Spine Injuries in Household Environments: A Comprehensive Analysis.

Introduction Recognizing the concerns posed by spine injuries within homes, stemming from falls, interactions with furnishings, and daily activities, it is imperative to consider preventive strategies. Our analysis of spine injuries utilizing the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) data sheds light on falls, furnishings, age-specific risks, recreation, technology, and socioeconomic disparities as contributing elements, accentuating the need for targeted interventions. This study aims to provide insights into the prevalence of spine injuries in different household locations, associated products, age groups, and gender, thus informing injury prevention strategies for safer living environments. Methods This is a retrospective, cross-sectional study utilizing data between 2013 to 2022 from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System database. Specific household product codes and demographic data, such as age and gender, were analyzed. Statistical analysis in R (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) involved descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regressions. Results In analyzing 44,267 spine injuries, the study revealed location-specific variations in spine injuries within households. Living rooms and bedrooms had the highest injury rates at 34.17% and 21.65%, respectively. Significant differences in injury rates between males and females across various home locations. Females accounted for 51.78% of injuries in the living room and 59.99% in the bedroom. In the kitchen, females experienced 53.21% of injuries, while males accounted for 46.79% of cases. Notably, overall spine injuries exhibited a significant difference between males and females, with females having a higher total likelihood of injuries (AOR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.14-1.77, p < 0.001). Regarding age, individuals between 51-60 years were most vulnerable to spine injuries, accounting for 17.98% of total cases. Notably, the age group of 61-70 years exhibited a substantial proportion of injuries at 17.12%, while the age group of 71-80 years accounted for 14.39%. The age group of 41-50 years also displayed a notable injury rate of 14.12%. The youngest age group, 0-10 years, demonstrated the lowest percentage of injuries at 4.79%. This age-based analysis provides valuable insights into the distribution of spine injuries across different demographic segments. Regarding age, individuals between 51-60 years were most vulnerable to spine injuries, comprising 17.98% of total cases. Age groups of 41-50 and 61-70 years also showed substantial proportions of injuries, accounting for 14.12% and 17.12%, respectively. The youngest age group, 0-10, exhibited the lowest percentage of injuries at 4.79%. Conclusion The study focuses on the occurrence of spinal injuries in common sites of injury in the household, such as the living room, bedroom, kitchen, and stairs. There is increased prevalence amongst females and increased risk vulnerability amongst people 51 to 60 years of age. Our research emphasizes the necessity of implementing specific injury prevention measures tailored to different demographic groups within their home setting. This approach should involve collaborative decision-making with patients while prioritizing patient education to create a safer living environment and reduce the likelihood of spine injuries.

Unintentional Drownings in Pediatric Populations: Injury Prevention in the Post-COVID-19 Era.

Unintentional injuries are one of the leading causes of death in Americans. A large proportion of these deaths are attributable to accidental drownings and falls, both of which oftentimes take place in or around swimming pools and swimming pool-related apparatuses such as diving boards. The American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) has reported drowning incidents as the most common injury-related cause of death in children ages one to four years. Although the AAFP has outlined steps to take to prevent drownings, there has not been a current large-scale study illustrating the effectiveness of these strategies with regard to their effect on the prevalence of swimming pool drowning cases in the last 10 years. Thus, we aim to utilize the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) database to uncover these rates, which can ultimately help aid in the reevaluation of current recommended guidelines.

Trauma and Injuries Pattern During Hajj, 1443 (2022): A Cross-Sectional Study.

Introduction Trauma and injuries are common among pilgrims during Hajj, the biggest mass gathering event. Trauma and injury causes vary from falling and pressing in crowds to being burned by boiled water and road traffic accidents (RTA). Time to reach the hospital during highly condensed areas in Hajj are challenges for the public health authorities and the healthcare system to achieve optimum control, management, and outcome. This study aims to explore the pattern of trauma and injuries during Hajj as it is crucial to improve future preventive measures and care quality. Methods A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted in one hospital in each of the Mena and Arafat (Al-Mashaar's areas) in Makkah City, Saudi Arabia, from July 8 to 10, 2022. Data was collected through interviews with patients who visit the hospitals or enter the emergency department and are diagnosed with trauma or injury during the Hajj season of 1443 Hijri date (2022). Results A total of 264 people volunteered to participate in the survey. The mean age by years was 43.5 ± 10.7, and the majority (56%) were between 41 and 64. There were multiple nationalities - the most common nationality was Egyptian (25%), followed by Saudi (10%). The commonest type of trauma was cutting wounds (50%), and the commonest cause was falling (39%), followed by foot twisting (31%). There were 142 cases in Arafat and 122 cases in Mena in the study duration. Tissue contusions are higher in Arafat. Fractures (5%) were in both areas but higher in Mena with burns and sprains. Friction blister injuries were only in Mena and were statistically associated with walking barefoot (p<0.01), which was associated with Egyptians (p<0.05). Also, thigh chafing is only in Mena, while eye traumas and abrasion are only in Arafat. There were four causes of injury that are statistically significantly associated with the area (p<0.05): foot twisting in Arafat, pressing in overcrowding, stoning, and burning in Mena. Moreover, all the RTA cases (n=4) were in Arafat, and all the stoning and burning by boiling water were in Mena. Admission was only for burning (n=2) and falling (n=2) cases and only in Mena emergency hospital; otherwise, all trauma cases were discharged after receiving management - no deaths among the study sample. Injuries in Mena are likely to happen in the evening and night (n=91), while in Arafat, it is more likely in two periods (n=113), in the early morning and afternoon. This difference is statistically significant between the two areas (p<0.05). Most pilgrims (n=129/253) reach the hospital in 16 to 30 minutes. A statistically significant association exists between the duration and the area (p<0.05). Most patients in Arafat (88%) reach the hospital in less than 30 minutes, while only 50% take the same duration in Mena. Conclusion The Hajj season of 1443 H (2022) has a similar trauma pattern and improved outcomes compared to previous seasons. Discovering and digging into the causes of traumas and injuries should be optimized in future research for better control and customized prevention measures. Establishing new and remodeling current prevention measures is recommended for more control.