Potentiation of Muscarinic M3 Receptor Activation through a New Allosteric Site with a Novel Positive Allosteric Modulator ASP8302.

Muscarinic M3 (M3) receptors mediate a wide range of acetylcholine (ACh)-induced functions, including visceral smooth-muscle contraction and glandular secretion. Positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) can avoid various side effects of muscarinic agonists with their spatiotemporal receptor activation control and potentially better subtype selectivity. However, the mechanism of allosteric modulation of M3 receptors is not fully understood, presumably because of the lack of a potent and selective PAM. In this study, we investigated the pharmacological profile of ASP8302, a novel PAM of M3 receptors, and explored the principal site of amino-acid sequences in the human M3 receptor required for the potentiation of receptor activation. In cells expressing human M3 and M5 receptors, ASP8302 shifted the concentration-response curve (CRC) for carbachol to the lower concentrations with no significant effects on other subtypes. In a binding study with M3 receptor-expressing membrane, ASP8302 also shifted the CRC for ACh without affecting the binding of orthosteric agonists. Similar shifts in the CRC of contractions by multiple stimulants were also confirmed in isolated human bladder strips. Mutagenesis analysis indicated no interaction between ASP8302 and previously reported allosteric sites; however, it identified threonine 230 as the amino acid essential for the PAM effect of ASP8302. These results demonstrate that ASP8302 enhances the activation of human M3 receptors by interacting with a single amino acid distinct from the reported allosteric sites. Our findings suggest not only a novel allosteric site of M3 receptors but also the potential application of ASP8302 to diseases caused by insufficient M3 receptor activation. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The significance of this study is that the novel M3 receptor positive allosteric modulator ASP8302 enhances the activation of human M3 receptor by interacting with a residue distinct from the reported allosteric sites. The finding of Thr230 as a novel amino acid involved in the allosteric modulation of M3 receptors provides significant insight into further research of the mechanism of allosteric modulation of M3 and other muscarinic receptors.

Structure-based discovery of selective positive allosteric modulators of antagonists for the M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor.

Subtype-selective antagonists for muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) have long been elusive, owing to the highly conserved orthosteric binding site. However, allosteric sites of these receptors are less conserved, motivating the search for allosteric ligands that modulate agonists or antagonists to confer subtype selectivity. Accordingly, a 4.6 million-molecule library was docked against the structure of the prototypical M2 mAChR, seeking molecules that specifically stabilized antagonist binding. This led us to identify a positive allosteric modulator (PAM) that potentiated the antagonist N-methyl scopolamine (NMS). Structure-based optimization led to compound '628, which enhanced binding of NMS, and the drug scopolamine itself, with a cooperativity factor (α) of 5.5 and a KB of 1.1 µM, while sparing the endogenous agonist acetylcholine. NMR spectral changes determined for methionine residues reflected changes in the allosteric network. Moreover, '628 slowed the dissociation rate of NMS from the M2 mAChR by 50-fold, an effect not observed at the other four mAChR subtypes. The specific PAM effect of '628 on NMS antagonism was conserved in functional assays, including agonist stimulation of [35S]GTPγS binding and ERK 1/2 phosphorylation. Importantly, the selective allostery between '628 and NMS was retained in membranes from adult rat hypothalamus and in neonatal rat cardiomyocytes, supporting the physiological relevance of this PAM/antagonist approach. This study supports the feasibility of discovering PAMs that confer subtype selectivity to antagonists; molecules like '628 can convert an armamentarium of potent but nonselective GPCR antagonist drugs into subtype-selective reagents, thus reducing their off-target effects.

The muscarinic agonist pilocarpine modifies cocaine-reinforced and food-reinforced responding in rats: comparison with the cholinesterase inhibitor tacrine.

Activation of muscarinic receptors in the brain antagonizes the actions of cocaine, blocking both its discriminative stimulus and reinforcing properties. Pilocarpine is a nonselective muscarinic agonist that is used clinically, but has not been well characterized for its actions during cocaine-reinforced behavior. This study evaluated its effects on cocaine-reinforced and food-reinforced behaviors in rats, using the cholinesterase inhibitor tacrine as a comparator. Intraperitoneal pilocarpine or tacrine at doses of 1.0 mg/kg or more attenuated self-administration of low-dose cocaine (0.1 mg/kg injection) but also increased oral movements. Pilocarpine was less potent than tacrine in decreasing responding supported by low or intermediate amounts of liquid food. Combined treatment with pilocarpine and tacrine was more effective than either compound alone in attenuating self-administration of intermediate-dose cocaine. At a low (0.66 mg/kg) dose which did not modify reinforced responding, pilocarpine increased nonspecific behavior (sniffing, rearing, and activity) in cocaine-reinforced but not in food-reinforced animals; with greater doses increasing cholinergic or gastrointestinal signs. These effects were most consistently correlated with changes in reinforcement in rats responding for cocaine relative to food-reinforced animals. Overall, pilocarpine exhibited modest selectivity for attenuating self-administration of low-dose cocaine without affecting a nondrug reinforcer.

Teaching an Old Drug New Tricks: Agonism, Antagonism, and Biased Signaling of Pilocarpine through M3 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor.

Pilocarpine is a prototypical drug used to treat glaucoma and dry mouth and is classified as either a full or partial muscarinic agonist. Here, we report several unexpected results pertaining to its interaction with muscarinic M3 receptor (M3R). We found that pilocarpine was 1000 times less potent in stimulating mouse-eye pupil constriction than muscarinic agonists oxotremorin-M (Oxo-M) or carbachol (CCh), although all three ligands have similar Kd values for M3R. In contrast to CCh or Oxo-M, pilocarpine does not induce Ca2+ mobilization via endogenous M3R in human embryonic kidney cell line 293T (HEK293T) or mouse insulinoma (MIN6) cells. Pilocarpine also fails to stimulate insulin secretion and, instead, antagonizes the insulinotropic effect of Oxo-M and CCh-induced Ca2+ upregulation; however, in HEK293T or Chinese hamster ovary-K1 cells overexpressing M3R, pilocarpine induces Ca2+ transients like those recorded with another cognate G protein-coupled muscarinic receptor, M1R. Stimulation of cells overexpressing M1R or M3R with CCh resulted in a similar reduction in phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2). In contrast to CCh, pilocarpine stimulated PIP2 hydrolysis only in cells overexpressing M1R but not M3R. Moreover, pilocarpine blocked CCh-stimulated PIP2 hydrolysis in M3R-overexpressing cells, thus, it acted as an antagonist. Pilocarpine activates extracellular regulated kinase 1/2 in MIN6 cells. The stimulatory effect on extracellular regulated kinase (ERK1/2) was blocked by the Src family kinase inhibitor PP2, indicating that the action of pilocarpine on endogenous M3R is biased toward ß-arrestin. Taken together, our findings show that pilocarpine can act as either an agonist or antagonist of M3R, depending on the cell type, expression level, and signaling pathway downstream of this receptor.

Contribution of muscarinic receptors to in vitro and in vivo effects of Ruscus extract.

The objectives of this study were to evaluate, in vitro and in vivo, the contribution of muscarinic receptors to the effects of Ruscus extract. Ruscus extract was tested in competition binding experiments at recombinant human muscarinic receptors, heterologous expressed in Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells and in cellular assays measuring Ca2+ liberation and activator protein-1 (AP-1) reporter gene activation. The impact of muscarinic blockade on prolonged treatment outcome was evaluated using the hamster cheek pouch (HCP) microcirculation examining macromolecular permeability increase induced by histamine or ischemia/reperfusion (I/R), mean arteriolar and venular diameters, functional capillary density and I/R-induced leukocyte rolling and sticking. Ruscus extract exhibited affinities for muscarinic receptor subtypes at a range of 50-100µg/ml and behaved as partial agonist at human recombinant M1 and M3 receptors for Ca2+ liberation, confirmed in an AP-1 reporter gene assay. In the HCP model, topical application of atropine completely or partially blocked Ruscus extract-induced reductions of histamine- and I/R-induced increases of macromolecular permeability and leukocyte-endothelium interaction. Our results showed that Ruscus extract in vitro binds and activates different subtypes of muscarinic receptors and in vivo its anti-inflammatory effects are, at least partially, mediated via muscarinic receptors.

Evidence for Classical Cholinergic Toxicity Associated with Selective Activation of M1 Muscarinic Receptors.

The muscarinic acetylcholine receptor subtype 1 (M1) receptors play an important role in cognition and memory, and are considered to be attractive targets for the development of novel medications to treat cognitive impairments seen in schizophrenia and Alzheimer's disease. Indeed, the M1 agonist xanomeline has been shown to produce beneficial cognitive effects in both Alzheimer's disease and schizophrenia patients. Unfortunately, the therapeutic utility of xanomeline was limited by cholinergic side effects (sweating, salivation, gastrointestinal distress), which are believed to result from nonselective activation of other muscarinic receptor subtypes such as M2 and M3. Therefore, drug discovery efforts targeting the M1 receptor have focused on the discovery of compounds with improved selectivity profiles. Recently, allosteric M1 receptor ligands have been described, which exhibit excellent selectivity for M1 over other muscarinic receptor subtypes. In the current study, the following three compounds with mixed agonist/positive allosteric modulator activities that are highly functionally selective for the M1 receptor were tested in rats, dogs, and cynomologous monkeys: (3-((1S,2S)-2-hydrocyclohexyl)-6-((6-(1-methyl-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)pyridin-3-yl)methyl)benzo[h]quinazolin-4(3H)-one; 1-((4-cyano-4-(pyridin-2-yl)piperidin-1-yl)methyl)-4-oxo-4H-quinolizine-3-carboxylic acid; and (R)-ethyl 3-(2-methylbenzamido)-[1,4'-bipiperidine]-1'-carboxylate). Despite their selectivity for the M1 receptor, all three compounds elicited cholinergic side effects such as salivation, diarrhea, and emesis. These effects could not be explained by activity at other muscarinic receptor subtypes, or by activity at other receptors tested. Together, these results suggest that activation of M1 receptors alone is sufficient to produce unwanted cholinergic side effects such as those seen with xanomeline. This has important implications for the development of M1 receptor-targeted therapeutics since it suggests that dose-limiting cholinergic side effects still reside in M1 receptor selective activators.

Muscarinic drugs regulate the PKG-II-dependent phosphorylation of M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors at plasma membranes from airway smooth muscle.

Muscarinic agonists induce the activation of the airway smooth muscle (ASM) leading to smooth muscle contraction, important in asthma. This activation is mediated through M2/M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs). Muscarinic receptor activity, expressed as [(3)H]QNB binding at plasma membranes from bovine tracheal smooth muscle (BTSM), increased with cGMP and was augmented significantly cGMP plus ATP but diminished with the PKG-II inhibitor, Sp-8-pCPT-cGMPS. The [(3)H]-QNB binding was accelerated by okadaic acid, (OKA), a protein phosphatase (PPase) inhibitor. These two results indicated the involvement of a membrane-bound PPase. Moreover, a cGMP-dependent-[(32)P]γATP phosphorylation of plasma membranes from BTSM was stimulated at low concentrations of muscarinic agonist carbamylcholine (CC). However, higher amounts of CC produced a significant decrement of [(32)P]-labeling. A selective M3mAChR antagonist, 4-DAMP produced a dramatic inhibition of the basal and CC-dependent [(32)P]-labeling. The [(32)P] labeled membrane sediments were detergent solubilized and immunoprecipitated with specific M2/M3mAChR antibodies. The M3mAChR immuno-precipitates exhibited the highest cGMP-dependent [(32)P]-labeling, indicating it is a PKG-II substrate. Experiments using synthetic peptides from the C-terminal of the third intracellular loop (i3) of both M2mAChR (356-369) and M3mAChR (480-493) as external PKG-II substrates resulted in the i3M3-peptide being heavily phosphorylated. These results indicated that PKG-II phosphorylated the M3mAChR at the i3M3 domain ((480)MSLIKEKK(485)), suggesting that Ser(481) may be the target. Finally, this phosphorylation site seems to be regulated by a membrane-bound PPase linked to muscarinic receptor. These findings are important to understand the role of M3mAChR in the patho-physiology of ASM involved in asthma and COPD.

Cyclic GMP regulates M3AChR activity at plasma membranes from airway smooth muscle.

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors MAChRs from Bovine Tracheal Smooth Muscle (BTSM) plasma membranes are responsible for the cGMP rise and signal-amplitude peaks associated with smooth muscle contraction present in bronchial asthma. These MAChRs bind [(3)H]QNB and exhibit the classic G Protein Coupled-Receptor (GPCR) behavior towards muscarinic agonist and antagonists that is sensitive to sensitive to GTP analogs. Interestingly, the [(3)H]QNB binding activity was stimulated by cGMP and ATP, and was enhanced by IBMX and Zaprinast, inhibitors of cGMP-PDE. Cyclic GMP plus ATP affected the agonist-antagonist muscarinic binding activities. Thus, the high affinity agonist (Carbamylcholine) binding sites disappeared, whereas, 4-DAMP, a M3 selective antagonist displayed an additional high affinity-binding site. In contrast, non-selective (atropine) and M2-selective (methoctramine and gallamine) antagonists revealed one low binding site. Moreover, the 4-DAMP-mustard alkylation of the MAChRs blocked the cGMP effect indicating that the M3AChR is the main receptor target of cGMP. Interestingly, these cGMP effects were potentiated by an activator (Sp-8-pCPT-cGMPS), and diminished by an inhibitor (Rp-8-pCPT-CGMPS), of cGMP-dependent protein kinase (PKG-II), which was detected by Western blotting using specific PKG II antibodies. Finally, plasma membrane M3AChRs were phosphorylated in a cGMP-dependent manner and this novel post-translational reversible modification at M3AChRs may act as a feedback mechanism to terminate the cGMP dependent muscarinic signal transduction cascades at the sarcolema of BTSM.

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor activation synergizes the knockdown and toxicity of GABA-gated chloride channel insecticides.

BACKGROUND: Pest management requires continual identification of new physiological targets and strategies to control pests affecting agriculture and public/animal health. We propose the muscarinic system as a target for agrochemicals because of its physiological importance. Unlike the muscarinic system, gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA) receptors are an established insecticide target. Here, we investigated target-site synergism using small molecule probes (agonist and antagonist) against the muscarinic system and their ability to enhance the toxicity of GABAergic insecticides in Drosophila melanogaster (Meigen). RESULTS: Oral delivery of pilocarpine (muscarinic agonist) enhanced the toxicity of dieldrin, fipronil, and lindane, resulting in synergist ratios (SRs) between 4-32-fold (orally delivered) or between 2-67-fold when insecticides were topically applied. The synergism between pilocarpine and the GABA-insecticides was greater than the synergism observed with atropine (muscarinic antagonist), and was greater, or comparable, to the synergism observed with the metabolic inhibitor piperonyl butoxide. In addition to lethality, pilocarpine increased the knockdown of lindane. The mechanism of synergism was also investigated in the central nervous system using extracellular electrophysiology, where pilocarpine (3 µmo/L) lowered the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50 ) of lindane from 1.3 (0.86-1.98) µmol/L to 0.17 (0.14-0.21) µmol/L and fipronil's IC50 from 2.2 (1.54-3.29) µmol/L to 0.56 (0.40-0.77) µmol/L. CONCLUSION: Convergence of the cellular function between the muscarinic and GABAergic systems enhanced the insecticidal activity of GABA receptor blocking insecticides through the modulation of the central nervous system (CNS). The future impact of the findings could be the reduction of the active ingredient needed in a formulation with the development of muscarinic synergists. © 2022 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

THRX-198321 is a bifunctional muscarinic receptor antagonist and beta2-adrenoceptor agonist (MABA) that binds in a bimodal and multivalent manner.

Biphenyl-2-yl-carbamic acid 1-{9-[(R)-2-hydroxy-2-(8-hydroxy-2-oxo-1,2-dihydro-quinolin-5-yl)-ethylamino]-nonyl}-piperidin-4-yl ester (THRX-198321) is a single molecule composed of a muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) antagonist moiety, represented by the fragment MA, linked by a C9 polymethylene chain to a ß(2)-adrenoceptor (ß(2)AR) agonist moiety, represented by the fragment 8-hydroxy-5-((R)-1-hydroxy-2-methylamino-ethyl)-1H-quinolin-2-one (BA). THRX-198321 exhibited high affinity for mAChR (M(2) pK(I,App) = 10.57 ± 0.09; M(3) pK(I,App) = 10.07 ± 0.11) and ß(2)AR (pK(I,App) = 9.54 ± 0.15), with potent mAChR antagonist (M(2) pK(I,Fn) = 9.69 ± 0.23; M(3) pK(I,Fn) = 10.05 ± 0.17) and ß(2)AR agonist (pEC(50) = 9.25 ± 0.02) activities. Consistent with multivalent interactions, THRX-198321 binding affinity was >300-fold higher at mAChR and 29-fold higher at ß(2)AR relative to its monovalent fragments biphenyl carbamic acid piperidinyl ester (MA) and BA, respectively. THRX-198321 was a competitive antagonist at mAChR (M(2) pK(B) = 9.98 ± 0.13; M(3) pK(B) = 10.31 ± 0.89), whereas THRX-198321 agonist activity at ß(2)AR was competitively inhibited by propranolol. Interactions of THRX-198321 with an allosteric site on mAChR and a novel extracellular allosteric site on ß(2)AR, respectively, were detected by measuring THRX-198321-evoked changes in the dissociation rates for the orthosteric radioligands, [N-methyl-(3)H]scopolamine methyl chloride (M(2) pEC(50,diss) = 6.73 ± 0.10; M(3) pEC(50,diss) = 5.02 ± 0.14) and [4,6-propyl-(3)H]dihydroalprenolol (ß(2)AR pEC(50,diss) = 3.82 ± 0.25). The carbostyril-linker fragment (BA-L) binds to the allosteric site of mAChR (M(2) pEC(50,diss) = 5.06 ± 0.03; M(3) pEC(50,diss) = 4.15 ± 0.25), whereas the MA fragment binds to the allosteric site of ß(2)AR (pEC(50,diss) = 3.60 ± 0.18). Collectively, these observations suggest that THRX-198321 exhibits a multivalent bimodal orientation in the orthosteric and allosteric binding pockets of mAChR and ß(2)AR, a phenomenon that may be unique to this class of molecule.

Identification of orthosteric and allosteric site mutations in M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors that contribute to ligand-selective signaling bias.

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors contain at least one allosteric site that is topographically distinct from the acetylcholine, orthosteric binding site. Although studies have investigated the basis of allosteric modulation at these receptors, less is known about putative allosteric ligands that activate the receptor in their own right. We generated M(2) muscarinic acetylcholine receptor mutations in either the orthosteric site in transmembrane helices 3 and 6 (TM3 and -6) or part of an allosteric site involving the top of TM2, the second extracellular (E2) loop, and the top of TM7 and investigated their effects on the binding and function of the novel selective (putative allosteric) agonists (AC-42 (4-n-butyl-1-(4-(2-methylphenyl)-4-oxo-1-butyl)piperidine HCl), 77-LH-28-1 (1-(3-(4-butyl-1-piperidinyl)propyl)-3,3-dihydro-2(1H)-quinolinone), and N-desmethylclozapine) as well as the bitopic orthosteric/allosteric ligand, McN-A-343 (4-(m-chlorophenyl-carbamoyloxy)-2-butynyltrimethylammonium). Four classes of agonists were identified, depending on their response to the mutations, suggesting multiple, distinct modes of agonist-receptor interaction. Interestingly, with the exception of 77-LH-28-1, allosteric site mutations had no effect on the affinity of any of the agonists tested, but some mutations in the E2 loop influenced the efficacy of both orthosteric and novel selective agonists, highlighting a role for this region of the receptor in modulating activation status. Two point mutations (Y104(3.33)A (Ballesteros and Weinstein numbers in superscript) in the orthosteric and Y177A in the allosteric site) unmasked ligand-selective and signaling pathway-selective effects, providing evidence for the existence of pathway-specific receptor conformations. Molecular modeling of 77-LH-28-1 and N-desmethylclozapine yielded novel binding poses consistent with the possibility that the functional selectivity of such agents may arise from a bitopic mechanism.

Pharmacological characterization of LY593093, an M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor-selective partial orthosteric agonist.

Alzheimer's disease and schizophrenia are characterized by expression of psychotic, affective, and cognitive symptoms. Currently, there is a lack of adequate treatment for the cognitive symptoms associated with these diseases. Cholinergic signaling and, in particular, M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (m1AChR) signaling have been implicated in the regulation of multiple cognitive domains. Thus, the M1AChR has been identified as a therapeutic drug target for diseases, such as schizophrenia and Alzheimer's disease, that exhibit marked cognitive dysfunction as part of their clinical manifestation. Unfortunately, the development of selective M1 agonist medications has not been successful, mostly because of the highly conserved orthosteric acetylcholine binding site among the five muscarinic receptor subtypes. More recent efforts have focused on the development of allosteric M1AChR modulators that target regions of the receptor distinct from the orthosteric site that are less conserved between family members. However, orthosteric and allosteric ligands may differentially modulate receptor function and ultimately downstream signaling pathways. Thus, the need for highly selective M1AChR orthosteric agonists still exists, not only as a potential therapeutic but also as a pharmacological tool to better understand the physiologic consequences of M1AChR orthosteric activation. Here, we describe the novel, potent and selective M1AChR orthosteric partial agonist LY593093 [N-[(1R,2R)-6-({(1E)-1-[(4-fluorobenzyl)(methyl)amino]ethylidene})amino)-2-hydroxy-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-1-yl]biphenyl-4-carboxamide]. This compound demonstrates modest to no activity at the other muscarinic receptor subtypes, stimulates Gα(q)-coupled signaling events as well as ß-arrestin recruitment, and displays significant efficacy in in vivo models of cognition.

FRET-based sensors for the human M1-, M3-, and M5-acetylcholine receptors.

Based on the recently developed approach to generate fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based sensors to measure GPCR activation, we generated sensor constructs for the human M(1)-, M(3)-, and M(5)-acetylcholine receptor. The receptors were labeled with cyan fluorescent protein (CFP) at their C-terminus, and with fluorescein arsenical hairpin binder (FlAsH) via tetra-cysteine tags inserted in the third intracellular loop. We then measured FRET between the donor CFP and the acceptor FlAsH in living cells and real time. Agonists like acetylcholine, carbachol, or muscarine activate each receptor construct with half-maximal activation times between 60 and 70ms. Removal of the agonist caused the reversal of the signal. Compared with all other agonists, oxotremorine M differed in two major aspects: it caused significantly slower signals at M(1)- and M(5)-acetylcholine receptors and the amplitude of these signals was larger at the M(1)-acetylcholine receptor. Concentration-response curves for the agonists reveal that all agonists tested, with the mentioned exception of oxotremorine M, caused similar maximal FRET-changes as acetylcholine for the M(1)-, M(3)- and M(5)-acetylcholine receptor constructs. Taken together our data support the notion that orthosteric agonists behave similar at different muscarinic receptor subtypes but that kinetic differences can be observed for receptor activation.

Pharmaceutical Assessment Suggests Locomotion Hyperactivity in Zebrafish Triggered by Arecoline Might Be Associated with Multiple Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptors Activation.

Arecoline is one of the nicotinic acid-based alkaloids, which is found in the betel nut. In addition to its function as a muscarinic agonist, arecoline exhibits several adverse effects, such as inducing growth retardation and causing developmental defects in animal embryos, including zebrafish, chicken, and mice. In this study, we aimed to study the potential adverse effects of waterborne arecoline exposure on zebrafish larvae locomotor activity and investigate the possible mechanism of the arecoline effects in zebrafish behavior. The zebrafish behavior analysis, together with molecular docking and the antagonist co-exposure experiment using muscarinic acetylcholine receptor antagonists were conducted. Zebrafish larvae aged 96 h post-fertilization (hpf) were exposed to different concentrations (0.001, 0.01, 0.1, and 1 ppm) of arecoline for 30 min and 24 h, respectively, to find out the effect of arecoline in different time exposures. Locomotor activities were measured and quantified at 120 hpf. The results showed that arecoline caused zebrafish larvae locomotor hyperactivities, even at a very low concentration. For the mechanistic study, we conducted a structure-based molecular docking simulation and antagonist co-exposure experiment to explore the potential interactions between arecoline and eight subtypes, namely, M1a, M2a, M2b, M3a, M3b, M4a, M5a, and M5b, of zebrafish endogenous muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs). Arecoline was predicted to show a strong binding affinity to most of the subtypes. We also discovered that the locomotion hyperactivity phenotypes triggered by arecoline could be rescued by co-incubating it with M1 to M4 mAChR antagonists. Taken together, by a pharmacological approach, we demonstrated that arecoline functions as a highly potent hyperactivity-stimulating compound in zebrafish that is mediated by multiple muscarinic acetylcholine receptors.

Current Advances in Allosteric Modulation of Muscarinic Receptors.

Allosteric modulators are ligands that bind to a site on the receptor that is spatially separated from the orthosteric binding site for the endogenous neurotransmitter. Allosteric modulators modulate the binding affinity, potency, and efficacy of orthosteric ligands. Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors are prototypical allosterically-modulated G-protein-coupled receptors. They are a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of psychiatric, neurologic, and internal diseases like schizophrenia, Alzheimer's disease, Huntington disease, type 2 diabetes, or chronic pulmonary obstruction. Here, we reviewed the progress made during the last decade in our understanding of their mechanisms of binding, allosteric modulation, and in vivo actions in order to understand the translational impact of studying this important class of pharmacological agents. We overviewed newly developed allosteric modulators of muscarinic receptors as well as new spin-off ideas like bitopic ligands combining allosteric and orthosteric moieties and photo-switchable ligands based on bitopic agents.

Regiospecific Introduction of Halogens on the 2-Aminobiphenyl Subunit Leading to Highly Potent and Selective M3 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor Antagonists and Weak Inverse Agonists.

Muscarinic M3 receptor antagonists and inverse agonists displaying high affinity and subtype selectivity over the antitarget M2 are valuable pharmacological tools and may enable improved treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, or urinary incontinence. On the basis of known M3 antagonists comprising a piperidine or quinuclidine unit attached to a biphenyl carbamate, 5-fluoro substitution was responsible for M3 subtype selectivity over M2, while 3'-chloro substitution substantially increased affinity through a σ-hole interaction. Resultantly, two piperidinyl- and two quinuclidinium-substituted biphenyl carbamates OFH243 (13n), OFH244 (13m), OFH3911 (14n), and OFH3912 (14m) were discovered, which display two-digit picomolar affinities with Ki values from 0.069 to 0.084 nM, as well as high selectivity over the M2 subtype (46- to 68-fold). While weak inverse agonistic properties were determined for the biphenyl carbamates 13m and 13n, neutral antagonism was observed for 14m and 14n and tiotropium under identical assay conditions.

Carbachol dimers with primary carbamate groups as homobivalent modulators of muscarinic receptors.

Although agonists and antagonists of muscarinic receptors have been known for long time, there is renewed interest in compounds (such as allosteric or bitopic ligands, or biased agonists) able to differently and selectively modulate these receptors. As a continuation of our previous research, we designed a new series of dimers of the well-known cholinergic agonist carbachol. The new compounds were tested on the five cloned human muscarinic receptors (hM1-5) expressed in CHO cells by means of equilibrium binding experiments, showing a dependence of the binding affinity on the length and position of the linker connecting the two monomers. Kinetic binding studies revealed that some of the tested compounds were able to slow the rate of NMS dissociation, suggesting allosteric behavior, also supported by docking simulations. Assessment of ERK1/2 phosphorylation on hM1, hM2 and hM3 activation showed that the new compounds are endowed with muscarinic antagonist properties. At hM2 receptors, some compounds were able to stimulate GTPγS binding but not cAMP accumulation, suggesting a biased behavior. Classification, Molecular and cellular pharmacology.

Exploring the mechanism of agonist efficacy: a relationship between efficacy and agonist dissociation rate at the muscarinic M3 receptor.

Although there are several empirical approaches that enable the comparison of relative agonist efficacy, the molecular basis that underlies differences in the ability of G protein-coupled receptor agonists to elicit a response is still largely unexplained. Several models have been described that incorporate the kinetics of receptor-mediated initiation of the G protein cycle, but these have not directly addressed the influence of agonist-binding kinetics. To test this, we investigated the relationship between the efficacy of seven M(3) muscarinic receptor agonists and their rate of dissociation (k(off)) from the M(3) receptor. The association and dissociation rate constants of the agonists were determined using a l-[N-methyl]-[(3)H]scopolamine methyl chloride competition binding assay in the presence of GTP. The agonists displayed a range of association and dissociation rates. Relative agonist efficacy was measured at two points after M(3) receptor activation: the stimulation of guanosine 5'-O-(3-[(35)S]thio)triphosphate binding to G alpha subunits, and the subsequent increase in intracellular calcium levels. These experiments revealed a range of intrinsic efficacy, from the low-efficacy pilocarpine and oxotremorine to high-efficacy acetylcholine. There was no relationship between agonist efficacy and the equilibrium binding affinity of each agonist (K(d)). When efficacy was compared with the dissociation rate constant, however, the two were highly correlated, suggesting a relationship between the duration of agonist binding at the receptor and the intrinsic efficacy. These data suggest that kinetic models incorporating the mean lifetime of specific complexes will be required to fully explain the nature of agonist efficacy.

Discovery and characterization of novel allosteric potentiators of M1 muscarinic receptors reveals multiple modes of activity.

Activators of M(1) muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) may provide novel treatments for schizophrenia and Alzheimer's disease. Unfortunately, the development of M(1)-active compounds has resulted in nonselective activation of the highly related M(2) to M(5) mAChR subtypes, which results in dose-limiting side effects. Using a functional screening approach, we identified several novel ligands that potentiated agonist activation of M(1) with low micromolar potencies and induced 5-fold or greater leftward shifts of the acetylcholine (ACh) concentration-response curve. These ligands did not compete for binding at the ACh binding site, indicating that they modulate receptor activity by binding to allosteric sites. The two most selective compounds, cyclopentyl 1,6-dimethyl-4-(6-nitrobenzo[d][1,3]-dioxol-5-yl)-2-oxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrimidine-5-carboxylate (VU0090157) and (E)-2-(4-ethoxyphenylamino)-N'-((2-hydroxynaphthalen-1-yl)methylene)acetohydrazide (VU0029767), induced progressive shifts in ACh affinity at M(1) that were consistent with their effects in a functional assay, suggesting that the mechanism for enhancement of M(1) activity by these compounds is by increasing agonist affinity. These compounds were strikingly different, however, in their ability to potentiate responses at a mutant M(1) receptor with decreased affinity for ACh and in their ability to affect responses of the allosteric M(1) agonist, 1-[1'-(2-tolyl)-1,4'-bipiperidin-4-yl]-1,3-dihydro-2H-benzimidazol-2-one. Furthermore, these two compounds were distinct in their abilities to potentiate M(1)-mediated activation of phosphoinositide hydrolysis and phospholipase D. The discovery of multiple structurally distinct positive allosteric modulators of M(1) is an exciting advance in establishing the potential of allosteric modulators for selective activation of this receptor. These data also suggest that structurally diverse M(1) potentiators may act by distinct mechanisms and differentially regulate receptor coupling to downstream signaling pathways.

Differential regulation of muscarinic M1 receptors by orthosteric and allosteric ligands.

BACKGROUND: Activation of muscarinic M1 receptors is mediated via interaction of orthosteric agonists with the acetylcholine binding site or via interaction of allosteric agonists with different site(s) on the receptor. The focus of the present study was to determine if M1 receptors activated by allosteric agonists undergo the same regulatory fate as M1 receptors activated by orthosteric agonists. RESULTS: The orthosteric agonists carbachol, oxotremorine-M and pilocarpine were compared to the allosteric agonists AC-42, AC-260584, N-desmethylclozapine and xanomeline. All ligands activated M1 receptors and stimulated interaction of the receptors with beta-arrestin-1. All ligands reduced cell surface binding and induced the loss of total receptor binding. Receptor internalization was blocked by treatment with hypertonic sucrose indicating that all ligands induced formation of clathrin coated vesicles. However, internalized receptors recycled to the cell surface following removal of orthosteric, but not allosteric agonists. Whereas all ligands induced loss of cell surface receptor binding, no intracellular vesicles could be observed after treatment with AC-260584 or xanomeline. Brief stimulation of M1 receptors with AC-260584 or xanomeline resulted in persistent activation of M1 receptors, suggesting that continual receptor signaling might impede or delay receptor endocytosis into intracellular vesicles. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that allosteric agonists differ from orthosteric ligands and among each other in their ability to induce different regulatory pathways. Thus, signaling and regulatory pathways induced by different allosteric ligands are ligand specific.