Outcomes of different perioperative management strategies of patients on chronic anticoagulation in elective total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: There are currently different management guidelines for patients undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) that are on long-term anticoagulation. The timing of discontinuation and restarting the anticoagulation is challenging during the postoperative care, which often involves general practitioners and physiotherapists. METHODS: The systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines and included 3 databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science Core Collection. It was registered in the International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PROSPERO) under the registration number: CRD42023408906. The risk of bias assessment was performed using the Methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) criteria. RESULTS: Six retrospective studies involving 727 patients with therapeutic anticoagulation (1,540 controls) for elective THA, TKA and revision arthroplasty have been included. The follow-up ranged from 30 days to 1 year postoperatively. All studies evaluated outcomes of warfarin therapeutic anticoagulation versus prophylactic dosages of one or more of the following: warfarin, aspirin, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and unfractionated low-dose heparin (UFH). One study did not discontinue therapeutic anticoagulation. Two studies reported no significant differences in complications between groups, whilst 3 studies had significantly higher rates of superficial wound infections, revision surgeries, postoperative haematomas, and prosthetic joint infections (PJI). CONCLUSION: Different anticoagulation-related perioperative management strategies achieve different outcomes following elective arthroplasty in patients with therapeutic chronic anticoagulation. There is contradictory evidence regarding the need for the discontinuation of therapeutic warfarin. Retrospective data showed that individual risk stratification with multi-modal prophylaxis resulted in minimal complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic Review of Level III studies.

Abnormal uterine bleeding in anticoagulated patients by drug class: outcomes and management.

BACKGROUND: Although abnormal uterine bleeding is a known adverse effect of anticoagulant drugs, true rates have not been widely studied. Society-backed recommendations and guidelines do not yet exist for prevention and management of abnormal uterine bleeding among anticoagulated patients. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe the incidence of new-onset abnormal uterine bleeding among patients receiving therapeutic anticoagulation by anticoagulant class, and to evaluate gynecologic treatment patterns. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted an institutional review board-waived retrospective chart review of female patients aged 18 to 55 years and prescribed therapeutic anticoagulants, including vitamin-K antagonists, low-molecular-weight heparins, and direct oral anticoagulants, in an urban hospital network from January 2015 through January 2020. We excluded patients with antecedent abnormal uterine bleeding and menopause. Associations between abnormal uterine bleeding, anticoagulant class, and other covariates were evaluated with Pearson chi-square and analysis-of-variance tests. The primary outcome, abnormal uterine bleeding odds by anticoagulant class, was modeled with logistic regression. Age, antiplatelet therapy, body mass index, and race were included in our multivariable model. Secondary outcomes included emergency department visits and treatment patterns. RESULTS: Of the 2479 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 645 were diagnosed with abnormal uterine bleeding after initiating therapeutic anticoagulation. After adjusting for age, race, body mass index, and concurrent use of antiplatelet therapy, those receiving all 3 classes of anticoagulants had higher odds of experiencing abnormal uterine bleeding (adjusted odds ratio, 2.63; confidence interval, 1.70-4.08; P<.001), whereas those taking only direct oral anticoagulants had the lowest odds (adjusted odds ratio, 0.70; confidence interval, 0.51-0.97; P=.032), with vitamin-K antagonists as the reference group. Race other than White was associated with higher odds of abnormal uterine bleeding, as was lower age. The most common hormone therapies used among patients with abnormal uterine bleeding were levonorgestrel intrauterine devices (7.6%; 49/645) and oral progestins (7.6%; 49/645). Sixty-eight patients (10.5%; 68/645) had an emergency department visit for abnormal uterine bleeding; 29.5% (190/645) of patients received a blood transfusion; 12.2% (79/645) began any pharmacologic therapy for bleeding; and 18.8% (121/645) underwent any gynecologic procedure. CONCLUSION: Abnormal uterine bleeding occurs frequently among patients on therapeutic anticoagulation. Incidence in this sample varied considerably by anticoagulant class and race; use of single-agent direct oral anticoagulation carried the lowest risk. Important sequelae such as bleeding-related emergency department visits, blood transfusions, and gynecologic procedures were common. Balancing bleeding and clotting risk in patients on therapeutic anticoagulation requires a nuanced approach and should involve collaborative management between hematologists and gynecologists.

Major hemorrhage and mortality in COVID-19 patients on therapeutic anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism.

We observed multiple fatal intracranial hemorrhages shortly after initiating therapeutic anticoagulation for treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in COVID-19 patients suggesting increased anticoagulation risk associated with COVID-19. The objective of this study is to quantify risk of major hemorrhage in hospitalized COVID-19 patients on therapeutic anticoagulation for deep venous thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE). Hospitalized patients with COVID-19 receiving therapeutic anticoagulation for DVT, PE or both at four New York City hospitals were evaluated for hemorrhagic complications. These were categorized as major (including fatal) or clinically relevant non-major according to the criteria of the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Hemorrhagic complications were correlated with clinical and laboratory data, ICD-10 code diagnoses and type of anticoagulation treatment. Minor hemorrhages were excluded. Major/clinically relevant hemorrhages occurred in 36 of 170 (21%) hospitalized COVID-19 patients being treated with therapeutic anticoagulation for VTE including 4 (2.4%) fatal hemorrhages. Hemorrhage was 3.4 times more likely with unfractionated heparin 27/76 (36%) compared to 8/81 (10%) with low molecular weight heparin (p = 0.002). Multivariate analysis showed that major hemorrhage was associated with intubation (p = 0.04) and elevated serum LDH (p < 0.001) and low fibrinogen (p = 0.05). Increased risk of hemorrhagic complications in treating VTE in hospitalized COVID-19 patients should be considered especially when using unfractionated heparin, in intubated patients, with low fibrinogen and/or elevated LDH. Checking serum fibrinogen and LDH before initiating therapeutic anticoagulation and monitoring coagulation parameters frequently may reduce bleeding complications.

Therapeutic anticoagulation using heparin in early phase severe coronavirus disease 2019: A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Although several reports recommend the use of systemic anticoagulation therapy in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia, appropriate target population and timing of administration are unknown. We assessed association between therapeutic anticoagulation administration with unfractionated heparin and outcomes in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia, assuming that anticoagulant administration effects are influenced by therapy timing. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included severe COVID-19 patients requiring mechanical ventilation in a tertiary emergency critical care hospital intensive care unit (ICU) in Japan from May 1, 2020 to September 30, 2021. All included patients were divided into early and late-phase administration groups based on therapeutic anticoagulant administration timing (≤5 and >5 days, respectively, after commencing oxygen therapy). Primary outcomes (in-hospital mortality and adverse events related to anticoagulation therapy) and secondary outcomes [veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), ventilator-free days (VFD), and ICU-free days] were compared between groups using univariate and multivariate models. RESULTS: Of 198 included patients 104 (52.5%) and 94 (47.5%) were in early-phase and late-phase administration groups, respectively. Although background characteristics were similar between the groups, the early-phase administration group had a significantly lower in-hospital mortality rate (3.8% vs. 27.7%; p < 0.001), lower adverse event rates (1.9% vs. 12.8%; p < 0.001), significantly longer VFD and ICU-free days, and lower ECMO rates, than the late-phase administration group, in the multivariate model. CONCLUSIONS: Late administration of therapeutic-dose anticoagulation in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia was significantly associated with worse outcomes than early administration.

Direct oral anticoagulants vs. low-molecular-weight heparin for pulmonary embolism in patients with glioblastoma.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a cancer type with high thrombogenic potential and GBM patients are therefore at a particularly high risk for thrombotic events. To date, only limited data on anticoagulation management after pulmonary embolism (PE) in GBM is available and the sporadic use of DOACs remains off-label. A retrospective cohort analysis of patients with GBM and postoperative, thoracic CT scan confirmed PE was performed. Clinical course, follow-up at 6 and 12 months and the overall survival (OS) were evaluated using medical charts and neuroradiological data. Out of 584 GBM patients, 8% suffered from postoperative PE. Out of these, 30% received direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and 70% low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for therapeutic anticoagulation. There was no significant difference in major intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), re-thrombosis, or re-embolism between the two cohorts. Although statistically non-significant, a tendency to reduced mRS at 6 and 12 months was observed in the LMWH cohort. Furthermore, patients receiving DOACs had a statistical benefit in OS. In our analysis, DOACs showed a satisfactory safety profile in terms of major ICH, re-thrombosis, and re-embolism compared to LMWH in GBM patients with postoperative PE. Prospective, randomized trials are urgent to evaluate DOACs for therapeutic anticoagulation in GBM patients with PE.

Which are the optimal thromboprophylaxis strategies for hospitalized patients with COVID-19? current controversies.

Novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) represents a significant risk factor for the development of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in hospitalized with both moderate and severe/critical COVID-19. Herein, we present a brief updated review on emerging robust data on diverse thromboprophylaxis strategies used to mitigate VTE complications, as well as a personal point of view of current controversies in regards the use of therapeutic and prophylactic anticoagulation strategies, particularly in the moderately-ill subgroup of patients with COVID-19.

Between Scylla and Charybdis: risks of early therapeutic anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism after acute intracranial hemorrhage.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk of hematoma expansion in patients with acute intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) requiring therapeutic anticoagulation for the treatment of venous thromboembolism. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients at our institution between 2014 and 2019 who were therapeutically anticoagulated for venous thromboembolism within 4 weeks after ICH. We included subtypes of traumatic ICH and spontaneous intraparenchymal hemorrhage. Our main outcome was the incidence of hematoma expansion within 14 days from initiating therapeutic anticoagulation. Hematoma expansion was defined as (1) radiographically proven expansion leading to cessation of therapeutic anticoagulation or (2) death due to hematoma expansion. Secondary outcomes included mortality due to hematoma expansion and characteristics associated with hematoma expansion. RESULTS: Fifty patients met inclusion criteria (mean age: 54 years, 80% male, 76% Caucasian); 24% had undergone a neurosurgical procedure prior to therapeutic anticoagulation. Median time from ICH to therapeutic anticoagulation initiation was 9.5 days (IQR 4-17), 40% received therapeutic anticoagulation in <7 days after ICH. Six patients (12%) developed hematoma expansion, of whom two (4%) died. While not statistically significant, patients with hematoma expansion tended to be older (57.8 vs. 53.5 years), were anticoagulated sooner (4 vs. 10 days), presented with lower GCS (50% vs. 39% with GCS <8), higher hematoma volume (50% vs. 42% >30 cc), and higher SDH diameter (16 mm vs. 8.35 mm). There was a trend towards greater risk of hematoma expansion for patients undergoing endoscopic ICH evacuation (16% vs. 2%, p = 0.09); patients with hematoma expansion were more likely to present with hydrocephalus (67% vs. 16%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Our study is among the first to explore characteristics associated with hematoma expansion in patients undergoing therapeutic anticoagulation after acute ICH. Larger studies in different ICH subtypes are needed to identify determinants of hematoma expansion in this high-acuity population.

Comparison of published guidelines for management of coagulopathy and thrombosis in critically ill patients with COVID 19: implications for clinical practice and future investigations.

Critically ill patients with COVID-19 are at increased risk for thrombotic complications which has led to an intense debate surrounding their anticoagulation management. In the absence of data from randomized controlled clinical trials, a number of consensus guidelines and recommendations have been published to facilitate clinical decision-making on this issue. However, substantive differences exist between these guidelines which can be difficult for clinicians. This review briefly summarizes the major societal guidelines and compares their similarities and differences. A common theme in all of the recommendations is to take an individualized approach to patient management and a call for prospective randomized clinical trials to address important anticoagulation issues in this population.

Therapeutic Anticoagulation in Patients with Primary Brain Tumors or Secondary Brain Metastasis.

Patients with primary or metastatic brain tumors are at increased risk of developing venous thromboses. However, the potential benefit of therapeutic anticoagulation in these patients must be weighed against the deadly complication of intracranial hemorrhage. In this review, we summarize available evidence and recent studies of intracranial bleeding risks in primary and metastatic tumors and the impact of therapeutic anticoagulation. We find that for the majority of primary and treated metastatic brain tumors, the risk of spontaneous bleeding is acceptable and not further increased by careful therapeutic anticoagulation with low molecular weight heparin or direct oral anticoagulants, although thrombocytopenia (platelet count less than 50,000/µL) and other coagulopathies are relative contraindications. Patients with brain metastasis from melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, choriocarcinoma, thyroid carcinoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma have a higher tendency to bleed spontaneously than noted in patients with other malignancies, and thus warrant routine brain imaging and alternative strategies such as inferior vena cava filter placement in the acute setting of venous thromboembolism before consideration of therapeutic anticoagulation. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Malignant gliomas are associated with increased risks of both venous thromboses and intracranial hemorrhage, but the additional bleeding risk associated with therapeutic anticoagulation appears acceptable, especially after treatment of primary tumors. Most patients with treated brain metastasis have a low risk of intracranial hemorrhage associated with therapeutic anticoagulation, and low molecular weight heparin is currently the preferred agent of choice. Patients with untreated brain metastasis from melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, thyroid cancer, choriocarcinoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma have a higher propensity for spontaneous intracranial bleeding, and systemic anticoagulation may be contraindicated in the acute setting of venous thromboembolism.

Therapeutic anticoagulation in patients with traumatic brain injury.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic anticoagulation (TAC) is often required in trauma patients for various indications. However, it remains unknown whether TAC can be safely initiated in the postinjury period for patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of TAC in TBI patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a 7-y retrospective study. All TBI patients who received TAC within 60 d postinjury were included. In addition to patient and injury characteristics, detailed information regarding TAC was collected. The primary outcome was the incidence of neurologic deterioration or progression of hemorrhagic TBI on repeat head computed tomography (CT) after initiation of TAC. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify factors associated with progression of hemorrhagic TBI after TAC. RESULTS: A total of 3355 TBI patients were identified. Of those, 72 patients (2.1%) received TAC. Median age, 59; 76.4% male; median Injury Severity Score, 19; median admission Glasgow Coma Scale, 14; and median Rotterdam score on the initial head CT, 3. Although atrial fibrillation was the most common preinjury indication for TAC, venous thromboembolism was the most common postinjury indication. The median postinjury time of initiation of TAC was 9 d. Intravenous heparin infusion was the most commonly used agent for TAC (70.8%). None of our study patients developed any signs of neurologic deterioration due to TAC. Progression of hemorrhagic TBI on repeat head CT was observed in six patients. In a multiple logistic regression model, aged ≥65 y was significantly associated with progression of hemorrhagic TBI after TAC (odds ratio, 15.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-212.7; P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows preliminary data regarding TAC initiated in patients with TBI. Further prospective study is warranted to determine the risks and benefits of TAC in this specific group of patients.

Evaluation of therapeutic enoxaparin in a pregnant population at a tertiary hospital.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic anticoagulation with enoxaparin in pregnancy is complex due to varying pharmacokinetics and the increasing prevalence of obesity. There is limited evidence to support current dosing and monitoring strategies of enoxaparin in this population. AIM: To describe the current practice in therapeutic anticoagulation in the pregnant population at a tertiary institution. METHODS: A retrospective study of pregnant women on therapeutic enoxaparin between January 2007 and December 2011. RESULTS: Forty-four pregnant women requiring therapeutic anticoagulation were identified and divided into two groups, monitored with anti-factor Xa (AXA) concentrations and unmonitored. Fifty-five percent of monitored women were initiated on the recommended 1 mg/kg twice a day (bd) enoxaparin dose-strategy. Eighty-two percent of women were monitored; however, there was variability regarding the timing, frequency and subsequent dose adjustments from monitoring. Overall, as pregnancies progressed, there was both increasing dose adjustments and increasing frequency of monitoring. Fourteen women had a BMI over 30 kg/m(2) , and 13 of these women were monitored. Nine monitored obese women required doses less than 1 mg/kg/bd to maintain a therapeutic AXA level. Management appeared to be individualised. There were small numbers of toxicity events. CONCLUSION: Variation exists in dosing and monitoring practices for therapeutic enoxaparin in the pregnant population. Dosing obese patients using 1 mg/kg twice daily can lead to toxic AXA concentrations, and dose reductions are required to maintain a therapeutic range. A larger prospective study reviewing dose, AXA concentrations and outcome data is necessary to make dosing recommendations in this group.

Efficacy and safety of therapeutic anticoagulation for the treatment of isolated calf muscle vein thrombosis - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Diverse treatment suggestions range from monitoring with duplex examinations to therapeutic anticoagulation (TA) for managing isolated calf muscle vein thrombosis (ICMVT). However, the small sample sizes and low-level evidence provided by most studies in the literature mean that the benefits of promising new treatment protocols are unclear. Hence, this meta-analysis is intended to assess the efficacy and safety of TA for patients with ICMVT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Articles comparing TA with no anticoagulation (NA) or no therapeutic anticoagulation (NTA) in patients with ICMVT were collected from PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science. The risk ratio (RR) and 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) were generated for each outcome of interest. The data were pooled using a random-effects or fixed-effects model to evaluate differences in outcomes between the TA and control groups. RESULTS: Five of 377 initially identified papers were included. One randomized controlled trial, one non-randomized controlled trial and three retrospective cohort studies (a total of 744 patients, 390 in the TA group and the remaining 354 in the NA or NTA group) were included in this meta-analysis. The occurrence of thrombosis progression was significantly less frequent in those who received TA compared with those receiving NTA (RR = 0.33, 95 % CI 0.20 to 0.54, p < 0.01). The rate of complete recanalization was higher, albeit not significantly, in the TA group than in the NTA group (RR = 1.96, 95 % CI 1.01 to 3.80, p = 0.05). None of the pooled outcomes were significantly different when comparing the TA and NA groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that TA may result in a significant reduction in the rate of thrombosis progression and a marginally significant increase in the rate of complete recanalization for patients with ICMVT. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and clarify whether the benefits of TA outweigh the potential harm.

Characterization of the Benefits and Risks of Therapeutic Anticoagulation in Patients Admitted with Severe COVID-19 (CRITAC).

Background: Severe COVID-19 is associated with increased rates of thrombotic complications. Recent provincial recommendations in British Columbia have suggested providing thromboprophylaxis with therapeutic anticoagulation for hospital inpatients with severe COVID-19 who do not have a high risk of bleeding. Objectives: To characterize the rates of major bleeding, thrombotic events, complications from COVID-19, and adverse effects among patients with severe COVID-19 treated with therapeutic anticoagulation. Methods: This retrospective chart review involved patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 who were admitted to 3 sites within a local health authority between April 1 and December 31, 2021, and received therapeutic anticoagulation for thromboprophylaxis. Results: After screening of 1036 patients, 72 patients were included in the study. The mean age of participants was 54 years, 63% (n = 45) were male, and 92% (n = 66) were receiving supplemental oxygen by nasal prongs on admission. The primary outcome, major bleeding, was experienced by 1 patient (1%). Increasing oxygen requirements resulting in progression to high-flow nasal cannula occurred in 11 patients (15%), and 5 patients (7%) required admission to the intensive care unit. One patient (1%) experienced a thrombotic event, and 1 patient (1%) had a minor bleed. The mean duration of hospitalization was 10 (standard deviation 10.8) days. One death occurred during the study period, and no cases of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia were observed. Conclusions: In this study of hospital inpatients with severe COVID-19 who were deemed to be at low risk of bleeding and who received therapeutic anticoagulation, there were low rates of both major bleeding and thrombotic events.

Contexte: Les cas graves de COVID-19 sont associés à des taux accrus de complications thrombotiques. De récentes recommandations provinciales en Colombie-Britannique proposent de fournir une thromboprophylaxie avec anticoagulation thérapeutique aux patients hospitalisés atteints d'une forme grave de COVID-19 qui ne présentent pas un risque élevé de saignement. Objectifs: Caractériser les taux d'hémorragies majeures, d'événements thrombotiques, de complications découlant de la COVID-19 et d'effets indésirables chez les patients atteints de COVID-19 sévère traités par anticoagulation thérapeutique. Méthodes: Cette revue rétrospective des dossiers portait sur des patients atteints de COVID-19 confirmée en laboratoire qui ont été admis dans 3 sites au sein d'une autorité sanitaire locale entre le 1er avril et le 31 décembre 2021 et qui ont reçu une anticoagulation thérapeutique pour la thromboprophylaxie. Résultats: Après la présélection de 1036 patients, 72 ont été inclus dans l'étude. L'âge moyen des participants était de 54 ans, 63 % (n = 45) étaient des hommes et 92 % (n = 66) recevaient un supplément d'oxygène par sonde nasale à l'admission. Le critère de jugement principal, une hémorragie majeure, a été observé chez 1 patient (1 %). Une augmentation des besoins en oxygène entraînant une progression vers une canule nasale à haut débit s'est produite chez 11 patients (15 %) et 5 patients (7 %) ont dû être admis à l'unité de soins intensifs. Un patient (1 %) a présenté un événement thrombotique et 1 patient (1 %) a eu un saignement mineur. La durée moyenne d'hospitalisation était de 10 jours (écart type 10,8). Un décès est survenu au cours de la période d'étude et aucun cas de thrombocytopénie induite par l'héparine n'a été observé. Conclusions: Dans cette étude portant sur des patients hospitalisés atteints d'une forme grave de COVID-19, considérés comme présentant un faible risque de saignement et ayant reçu une anticoagulation thérapeutique, les taux d'hémorragies majeures et d'événements thrombotiques étaient faibles.

Risk assessment of early therapeutic anticoagulation following cranial surgery: an institutional case series.

OBJECTIVE: Postoperative thrombotic complications represent a unique challenge in cranial neurosurgery as primary treatment involves therapeutic anticoagulation. The decision to initiate therapy and its timing is nuanced, as surgeons must balance the risk of catastrophic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). With limited existing evidence to guide management, current practice patterns are subjective and inconsistent. The authors assessed their experience with early therapeutic anticoagulation (≤ 7 days postoperatively) initiation for thrombotic complications in neurosurgical patients undergoing cranial surgery to better understand the risks of catastrophic ICH. METHODS: Adult patients treated with early therapeutic anticoagulation following cranial surgery were considered. Anticoagulation indications were restricted to thrombotic or thromboembolic complications. Records were retrospectively reviewed for demographics, surgical details, and anticoagulation therapy start. The primary outcome was the incidence of catastrophic ICH, defined as ICH resulting in reoperation or death within 30 days of anticoagulation initiation. As a secondary outcome, post-anticoagulation cranial imaging was reviewed for new or worsening acute blood products. Fisher's exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to compare cohorts. Cumulative outcome analyses were performed for primary and secondary outcomes according to anticoagulation start time. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients satisfied the inclusion criteria. Anticoagulation commenced on mean postoperative day (POD) 4.3 (SD 2.2). Catastrophic ICH was observed in 7 patients (9.9%) and was associated with earlier anticoagulation initiation (p = 0.02). Of patients with catastrophic ICH, 6 (85.7%) had intra-axial exploration during their index surgery. Patients with intra-axial exploration were more likely to experience a catastrophic ICH postoperatively compared to those with extra-axial exploration alone (OR 8.5, p = 0.04). Of the 58 patients with postoperative imaging, 15 (25.9%) experienced new or worsening blood products. Catastrophic ICH was 9 times more likely with anticoagulation initiation within 48 hours of surgery (OR 8.9, p = 0.01). The cumulative catastrophic ICH risk decreased with delay in initiation of anticoagulation, from 21.1% on POD 2 to 9.9% on POD 7. Concurrent antiplatelet medication was not associated with either outcome measure. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of catastrophic ICH was significantly increased when anticoagulation was initiated within 48 hours of cranial surgery. Patients undergoing intra-axial exploration during their index surgery were at higher risk of a catastrophic ICH.

Cerebral Venous Thrombosis in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury: Epidemiology and Outcome.

The natural history and epidemiological aspects of traumatic cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) are not fully understood. Due to the concomitant occurrence with intracranial hemorrhages, guidelines for medical treatment have been highly controversial. In this study, our objective was to carry out an analysis description of the population and to conduct a literature review. A prospectively gathered radiology registry data of patients hospitalized at the tertiary hospital of Centro Hospitalar Universitário do São João, Porto, Portugal, between 2016 and 2021 was carried out. All patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and concomitant CVT were identified. CVT was confirmed by CT venogram. Demographic, clinical, and radiological data and their medical management were reported. In-hospital complications and treatment outcomes were compared between patients measured by the Glasgow Outcome Score Extended (GOSE) at discharge and GOSE at three months. There were 41 patients with traumatic CVT admitted to this study. The majority (45.2%) had a hyperdense signal near the lateral sinus at admission, and only 26.2% presented with skull fractures. Of this cohort, 95% had experienced lateral sinus thrombosis. Twenty-five patients (60%) had occlusive venous thrombosis. Venous infarct was the main complication following CVT. Thirty-two patients (78%) were anticoagulated after CVT and four developed complications. At the three-month follow-up after discharge, 28.2% had good recovery (GOSE > 6). This study revealed a higher incidence of CVT in severe TBI and a mild association with skull fractures. There is a higher incidence of CVT in the lateral sinus. Management was inconsistent, with no difference in outcome without or with anticoagulation. Larger, prospective cohort studies are required to better comprehend this condition and determine evidence-based guidelines.

Brachial Plexus Injury Secondary to Spontaneous Upper Limb Haematoma.

Spontaneous upper limb muscle haematomas are rare clinical phenomenons, which often go under- or misdiagnosed. They can present management challenges in the context of anticoagulant therapy, especially in the presence of other medical conditions. We present the case of a 52-year-old male with an initially missed presentation of a spontaneous muscle haematoma that progressed and re-presented to the emergency department (ED) with signs of mixed upper limb neuropathy requiring surgical evacuation and an emergency fasciotomy. This case highlights the importance of prompt diagnosis and intervention. While brachial plexus injuries from haematoma compression are uncommon, in our case, we discuss the need for surgical intervention to relieve pressure and optimise patient outcomes when clinically concerned about compartment syndrome or progressive neuropathy.

Post-COVID-19 Vaccine Thromboembolic Complication in the Setting of Newly Diagnosed May-Thurner Syndrome.

May-Thurner syndrome (MTS) can lead to deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in the left lower extremity, and it is often triggered by factors such as surgery or pregnancy. We present a rare case where the risk factor for thromboembolism in MTS is a complication from COVID-19 vaccination. A 44-year-old female who presented with fatigue, fever, and myalgia had developed thromboembolism as a complication of the Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine. Diagnostic criteria for vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) should be considered in such cases that include symptoms within 5-30 days post vaccination, elevated D-dimer, and thrombosis. Treatment involved anticoagulants and intervention for MTS included thrombectomy and stent placement. Recognition of post-COVID-19 vaccination complications such as VITT is crucial for early intervention and patient awareness during vaccination decisions.

Management of Acute Saddle Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnancy Following Fetal Surgery.

A 33-year-old gravidity three parity three (G3P3) woman at 34 weeks of pregnancy underwent fetal surgery to repair an open lumbosacral myelomeningocele at 22 weeks gestation and experienced preterm premature rupture of membranes as a result. She developed a saddle pulmonary embolus with signs of right heart strain while on prolonged bed rest. She was treated emergently with aspiration thrombectomy and suprarenal inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement, followed by an uncomplicated cesarean delivery thereafter.

Comparison of Blood Concentration and Weight-Based Heparin and Protamine Dosing Strategies for Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND:  The conventional method of heparin and protamine management during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is based on total body weight which fails to account for the heterogeneous response to heparin in each patient. On the other hand, the literature is inconclusive on whether individualized anticoagulation management based on real-time blood heparin concentration improves post-CBP outcomes. METHODS:  We searched databases of Medline, Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE), PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINHL), and Google Scholar, recruiting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective studies comparing the outcomes of dosing heparin and/or protamine based on measured heparin concentration versus patient's total body weight for CPB. Random effects meta-analyses and meta-regression were conducted to compare the outcome profiles. Primary endpoints include postoperative blood loss and the correlation with heparin and protamine doses, the reversal protamine and loading heparin dose ratio; secondary endpoints included postoperative platelet counts, antithrombin III, fibrinogen levels, activated prothrombin time (aPTT), incidences of heparin rebound, and re-exploration of chest wound for bleeding. RESULTS:  Twenty-six studies, including 22 RCTs and four prospective cohort studies involving 3,810 patients, were included. Compared to body weight-based dosing, patients of individualized, heparin concentration-based group had significantly lower postoperative blood loss (mean difference (MD)=49.51 mL, 95% confidence interval (CI): 5.33-93.71), lower protamine-to-heparin dosing ratio (MD=-0.20, 95% CI: -0.32 ~ -0.12), and higher early postoperative platelet counts (MD=8.83, 95% CI: 2.07-15.59). The total heparin doses and protamine reversal were identified as predictors of postoperative blood loss by meta-regression. CONCLUSIONS:  There was a significant correlation between the doses of heparin and protamine with postoperative blood loss; therefore, précised dosing of both could be critical for reducing bleeding and transfusion requirements. Data from the enrolled studies indicated that compared to conventional weight-based dosing, individualized, blood concentration-based heparin and protamine dosing may have outcome benefits reducing postoperative blood loss. The dosing calculation of heparin based on the assumption of a one-compartment pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model and linear relationship between the calculated dose and blood heparin concentration may be inaccurate. With the recent advancement of the technologies of machine learning, individualized, precision management of anticoagulation for CPB may be possible in the near future.

Splanchnic vein thrombosis in acute pancreatitis: a review of treatment indications, methods, and outcomes in a single institution.

BACKGROUND: Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) is a well-recognized complication of acute pancreatitis. The question of whether or not to treat SVT with systemic therapeutic anticoagulation (STA) remains to be seen. The universal use of anticoagulation may lead to an increased risk of bleeding complications associated with acute pancreatitis. Literature on this subject is sparse and there is no clear guideline on how to treat SVT. Our research demonstrates local practice where therapeutic anticoagulation in SVT varies. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients presenting with acute pancreatitis admitted over a five-year period to a single tertiary hospital with splanchnic vein thrombosis was performed. RESULTS: Of the 1408 patients admitted with acute pancreatitis, 42 were diagnosed with splanchnic vein thrombosis, with a male dominance of 34 (81%). A total of 25 patients received anticoagulation. The use of anticoagulation was dependent on the location of the thrombus, P < 0.01. Anticoagulation use was most common in cases of combination mesenteric, splenic, and portal vein thrombus (100%), isolated mesenteric vein (100%), isolated portal vein (89%), combination portal and splenic vein (87%), and combination mesenteric and splenic vein (75%). The rate of anticoagulation use was lowest in isolated splenic vein thrombus (23%). CONCLUSION: The early commencement of STA in patients with acute pancreatitis and triple-vessel SVT or with portal vein involvement is supported by our data. Isolated splenic vein thrombus does not require systemic therapy. Further research is needed to establish a clear clinical guideline.