Long-Term Implications of Post-ACA Health Reform on State Health Care Policy.

In the midst of the COVID-19 outbreak, health care reform has again taken a major role in the 2020 election, with Democrats weighing Medicare for All against extensions of the Affordable Care Act, while Republicans quietly seem to favor proposals that would eliminate much of the ACA and cut Medicaid. Although states play a major role in health care funding and administration, public and scholarly debates over these proposals have generally not addressed the potential disruption that reform proposals might create for the current state role in health care. We examine how potential reforms influence state-federal relations, and how outside factors like partisanship and exogenous shocks like the COVID-19 pandemic interact with underlying preferences of each level of government. All else equal, reforms that expand the ACA within its current framework would provide the least disruption for current arrangements and allow for smoother transitions for providers and patients, rather than the more radical restructuring proposed by Medicare for All or the cuts embodied in Republican plans.

Challenges for immigrant health in the USA-the road to crisis.

The USA is home to more immigrants than any other country-about 46 million, just less than a fifth of the world's immigrants. Immigrant health and access to health care in the USA varies widely by ethnicity, citizenship, and legal status. In recent decades, several policy and regulatory changes have worsened health-care quality and access for immigrant populations. These changes include restrictions on access to public health insurance programmes, rhetoric discouraging the use of social services, aggressive immigration enforcement activities, intimidation within health-care settings, decreased caps on the number of admitted refugees, and rescission of protections from deportation. A receding of ethical norms has created an environment favourable for moral and public health crises, as evident in the separation of children from their parents at the southern US border. Given the polarising immigration rhetoric at the national level, individual states rather than the country as a whole might be better positioned to address the barriers to improved health and health care for immigrants in the USA.

Brazil's unified health system: the first 30 years and prospects for the future.

In 1988, the Brazilian Constitution defined health as a universal right and a state responsibility. Progress towards universal health coverage in Brazil has been achieved through a unified health system (Sistema Único de Saúde [SUS]), created in 1990. With successes and setbacks in the implementation of health programmes and the organisation of its health system, Brazil has achieved nearly universal access to health-care services for the population. The trajectory of the development and expansion of the SUS offers valuable lessons on how to scale universal health coverage in a highly unequal country with relatively low resources allocated to health-care services by the government compared with that in middle-income and high-income countries. Analysis of the past 30 years since the inception of the SUS shows that innovations extend beyond the development of new models of care and highlights the importance of establishing political, legal, organisational, and management-related structures, with clearly defined roles for both the federal and local governments in the governance, planning, financing, and provision of health-care services. The expansion of the SUS has allowed Brazil to rapidly address the changing health needs of the population, with dramatic upscaling of health service coverage in just three decades. However, despite its successes, analysis of future scenarios suggests the urgent need to address lingering geographical inequalities, insufficient funding, and suboptimal private sector-public sector collaboration. Fiscal policies implemented in 2016 ushered in austerity measures that, alongside the new environmental, educational, and health policies of the Brazilian government, could reverse the hard-earned achievements of the SUS and threaten its sustainability and ability to fulfil its constitutional mandate of providing health care for all.

Legislating for public accountability in universal health coverage, Thailand.

Sustaining universal health coverage requires robust active public participation in policy formation and governance. Thailand's universal coverage scheme was implemented nationwide in 2002, allowing Thailand to achieve full population coverage through three public health insurance schemes and to demonstrate improved health outcomes. Although Thailand's position on the World Bank worldwide governance indicators has deteriorated since 1996, provisions for voice and accountability were embedded in the legislation and design of the universal coverage scheme. We discuss how legislation related to citizens' rights and government accountability has been implemented. Thailand's constitution allowed citizens to submit a draft bill in which provisions on voice and accountability were successfully embedded in the legislative texts and adopted into law. The legislation mandates registration of beneficiaries, a 24/7 helpline, annual public hearings and no-fault financial assistance for patients who have experienced adverse events. Ensuring the right to health services, and that citizens' voices are heard and action taken, requires the institutional capacity to implement legislation. For example, Thailand needed the capacity to register 47 million people and match them with the health-care provider network in the district where they live, and to re-register members who move out of their districts. Annual public hearings need to be inclusive of citizens, health-care providers, civil society organizations and stakeholders such as local governments and patient groups. Subsequent policy and management responses are important for building trust in the process and citizens' ownership of the scheme. Annual public reporting of outcomes and performance of the scheme fosters transparency and increases citizens' trust.

Maintenir la couverture sanitaire universelle exige une forte participation publique à l'élaboration des politiques et à la gouvernance. En Thaïlande, le régime de couverture universelle a été mis en œuvre dans tout le pays en 2002, permettant de couvrir l'ensemble de la population grâce à trois régimes publics d'assurance maladie et d'améliorer les résultats de santé. Bien que la position de la Thaïlande concernant les Indicateurs de gouvernance mondiaux de la Banque mondiale se soit détériorée depuis 1996, des dispositions en matière d'expression et de reddition de comptes ont été intégrées à la législation et à la structure du régime de couverture universelle. Nous discutons ici de la mise en œuvre de la législation relative aux droits des citoyens et à la reddition de comptes du gouvernement. En vertu de la constitution de la Thaïlande, les citoyens ont pu soumettre un projet de loi dont les dispositions en matière d'expression et de reddition de comptes ont été intégrées aux textes législatifs et transposées dans la loi. La législation rend obligatoire l'enregistrement des bénéficiaires, une assistance téléphonique 24h/24 et 7 j/7, des auditions publiques annuelles et une aide financière systématique pour les patients qui ont été victimes d'événements indésirables. Pour garantir le droit à des services de santé, permettre aux citoyens de faire entendre leur voix et s'assurer que des mesures soient prises, les institutions doivent être en mesure d'appliquer la législation. Par exemple, la Thaïlande devait pouvoir enregistrer 47 millions de personnes et les rattacher au réseau de prestataires de soins du district où elles vivaient, et réenregistrer les personnes qui changeaient de district. Les auditions publiques annuelles doivent faire participer les citoyens, les prestataires de soins, les organisations de la société civile et les parties prenantes telles que les collectivités locales et les groupes de patients. Les réponses qui en découlent au point de vue des politiques et de la gestion sont importantes pour instaurer la confiance dans le processus et permettre aux citoyens de se l'approprier. Les rapports annuels publics sur les résultats du régime de couverture permettent d'accroître la transparence et de renforcer la confiance des citoyens.

Para mantener la cobertura sanitaria universal se requiere una sólida participación activa del público en la formulación de políticas y la gobernanza. El plan de cobertura universal de Tailandia se implementó en todo el país en 2002, lo que permitió a Tailandia lograr una cobertura completa de la población a través de tres planes de seguro médico público y demostrar mejores resultados en materia de salud. Aunque la posición de Tailandia respecto de los Indicadores mundiales de gobernanza del Banco Mundial ha disminuido desde 1996, las disposiciones relativas a la voz y la rendición de cuentas estaban incorporadas en la legislación y en el diseño del plan de cobertura universal. Se discute cómo se ha implementado la legislación relacionada con los derechos de los ciudadanos y la rendición de cuentas del gobierno. La Constitución de Tailandia permitía a los ciudadanos presentar un proyecto de ley en el que las disposiciones sobre la voz y la rendición de cuentas se incorporaban con éxito en los textos legislativos y se aprobaban como ley. La legislación exige el registro de los beneficiarios, una línea telefónica de ayuda 24 horas al día los 7 días de la semana, audiencias públicas anuales y asistencia financiera gratuita para los pacientes que han sufrido eventos adversos. Para garantizar el derecho a los servicios de salud y que se escuche la voz de los ciudadanos y se adopten medidas, es necesario contar con la capacidad institucional para aplicar la legislación. Por ejemplo, Tailandia necesitaba la capacidad de inscribir a 47 millones de personas y ponerlas en contacto con la red de proveedores de servicios de salud del distrito en el que viven, y de volver a inscribir a los miembros que se trasladan fuera de sus distritos. Las audiencias públicas anuales deben incluir a los ciudadanos, los proveedores de servicios de salud, las organizaciones de la sociedad civil y las partes interesadas, como los gobiernos locales y los grupos de pacientes. Las respuestas políticas y de gestión subsiguientes son importantes para generar confianza en el proceso y en la apropiación del plan por parte de los ciudadanos. El informe público anual sobre los resultados y el rendimiento del plan fomenta la transparencia y aumenta la confianza de los ciudadanos.

The many roads to universal health care in the USA.

Health-care systems in different countries have evolved along different paths, with some countries offering private insurance, some universal health care, and some a mixture between the two. In most high-income countries, health care is considered a human right and is provided universally, typically free at the point-of-care. The USA has developed a fractured for-profit system that is substantially more expensive than those of its European counterparts and delivers poorer outcomes than the health-care systems in other high-income countries, while leaving a substantial proportion of Americans without health coverage. This Personal View discusses the current health-care system in the USA and offers a roadmap towards the achievement of universal health care for the USA. Three key components of the roadmap are: support and improve the Affordable Care Act; maintain the existing private insurance system; offer in parallel a government-sponsored health-care insurance, or gradually expand Medicare to more people, and ultimately to all Americans not covered under existing health-care insurances.

Regulating the for-profit private healthcare providers towards universal health coverage: A qualitative study of legal and organizational framework in Mongolia.

BACKGROUND: Regulating the behavior of private providers in the context of mixed health systems has become increasingly important and challenging in many developing countries moving towards universal health coverage including Mongolia. This study examines the current regulatory architecture for private healthcare in Mongolia exploring its role for improving accessibility, affordability, and quality of private care and identifies gaps in policy design and implementation. METHODS: Qualitative research methods were used including documentary review, analysis, and in-depth interviews with 45 representatives of key actors involved in and affected by regulations in Mongolia's mixed health system, along with long-term participant observation. RESULTS: There has been extensive legal documentation developed regulating private healthcare, with specific organizations assigned to conduct health regulations and inspections. However, the regulatory architecture for healthcare in Mongolia is not optimally designed to improve affordability and quality of private care. This is not limited only to private care: important regulatory functions targeted to quality of care do not exist at the national level. The imprecise content and details of regulations in laws inviting increased political interference, governance issues, unclear roles, and responsibilities of different government regulatory bodies have contributed to failures in implementation of existing regulations.

Tunisian documentation of «Public Health¼ in post revolution, with a taste of freedom. For a fair, participatory and efficient National Health System.

CONTEXT: Following the Tunisian revolution of 2010/2011, a new Public Health literature emerged, by the ministerial departments as well as the civil society, which was marked by the transparency and the comprehensiveness of the approach. OBJECTIVE: To identify the key ideas of the new Tunisian Public Health discourse, reconciling the principles of a globalizing paradigm with the health problems of a country in transition. METHODS: During this qualitative research, a selected series of three Tunisian reports of Public Health, published in the first quinquennium of the revolution, was read by an independent team of experts in Public Health, not having contributed to their elaboration, to identify the consensual foundations of the new Public Health discourse. These documents were: the "2011 Health Map" of the Department of Studies and Planning of the Ministry of Health, the "Societal Dialogue Report on Health Policies, Strategies and Plans" (2014), and the "Report on the right to health in Tunisia" (2016). RESULTS: The reading of this sample of the Tunisian Public Health literature of the post-revolution brought out three consensual ideas: 1. The constitutional principle of the "right to health" (article 38 of the constitution) with its corollary the State's obligation to ensure access to comprehensive, quality and secure care; 2. The challenge of social "inequalities" of access to care, reinforced by a regional disparity in the distribution of resources, particularly high-tech (specialist doctors, university structures); 3. Advocacy for a National Health System, based on a universal health coverage for its funding and citizen participation in its governance. CONCLUSION: The new Tunisian Public Health literature, in post-revolution, calls on all stakeholders in Preventive and Community Medicine to replace their segmental, technical and hospital practices with a new approach, centered on the implementation of a National Health System that is based on a socialized financing of care and citizen participation in its management.

Assessing the feasibility of introducing health insurance in Afghanistan: a qualitative stakeholder analysis.

BACKGROUND: In the last decade, the health status of Afghans has improved drastically. However, the health financing system in Afghanistan remains fragile due to high out-of-pocket spending and reliance on donor funding. To address the country's health financing challenges, the Ministry of Public Health investigated health insurance as a mechanism to mobilize resources for health. This paper presents stakeholders' opinions on seven preconditions of implementing this approach, as their understanding and buy-in to such an approach will determine its success. METHODS: Key informant interviews and focus group discussions were conducted with stakeholders. The interviews focused on perceptions of the seven preconditions of introducing health insurance, and adapting a framework developed by the International Labor Organization. Content analysis was conducted after interviews and discussions were transcribed and coded. RESULTS: Almost all of the stakeholders from government agencies, the private sector, and development partners are interested in introducing health insurance in Afghanistan, and they were aware of the challenges of the country's health financing system. Stakeholders acknowledged that health insurance could be an instrument to address these challenges. However, stakeholders differed in their beliefs about how and when to initiate a health insurance scheme. In addition to increasing insecurity in the country, they saw a lack of clear legal guidance, low quality of healthcare services, poor awareness among the population, limited technical capacity, and challenges to willingness to pay as the major barriers to establishing a successful nationwide health insurance scheme. CONCLUSIONS: The identified barriers prevent Afghanistan from establishing health insurance in the short term. Afghanistan must progressively address these major impediments in order to build a health insurance system.

HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN TURKEY.

OBJECTIVES: The healthcare transformation program in Turkey has shown its success with improvements in important health indicators, increased access to healthcare services and expansion of coverage to all citizens. Turkey has been relatively able to bear the burdens associated with this due to rapid economic growth. The need for health technology assessment (HTA) was believed as a result of the expansion of coverage, pressure of new technologies, and increased expenditures. This study outlines the background and current formalization of HTA and shares the current use of HTA in decision making, while summarizing the transformation of the Turkish healthcare system for developing a high-quality, equal, and accessible care system. METHODS: We reviewed and analyzed policy changes in the Turkish healthcare system, universal health coverage, healthcare expenditures, and pricing and reimbursement policies to identify the changes leading to HTA. We reviewed existing HTA functions in Turkey and outlined their activities. Finally, we outlined a set of major challenges for HTA in Turkey over the next decade. RESULTS: HTA was formalized in Turkey in 2012-2013 with three national HTA structures and one hospital-based HTA unit. These functions currently run independent from each other. There are three major challenges in this country for HTA in the next decade: clarification of the assessment scope and methods, building a strong supporting system for HTA, and defining the role of HTA in the future vision of Turkish healthcare policy. CONCLUSION: HTA, despite challenges, has a good opportunity to develop further with clear action plans and strong political will.

Addressing Ten Unhelpful Myths about the Canada Health Act and Why It Matters.

Since its enactment in 1984, the iconic Canada Health Act (CHA) has been at the centre of a polarized debate on whether universal coverage should be expanded or restricted in Canada. This discussion on the future direction of Canadian medicare has been vexed by prevailing myths about the CHA. These myths are unhelpful in that they perpetuate misleading notions about the ambit and impact of the CHA. This article deconstructs 10 of the more common myths to get at the realities of the CHA and the extent to which it sets national standards and constrains - or does not constrain - provincial health reform and innovation. Understanding the realities of the CHA is becoming a critical litmus test for the courts as they interpret the CHA and the provincial laws and regulations, which were established in conformity with five criteria - public administration, comprehensiveness, universality, portability, and accessibility). Separating myths from realities also allows practitioners and scholars to better understand the limits of the CHA.

The Canada Health Act for the Twenty-First Century?.

As the participants in the Canada Health Act, Version 2.0 conference made clear, there is a strong case to be made that this key piece of legislation no longer captures some key challenges to managing health care in Canada. Particular issues include 'portability' across provincial/territorial boundaries, and the definition of insured services. However, the CHA is not a barrier to reform; it acts as a floor, rather than a ceiling. Health reform may thus require a combination of new legislation to set conditions for which new services should be insured, and developing mechanisms to identify priorities, ensure appropriateness, and improve efficiency, which are unlikely to be addressed through overarching legislation. The CHA should thus be maintained, recognizing that it is necessary, but not sufficient.

[Chilean health reform ten years since its implementation]. / La reforma de salud chilena a diez años de su implementación.

OBJECTIVE:: To analyze the process of design and implementation of AUGE. MATERIALS AND METHODS:: Literature review of pre-reform background, architecture design and implementation process of reform AUGE and complementary interviews to eight informants involved in its development. RESULTS:: The assessment of health equity was a key element in pre-reform, there are four fundamental dimensions in the design, and the implementation has nine phases. CONCLUSION:: The results show AUGE strengthening public health by investing in equipment for cost-effective treatments, and also through clinical guidelines that standardize and guide the management of health professionals with patients.