RESUMO
Recent years have seen increasing recognition of the scientific, economic and ethical benefits of the use of non-animal models in advancing preclinical research, giving reason to rethink the application and framework of the Three Rs. However, to benefit from the economic advantages of shifting to such alternative methods, and to realise Australia's drug development potential, legislative reform is essential. Such reform should be responsive to international regulations that encourage the use of animal-free methods, and be coupled with a corresponding re-evaluation of current Three Rs frameworks and principles. If these supportive changes, and the recommendations from the 2023 Australian Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Futures Non-animal models report, are implemented concurrently - with government support paramount- then a new gold standard for scientific research in Australia could be created in which the use of non-animal models and animal-free methods is the default.
Assuntos
Alternativas aos Testes com Animais , Austrália , Alternativas aos Testes com Animais/legislação & jurisprudência , Animais , Humanos , Experimentação Animal/legislação & jurisprudência , Experimentação Animal/éticaRESUMO
Following a review of Directive 2010/63/EU on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes in the European Union (EU), non-technical project summaries (NTS) of all approved projects must be published in a central database using a standard template. Our initial review of the NTS reported in ALTEX in 2018 had found the NTS to be deficient in their accessibility and quality, notably the "adverse effects" section where the harms to the animals are meant to be described. Here we repeat our review to see if these legislative changes have improved the accessibility and quality of the NTS. As before, we focused on the NTS from the United Kingdom (UK) and Germany; even though the UK has left the EU, it is using the same template. We found significant improvement in the reporting of five of the six elements we identified as essential to the "predicted harms" section. However, there was no significant improvement in the reporting of adverse effects. Only 41% of German NTS and 48% of UK NTS are fully reporting this important element of the "predicted harms" section. In our view, researchers need support in describing the impact of their research on the animals and to assist here we include a checklist for competent authorities and a list of suggested terminology for standard administration and sampling procedures. Unless the NTS improve further, their utility as a tool for sharing of good practices in the 3Rs or to support evidence-based policymaking will remain limited.
All countries of the European Union (EU) are required to publish "non-technical summaries" (NTS) of research projects that use animals. To improve transparency, the public must have access to NTS and understand their content. Our previous review found that the information provided in the NTS was lacking in many cases. This is preventing a full understanding of what animals experience during experiments. In particular, NTS often failed to fully describe what procedures the animals would be subjected to, how often they would take place, how long they would last, and the harm they would cause. Here we repeat our review to see if recent legislative changes, including the requirement for NTS to be published in a central database using a standard template, have made a difference. While there has been some improvement in reporting, many NTS still fail to adequately describe the harm that animals will experience.
Assuntos
Experimentação Animal , Alternativas aos Testes com Animais , Animais , Alternativas aos Testes com Animais/legislação & jurisprudência , Experimentação Animal/legislação & jurisprudência , Experimentação Animal/normas , Europa (Continente) , Bem-Estar do Animal/legislação & jurisprudência , Bem-Estar do Animal/normas , União EuropeiaRESUMO
La utilización de animales de laboratorio para la investigación biomédica ha tenido un crecimiento importante en nuestro país en los últimos años. La clase de estos animales influyen directamente en la calidad de los trabajos científicos realizados con ellos. El presente trabajo tiene por objeto exponer un panorama general de lo que es el animal de laboratorio. Se analizan las razones de tipo científico, ético-legales y laborales que obligan a que la calidad de estos animales sea apropiada. Se describen las características microbiológicas de los animales convencionales y aquellos clasificados como libres de patógenos específicos. Además, se describen las características físicas que debe terner el albergue para animales de laboratorio. Se concluye que el animal de laboratorio es un modelo biológico de gran valor para la investigación, por lo que su producción y cuidado deben responder a estrictas normas de calidad que aseguren que su uso sea científica y éticamente aceptable