Sequential treatment in vulvovaginal atrophy.

Vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) is a chronic and progressive disease that affects sexuality and quality of life. VVA is preventable and treatable, but requires long-term and often sequential treatment. Sequential treatment consists of designing a strategy that uses one or more medications for a long enough time to achieve the desired benefits with minimal risk and maximum adherence. Currently available therapeutic options consist of topical over-the-counter products (including non-hormonal lubricants and moisturizers applied to the vagina), systemic hormone therapy and estrogens, and prescribed vaginal dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA). In addition, we have a selective estrogen receptor modulator, ospemifene, and new energy-based treatments (laser and radiofrequency). There are clear differences between the treatments both in the mechanism of action and in the efficacy. Compliance is very low, and patients complain about the use of the vaginal route, often due to its low efficacy, or express fear of the long-term use of estrogens or the price of the treatments. We believe that, as a first option, and for physiological, preventive and efficacy reasons, we should consider the prescription of treatments that work on estrogen receptors. As a second option, there are vaginal moisturizers, which are effective on symptoms but do not prevent or improve conditions. Finally, techniques using heat, which although each time represent a clearer alternative, but on the other hand are the cost and the long-term safety data, give us a third option. Of course, we consider that vulvar moisturizers and lubricants can be used at any time.

Sustainability of vaginal estrogens for genitourinary syndrome of menopause - a systematic review.

Genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) is a highly prevalent, not self-limiting condition displaying a major negative impact on sexual function and emotional well-being. Various non-hormonal and hormonal treatment options are available. Many women consider GSM treatment to be a short-term interval cure rather than a long-term or lifelong treatment. The aim of this systematic literature search was to assess the sustainability of vaginal estrogens for GSM treatment after treatment cessation. We found that objective GSM signs mostly deteriorated within approximately 4 weeks after vaginal estrogen treatment cessation, while vaginal estrogens had a more sustainable impact on subjective GSM symptoms up to 3-6 months. However, overall, scientific evidence on sustainability of vaginal estrogens was low. Thus, GSM treatment should not be considered a short-term interval cure but long-term therapy. Further studies in an internationally harmonized setting (Core Outcomes in Menopause [COMMA]) are needed.

[Current aspects of the treatment of urogenital atrophy (based on the consensus of britain society of menopause)].

The symptoms of genitourinary syndrome of menopause are considered as typical for late menopausal period. However, these symptoms are increasingly diagnosed in perimenopausal and early menopausal period. Women seldom seek medical care, since autonomic menopausal symptoms are usually more bothersome. In many cases, doctors are not sure in necessity of any hormonal replacement. Moreover, a confusion still exists between systemic hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and local estrogen preparations. Besides moisturizers and local intravaginal estrogens, novel treatment modalities have emerged that extend therapeutic armamentarium.

Management of genitourinary syndrome of menopause in breast cancer survivors: An update.

There is increasing attention about managing the adverse effects of adjuvant therapy (Chemotherapy and anti-estrogen treatment) for breast cancer survivors (BCSs). Vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA), caused by decreased levels of circulating estrogen to urogenital receptors, is commonly experienced by this patients. Women receiving antiestrogen therapy, specifically aromatase inhibitors, often suffer from vaginal dryness, itching, irritation, dyspareunia, and dysuria, collectively known as genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM), that it can in turn lead to pain, discomfort, impairment of sexual function and negatively impact on multiple domains of quality of life (QoL). The worsening of QoL in these patients due to GSM symptoms can lead to discontinuation of hormone adjuvant therapies and therefore must be addressed properly. The diagnosis of VVA is confirmed through patient-reported symptoms and gynecological examination of external structures, introitus, and vaginal mucosa. Systemic estrogen treatment is contraindicated in BCSs. In these patients, GSM may be prevented, reduced and managed in most cases but this requires early recognition and appropriate treatment, but it is normally undertreated by oncologists because of fear of cancer recurrence, specifically when considering treatment with vaginal estrogen therapy (VET) because of unknown levels of systemic absorption of estradiol. Lifestyle modifications and nonhormonal treatments (vaginal moisturizers, lubricants, and gels) are the first-line treatment for GSM both in healthy women as BCSs, but when these are not effective for symptom relief, other options can be considered, such as VET, ospemifene, local androgens, intravaginal dehydroepiandrosterone (prasterone), or laser therapy (erbium or CO2 Laser). The present data suggest that these therapies are effective for VVA in BCSs; however, safety remains controversial and a there is a major concern with all of these treatments. We review current evidence for various nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapeutic modalities for GSM in BCSs and highlight the substantial gaps in the evidence for safe and effective therapies and the need for future research. We include recommendations for an approach to the management of GSM in women at high risk for breast cancer, women with estrogen-receptor positive breast cancers, women with triple-negative breast cancers, and women with metastatic disease.

Ospemifene in the Management of Vulvar and Vaginal Atrophy: Focus on the Assessment of Patient Acceptability and Ease of Use.

Endocrinological changes that occur with menopause lead to a chronic and progressive condition named vulvar and vaginal atrophy (VVA). This disease is characterized by symptoms such as dryness, dyspareunia, itching, burning, and dysuria. According to recent epidemiological studies, VVA has a high prevalence and can also occur in younger women prior to the menopause, negatively affecting quality of life, sexual function, intimacy and relationship with the partner. Accordingly, therapy should be effective, initiated early and continued for as long as possible. Up to recent years, available therapeutic options have included over-the-counter lubricants and moisturizers, vaginal oestrogens and systemic hormones. These products are not indicated for all women. Hormones are mostly contraindicated in women with a history of hormone-sensitive cancer and are frequently not accepted even by women without contraindications. Local therapies are frequently considered uncomfortable, difficult to apply, and messy. Indeed, these treatments have a high spontaneous discontinuation rate, mostly due to dissatisfaction, safety concern, side effects and difficulty in vaginal placement. Recently, ospemifene, a new non-hormonal systemic remedy, was approved by FDA (Food and Drug Administration) and EMA (European Medicines Agency) for the treatment of the two most bothersome symptoms of VVA: dryness and dyspareunia. Because ospemifene is a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), it can be administered also in women with a history of breast cancer, and this makes it more acceptable by any woman. In addition, its route of administration minimizes those bothersome side effects intrinsic to the vaginal route of administration. Available data indicate that women using ospemifene have higher adherence to treatment, higher persistence and lower discontinuation rate. Satisfaction is higher than with other local therapies and overall health care cost is lower.