Urinary Dickkopf 3 Is Not an Independent Risk Factor in a Cohort of Kidney Transplant Recipients and Living Donors.

Urinary dickkopf 3 (uDKK3) is a marker released by kidney tubular epithelial cells that is associated with the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and may cause interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy. Recent evidence suggests that uDKK3 can also predict the loss of kidney function in CKD patients and kidney transplant recipients, regardless of their current renal function. We conducted a prospective study on 181 kidney transplant (KTx) recipients who underwent allograft biopsy to determine the cause, analyzing the relationship between uDKK3 levels in urine, histological findings, and future allograft function progression. Additionally, we studied 82 living kidney donors before unilateral nephrectomy (Nx), 1-3 days after surgery, and 1 year post-surgery to observe the effects of rapid kidney function loss. In living donors, the uDKK3/creatinine ratio significantly increased 5.3-fold 1-3 days after Nx. However, it decreased significantly to a median level of 620 pg/mg after one year, despite the absence of underlying primary kidney pathology. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decreased by an average of 29.3% to approximately 66.5 (±13.5) mL/min/1.73 m2 after one year, with no further decline in the subsequent years. uDKK3 levels increased in line with eGFR loss after Nx, followed by a decrease as the eGFR partially recovered within the following year. However, uDKK3 did not correlate with the eGFR at the single time points in living donors. In KTx recipients, the uDKK3/creatinine ratio was significantly elevated with a median of 1550 pg/mg compared to healthy individuals or donors after Nx. The mean eGFR in the recipient group was 35.5 mL/min/1.73 m2. The uDKK3/creatinine ratio was statistically associated with the eGFR at biopsy but was not independently associated with the eGFR one year after biopsy or allograft loss. In conclusion, uDKK3 correlates with recent and future kidney function and kidney allograft survival in the renal transplant cohort. Nevertheless, our findings indicate that the uDKK3/creatinine ratio has no prognostic influence on future renal outcome in living donors and kidney recipients beyond the eGFR, independent of the presence of acute renal graft pathology, as correlations are GFR-dependent.

Urinary Dickkopf-3: a new biomarker for CKD progression and mortality.

BACKGROUND: Kidney fibrosis has been reported to be a prognostic factor in chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression. Previous studies have shown that the assessment of urinary Dickkopf-3 (uDKK3), a stress-induced tubular epithelial-derived profibrotic glycoprotein, might be a potential tubulointerstitial fibrosis biomarker and might identify patients at short-term risk of glomerular filtration rate loss. We aim to evaluate uDKK3 as a potential biomarker for progression of CKD in a cohort with various aetiologies of CKD and subsequently in an overt diabetic nephropathy cohort. METHODS: We prospectively studied two independent cohorts comprising a total of 351 patients with Stages 2 and 3 CKD. Combined primary outcome consisted of a 50% increase in serum creatinine, end-stage kidney disease or death. The Progreser cohort included patients with heterogeneous aetiologies and the Pronedi cohort (101 patients) with overt diabetic nephropathy. The median follow-up time was 36 months [interquartile range (IQR) 30-39] and 36 (16-48), respectively. RESULTS: At baseline, median uDKK3 was 2200 pg/mg (IQR 671-7617) in the Progreser cohort and 3042 pg/mg (IQR 661-9747) in the Pronedi cohort. There were no statistically significant differences in the uDKK3 ratio between both cohorts nor between CKD aetiologies. Baseline uDKK3 was significantly higher in patients who reached the primary outcome. In the Cox proportional hazards model, the highest levels of uDKK3 were found to be an independent factor for renal progression in the Progreser cohort {hazard ratio [HR] 1.91 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-3.52]} and in the Pronedi cohort [HR 3.03 (95% CI 1.03-8.92)]. uDKK3 gradually increased in the following months, especially in patients with higher proteinuria. Treatment with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockers did not modify uDKK3 after 4 or 12 months of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: uDKK3 identifies patients at high risk of CKD progression regardless of the cause of kidney injury. uDKK3 might serve as a useful biomarker for kidney disease progression and therefore could be used by clinicians to optimize staging for renal progression and monitor the response to potential treatments.

Tubular biomarkers in proteinuric kidney disease: histology correlation and kidney prognosis of tubular biomarkers.

Background: Proteinuria is not only a biomarker of chronic kidney disease (CKD) but also a driver of CKD progression. The aim of this study was to evaluate serum and urinary tubular biomarkers in patients with biopsied proteinuric kidney disease and to correlate them with histology and kidney outcomes. Methods: A single-center retrospective study was conducted on a cohort of 156 patients from January 2016 to December 2021. The following urinary and serum biomarkers were analyzed on the day of kidney biopsy: beta 2 microglobulin (ß2-mcg), alpha 1 microglobulin (α1-mcg), neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), urinary kidney injury molecule-1 (uKIM-1), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), urinary Dickkopf-3 (uDKK3), uromodulin (urinary uUMOD), serum kidney injury molecule-1 (sKIM-1) and serum uromodulin (sUMOD). A composite outcome of kidney progression or death was recorded during a median follow-up period of 26 months. Results: Multivariate regression analysis identified sUMOD (ß-0.357, P < .001) and uDKK3 (ß 0.483, P < .001) as independent predictors of interstitial fibrosis, adjusted for age, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and log proteinuria. Elevated levels of MCP-1 [odds ratio 15.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.52-69.20] were associated with a higher risk of cortical interstitial inflammation >10% adjusted for eGFR, log proteinuria and microhematuria. Upper tertiles of uDKK3 were associated with greater eGFR decline during follow-up. Although not a predictor of the composite outcome, doubling of uDKK3 was a predictor of kidney events (hazard ratio 2.26, 95% CI 1.04-4.94) after adjustment for interstitial fibrosis, eGFR and proteinuria. Conclusions: Tubular markers may have prognostic value in proteinuric kidney disease, correlating with specific histologic parameters and identifying cases at higher risk of CKD progression.

Tubular biomarkers and histology in lupus nephritis.

INTRODUCTION: The relevance of tubulo-interstitial involvement for kidney prognosis has recently been emphasized, but validated biomarkers for predicting histology are still lacking. The aim of our study was to evaluate different serum and urinary markers of tubular damage in patients with lupus nephritis (LN) and to correlate them with kidney histopathology. METHODS: A single-center retrospective study was conducted from January 2016 to December 2021. Serum and urine samples were collected on the same day of kidney biopsy and correlated with histologic data from a cohort of 15 LN patients. We analyzed the following urinary markers, adjusted for urine creatinine: beta 2-microglobulin, alpha 1-microglobulin, NGAL, uKIM-1, MCP-1, uDKK-3, and uUMOD. The serum markers sKIM-1 and sUMOD were also analyzed. RESULTS: A positive and strong correlation was observed between the degree of interstitial fibrosis (rho = 0.785, p = .001) and tubular atrophy (rho = 0.781, p = .001) and the levels of uDKK3. uUMOD also showed an inverse and moderate correlation with interstitial fibrosis (rho = -0.562, p = .037) and tubular atrophy (rho = -0.694, p = .006). Patients with >10% cortical interstitial inflammation had higher levels of uKIM-1 [4.9 (3.9, 5.5) vs. 0.8 (0.6, 1.5) mcg/mg, p = .001], MCP-1 [3.8 (2. 3, 4.2) vs. 0.7 (0.3, 1.2) mcg/mg, p = .001], sKIM-1 [9.2 (5.9, 32.7) vs. 1.4 (0, 3.5) pg/mL, p = .001], and lower sUMOD [8.7 (0, 39.7) vs. 46.1 (35.7, 53) ng/mL, p = .028]. CONCLUSION: The use of specific urinary and serum biomarkers of tubular dysfunction or injury may help to predict certain histologic parameters in LN patients.