervention. METHODS: We queried PubMed and EMBASE in January 2023 and performed a network meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCT), including high or intermediate-risk PE patients, and comparing AC, CDT, SE, and ST. The primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and major bleeding. The secondary outcomes included long-term mortality (≥6 months), recurrent PE, minor bleeding, and intracranial hemorrhage. RESULTS: We identified 11 RCTs and 42 observational studies involving 157,454 patients. CDT was associated with lower in-hospital mortality than ST (odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0.41 [0.31-0.55]), AC (OR [95% CI]: 0.33 [0.20-0.53]), and SE (OR [95% CI]: 0.61 [0.39-0.96]). Recurrent PE in CDT was lower than ST (OR [95% CI]: 0.66 [0.50-0.87]), AC (OR [95% CI]: 0.36 [0.20-0.66]), and trended lower than SE (OR [95% CI]: 0.71 [0.40-1.26]). Notably, ST had higher major bleeding risks than CDT (OR [95% CI]: 1.51 [1.19-1.91]) and AC (OR [95% CI]: 2.21 [1.53-3.19]). By rankogram analysis, CDT presented the highest p-score in in-hospital mortality, long-term mortality, and recurrent PE. CONCLUSION: In this network meta-analysis of observational studies and RCTs involving patients with intermediate to high-risk PE, CDT was associated with improved mortality outcomes compared to other therapies, without significant additional bleeding risk.

Systemic thrombolysis with newer thrombolytics vs anticoagulation in acute intermediate risk pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing systemic thrombolysis to anticoagulation in intermediate risk pulmonary embolism (PE) have yielded mixed results. A prior meta-analysis on this topic had included studies that used lower than standard dose of thrombolytics and included thrombolytic agents that are no longer available. Hence, interpreting the findings of that paper is not valid in contemporary practice. OBJECTIVES: We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of systemic thrombolysis with newer thrombolytic agents vs anticoagulation in intermediate risk PE. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis is reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. RESULTS: Nine randomized controlled trials were included in the study. We did not find any difference in in-hospital mortality (RR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.42-1.50; I2: 0) or risk of major bleeding (RR:2.08;95% CI: 0.98-4.42; I2: 23.9%) between systemic thrombolysis and anticoagulation. Systemic thrombolysis was associated with lower risks for vasopressor use (RR: 0.27; 95% CI: 0.11-0.64, I2: 0) and secondary/rescue thrombolysis (RR: 0.25; 95% CI: 0.14-0.45; I2: 0). But systemic thrombolysis was found to have an increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage (RR: 4.55; 95% CI: 1.30-15.91; I2:0). There was no difference in mechanical ventilation between the two groups (RR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.31-1.19, I2:0). CONCLUSION: In our meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of systemic thrombolysis vs anticoagulation in intermediate risk PE, we did not find any difference in in-hospital mortality or overall risk of major bleeding. With systemic thrombolysis, we found lower risks for vasopressor use and need for secondary/ rescue thrombolysis and an increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage.

[Clinical Comparison of the Efficacy of Systemic Thrombolysis,Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis,and AngioJet Percutaneous Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis].

Objective To compare the clinical effects of three treatment methods including systemic thrombolysis(ST),catheter-directed thrombolysis(CDT),and AngioJet percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy(PMT)in acute lower extremity deep venous thrombosis(LEDVT). Methods The data of 82 patients diagnosed with LEDVT in the Department of Vascular and Gland Surgery of the First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University from January 2017 to December 2020 were collected.The patients were assigned into a ST group(n=50),a CDT group(n=16),and a PMT group(n=16)according to different treatment methods.The efficacy and safety were compared among the three groups. Results Compared with that before treatment,the circumferential diameter difference of both lower limbs on days 1,2,and 3 of treatment in the ST,CDT,and PMT groups reduced(all P<0.001).The PMT group showed smaller circumferential diameter difference of lower limbs on days 1,2,and 3 of treatment than the ST group(all P<0.001)and smaller circumferential diameter difference of the lower patellar margin on day 1 of treatment than the CDT group(P<0.001).The PMT group showed higher diminution rate for swelling of the affected limb at the upper and lower edges of the patella than the ST group(P<0.001)and higher diminution rate for swelling at the upper edge of the patella than the CDT group(P=0.026).The incidence of complications after treatment showed no significant differences among the three groups(all P>0.05).The median of hospital stay in the PMT group was shorter than that in the ST and CDT groups(P=0.002,P=0.001).The PMT group had higher thrombus clearance rate than the ST group(P=0.002)and no significant difference in the thrombus clearance rate from the CDT group(P=0.361).The vascular recanalization rates in the PMT(all P<0.001)and CDT(P<0.001,P=0.002,P=0.009)groups 3,6,and 12 months after treatment were higher than those in ST group,and there were no significant differences between PMT and CDT groups(P=0.341,P=0.210,P=0.341). Conclusions ST,CDT,and PMT demonstrated significant efficacy in the treatment of LEDVT,and PMT was superior to ST and CDT in terms of circumferential diameter difference of the lower limbs,diminution rate for swelling of the affected limb,thrombus clearance rate,length of hospital stay,and long-term vascular recanalization.There was no obvious difference in safety among the three therapies.

[Endovascular surgery for deep vein thrombosis]. / Endovaskulyarnaya khirurgiya tromboza glubokikh ven.

The authors reviewed national and world literature data on endovascular technologies for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis. Indications, technologies, complications and results of systemic and regional thrombolysis are described in detail. The authors consider percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy, pharmacomechanical thrombectomy, venous stenting and catheter thrombectomy. The role of combined endovascular approaches in delayed stages of disease is emphasized. The indications for implantation of cava filter are presented.

Early effect of thrombolysis on structural brain network organisation after anterior-circulation stroke in the randomized WAKE-UP trial.

The symptoms of acute ischemic stroke can be attributed to disruption of the brain network architecture. Systemic thrombolysis is an effective treatment that preserves structural connectivity in the first days after the event. Its effect on the evolution of global network organisation is, however, not well understood. We present a secondary analysis of 269 patients from the randomized WAKE-UP trial, comparing 127 imaging-selected patients treated with alteplase with 142 controls who received placebo. We used indirect network mapping to quantify the impact of ischemic lesions on structural brain network organisation in terms of both global parameters of segregation and integration, and local disruption of individual connections. Network damage was estimated before randomization and again 22 to 36 h after administration of either alteplase or placebo. Evolution of structural network organisation was characterised by a loss in integration and gain in segregation, and this trajectory was attenuated by the administration of alteplase. Preserved brain network organization was associated with excellent functional outcome. Furthermore, the protective effect of alteplase was spatio-topologically nonuniform, concentrating on a subnetwork of high centrality supported in the salvageable white matter surrounding the ischemic cores. This interplay between the location of the lesion, the pathophysiology of the ischemic penumbra, and the spatial embedding of the brain network explains the observed potential of thrombolysis to attenuate topological network damage early after stroke. Our findings might, in the future, lead to new brain network-informed imaging biomarkers and improved prognostication in ischemic stroke.

Outcomes of Mechanical Thrombectomy Compared With Systemic Thrombolysis in Pulmonary Embolism: A Comprehensive Evaluation From the National Inpatient Sample Database.

BACKGROUND: Systemic thrombolysis (ST) may not be ideal for many patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) due to bleeding risk. In this analysis, we evaluated the safety and effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) as an alternative to ST for acute PE. METHODS: Patients aged ≥18 years who underwent MT and/or ST for PE were identified from the National Inpatient Sample database from 2016 to 2017. Patients who underwent catheter-directed thrombolysis were excluded. We compared in-hospital outcomes of both groups in this retrospective study. RESULTS: Of 16 890 patients who received an intervention for acute PE, 1380 (8.2%) received MT and 15 510 (91.8%) received ST. There was no difference in age between both groups. In-hospital mortality was significantly lower in patients who received MT than that in those who received ST (11.9% vs 20.6%, odds ratio [OR]: 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.29-0.93, p=0.028). There was no statistically significant difference in terms of periprocedural bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, and acute kidney injury between the 2 groups (p≥0.608 for all). Patients who received MT had a higher rate of respiratory complications (19.0% vs 11.6%, OR: 1.79, 95% CI: 1.06-3.03, p=0.030) and discharge to an outside facility (34.1% vs 19.2%, OR: 2.18, 95% CI: 1.41-3.37, p<0.001) than those who received ST. CONCLUSION: Mortality was significantly lower with MT than that with ST, but larger randomized studies are needed to validate this. The use of MT should be individualized on the basis of the patients' clinical presentation, risk profile, and local resources. CLINICAL IMPACT: In this study, we utilized the National Inpatient Sample database to study the in-hospital outcomes of pulmonary embolism patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy compared to those who underwent systemic thrombolysis. We found that the patients who were diagnosed with pulmonary embolism and underwent mechanical thrombectomy had significantly lower mortality compared to those who were treated using systemic thrombolysis. This study was the first of its kind, utilizing the national inpatient sample database for evaluation of mechanical thrombectomy in comparison with the standard of care. These result would direct further randomized controlled trials for better evaluation of the utilization of mechanical thrombectomy in the correct clinical context. Furthermore, our study demonstrated comparable peri-operative complications between the mechanical thrombectomy group and the systemic thrombolysis group. These results would direct clinicians to consider mechanical thrombectomy if clinically indicated given the promising results.

Catheter directed compared to systemically delivered thrombolysis for pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

To compare the efficacy and safety of systemic and catheter directed thrombolysis for patients with pulmonary embolism. Pubmed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched from inception to May 31st 2020 to identify relevant studies. Outcomes of interest were in-hospital mortality and major bleeding including intracranial hemorrhage. We included 8 observational studies comprising 11,932 patients with PE. Catheter directed thrombolysis was associated with lower in-hospital mortality [RR 0.52; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40-0.68]. Although there was no difference in major bleeding by treatment strategy (RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.37-1.76), intracranial hemorrhage was lower in patients receiving catheter directed therapy (RR 0.66; 95% CI, 0.47-0.94).The certainty in these estimates was low. Non-randomized studies suggest that catheter directed delivery of thrombolytic therapy may be associated with lower in-hospital mortality and intracranial hemorrhage rates. These results may help inform management strategies for health care and pulmonary embolism response teams (PERT) involved in the management of high risk patients with massive or submassive pulmonary emboli.

Reperfusion therapy in a patient with early recurrence of ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) has a high risk of recurrence, particularly in the early stage. Recurrent ischemic stroke (RIS) is associated with adverse neurological outcomes but the phenomenon of early RIS in the endovascular thrombectomy era has not been frequently discussed. We report a case addressing this issue. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a patient who was successfully treated by mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for middle cerebral artery occlusion. Due to an early stroke recurrence, within 72 h after the first MT, he received systemic thrombolysis and repeated MT was performed with excellent clinical outcome. DISCUSSION: We discuss the aspects of reperfusion therapy for patients experiencing early stroke recurrence. Consideration was given to stroke etiology and off-label use of thrombolytic therapy. Also, effectiveness of repeated MT for early re-occlusion of initially reanalyzed vessel was evaluated in order to allow more patients with RIS to benefit from reperfusion therapy.

Establishing Stroke Services in the Republic of Georgia.

INTRODUCTION: This article summarizes the medical experience in establishing stroke units and systemic thrombolysis in Georgia, which, like many other post-Soviet countries, still faces problems in organizing stroke care even after 30 years of independence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We created an example of treating acute stroke with systemic thrombolysis and introduced stroke units in several hospitals in the country, including standardization of the diagnostic and treatment process, consistent evaluation, and monthly feedback to the stroke unit staff. RESULTS: Systemic thrombolysis has become a clinical routine in some large hospitals and is meanwhile reimbursed by the state insurance. The data of consecutive 1,707 stroke patients in 4 major cities demonstrated significant time lost at the prehospital level, due to failure in identifying stroke symptoms, delay in notification, or transportation. The consequent quality reports resulted in a dramatic increase in adherence to the European and national guidelines. A mandatory dysphagia screening and subsequent treatment led to a decrease in pneumonia rates. DISCUSSION: We discuss our experience and suggestions on how to overcome clinical, financial, and ethical problems in establishing a stroke services in a developing country. CONCLUSION: The Georgian example might be useful for doctors in other post-Soviet countries or other parts of the world.

Early-term outcomes of the pulmonary embolism response team.

Objective: Treatment of pulmonary embolism varies according to the different clinical presentations. Pulmonary embolism response teams (PERT) might improve outcomes of pulmonary embolism with faster evaluation and increased usage of advanced treatment methods. In this study, the effects of PERT for the treatment of pulmonary embolism were investigated. Methods: In this retrospectively analyzed study, patients diagnosed with PE in our hospital between March 1st, 2019 and February 28th, 2022 were included. Patients' medical records were evaluated according to the treatment procedures and early outcomes. Results: Ninety-eight patients with pulmonary embolism were evaluated by the PERT during the study period. The mean age was 62.8+16.4 years and 59% were male. All patients with intermediate-low risk were treated medically. About 59.2% of the patients were hospitalized. The rate of catheter-directed thrombolysis was 37.8% (n=37). Systemic thrombolytic therapy was performed on two patients. One patient with a metastatic brain tumor was treated with low-molecular-weight heparin. Catheter-directed procedures were performed in 37 patients. The time from diagnosis to reperfusion was 243 minutes. There was one pericardial effusion and one mortality. In the 30-day follow- up there was no re-hospitalization and mortality. Conclusion: PERT might help early triage and treatment of patients with pulmonary embolism. Experienced specialists in this team might contribute to clinical recovery by performing advanced treatment methods and decreasing the risk of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension in the long term.

Trends in thrombolytic treatment and outcomes of acute pulmonary embolism in Germany.

AIMS: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the third most common cardiovascular cause of death; systemic thrombolysis is potentially lifesaving treatment in patients presenting with haemodynamic instability. We investigated trends in the use of systemic thrombolysis and the outcome of patients with acute PE. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed data on the characteristics, comorbidities, treatment, and in-hospital outcome of 885 806 PE patients in Germany between 2005 and 2015. Incidence of acute PE was 99/100 000 population/year and increased from 85/100 000 in 2005 to 109/100 000 in 2015 [ß 0.32 (0.26-0.38), P < 0.001]. During the same period, in-hospital case fatality rates decreased from 20.4% to 13.9% [ß -0.51 (-0.52 to -0.49), P < 0.001]. The overall proportion of patients treated with systemic thrombolysis increased from 3.1% in 2005 to 4.4% in 2015 [ß 0.28 (0.25-0.31), P < 0.001]. Thrombolysis was associated with lower in-hospital mortality rates in patients with haemodynamic instability, both in those with shock not necessitating cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or mechanical ventilation [odds ratio (OR) 0.42 (0.37-0.48), P < 0.001], and in those who underwent CPR [OR 0.92 (0.87-0.97), P = 0.002]. This association was independent from age, sex, and comorbidities. However, systemic thrombolysis was administered to only 23.1% of haemodynamically unstable patients. CONCLUSION: Although the proportion of PE patients treated with systemic thrombolysis increased slightly in Germany between 2005 and 2015, only the minority of haemodynamically unstable patients currently receive this treatment. In the nationwide inpatient cohort, thrombolytic therapy was associated with reduced in-hospital mortality rates in PE patients with shock, and also in those who underwent CPR.

Acute limb ischemia due to paradoxical embolism treated with systemic thrombolysis.

We present a case report of a patient with acute upper and lower limb ischemia due to paradoxical embolism. A 67-year old woman without history of venous thromboembolism suffered dislocated patellar fracture requiring surgery in November 2017. Two months after surgery she presented to the emergency room with bilateral pulmonary embolism, occlusion of the left subclavian artery, left common femoral artery and superior mesenteric artery. Transesophageal echocardiography detected patent foramen ovale. Vascular surgeon decided against embolectomy, interventional radiologist against pharmacomechanical thrombolysis due to the extent of the occlusions. Systemic thrombolysis (alteplase) was administered successfully with resolution of the emboli in the left subclavian artery, left common femoral artery and superior mesenteric artery.

Endovascular stroke treatment does not preclude high thrombolysis rates.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In 1995 intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (IVRTPA) was the first reperfusion therapy to be approved in patients with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS). The significance and impact of IVRTPA in times of modern endovascular stroke treatment (EST) were analysed in a German academic stroke centre. METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort analysis of 1034 patients with suspected AIS presenting at the emergency department in 2014 was performed. Patients were evaluated for baseline characteristics, reperfusion procedures, IVRTPA eligibility, clinical outcome, symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (sICH) and mortality. Data acquisition was part of an investigator-initiated, prospective and blinded end-point registry. RESULTS: In 718 (69%) patients the diagnosis of symptomatic AIS was confirmed. 419 (58%) patients presented within 4.5 h of symptom onset and of those 260 (62%) received reperfusion therapy (IVRTPA alone, n = 183; combination or bridging therapy, n = 60; EST alone, n = 17). Subtracting cases with absolute contraindications for IVRTPA resulted in an effective thrombolysis rate of 82%. sICH occurred in two patients treated with IVRTPA alone (1.1%). The median door-to-needle interval was 30 min. Fifty (17%) non-EST eligible AIS patients presenting within 4.5 h without absolute contraindications did not receive IVRTPA mainly due to mild or regressive symptoms. Most of these untreated IVRTPA eligible patients (82%) were discharged with a good clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale ≤ 2). CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator remains the most frequently applied reperfusion therapy in AIS patients presenting within 4.5 h of onset in a tertiary stroke centre. An effective thrombolysis rate of over 80% can be achieved without increased rates of sICH.

Retrospective comparison of ultrasound facilitated catheter-directed thrombolysis and systemically administered half-dose thrombolysis in treatment of pulmonary embolism.

This study retrospectively compared the outcomes of patients who received ultrasound facilitated catheter-directed thrombolysis (UFCDT) versus systemically administered 'half-dose' thrombolysis (HDT) in 97 patients with PE. The outcomes assessed included changes in baseline pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP), right ventricle/left ventricle ratio (RV/LV), cost and duration of hospitalization, death, bleeding, and recurrent venous thromboembolism in the short and intermediate term follow-up. Analyses were performed using a covariance adjustment propensity score approach to address baseline differences between groups in variables associated with PASP and RV/LV, covarying baseline scores. The baseline mean ± SE PASP dropped from 49.3 ± 1.1 to 32.5 ± 0.3 mmHg at 36 hours in the HDT group, and from 50.6 ± 1.2 to 35.1 ± 0.4 mmHg in the UFCDT group; group × time interaction p-value = 0.007. Corresponding drops in the RV/LV were from a baseline of 1.26 ± 0.05 to 1.07 ± 0.01 in the HDT group and from 1.30 ± 0.05 to 1.14 ± 0.01 in the UFCDT group at 36 hours; group × time interaction p-value = 0.269. Statistically significant decreases were noted in PASP and RV/LV for both the HDT and UFCDT at 36 hours and follow-up. PASP through follow-up was significantly lower in the HDT than the UFCDT group. Likewise, RV/LV was lower in the HDT group. The duration and cost of hospitalization were lower in the HDT group (6.2 ± 1.4 days vs 1.9 ± 0.3 days, p < 0.001; US$12,000 ± $3000 vs $74,000 ± $6000, p < 0.001). We conclude that both UFCDT and HDT lead to rapid reduction of PASP and RV/LV, whereas HDT leads to a lower duration and cost of hospitalization.

Thrombolysis in hemodynamically unstable patients: still underused: a review based on multicenter prospective registries on acute pulmonary embolism.

Hemodynamically unstable pulmonary embolism (PE) represents a complex and life-threatening event with a highly variable course and poor prognosis in the short-term period. Despite an immediate reperfusion treatment is recommended in these patients, previous investigations have reported a lower use of systemic thrombolysis (ST). The aim of the present review is to assess and describe the real use of ST in hemodynamically unstable patients with acute PE enrolled in prospective-multicenter registries between the 1990 and 2018. Over that period, 1216 articles were identified in Pubmed. After excluding the duplicates obtained using the different searching MeSH (n = 703), 513 articles were screened and then excluded for not meeting inclusion criteria due the article type, design of the study or no English language. As result, 13 articles were assessed for eligibility and carefully reviewed. Finally, five studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. The identified study registries enrolled prospectively 41364 consecutive patients with acute PE between the 1993 and the 2016. Among these, 2168 (5.2%) were hemodynamically unstable at presentation. ST was administered in 29.7% (n = 645) of patients while catheter-direct treatment (CDT) was used only in 1.4% (n = 32) of cases. Conversely, surgical pulmonary embolectomy (SPE) was adopted as reperfusion treatment in 39 patients (1.7%). Intriguingly, the 68% of patients not received a reperfusion treatment despite they were hemodynamically unstable at admission. Despite the internationals guidelines recommendations, a prompt reperfusion is performed only in one on three hemodynamically unstable patients with acute PE.

In Utero Aortic Arch Thrombosis Masquerading as Interrupted Aortic Arch: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Aortic arch thrombosis is an extremely rare but life-threatening diagnosis that is often misdiagnosed in the neonatal period. Strategies including surgical intervention, systemic anticoagulation, and thrombolysis have been previously described in the treatment of these neonates. We describe the case of a neonate who presented with concern for interrupted aortic arch and was diagnosed with an in utero aortic arch thrombosis. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case with evidence of aortic arch thrombosis in fetal life. The patient underwent successful treatment with systemic thrombolysis with tissue plasminogen activator. A brief review of the literature regarding the diagnosis, treatment, and management of neonatal aortic arch thrombosis is also presented.

From head to toe: Sex and gender differences in the treatment of ischemic cerebral disease.

Stroke is a major cause of mortality and morbidity, particularly in the older ages. Women have a longer life expectancy and are more likely to experience stroke than men. Interestingly, the increased risk of ischemic stroke in women seems to be independent from age or classical cardiovascular risk factors. Notwithstanding the fact that stroke outcomes and survival are usually poorer in women, current evidence suggests that thrombolysis, antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies are more beneficial in women than in men. A possible explanation of this paradox might be that females are often undertreated and they have fewer chances to be submitted to an effective and timely treatment for stroke than the male counterpart. The first step in the attempt to solve this obvious discrimination is surely to emphasize any reasons for differences in the therapeutic approach in relation to gender and then to denounce the lack of a sustainable motivation for them. In this article, we aimed to review the existing literature about gender-related differences on efficacy, administration and side effects of the most common drugs used for the treatment of ischemic stroke. The most striking result was the evidence that the therapeutic approach for stroke is often different according to patients' gender with a clear detrimental prognostic effect for women. A major effort is necessary to overcome this problem in order to ensure equal right to treatment without any sexual discrimination.

Hub-and-spoke stroke network in the Veneto region: a retrospective study investigating the effectiveness of the stroke pathway and trends over time.

After recognizing the pivotal role played by stroke unit (SU) admission in reducing mortality and dependency in stroke patients, the need to organize and monitor stroke networks has become an increasingly essential aspect of stroke care. We conducted a retrospective study of stroke patients admitted to hospitals in the Veneto region from 2007 to 2015 in order to evaluate the effectiveness of the stroke pathway and trends over time. Between 2007 and 2015, 61,062 stroke patients were discharged from Veneto hospitals: they were more frequently female, females were older than males, and had higher intrahospital mortality and a lower probability of undergoing systemic thrombolysis. Patients admitted to facilities with a level 2 SU were twice as likely to undergo thrombolytic treatment compared to those admitted to facilities with a level 1 and had a lower intrahospital mortality rate. During the collection period, thrombolytic treatments increased in both level 1 and 2 SUs, as did the number of patients admitted to neurology wards and to facilities with an SU. Our study confirmed that thrombolytic treatment and admission to a facility with an SU are important determinants in improving stroke patient outcome. The increase in the proportion of both SU admissions and thrombolytic treatments demonstrates the effectiveness of the regional hub-and-spoke organization model, suggesting that implementation of highly specialized facilities is an efficient strategy in improving stroke care. The role of the observed sex bias in stroke treatment and outcome needs to be explored.