Long-term survival benefits of thrombolysis: the Royal College of General Practitioners' myocardial infarction study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether there is a long-term survival benefit from receipt of thrombolysis in routine care particularly pre-hospital thrombolysis, using 20 year mortality data from the RCGP myocardial infarction (MI) cohort study. METHODS: During 1991-92 the RCGP MI study assessed GP delivery of thrombolysis. Participants who received pre-hospital thrombolysis (n = 290), thrombolysis in hospital (n = 781) or no thrombolysis (n = 2021) were followed and mortality data collected to June 2012. The relationship between thrombolysis and survival time was analysed using Cox regression at 28 days, 1, 5, 10, 15 years post-AMI, and at end of follow-up (~20 years post-AMI). RESULTS: Compared to those who did not receive it, participants who received thrombolysis had a significant survival benefit at 28 days [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.72, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.58-0.90]; 1 year (adjusted HR 0.69, 95% CI: 0.57-0.83); 5 years (adjusted HR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.66-0.86); 10 years (adjusted HR 0.85, 95% CI: 0.77-0.95) and 15 years (adjusted HR 0.88, 95% CI: 0.80-0.96) post-AMI until end of follow-up (adjusted HR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.84-1.00). Pre versus in-hospital thrombolysis did not appear beneficial, although there was evidence among the pre-hospital group that short symptom onset-to-needle times conferred greater benefit. CONCLUSIONS: We found substantial long-term survival benefits associated with thrombolysis when used in routine care. Although primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) is now the choice treatment, thrombolysis remains an important option when pPCI cannot be delivered within 120 minutes of diagnosis.

Plasminogen activators: a comparison.

Thrombolytic drugs play a crucial role in the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, arterial thrombosis, acute thrombosis of retinal vessel, extensive coronary emboli, and peripheral vascular thromboembolism. Recognition of the importance of fibrinolytic system in thrombus resolution has resulted in the development of different fibrinolytic agents. Now a days several newer plasminogen activators with different pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties have been developed to treat thrombotic disease, which are fibrin specific with prolonged half-life and can be administered as a single bolus.

Thrombolysis: the need for a critical review.

The (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) TIMI-I trial led to the hypothesis that the greater reperfusion rate seen with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) versus streptokinase would result in greater reductions in infarct size and mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Despite extensive investigation, no trial comparing rt-PA with streptokinase (European Cooperative Study Group, Plasminogen Activator Italian Multicenter Study [PAIMS], Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenze nell'Infarto Miocardico [GISSI-2], International Study on Infarct Survival [ISIS-3], even TIMI-I itself) nor rt-PA and anisoylated plasminogen-streptokinase activator complex (APSAC or anistreplase) (Bassand, TEAM-3, ISIS-3), have confirmed this hypothesis. In a reversal of traditional scientific method, the studies, rather than the unconfirmed hypothesis, have been rejected. A lack of independent review of this subject may have contributed to this outcome. It is proposed that standards of review and editorial comment mandating true critical distance and independence be followed, permitting greater independence of scientific inquiry, review and debate.

Angiographic predictors of reocclusion after thrombolysis: results from the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 4 trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study attempted to determine which lesion characteristics are associated with reocclusion by 18 to 36 h. BACKGROUND: Reocclusion of the infarct-related artery after successful reperfusion is associated with significant morbidity and up to a threefold increase in mortality. METHODS: Two hundred seventy-eight patients with acute myocardial infarction were randomized to receive either anisoylated plasminogen streptokinase activator complex (APSAC) or recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) or their combination. Culprit arteries were assessed for Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade, lesion ulceration, thrombus, collateral circulation and eccentricity. Minimal lumen diameter, percent diameter stenosis and lesion irregularity (power) were calculated using quantitative angiography. RESULTS: Reocclusion was observed more frequently in arteries with TIMI 2 versus TIMI 3 flow (10.4% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.003), in ulcerated lesions (10.7% vs. 3.0%, p = 0.009) and in the presence of collateral vessels (18.2% vs. 5.6%, p = 0.03). Similar trends were observed for eccentric (7.3% vs. 2.3%, p = 0.06) and thrombotic (8.4% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.06) lesions. Reocclusion was associated with more severe mean percent stenosis (77.9% vs. 73.9%, p = 0.04). Lesion length, reference segment diameter and Fourier measures of lesion irregularity were not associated with reocclusion. CONCLUSIONS: Several simply assessed angiographic variables, such as the presence of TIMI grade 2 flow, ulceration, collateral vessels and greater percent diameter stenosis at 90 min after thrombolytic therapy, are associated with significantly higher rates of infarct-related artery reocclusion by 18 to 36 h and may aid in identifying the subset of patients who are at significantly higher risk of early reocclusion and who potentially warrant further early pharmacologic or mechanical intervention.

Current issues concerning thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction.

Data are now available from three large-scale randomized trials that directly compare the risks and benefits of thrombolytic agents in acute myocardial infarction. In the interpretation of results from the Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'Infarto Miocardico (GISSI-2) trial and its International Extension, the Third International Study of Infarct Survival (ISIS-3), and the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO-1) trial, there are areas of both agreement and controversy. It is generally agreed that the agents most commonly used in the United States--tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA), streptokinase and anisoylated plasminogen streptokinase activator complex (APSAC)--all reduce mortality when given to patients with acute evolving myocardial infarction. Further, it is clear that thrombolytic therapy given to such patients presenting up to 12 h after onset of symptoms reduces the mortality rate by approximately 20%, that aspirin therapy for patients presenting up to 24 h reduces the mortality rate by approximately 23% and that the benefits of thrombolytic therapy and aspirin are additive. Finally, and of most importance, the earlier administration as well as the more widespread use of thrombolytic therapy and aspirin would save many more lives. The totality of evidence clearly indicates that streptokinase produces significantly fewer strokes and cerebral hemorrhages than either t-PA or APSAC. Whether or not accelerated t-PA has a small advantage for mortality is less conclusive.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Creation of the recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) image and its influence on practice habits.

American physicians have commonly practiced thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction with the recombinant form of tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA), although its cost is much higher than that of streptokinase. The greater popularity of rt-PA is based on the belief that it is a more effective and a safer drug for achieving myocardial salvage and mortality reduction. However, a series of studies testing this assumption have not substantiated its greater efficacy or safety with respect to not only streptokinase but also urokinase and anisoylated plasminogen-streptokinase activator complex (APSAC). This editorial reviews the sequence of events that led to the creation of the rt-PA image, the mistaken premises on which it was based and the questions that need to be addressed if we are to strengthen the scientific method for evaluating similar types of drugs and its influence on practice habits including the costs to the health system.

Evaluation of thrombolytic and systemic effects of the novel recombinant plasminogen activator BM 06.022 compared with alteplase, anistreplase, streptokinase and urokinase in a canine model of coronary artery thrombosis.

The thrombolytic and systemic effects of BM 06.022 were evaluated and compared with those of alteplase, anistreplase, streptokinase and urokinase in a canine model of coronary artery thrombosis. BM 06.022 consists of the kringle-2 and protease domains of human tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) and is unglycosylated because of its expression in Escherichia coli cells. Thrombus formation in anesthetized open chest dogs was induced by electrical injury to the intimal surface of the left circumflex coronary artery at a high level site of obstruction. In heparinized dogs, none of six vehicle-treated animals exhibited reperfusion. Reperfusion was achieved in four of six dogs at 18.3 +/- 6 min after intravenous bolus injection of 140 kU/kg (0.24 mg/kg) of BM 06.022, whereas four of six dogs exhibited reperfusion later (p less than 0.05) at 76.5 +/- 16.1 min during infusion of 1.33 mg/kg of alteplase (0.13 mg/kg as initial bolus injection, followed by 0.66 mg/kg over 1 h and 0.53 mg/kg over 2 h). Significantly later (p less than 0.05) reperfusion than that achieved with BM 06.022 was achieved in five of six dogs at 57.8 +/- 12.1 min after intravenous injection of 0.4 U/kg of anistreplase. Streptokinase (21,000 IU/kg over 60 min) and urokinase (20,000 IU/kg as an intravenous bolus injection, followed by 20,000 IU/kg over 89 min) each induced reperfusion in three of six dogs but at 67 +/- 12 and 84.3 +/- 17.1 min (p less than 0.05 vs. BM 06.022), respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Comparison of front-loaded recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator, anistreplase and combination thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: results of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 4 trial.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to determine a superior thrombolytic regimen from three: anistreplase (APSAC), front-loaded recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) or combination thrombolytic therapy. BACKGROUND: Although thrombolytic therapy has been shown to reduce mortality and morbidity after acute myocardial infarction, it has not been clear whether more aggressive thrombolytic-antithrombotic regimens could improve the outcome achieved with standard regimens. METHODS: To address this issue, 382 patients with acute myocardial infarction were randomized to receive in a double-blind fashion (along with intravenous heparin and aspirin) APSAC, front-loaded rt-PA or a combination of both agents. The primary end point "unsatisfactory outcome" was a composite clinical end point assessed through hospital discharge. RESULTS: Patency of the infarct-related artery (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] grade 2 or 3 flow) at 60 min after the start of thrombolysis was significantly higher in rt-PA-treated patients (77.8% vs. 59.5% for APSAC-treated patients and 59.3% for combination-treated patients [rt-PA vs. APSAC, p = 0.02; rt-PA vs. combination, p = 0.03]). At 90 min, the incidence of both infarct-related artery patency and TIMI grade 3 flow was significantly higher in rt-PA-treated patients (60.2% had TIMI grade 3 flow vs. 42.9% and 44.8% of APSAC- and combination-treated patients, respectively [rt-PA vs. APSAC, p < 0.01; rt-PA vs. combination, p = 0.02]). The incidence of unsatisfactory outcome was 41.3% for rt-PA compared with 49% for APSAC and 53.6% for the combination (rt-PA vs. APSAC, p = 0.19; rt-PA vs. combination, p = 0.06). The mortality rate at 6 weeks was lowest in the rt-PA-treated patients (2.2% vs. 8.8% for APSAC and 7.2% for combination thrombolytic therapy [rt-PA vs. APSAC, p = 0.02; rt-PA vs. combination, p = 0.06]). CONCLUSIONS: Front-loaded rt-PA achieved significantly higher rates of early reperfusion and was associated with trends toward better overall clinical benefit and survival than those achieved with a standard thrombolytic agent or combination thrombolytic therapy. These findings support the concept that more rapid reperfusion of the infarct-related artery is associated with improved clinical outcome.

Coronary angiographic findings do not predict clinical outcome in patients with unstable angina.

OBJECTIVES: The presence of thrombus formation and type of coronary artery lesion were determined in patients with unstable angina and correlated with the angiographic findings and clinical outcome. BACKGROUND: Some previous studies have suggested that thrombus formation and lesions are predictive of the angiographic and clinical findings. This was evaluated in a retrospective analysis of 159 patients participating in the placebo-controlled Unstable Angina Study Using Eminase (UNASEM) trial on the effect of thrombolysis in unstable angina. METHODS: Patients without a previous myocardial infarction who presented with a typical history of unstable angina in the presence of abnormal findings on the electrocardiogram indicative of ischemia were included in the study. After baseline angiography, study medication (anistreplase or placebo) was given to 126 to 159 patients. Thirty-three patients did not receive medication because of significant main stem disease or normal coronary arteries or for other reasons. Angiography was repeated after 12 to 28 h. RESULTS: Quantitative angiography showed a significant decrease in diameter stenosis in the anistreplase-treated group compared with the placebo-treated group (decrease 11% vs. 3%, p = 0.008). No differences in clinical outcome were found when thrombolytic treatment was compared with placebo (p = 0.98). Neither the presence nor absence of thrombus formation (p = 0.98) nor the type of lesion (p = 0.96) was related to the changes in diameter stenosis or to clinical outcome (p = 0.90 and p = 0.77, respectively). The power of these analyses to detect a 20% difference varied between 56% and 74%. CONCLUSIONS: In this selected group of patients with unstable angina, type of coronary artery lesion and the presence or absence of thrombus formation does not predict clinical outcome.

Halving of mortality at 1 year by domiciliary thrombolysis in the Grampian Region Early Anistreplase Trial (GREAT).

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to determine the time saved by administration of thrombolytic therapy at home rather than in the hospital and to assess whether earlier thrombolysis resulted in decreased mortality from acute myocardial infarction. BACKGROUND: There is much theoretic, experimental and trial evidence to indicate that in acute myocardial infarction the earlier that thrombolytic therapy is given, the greater its efficacy. However, the clinical importance of this time effect is uncertain. METHODS: In a randomized double-blind parallel-group clinical trial, 311 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction seen by their general practitioners within 4 h of symptom onset were given intravenous anistreplase (30 U) either at home or later, after arrival in the hospital. RESULTS: Anistreplase was given at home or in the hospital at median times of 101 and 240 min, respectively, after symptom onset. The median time saved by domiciliary thrombolysis was 130 min. By the end of 1 year after trial entry, 17 (10.4%) of 163 patients given anistreplase at home died compared with 32 (21.6%) of 148 in those allotted anistreplase in the hospital (relative reduction 52%, 95% confidence interval 14% to 89%, p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: In this trial the time saved by domiciliary thrombolysis by primary care physicians was > 2 h. It is likely that a similar time saving would be achieved if prehospital thrombolysis were to become established practice. Prehospital thrombolysis resulted in a halving of the mortality rate from acute myocardial infarction.

Quantification of the benefit of earlier thrombolytic therapy: five-year results of the Grampian Region Early Anistreplase Trial (GREAT).

OBJECTIVES: This report presents the 5-year results of the Grampian Region Early Anistreplase Trial (GREAT) and quantifies the benefit of earlier thrombolysis in terms that are generally applicable. BACKGROUND: Although it is accepted that the earlier thrombolytic therapy is given for acute myocardial infarction the greater the benefit, there are widely differing estimates of the magnitude of the time-related benefit of thrombolysis because of inappropriate trial design and analysis. METHODS: In a previously reported randomized trial, anistreplase (30 U) was given intravenously either before hospital admission or in the hospital, at a median time of 105 and 240 min, respectively, after onset of symptoms. Intention to treat and multivariate analyses of the 5-year results were performed. RESULTS: By 5 years, 41 (25%) of 163 patients had died in the prehospital treatment group compared with 53 (36%) of 148 in the hospital treatment group (log-rank test, p < 0.025). Delaying thrombolytic treatment by 1 h increases the hazard ratio of death by 20%, equivalent to the loss of 43/1,000 lives within the next 5 years (95% confidence interval 7 to 88, p = 0.012). Delaying thrombolytic treatment by 30 min reduces the average expectation of life by approximately 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: The magnitude of the benefit from earlier thrombolysis is such that giving thrombolytic therapy to patients with acute myocardial infarction should be accorded the same degree of urgency as treatment of cardiac arrest. Policies should be developed for giving thrombolytic therapy on-site if practicable and by the first qualified person to see the patient.

A randomized trial of intravenous heparin in conjunction with anistreplase (anisoylated plasminogen streptokinase activator complex) in acute myocardial infarction: the Duke University Clinical Cardiology Study (DUCCS) 1.

OBJECTIVES: We designed a randomized trial to evaluate the effects of heparin administration in conjunction with anistreplase (anisoylated plasminogen streptokinase activator complex [APSAC]) on arterial patency and clinical end points. BACKGROUND: The role of conjunctive intravenous heparin therapy with APSAC has not been tested despite the recommendations that intravenous heparin should be used. METHODS: Four hours after APSAC administration, 250 patients with acute myocardial infarction were randomly assigned to receive 325 mg of either aspirin alone or aspirin and a continuous infusion of heparin (15 IU/kg body weight per h). Clinical ischemic events and bleeding complications were monitored. On hospital day 5, coronary arteriography and left ventriculography were performed. RESULTS: The primary end point of the trial (the combined outcome of death, reinfarction, recurrent ischemia and occlusion of the infarct-related artery) occurred in 42% of the heparin-treated group versus 43% of the group treated without heparin (p = 0.94). A patent infarct-related artery was present in 80% of the patients treated with heparin and in 73% of those treated without heparin (p = 0.26). Left ventricular function, as measured by ejection fraction, was well preserved in both groups (52% vs. 50.5%, respectively, p = 0.29). The overall bleeding rate was higher in patients with (32%) than without (17.2%) heparin (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Weight-adjusted intravenous heparin therapy after APSAC in acute myocardial infarction does not reduce the combined incidence of death, reinfarction, recurrent ischemia and occlusion of the infarct-related artery. Furthermore, withholding intravenous heparin therapy is associated with a 46% reduction in bleeding complications. Our findings do not support the addition of intravenous heparin after APSAC therapy, as currently recommended, and suggest that a strategy of withholding heparin is simpler and safer and does not place the patient at increased risk for ischemic complications after myocardial infarction.

Prehospital thrombolysis: beneficial effects of very early treatment on infarct size and left ventricular function.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of very early (< or = 1.5 h after symptom onset) and later (> 1.5 up to 4 h) thrombolytic therapy on infarct size, left ventricular function and early mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction. To start thrombolysis at the earliest possible moment, it was performed in the prehospital setting. A cutoff time of 1.5 h was prospectively stipulated. BACKGROUND: Shortening of ischemic time is crucial within the 1st 2 h. Prehospital thrombolysis can reduce time to treatment and enables very early initiation of therapy for many patients. METHODS: One hundred seventy patients received 30 mg of anistreplase up to 4 h from symptom onset by a mobile intensive care unit physician. Infarct size was measured from cumulative release of alpha-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase, and left ventricular function was assessed by contrast angiograms 10 days after the infarction. RESULTS: The decision to treat on scene was correct in 98% of patients. There were no bleeding complications or deaths outside the hospital setting. In 28 patients (17%) the ischemic process was interrupted. Findings with thrombolytic therapy initiated < or = 1.5 (96 patients) versus > 1.5 h (74 patients) were the following: initial extent of epicardial injury, 1.6 +/- 0.9 versus 1.4 +/- 0.7 mV, p = NS; infarct size by cardiac enzyme release 646 +/- 634 versus 886 +/- 712 IU/liter, p < 0.05; ejection fraction 57 +/- 14% versus 51 +/- 13%, p < 0.05; regional dyssynergic area 24 +/- 22 versus 33 +/- 24 U, p < 0.05; 21-day mortality 1 of 96 versus 5 of 74 patients (1% vs. 7%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that in evolving myocardial infarction up to 4 h in duration, the start of thrombolytic therapy at < or = 1.5 h compared with > 1.5 h limits infarct size, preserves left ventricular function and may save lives.

Improved thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction with front-loaded administration of alteplase: results of the rt-PA-APSAC patency study (TAPS)

Thrombolysis with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) and anisoylated plasminogen streptokinase activator (APSAC) in myocardial infarction has been proved to reduce mortality. A new front-loaded infusion regimen of 100 mg of rt-PA with an initial bolus dose of 15 mg followed by an infusion of 50 mg over 30 min and 35 mg over 60 min has been reported to yield higher patency rates than those achieved with standard regimens of thrombolytic treatment. The effects of this front-loaded administration of rt-PA versus those obtained with APSAC on early patency and reocclusion of infarct-related coronary arteries were investigated in a randomized multicenter trial in 421 patients with acute myocardial infarction. Coronary angiography 90 min after the start of treatment revealed a patent infarct-related artery (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] grade 2 or 3) in 84.4% of 199 patients given rt-PA versus 70.3% of 202 patients given APSAC (p = 0.0007). Early reocclusion within 24 to 48 h was documented in 10.3% of 174 patients given rt-PA versus 2.5% of 163 patients given APSAC. Late reocclusion within 21 days was observed in 2.6% of 152 patients given rt-PA versus 6.3% of 159 patients given APSAC. There were 5 in-hospital deaths (2.4%) in the rt-PA group and 17 deaths (8.1%) in the APSAC group (p = 0.0095). The reinfarction rate was 3.8% and 4.8%, respectively. Peak serum creatine kinase and left ventricular ejection fraction at follow-up angiography were essentially identical in both treatment groups. There were more bleeding complications after APSAC (45% vs. 31%, p = 0.0019).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Does thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) perfusion grade 2 represent a mostly patent artery or a mostly occluded artery? Enzymatic and electrocardiographic evidence from the TEAM-2 study. Second Multicenter Thrombolysis Trial of Eminase in Acute Myocardial Infarction.

One measure of the success of thrombolysis is the early patency status of the infarct-related coronary artery. The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) study group designated patency grades 0 (occluded) or 1 (minimal perfusion) as thrombolysis failure and grade 2 (partial perfusion) or 3 (complete perfusion) as success. To evaluate their true functional significance, perfusion grades were compared with enzymatic and electrocardiographic (ECG) indexes of myocardial infarction in 359 patients treated within 4 h with anistreplase (APSAC) or streptokinase. Serum enzymes and ECGs were assessed serially. Patency was determined at 90 to 240 min (median 2.1 h) and graded by an observer who had no knowledge of patient data. Results for the two drug arms were similar and combined. Distribution of patency was grade 0 = 20%, n = 72; grade 1 = 8% n = 27; grade 2 = 16%, n = 58 and grade 3 = 56%, n = 202. Interventions were performed after angiography but within 24 h in 51% (n = 37), 70% (n = 19), 41% (n = 24) and 14% (n = 28) of patients with grades 0, 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Outcomes were compared among the four patency groups by the orthogonal contrast method. Patients with perfusion grade 2 did not differ significantly from those with grade 0 or 1 in enzymatic peaks, time to peak activity and evolution of summed ST segments, Q waves and R waves (contrast 2). Conversely, comparisons of patients with grade 3 perfusion with those with grades 0 to 2 yielded significant differences for enzymatic peaks and time to peak activity for three of the four enzymes (p = 0.02 to 0.0001) and ECG indexes of myocardial infarction (p = 0.02 to 0.0001) (contrast 3). Thus, patients with grade 2 flow have indexes of myocardial infarction similar to those in patients with an occluded artery (grades 0 and 1 flow). Only early grade 3 flow results in a significantly better outcome than that of the other grades. Because early achievement of grade 2 flow does not appear to lead to optimal myocardial salvage, the frequency of achieving grade 3 perfusion alone may best measure the reperfusion success of thrombolytic therapy.

Anistreplase versus alteplase in acute myocardial infarction: comparative effects on left ventricular function, morbidity and 1-day coronary artery patency. The TEAM-3 Investigators.

OBJECTIVES: This double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial was designed to compare the effects of treatment with anistreplase (APSAC) and alteplase (rt-PA) on convalescent left ventricular function, morbidity and coronary artery patency at 1 day in patients with acute myocardial infarction. BACKGROUND: Anistreplase (APSAC) is a new, easily administered thrombolytic agent recently approved for treatment of acute myocardial infarction. Alteplase (rt-PA) is a rapidly acting, relatively fibrin-specific thrombolytic agent that is currently the most widely used agent in the United States. METHODS: Study entry requirements were age less than or equal to 75 years, symptom duration less than or equal to 4 h, ST segment elevation and no contraindications. The two study drugs, APSAC, 30 U/2 to 5 min, and rt-PA, 100 mg/3 h, were each given with aspirin (160 mg/day) and intravenous heparin. Prespecified end points were convalescent left ventricular function (rest/exercise), clinical morbidity and coronary artery patency at 1 day. A total of 325 patients were entered, stratified into groups with anterior (37%) or inferior or other (63%) acute myocardial infarction, randomized to receive APSAC or rt-PA and followed up for 1 month. RESULTS: At entry, patient characteristics in the two groups were balanced. Convalescent ejection fraction at the predischarge study averaged 51.3% in the APSAC group and 54.2% in the rt-PA group (p less than 0.05); at 1 month, ejection fraction averaged 50.2% versus 54.8%, respectively (p less than 0.01). In contrast, ejection fraction showed similar augmentation with exercise at 1 month after APSAC (+4.3% points) and rt-PA (+4.6% points), and exercise times were comparable. Coronary artery patency at 1 day was high and similar in both groups (APSAC 89%, rt-PA 86%). Mortality (APSAC 6.2%, rt-PA 7.9%) and the incidence of other serious clinical events, including stroke, ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, heart failure within 1 month, recurrent ischemia and reinfarction were comparable in the two groups; and mechanical interventions were applied with equal frequency. A combined clinical morbidity index was determined and showed a comparable overall outcome for the two treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Convalescent rest ejection fraction was high after both therapies but higher after rt-PA; other clinical outcomes, including exercise function, morbidity index, and 1-day coronary artery patency, were favorable and comparable after APSAC and rt-PA.

Prehospital thrombolysis with reteplase: the Nijmegen/Rotterdam study.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this observational study was to assess time from electrocardiogram diagnosis to treatment and time from pain onset to treatment with double bolus reteplase compared to current therapy with streptokinase or bolus anistreplase in 2 cities (Rotterdam and Nijmegen) in the Netherlands, where prehospital thrombolysis is an established way of treatment of acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: Prehospital thrombolysis is performed using electrocardiogram diagnosis by the ambulance service as well as bolus anistreplase for treatment in Nijmegen, and streptokinase infusion in Rotterdam. Reteplase or anistreplase/streptokinase was assigned open label to patients according to order of presentation on a 1-to-1 basis. All patients were treated with nitrates sublingually and aspirin orally. Time intervals were recorded by the ambulance staff. RESULTS: In total, 250 patients were treated between April 1, 1999 and August 1, 2000. Reteplase was used in 120 patients and anistreplase/streptokinase in 130 patients. Using double bolus reteplase resulted in a significantly shorter time to treatment: a median of 81 minutes compared to a median of 104 minutes with the established therapy (P <.0001). There were no differences in mortality, aborted myocardial infarction, hemorrhagic stroke or the need for rescue angioplasty between the groups. CONCLUSION: In prehospital thrombolysis, double bolus reteplase is associated with a shorter time to treatment than bolus anistreplase or infusion of streptokinase.

Current perspectives on reperfusion therapy for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: integrating pharmacologic and mechanical reperfusion strategies.

The therapeutic approach to patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has advanced rapidly over the past decade. Intravenous fibrinolytic therapy remains the most common form of reperfusion therapy worldwide, since fibrinolytics are associated with a dramatic reduction in mortality rates. However, primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with improved outcomes and less bleeding complications compared with fibrinolytic therapy, but it is not widely available. Adjunctive therapies with intracoronary stents, glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and more potent antithrombin agents have shown great promise for the initial treatment of STEMI and have stimulated further investigation of combined pharmacological/mechanical reperfusion strategies that may be synergistic. Although the optimal combination of fibrinolytics, antiplatelet agents, antithrombins, and mechanical reperfusion at hospitals with and without primary PCI facilities remains elusive, results from recent studies suggest that such a combined approach may facilitate transfer of patients with STEMI from a referral hospital to an invasive hospital for definitive primary PCI after administration of a potent pharmacologic regimen designed to enhance early infarct-related artery reperfusion. Thus, as the reperfusion era continues to evolve, the ideal treatment strategy for patients with STEMI is being redefined to integrate pharmacologic and mechanical approaches to reperfusion.

Thrombolytic, antiplatelet, and antithrombotic agents.

The relative efficacy and safety of individual thrombolytic agents, administered alone and with antiplatelet and antithrombotic drugs, in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction are presented. The clinical benefits and risks of treatment choices are discussed in relation to the mechanisms of the formation and prevention of thrombus and thrombolysis. It is concluded that streptokinase, tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA), and anisoylated plasminogen-streptokinase activator complex (APSAC) significantly reduce mortality and improve left ventricular function equally, despite differences in the rate at which they achieve vascular patency, their durations of action, and the extent to which their use is associated with adverse events. The questions of how best to minimize reocclusion/reinfarction, bleeding, and stroke are discussed, with particular focus on the beneficial use of aspirin and the unresolved issue of how best to use heparin.

Comparison of mortality from acute myocardial infarction in patients receiving anistreplase with those not receiving thrombolysis.

Within 1 year, 434 patients were admitted to 14 hospitals with suspected acute myocardial infarction (AMI) < or = 4 hours after the onset of symptoms. Group A consisted of 171 patients (39%) treated with thrombolysis, and group B consisted of 263 patients (61%) with contraindications. Patients in group A more likely had a "definite AMI" (92%; group A1) than patients in group B (67%; group B1). Group B1 had 277 contraindications (1.6/per patient) with increased risk for life-threatening bleeding being the most frequently recorded at admission. The in-hospital mortality in group A1 was 7% (11 of 158) and in group B1, 27% (47 of 177) (p < 0.0001). Age and type of therapy (thrombolysis or no thrombolysis) were identified as independent predictors of increased mortality (p < 0.0001 and < 0.05, respectively). Thus, although most patients with an AMI are excluded from thrombolytic therapy because of contraindications, our data suggest that their in-hospital mortality is unexpectedly high. Further evaluation of this group of patients is warranted to define the impact of contraindications as an independent factor of mortality.