Impact of fixation method on femoral bone loss: a retrospective evaluation of stem loosening in first-time revision total hip arthroplasty among two hundred and fifty five patients.

PURPOSE: Implant loosening represent the most common indication for stem revision in hip revision arthroplasty. This study compares femoral bone loss and the risk of initial revisions between cemented and uncemented loosened primary stems, investigating the impact of fixation method at primary implantation on femoral bone defects. METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed 255 patients who underwent their first revision for stem loosening from 2010 to 2022, receiving either cemented or uncemented stem implants. Femoral bone loss was preoperatively measured using the Paprosky classification through radiographic evaluations. Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated the survival probability of the original stem, and the hazard ratio assessed the relative risk of revision for uncemented versus cemented stems in the first postoperative year and the following two to ten years. RESULTS: Cemented stems showed a higher prevalence of significant bone loss (type 3b and 4 defects: 32.39% vs. 2.72%, p < .001) compared to uncemented stems, which more commonly had type 1 and 2 defects (82.07% vs. 47.89%, p < .001). In our analysis of revision cases, primary uncemented stems demonstrated a 20% lower incidence of stem loosening in the first year post-implantation compared to cemented stems (HR 0.8; 95%-CI 0.3-2.0). However, the incidence in uncemented stems increased by 20% during the subsequent years two to ten (HR 1.2; 95%-CI 0.7-1.8). Septic loosening was more common in cemented stems (28.17% vs. 10.87% in uncemented stems, p = .001). Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated a modestly longer revision-free period for cemented stems within the first ten years post-implantation (p < .022). CONCLUSION: During first-time revision, cemented stems show significantly larger femoral bone defects than uncemented stems. Septic stem loosening occurred 17.30% more in cemented stems.

Unexpected early loosening of rectangular straight femoral Zweymüller stems with an alumina-reduced surface after total hip arthroplasty-a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Alumina particles from the grit blasting of Ti-alloy stems are suspected to contribute to aseptic loosening. An alumina-reduced stem surface was hypothesized to improve osseointegration and show comparable short-term outcomes to those of a standard stem. METHODS: In this prospective, double-blind, randomized trial, 26 standard (STD) and 27 experimental new technology (NT) stems were implanted. The latter were additionally treated by acid etching and ice blasting to remove alumina particles from the grit-blasting process. Follow-up occurred at 12 and 24 months. Bone mineral density (BMD) around the stem was measured by a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry device (DEXA). Radiographs were reviewed for alterations. Clinical scoring comprised the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and the Harris Hip Score (HHS). Survival rates were calculated up to 50 months. RESULTS: Lower mean BMD and more severe cortical hypertrophies were found in the NT group. At 12 months, radiolucent lines were observed mostly in the metaphyseal zone for both groups, with a progression tendency in the NT group at 24 months. At 12 months, pain scores and the WOMAC total and physical activity scores were significantly lower in the NT group, without any differences thereafter. The number of NT stem revisions amounted to 6 (24%) and 11 (41%) at 24 and 50 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: In the NT group, unexpected catastrophic failure rates of 41% caused by early aseptic loosening were noted within 50 months. Compared with the STD stems, NT stems lead to poor clinical and radiographic results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05053048.

Validation of the distal filling ratio in uncemented convertible short-stem shoulder arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Radiographic stress shielding is a common finding in uncemented convertible short-stem shoulder arthroplasty (UCSSSA). The distal filling ratio (DFR) has been described as a predictor for the occurrence of stress shielding. A DFR > 70% was mentioned as a risk factor for the occurrence of stress shielding for some UCSSSA. However, measurements were only performed on conventional radiographs and no validation exists for 3D automated planning tools. METHODS: DFR was manually measured on postoperative true ap radiographs of 76 shoulder arthroplasties using a standardized protocol and were compared to preoperative CT scans with an automated calculation of the DFR after virtual implantation of the stem. RESULTS: The mean DFR measured on X-rays was 75.9% (SD = 8.7; 95% CI = 74-78) vs. 78.9% (SD = 9.1; 95% CI = 76.8-83) automatically measured on CT scans. This difference was significant (p < 0.001). In 7 out of 76 cases (9%) the difference between manual measurement on radiographs and computerized measurement on CT scans was > 10%. CONCLUSION: Manual measurement of the DFR is underestimated on conventional radiographs compared to automated calculation on CT scans be a mean of 3%. Therefore, automated measurement of the DFR on CT scans seems to be beneficial, especially in cases with osteopenic cortices. Manual measurement of the DFR on conventional ap radiographs in cases without CT scans, however, is still a viable alternative. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective study.

Stem size prediction in shoulder arthroplasty with preoperative 3D planning.

INTRODUCTION: Three-dimensional surgical planning software provides virtual reconstructions of the shoulder with automated joint indices for a preoperative case assessment. The aim of this single center study was to evaluate the concordance between the preoperatively selected humeral components and the final implants used in shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS: 129 cases who had undergone anatomic (n = 16) or reverse shoulder arthroplasty (n = 117) using the same type of uncemented short stem implant and were included for review in this study. The type of arthroplasty, stem size, stem inclination, tray-offset and liner-thickness were noted preoperatively and compared to the final implant specifications used in surgery. RESULTS: The type of arthroplasty matched the surgical plan in 99.2% of cases, as one case was converted from RSA to TSA. The concordance of planned to implanted stem size was 44.2% and the planned size was in range of one adjacent size in 87.6% of cases. Stem inclination in TSA matched the surgical plan in 50% of cases. Tray offset in RSA was predicted correctly in 65% and liner-thickness matched the surgical plan in 98.3% of cases. CONCLUSION: Despite a low degree of concordance of planned to implanted stem sizes of 44.2%, the choice of stem size was found to be in range of one adjacent size in 87.6% of cases. Further investigations of other contributing factors are necessary to increase the accuracy of the preoperative selection of humeral implants. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: level IV, retrospective case study.

Primary outcomes of a femoral neck-preserving stem: a multicentre clinical-radiological analysis at 5-year follow-up.

PURPOSE: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the clinical-radiological outcomes of the Alteon Neck Preserving Stem (ANPS) (Exactech, Gainesville, FL, USA) implanted in four different centres by five senior hip surgeons with a minimum of 5 years of follow-up. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We conducted a multicentre prospective study that analysed 155 consecutive total hip replacements during 2014. We performed clinical-radiological analysis measuring Harris Hip Score (HHS), subjective satisfaction evaluation, radiolucencies, position of components, limb length discrepancy, heterotopic ossification, medical and surgical complications and a survival analysis at 5 years follow-up. RESULTS: Thigh pain was reported in 5 cases (3.2%), 2 of which reported mild pain, 2 moderate, and 1 severe. In 2 cases, subsidences of 3 mm were detected in the first scheduled X-ray, both related to intraoperative fractures with no progression after 3 months. The overall complication rate was 5.8% and 6 of the 9 complications were in the first 30 cases. Mean HHS improved from 42.9 points (range 37.2-55.7 points) preoperatively to 94.9 on average (range 87-98) at the end of the follow-up (p <0.01). Subjective evaluation was excellent in 130 (83.87%) cases and good in 25 patients (16.13%). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical-radiographic results of ANPS THR are satisfactory. The mid-term results are promising. However, long-term follow-up studies are necessary to confirm the validity of the concept.

Primary total hip arthroplasty with a fully porous-coated uncemented stem: up to twenty-eight years. Retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: The use of cementless prosthesis has increased in the last 30 years with the aim of improving the long-term results of total hip arthroplasties in young and active patients. Encouraging results have recently been reported for cementless titanium and cobalt chromium stems. However, there are few studies with long-term follow-up, and the majority have analysed several models of uncemented stems due to their modifications over the years. Therefore, the aim was to assess the long-term survival rate of the Mittelmeier Mark III or Autophor 900-S stem. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of both gender patients under 70 years old with at least one implanted Mittelmeier Mark III uncemented stem was performed. Survival rate was defined as the proportion of stems that did not need a surgical revision from any cause. Clinical status was evaluated using the Merle d'Aubigne scale modified by Matta (excellent/good/fair/poor). RESULTS: Between 1990 and 1999, 73 stems were implanted. The mean (SD) age at surgical time was 49.3 (9.9) years, and the median (range) of follow-up was 22 (1-28) years. The overall survival rate was 93% (68/73, 95%CI: 85-97%). The stem revisions were due to stem breakage (n = 2), to aseptic loosening (n = 2) and to septic loosening (n = 1). Clinical results were: excellent 84%, good 15% and fair 1.5%. CONCLUSIONS: The Mittelmeier Mark III stem had an excellent survival rate with a stable long-term fixation and excellent clinical outcomes.

Long Term Performance of an Uncemented, Proximally Hydroxyapatite Coated, Double Tapered, Titanium-Alloy Femoral Stem: Results From 1465 Hips at 10 years Minimum Follow-Up.

BACKGROUND: We assessed the survivorship of a proximally hydroxyapatite coated, double tapered, titanium-alloy femoral stem in a single center, at an average follow up of 12.5 years (10.1-15.8). The majority of stems were inserted as part of a Metal on Metal (MoM) Total Hip Replacement (THR). METHODS: Data was collected prospectively in a local database. A retrospective review was performed of all patients undergoing a primary THR with the prosthesis between 2003 and 2010. Primary outcome was revision of the stem for any cause. Analysis was also performed for stem revision for aseptic loosening, stem revision in the MoM setting and a worst case scenario whereby lost to follow up were presumed to have failed. True stem failure was considered if revision occurred for a stem related complication. RESULTS: 1465 stems were included (1310 patients, 155 bilateral). The bearing surface was cobalt chrome on cobalt chrome in 1351 cases (92%). Seven hips were lost to follow up. Thirty-two stems (31 part of a MoM THR) underwent revision for any cause. Kaplan Meier survival analysis demonstrates an overall 97.4% survivorship. Subset analysis demonstrates 100% survivorship for aseptic loosening, 97.3% in the MoM setting and 96.7% for the worst case senario. Of the 32 cases of stem revision, only 13 were classified as 'true' stem failure. CONCLUSION: This study represents the largest cohort of this uncemented femoral component with a minimum follow-up longer than 10 years. Our results demonstrate excellent long-term survivorship even in the presence of a challenging MoM environment.

Trabecular Metal Cones Combined With Short Cemented Stem Allow Favorable Outcomes in Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the functional outcomes and implant survivorship at a minimum of 5 years of follow-up of several reconstruction techniques with or without metaphyseal cone and stems of variable length. METHODS: A retrospective comparative matched analysis was performed from 2 prospectively collected databases. Only patients who underwent revision total knee arthroplasty procedures for aseptic causes using a single design of rotating hinge knee with a minimum of 5 years of follow-up were analyzed. Patients were separated into 3 groups: trabecular metal (TM) cones + short cemented stems (TM + short stem [SS]), TM cones + long uncemented stems (TM + long stem [LS]), and no cone (NC) + long uncemented stems (NC + LS). A matching process based on age (±5 years) was realized. RESULTS: About 99 patients were included; 33 in the TM + SS group, 33 in the TM + LS group, and 33 in the NC + LS group. The mean time of follow-up was 9.3 years. A significant difference of the improvement of subscale pain, symptom, activities of daily living, quality of life of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome score and knee, function of the Knee Society Score was observed in favor of TM + SS group compared with the 2 other groups. At 8 years of survivorship, the components free of revision for any cause were 90.9% for the TM + SS group, 84.9% for the TM + LS group, and 90.6% for the NC + LS group. CONCLUSION: The use of a short cemented tibial stem combined with a TM cone in revision total knee arthroplasty offers identical survival rate with better functional outcome compared with the use of a long uncemented stem associated with TM cones or metallic augments at a minimum of 5 years of follow-up.

Hybrid stems are superior to cemented stems in revision total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of recent comparative studies.

INTRODUCTION: The demand for revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has grown significantly in recent years. The two major fixation methods for stems in revision TKA include cemented and 'hybrid' fixation. We explore the optimal fixation method using data from recent, well-designed comparative studies. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of comparative studies published within the last 10 years with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. To allow for missing data, a random-effects meta-analysis of all available cases was performed. The odds ratio (OR) for the relevant outcome was calculated with 95% confidence intervals. The effects of small studies were analyzed using a funnel plot, and asymmetry was assessed using Egger's test. The primary outcome measure was all-cause failure. Secondary outcome measures included all-cause revision, aseptic revision and radiographic failure. RESULTS: There was a significantly lower failure rate for hybrid stems when compared to cemented stems (p = 0.006) (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.42-0.87). Heterogeneity was 4.3% and insignificant (p = 0.39). There was a trend toward superior hybrid performance for all other outcome measures including all-cause re-revision, aseptic re-revision and radiographic failure. CONCLUSION: Recent evidence suggests a significantly lower failure rate for hybrid stems in revision TKA. There is also a trend favoring the use of hybrid stems for all outcome variables assessed in this study. This is the first time a significant difference in outcome has been demonstrated through systematic review of these two modes of stem fixation. We therefore recommend the use, where possible, of hybrid stems in revision TKA.

Midterm Success of a Custom, Non-Fluted, Diaphyseal, Press-Fit Stem Used With a Tumor Megaprosthesis System.

BACKGROUND: High rates of aseptic loosening with cemented prostheses have led to increased utilization of uncemented stems in the setting of megaprosthetic reconstruction. Theoretic concerns of rotational instability resulted in early stem designs with de-rotational mechanisms such as flutes or side plates. However, these designs have their own associated complications, and mechanical data suggest they are unnecessary. The purpose of this study is to evaluate outcomes and survivorship of an unfluted diaphyseal press-fit stem in the setting of megaprosthetic reconstruction. METHODS: Forty-five patients (46 stems), with a minimum 3-year follow-up, underwent reconstruction using 1 of 2 fully porous coated, unfluted, press-fit stems between 2005 and 2013: revision stem with adapter to the megaprosthesis (revision stem), or custom megaprosthesis stem (custom stem). Complications were described using the Henderson classification system, and subanalyses evaluated stem-related failures and survival. Radiographic evaluation of stem fixation was determined via evidence of bone bridging, spot welding, resorption, subsidence, and pedestal formation. Four patients had early stem removal for local recurrence or infection and were thus excluded from the radiographic analyses. RESULTS: Twenty-eight femoral (15 revision stem, 13 custom stem) and 14 tibial (6 revision stem, 8 custom stem) stems were reviewed. Average follow-up was 81 months (range, 42-140 months). Revision for implant-related complications occurred in 7 of 41 (17%), all in revision stems (3 adapter failures, 4 polyethylene wear). At final follow-up, all stems were retained without evidence of aseptic loosening, although 7 of 41 (17%) exhibited mild stress shielding. CONCLUSION: A non-fluted, press-fit stem used with a tumor prosthesis provided a stable bone-prosthesis interface at midterm follow-up.

First application of three-dimensional designing total hip arthroplasty with long uncemented stem for fibrous dysplasia patients combined with hip joint osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: In order to treat proximal femur fibrous dysplasia (FD) patients combined with hip joint osteoarthritis (OA), the three-dimensional (3D) designing osteotomy and implantation of femoral component was firstly used for deformity correction and total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose is to present the detailed design, perioperative management and evaluate short-term clinical outcomes of this novel therapeutic method. METHOD: A retrospective study was performed in twelve FD patients combined with hip joint OA who were treated in our hospital between July 2013 and April 2015. Seven patients received 3D designing combined osteotomy and THA, and the other five patients underwent 3D designing THA only. RESULTS: All patients were followed-up with an average duration of 47 months (range, 35-56 months). There was no infection, dislocation, postoperative wound problems or mechanical failures. For the seven patients receiving 3D designing corrective osteotomy, the mean extremity lengthening was 2.8 (range, 1.5-4) cm. The average duration of bone union was 4.2 months. The average Harris Hip Score was improved from 46.08 (range, 13-67) points preoperatively to 93.72 (range, 83-100) points at the last follow-up. The average modified criteria of Guille was improved from 3.2 (range, 1-7) points preoperatively to 8.6 (range, 6-10) points at the last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The 3D designing THA with long uncemented stem, including 3D designing corrective osteotomy and implantation of long prosthesis stem, seems to be a reliable method for FD patients combined with hip joint OA. Through preoperative 3D design, corrective osteotomy and implantation of long prosthesis stem can be precise to re-store alignment, uttermost preserve host bone, obtain primary stem stability and provide necessary condition for long-term stem survival, finally leading to better limb function. Besides, perioperative management should be abided strictly for late stability. Nevertheless, the outcomes of long-term follow-up and larger cases are still required.

Long-term survivorship of a monoblock long cementless stem in revision total hip arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical outcomes, complications, and survival of a long cementless titanium femoral stem in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) at a minimum five year follow-up. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2010, 114 patients (116 hips), with a mean age of 68 ± 12 years, underwent revision THA using a KAR® stem (DePuy, Leeds, UK). The main reasons for revision were aseptic loosening (82%), periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) (11%), and periprosthetic fractures (6%). Mean follow-up was ten ± three years (range, 5-16). Harris Hip Score (HHS), Oxford Hip Score (OHS), and Postel-Merle d'Aubigné (PMA) score were recorded. Radiographic analysis assessed stem osseointegration and subsidence. Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method and cumulative incidence function (CIF). RESULTS: Post-operative HHS was 83 ± 15 (range, 35-99) and OHS was 37 ± 8 (range, 8-48). PMA score significantly increased from 12 ± 2 (range, 5-18) pre-operatively to 14.6 ± 2 (range, 9-18) post-operatively (p = 0.0004). The radiographic Engh score was 15 ± 8 (range, 7-22). Stem subsidence was observed in two cases (3%). At ten years, five stems had been revised, three for infections and two for periprosthetic fractures. Using the KM method, ten year survival free of stem revision for aseptic loosening was 100%, free of revision for any reason 95%, and free of any re-operation 81%. CONCLUSIONS: The present study reported satisfactory outcomes and survival of a long tapered unlocked cementless femoral stem in revision THA at a minimum follow-up of five years.

Short-Term Results of Ultra-Short Anatomic vs Ultra-Short Non-Anatomic Proximal Loading Uncemented Femoral Stems.

BACKGROUND: Question arises as to whether rigid fixation of ultra-short anatomic or ultra-short non-anatomic proximal loading uncemented femoral stem can be obtained without diaphyseal stem fixation. The purpose of this study is to compare the short-term clinical results, radiographic results, revision and survival rates, and complication rates of ultra-short anatomic versus ultra-short non-anatomic uncemented femoral stems. METHODS: This study consisted of 50 patients (56 hips) in the ultra-short anatomic uncemented stem group (mean age 61.4 ± 14.7 years) and 50 patients (56 hips) in the ultra-short non-anatomic uncemented stem group (mean age 59.5 ± 15.2 years). The mean follow-up was 3.4 years (range 3-4) in the ultra-short anatomic stem group and 3.5 years (range 3-4) in the ultra-short non-anatomic stem group. RESULTS: At the final follow-up, the mean Harris hip scores (92 vs 93 points), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis scores (16 vs 15 points), University of California at Los Angeles activity scores (6.5 vs 6.8 points), the incidence of thigh pain (0% vs 4%), revision rates (0% vs 4%), aseptic loosening rate (0% vs 2%), and complication rates (2% vs 4%) were not significantly different between 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Both ultra-short anatomic and ultra-short non-anatomic proximal loading uncemented femoral stems obtained rigid fixation without diaphyseal stem fixation in the short-term follow-up. This finding suggests that an ultra-short anatomic uncemented femoral stem can be replaced with an ultra-short non-anatomic uncemented stem to reduce inventory of the femoral stems, and consequently reduce manufacturing and delivery cost of these femoral stems.

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes at 25-30 Years of a Hip Stem Fully Coated With Hydroxylapatite.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the survival of total hip arthroplasty implants with bioactive coatings beyond the first 20 years. The authors aimed to report survival of a tapered hip stem fully coated with hydroxylapatite (HA) at follow-up of 25-30 years. METHODS: Of the original series of 320 patients (347 hips), 12 patients (12 hips) had stem and cup revisions, 54 patients (55 hips) had cup revisions, 17 patients (17 hips) had liner exchange. A total of 207 patients (225 hips) died with stems in place and 21 patients (24 hips) could not be reached. This left a cohort of 80 patients (86 hips) with their original stem for assessment. Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method and cumulative incidence function (CIF). RESULTS: Considering stem revision as endpoint, the revision risk calculated using the KM method was 6.3%, whereas using the CIF it was 3.7%. Considering any reoperation as endpoint, the revision risk calculated using the KM method was 41.2%, whereas using the CIF it was 25.9%. The Harris Hip Score for 77 patients (18 hips) was 81.6 ± 15.2. Standard x-rays were available for 52 hips (49 patients), and 10 (19.2%) showed radiolucencies <2 mm thick. CONCLUSION: This study is the first to report outcomes of an HA-coated stem beyond 25 years. The survival of stem compares favorably with long-term survival of the Charnley cemented stem, and with shorter-term registry studies. The stem achieved its intended purpose of total osteointegration in the long-term, although the proximolateral region remains susceptible to radiolucencies.

Total Hip Intraoperative Femur Fracture: Do the Design Enhancements of a Second-Generation Tapered-Wedge Stem Reduce the Incidence?

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative femur fracture (IFF) is a well-known complication in primary uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA). Variations in implant instrumentation design and operative technique may influence the risk of IFF. This study investigates IFF between a standard uncemented tapered-wedge femoral stem and its second-generation successor with the following design changes: size-specific medial curvature, proportional incremental stem growth, modest reduction in stem length, and distal lateral relief. METHODS: A single experienced surgeon's patient database was retrospectively queried for IFF occurring during primary uncemented THA using a standard tapered-wedge femoral stem system or a second-generation stem. All procedures were performed using soft tissue preserving anatomic capsule repair and posterior approach. The primary outcome measure was IFF. A z-test of proportions was performed to determine significant difference between the 2 stems with respect to IFF. Patient demographics, Dorr classification, and implant characteristics were also examined. RESULTS: Forty-one of 1510 patients (2.72%) who received a standard tapered-wedge femoral stem sustained an IFF, whereas 5 of 800 patients (0.63%) using the second-generation stem incurred an IFF. No other significant associations were found. CONCLUSION: A standard tapered-wedge femoral stem instrumentation system resulted in greater than 4 times higher incidence of IFF than its second-generation successor used for primary uncemented THA. Identifying risk factors for IFF is necessary to facilitate implant system improvements and thus maximize patient outcomes.

Cemented Versus Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty for Displaced Intracapsular Neck of Femur Fractures in the Elderly: Outcomes and Costings.

Background: Hemiarthroplasty (HA) is a common form of treatment for displaced neck of femur fractures. There is ongoing debate as to whether cemented or uncemented HA is a more superior treatment modality. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes between patients that underwent cemented HA to uncemented HA. Secondarily, we analysed the costs associated of each treatment option. Methods: This was a retrospective study conducted at a busy district general hospital. The study included 335 patients that were treated with either a cemented or uncemented HA for a displaced neck of femur fracture between January 2017 and December 2018. Data collected included age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) score, treatment modality, length of stay (LOS) and general costs. Results: 197 (58.8%) of the cohort underwent cemented HA and 138 (41.2%) underwent uncemented HA. Mean age for the cemented cohort was 84.7 years and 85.9 years in the uncemented group (p = 0.31). There was no significant differences between the groups with regard to mean LOS and discharge disposition (p = 0.44). There were no significant difference in 30-day and 1-year mortality between the two groups (p = 0.2). We did find a statistically significant difference in the costings between the two procedures, with cemented HAs costing £66 more than uncemented HAs (p < 0.001). Conclusion: We found that both cemented and uncemented HAs produced comparable results. We found a statistically significant reduction in operative time and costs associated with uncemented HA. Uncemented HA implants may be considered where a shorter operation duration is essential.

Does Mal-alignment of the CLS Spotorno Femoral Stem Correlate with Functional Outcome of Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty? An Evaluation at Mid-term Follow Up.

Background: The straight and thin design of the CLS Spotorno stem makes it prone for coronal plane mal-alignment, with potential for cortical impingement; reactive osteogenesis and thigh pain have been documented in this situation with some stems. The literature is scarce about the effect of distal mal-alignment with this particular stem, and its relationship with thigh pain, functional outcomes and stem survival. We assessed functional outcomes with incidence of varus/valgus CLS stem alignment, and correlated stem subsidence of these thin stems with hip scores. Methodology: Hip arthroplasty cases with CLS Spotorno stems, operated between 2015 and 2022, with a minimum follow up of 18 months were evaluated. Radiology included 100% pelvis x-rays with bilateral hips (anteroposterior with 15° internal rotation plus lateral views); parameters documented were coronal mal-alignment, stem subsidence, any pedestal formation and heterotrophic ossification (HO); special note was made of any thigh pain, and functional outcomes were recorded using mHHS and SF-36 scores. Results: We evaluated 65 patients with 79 operated hips at an average follow up of 5.26 years. 31.6% (25/79) stems were neutrally aligned, 64.6% (51/79) were in varus alignment and 3.8% (3/79) were in valgus alignment. The mean subsidence was 3.15 mm + 2.26 and 3 cases had Pedestal formation at the stem tip. There was no correlation between varus/valgus stem positions with the mHHS (p = 0.271) and SF-36 score (p = 0.553), which also did not correlate with the stem subsidence. HO formation was seen in 16 hips (20.3%), but no cases in our series needed revision during follow up. Conclusion: Significant distal malalignment with some subsidence were noted in the hips studied; despite these radiological issues, there were excellent mid-term outcomes and good stems survival, implying that distal malposition may have no bearing on functional outcomes.

Femoral Neck Preservation and Diaphyseal Invasion Comparing a Calcar-Metaphyseal Short Stem with its Homonymous Standard Femoral Stem. A Radiographic Study.

BACKGROUND: We aim to compare the preoperative planning radiographs of 50 patients in whom both a short stem and its homonymous standard version were programmed, focusing on the preservation of the neck and the invasion of the femoral shaft. The secondary objective was to evaluate the 50 preoperative radiographs with the 50 postoperative radiographs in which the short stem was implanted, measuring the real invasion of the diaphysis and the real preservation of the femoral neck. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We measured cut level at the femoral neck and diaphyseal invasion in 50 preoperative x-rays where an Alteon Neck Preserving Stem (ANPS) was templated and we compared it with 50 preoperative x-rays where an Alteon Taper Wedge Stem (ATWS) was templated. After surgery, we compared both parameters previously measured in the preoperative x-rays with the 50 postoperative radiographs where the short stem was implanted obtaining the real bone preservation at the femoral neck and the real diaphyseal invasion length. RESULTS: For templating comparison, mean bone preservation at the femoral neck was 14.87mm (SD 3.64) for the ANPS group and 9.94mm (SD 8.39) for the ATWS group (p <0.001). The mean diaphyseal bone invasion was 47.21mm (SD 5.89) and 76.77mm (SD 8.39) for ANPS and ATWS respectively (p <0.001). After surgery, the mean postoperative bone preservation at the femoral neck was 15.08mm (SD 3.1) with a mean of 0.17mm (SD 0.51) more preservation in the preoperative group. CONCLUSION: 1. ANPS allow bone preservation with limited diaphyseal invasion when compared with his homonymous ATWS in the preoperative templates. 2. ANPS showed a good correlation between preoperative radiographs and real bone preservation of the femoral neck and invasion of the femoral shaft.

Three-dimensional design custom-made uncemented stem for revision of cemented distal femoral endoprosthesis due to aseptic loosening.

BACKGROUND: Revision of cemented distal femoral replacement (DFR) due to aseptic loosening is challenging because of the resultant femoral bone loss. This paper aims to examine the outcomes of three-dimensional (3D) design custom-made uncemented stems for revision. METHODS: Between January 2014 and December 2020, 17 patients received 3D design uncemented stems for revision of loosed cemented DFR. The femoral bone loss was classified into four Grades, and four types of uncemented stems were designed correspondingly. The revision stems were custom-made for each patient by measuring the diameter of the medullary cavity and the anterior curvature of the femur. RESULTS: The patient counts with their corresponding Grades of femoral bone loss were as follows: Grade I, 8 patients; Grade II, 5 patients; Grade III, 3 patients; and Grade IV, 1 patient. During the mean follow-up of 80 months, no revision failure was detected. The postoperative radiographic showed that the stem matched the femoral anterior curvature well. The femoral bone defect was completely filled by the 3D design stem in 10 of the 17 cases postoperatively. In the remaining cases, the persistent peri-stem defect was filled or partially restored during the follow-up. CONCLUSION: 3D design custom-made uncemented stem created precise, stable, and durable fixation and provided satisfactory clinical outcomes, which seems to be a viable method for cemented DFR revision.

Outcomes of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Fracture Using Uncemented Stems, a Single Center Study.

Background: To evaluate the clinical, functional, radiographic, and survival outcomes in patients undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) with uncemented stem fixation for proximal humerus fractures. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study that evaluated a consecutive series of patients with proximal humerus fractures undergoing RSA. Clinical data, radiographs, and re-operation rates were reviewed in patients selected for uncemented stem fixation. The same parameters were compared to the remainder of the cohort undergoing cemented stem fixation. Results: The uncemented group (n = 16, median total follow-up = 108 weeks) and cemented group (n = 12, median total follow-up = 223 weeks, p = 0.110) did not differ statistically in pre-operative demographic, post-operative outcomes or incidence of complications. Two patients (12.5%) in the uncemented group required a reoperation (Week 52 and 180) versus none in the cemented group. Conclusion: Uncemented stem fixation in RSA for proximal humerus fractures does not yield worse results than cemented stem fixation in properly selected patients. Prospective non-inferiority trials comparing outcomes are recommended.