Win Ratio Analyses of Piperacillin-Tazobactam Versus Meropenem for Ceftriaxone-Nonsusceptible Escherichia coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae Bloodstream Infections: Post Hoc Insights From the MERINO Trial.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials of treatments for serious infections commonly use the primary endpoint of all-cause mortality. However, many trial participants survive their infection and this endpoint may not truly reflect important benefits and risks of therapy. The win ratio uses a hierarchical composite endpoint that can incorporate and prioritize outcome measures by relative clinical importance. METHODS: The win ratio methodology was applied post hoc to outcomes observed in the MERINO trial, which compared piperacillin-tazobactam with meropenem. We quantified the win ratio with a primary hierarchical composite endpoint, including all-cause mortality, microbiological relapse, and secondary infection. A win ratio of 1 would correspond to no difference between the 2 antibiotics, while a ratio <1 favors meropenem. Further analyses were performed to calculate the win odds and to introduce a continuous outcome variable in order to reduce ties. RESULTS: With the hierarchy of all-cause mortality, microbiological relapse, and secondary infection, the win ratio estimate was 0.40 (95% confidence interval [CI], .22-.71]; P = .002), favoring meropenem over piperacillin-tazobactam. However, 73.4% of the pairs were tied due to the small proportion of events. The win odds, a modification of the win ratio accounting for ties, was 0.79 (95% CI, .68-.92). The addition of length of stay to the primary composite greatly minimized the number of ties (4.6%) with a win ratio estimate of 0.77 (95% CI, .60-.99; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: The application of the win ratio methodology to the MERINO trial data illustrates its utility and feasibility for use in antimicrobial trials.

Removal of common antimicrobial agents by sustained low-efficiency dialysis.

Adequate dosing of antimicrobials is paramount for treating infections in critically ill patients undergoing kidney replacement therapy; however, little is known about antimicrobial removal by sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED). The objective was to quantify the removal of cefepime, daptomycin, meropenem, piperacillin-tazobactam, and vancomycin in patients undergoing SLED. Adult patients ≥18 years with acute kidney injury (AKI) or end-stage kidney disease receiving one of the select antimicrobials and requiring SLED were included. Blood and dialysate flow rates were maintained at 250 and 100 mL/min, respectively. Simultaneous arterial and venous blood samples for the analysis of antibiotic concentrations were collected hourly for 8 hours during SLED (on-SLED). Arterial samples were collected every 2 hours for up to 6 hours while not receiving SLED (off-SLED) for the calculation of SLED clearance, half-life (t1/2) on-SLED and off-SLED, and the fraction of removal by SLED (fD). Twenty-one patients completed the study: 52% male, mean age (±SD) 53 ± 13 years, and mean weight of 98 ± 30 kg. Eighty-six percent had AKI, and 4 patients were receiving cefepime, 3 daptomycin, 10 meropenem, 6 piperacillin-tazobactam, and 13 vancomycin. The average SLED time was 7.3 ± 1.1 hours, and the mean ultrafiltration rate was 95 ± 52 mL/hour (range 10-211). The t1/2 on-SLED was substantially lower than the off-SLED t1/2 for all antimicrobials, and the SLED fD varied between 44% and 77%. An 8-hour SLED session led to significant elimination of most antimicrobials evaluated. If SLED is performed, modification of the dosing regimen is warranted to avoid subtherapeutic concentrations.

Nationwide genome surveillance of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Japan.

Japan is a country with an approximate 10% prevalence rate of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA). Currently, a comprehensive overview of the genotype and phenotype patterns of CRPA in Japan is lacking. Herein, we conducted genome sequencing and quantitative antimicrobial susceptibility testing for 382 meropenem-resistant CRPA isolates that were collected from 78 hospitals across Japan from 2019 to 2020. CRPA exhibited susceptibility rates of 52.9%, 26.4%, and 88.0% against piperacillin-tazobactam, ciprofloxacin, and amikacin, respectively, whereas 27.7% of CRPA isolates was classified as difficult-to-treat resistance P. aeruginosa. Of the 148 sequence types detected, ST274 (9.7%) was predominant, followed by ST235 (7.6%). The proportion of urine isolates in ST235 was higher than that in other STs (P = 0.0056, χ2 test). Only 4.1% of CRPA isolates carried the carbapenemase genes: blaGES (2) and blaIMP (13). One ST235 isolate carried the novel blaIMP variant blaIMP-98 in the chromosome. Regarding chromosomal mutations, 87.1% of CRPA isolates possessed inactivating or other resistance mutations in oprD, and 28.8% showed mutations in the regulatory genes (mexR, nalC, and nalD) for the MexAB-OprM efflux pump. Additionally, 4.7% of CRPA isolates carried a resistance mutation in the PBP3-encoding gene ftsI. The findings from this study and other surveillance studies collectively demonstrate that CRPA exhibits marked genetic diversity and that its multidrug resistance in Japan is less prevailed than in other regions. This study contributes a valuable data set that addresses a gap in genotype/phenotype information regarding CRPA in the Asia-Pacific region, where the epidemiological background markedly differs between regions.

Effect modification of dosing strategy (AUC or trough) on AKI associated with vancomycin in combination with piperacillin/tazobactam or cefepime and meropenem.

Piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP), cefepime (FEP), or meropenem (MEM) and vancomycin (VAN) are commonly used in combination for sepsis. Studies have shown an increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) with TZP and VAN compared to FEP or MEM. VAN guidelines recommend area under the curve (AUC) monitoring over trough (Tr) to minimize the risk of AKI. We investigated the association of AKI and MAKE-30 with the two VAN monitoring strategies when used in combination with TZP or FEP/MEM. Adult patients between 2015 and 2019 with VAN > 72 hours were included. Patients with AKI prior to or within 48 hours of VAN or baseline CrCl of ≤30 mL/min were excluded. Four cohorts were defined: FEP/MEM/Tr, FEP/MEM/AUC, TZP/Tr, and TZP/AUC. A Cox Proportional Hazard Model was used to model AKI as a function of the incidence rate of at-risk days, testing monitoring strategy as a treatment effect modification. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model MAKE-30. Overall incidence of AKI was 18.6%; FEP/MEM/Tr = 115 (14.6%), FEP/MEM/AUC = 52 (14.9%), TZP/Tr = 189 (26%), and TZP/AUC = 96 (17.1%) (P < 0.001). Both drug group [(TZP; P = 0.0085)] and monitoring strategy [(Tr; P = 0.0007)] were highly associated with the development of AKI; however, the effect was not modified with interaction term [(TZP*Tr); 0.085)]. The odds of developing MAKE-30 were not different between any group and FEP/MEM/AUC. The effect of VAN/TZP on the development of AKI was not modified by the VAN monitoring strategy (AUC vs trough). MAKE-30 outcomes were not different among the four cohorts.

Clinical manifestations and treatment outcomes for patients with Pseudomonas endocarditis.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate clinical outcomes of patients with Pseudomonas endocarditis and identify factors associated with treatment failure. METHODS: Adult patients meeting definitive Duke's criteria for Pseudomonas endocarditis at 11 hospitals were identified between May 2000 and February 2024. Failure was defined as death or microbiological failure by day 42. First-line therapy consisted of cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime or ceftolozane/tazobactam alone or in combination. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients met inclusion criteria; 29% were persons who inject drugs and 13% were organ transplant recipients. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the causative species in 98% of cases. Patients who experienced 42 day cure were more likely to be initially managed with first-line ß-lactam agents compared with those who experienced clinical failure (97% versus 62%, P = 0.004). Treatment with first-line ß-lactams was associated with shorter time to treatment initiation and a lower likelihood of infection due to MDR Pseudomonas spp. In the univariate model, patients who experienced 90 day mortality were more likely to have prosthetic valve endocarditis (57% versus 24%, P = 0.02), an intracardiac complication (36% versus 9%, P = 0.04) and a higher median (IQR) Pitt bacteraemia score [2.5 (2-3.8) versus 1 (0-2), P = 0.048]. Combination therapy did not improve clinical outcomes but did increase the rate of adverse effects resulting in drug discontinuation compared with monotherapy, (21% versus 0%, P = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest study of Pseudomonas endocarditis to date. We identified improved clinical outcomes when cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime or ceftolozane/tazobactam were used for initial treatment. We did not identify a clinical benefit for combination treatment.

Clinical outcomes in patients with piperacillin/tazobactam-non-susceptible but ceftriaxone-susceptible E. coli or K. pneumoniae bloodstream infection.

BACKGROUND: A small proportion of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae demonstrate in vitro non-susceptibility to piperacillin/tazobactam but retain susceptibility to ceftriaxone. Uncertainty remains regarding how best to treat these isolates. OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare clinical outcomes between patients with piperacillin/tazobactam-non-susceptible but ceftriaxone-susceptible E. coli or K. pneumoniae bloodstream infection receiving definitive therapy with ceftriaxone versus an alternative effective antibiotic. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients with a positive blood culture for piperacillin/tazobactam-non-susceptible but ceftriaxone-susceptible E. coli or K. pneumoniae between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2022. Patients were divided into one of two definitive treatment groups: ceftriaxone or alternative effective antibiotic. Our primary outcome was a composite of 90 day all-cause mortality, hospital readmission, or recurrence of infection. We used Cox proportional hazards models to compare time with the composite outcome between groups. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were included in our analysis. Overall, median age was 63 years (IQR 49.5-71.0), the most common source of infection was intra-abdominal (25/62; 40.3%) and the median total duration of therapy was 12.0 days (IQR 9.0-16.8). A total of 9/22 (40.9%) patients in the ceftriaxone treatment group and 18/40 (45.0%) patients in the alternative effective antibiotic group met the composite endpoint. In an adjusted time-to-event analysis, there was no difference in the composite endpoint between groups (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.30-1.50). The adjusted Bayesian posterior probability that the HR was less than or equal to 1 (i.e. ceftriaxone is as good or better than alternative therapy) was 85%. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that ceftriaxone can be used to effectively treat bloodstream infections with E. coli or K. pneumoniae that are non-susceptible to piperacillin/tazobactam but susceptible to ceftriaxone.

Chloramphenicol treatment revisited - demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of hospitalized patients.

Limited literature exists on chloramphenicol's clinical use. In this retrospective, single-center case-series, we examined 183 chloramphenicol-treated and 81 piperacillin-tazobactam-treated medical patients. Chloramphenicol recipients were older, more debilitated, cognitively impaired, and penicillin allergic, while increased need for inotropics, higher leukocyte count, and higher creatinine levels were notable in the piperacillin-tazobactam group. Pneumonia was the most common indication, with no mortality difference between groups. While acknowledging its antimicrobial activity and potential benefit in specific conditions such as pneumonia, further clinical studies are needed to assess the role of chloramphenicol in the setting where other alternatives are available.

Comparing cefazolin/ metronidazole, piperacillin-tazobactam, or c efoxitin as surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative antibiotic options for pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) include cefoxitin (CX), piperacillin-tazobactam (PT), or combined cefazolin and metronidazole (CM). Recent studies suggest the superiority of PT over CX, but evidence for CM is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To explore the impact of preoperative antibiotic selection (CM vs. PT and CX vs. PT) on the development of surgical site infections (SSI). METHODS: Consecutive adult patients at one institution who underwent PD from November 2017 to December 2021 and received either CM, PT, or CX preoperatively, were included. The primary outcome was SSI. Secondary outcomes included postoperative infections and clinically significant postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). Logistic regression models were used. RESULTS: Among 127 patients included in the study, PT, CM, and CX were administered in 46 (36.2%), 44 (34.6%), and 37 (29.4%) patients, respectively. There were 32 (27.1%) SSI, 20 (36.1%) infections, and 21 (22.9%) POPF events. PT use was associated with reduced risk of SSI compared to CX (OR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.11-0.89, p = 0.03), but there was no difference as compared to CM (OR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.27-2.13, p = 0.59). There were no differences in secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: PT reduced SSI rates compared to CX but was no different to CM among patients undergoing PD at our center.

Antibiotic definitive treatment in ventilator associated pneumonia caused by AmpC-producing Enterobacterales in critically ill patients: a prospective multicenter observational study.

BACKGROUND: Ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) due to wild-type AmpC-producing Enterobacterales (wtAE) is frequent in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Despite a low level of evidence, definitive antimicrobial therapy (AMT) with third generation cephalosporins (3GCs) or piperacillin is discouraged. METHODS: Observational prospective study including consecutive wtAE VAP patients in 20 French ICUs. The primary objective was to assess the association of the choice of definitive AMT, i.e. piperacillin ± tazobactam (PTZ), 3GCs or other molecule (4GCs, carbapenems, quinolones, cotrimoxazole; control group), with treatment success at day-7. Recurrence of infection was collected as a secondary outcome, and analyzed accounting for the competing risk of death. RESULTS: From February 2021 to June 2022, 274 patients were included. Enterobacter cloacae was the most prevalent specie (31%). Seventy-eight patients (28%) had PTZ as definitive AMT while 44 (16%) had 3GCs and 152 (56%) were classified in the control group. Day-7 success rate was similar between the 3 groups (74% vs. 73% vs. 68% respectively, p = 0.814). Recurrence probability at day-28 was 31% (95% CI 21-42), 40% (95% CI 26-55) and 21% (95% CI 15-28) for PTZ, 3GCs and control groups (p = 0.020). In multivariable analysis, choice of definitive AMT was not associated with clinical success, but definitive AMT with 3GCs was associated with recurrence at day-28 [csHR(95%CI) 10.9 (1.92-61.91)]. CONCLUSION: Choice of definitive antimicrobial therapy was not associated with treatment success at day 7. However, recurrence of pneumonia at day-28 was higher in patients treated with third generation cephalosporins with no differences in mortality or mechanical ventilation duration.

Clinical recommendations for the inpatient management of lower respiratory tract infections in children and adolescents with severe neurological impairment in Germany.

Children and adolescents with severe neurological impairment (SNI) require specialized care due to their complex medical needs. In particular, these patients are often affected by severe and recurrent lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs). These infections, including viral and bacterial etiology, pose a significant risk to these patients, often resulting in respiratory insufficiency and long-term impairments. Using expert consensus, we developed clinical recommendations on the management of LRTIs in children and adolescents with SNI. These recommendations emphasize comprehensive multidisciplinary care and antibiotic stewardship. Initial treatment should involve symptomatic care, including hydration, antipyretics, oxygen therapy, and respiratory support. In bacterial LRTIs, antibiotic therapy is initiated based on the severity of the infection, with aminopenicillin plus a beta-lactamase inhibitor recommended for community-acquired LRTIs and piperacillin-tazobactam for patients with chronic lung disease or tracheostomy. Ongoing management includes regular evaluations, adjustments to antibiotic therapy based on pathogen identification, and optimization of supportive care. Implementation of these recommendations aims to improve the diagnosis and treatment of LRTIs in children and adolescents with SNI. What is Known: • Children and adolescents with severe neurological impairment are particularly affected by severe and recurrent lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs). • The indication and choice of antibiotic therapy for bacterial LRTI is often difficult because there are no evidence-based treatment recommendations for this heterogeneous but vulnerable patient population; the frequent overuse of broad-spectrum or reserve antibiotics in this patient population increases selection pressure for multidrug-resistant pathogens. What is New: • The proposed recommendations provide a crucial framework for focused diagnostics and treatment of LRTIs in children and adolescents with severe neurological impairment. • Along with recommendations for comprehensive and multidisciplinary therapy and antibiotic stewardship, ethical and palliative care aspects are taken into account.

Potential benefits of therapeutic drug monitoring for beta-lactam antibiotics in augmented renal clearance patients: a case report.

Augmented renal clearance (ARC) is commonly described in critically ill patients, making drug pharmacokinetics even harder to predict in this population. This case report displays the value of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of piperacillin/tazobactam (PTZ) in this population. We identified two patients with ARC and intermittent administration of PTZ who took part in a prospective, descriptive study conducted at Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal. Both had plasma samples drawn at peak, middle, and end of their dosing intervals of PTZ. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 4 and 8 mg/L were chosen to evaluate therapeutic target attainment at middle and end of dosing interval. The first patient was a 52-year-old male with a renal clearance rate estimated at 147 mL/min who received 3.375 g PTZ every 6 h. The second patient, a 49-year-old male, had an estimated renal clearance rate of 163 mL/min and received the same regimen. Both patients had piperacillin concentrations above the target MICs at middle of the dosing interval, but they failed to reach a trough concentration above 8 mg/L. The present case report showcases two patients with subtherapeutic PTZ concentrations despite strict following of local administration protocols. This suboptimal administration could not only lead to treatment failure, but also to the selection and growth of resistant pathogens. Implementing TDM would offer the possibility to adjust drug regimens in real-time and prevent situations like these from occurring.

Empirical carbapenems or piperacillin/tazobactam for infections in intensive care: An international retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Critically ill patients in intensive care units (ICU) are frequently administered broad-spectrum antibiotics (e.g., carbapenems or piperacillin/tazobactam) for suspected or confirmed infections. This retrospective cohort study aimed to describe the use of carbapenems and piperacillin/tazobactam in two international, prospectively collected datasets. METHODS: We conducted a post hoc analysis of data from the "Adjunctive Glucocorticoid Therapy in Patients with Septic Shock" (ADRENAL) trial (n = 3713) and the "Antimicrobial de-escalation in the critically ill patient and assessment of clinical cure" (DIANA) study (n = 1488). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients receiving initial antibiotic treatment with carbapenems and piperacillin/tazobactam. Secondary outcomes included mortality, days alive and out of ICU and ICU length of stay at 28 days. RESULTS: In the ADRENAL trial, carbapenems were used in 648 out of 3713 (17%), whereas piperacillin/tazobactam was used in 1804 out of 3713 (49%) participants. In the DIANA study, carbapenems were used in 380 out of 1480 (26%), while piperacillin/tazobactam was used in 433 out of 1488 (29%) participants. Mortality at 28 days was 23% for patients receiving carbapenems and 24% for those receiving piperacillin/tazobactam in ADRENAL and 23% and 19%, respectively, in DIANA. We noted variations in secondary outcomes; in DIANA, patients receiving carbapenems had a median of 13 days alive and out of ICU compared with 18 days among those receiving piperacillin/tazobactam. In ADRENAL, the median hospital length of stay was 27 days for patients receiving carbapenems and 21 days for those receiving piperacillin/tazobactam. CONCLUSIONS: In this post hoc analysis of ICU patients with infections, we found widespread initial use of carbapenems and piperacillin/tazobactam in international ICUs, with the latter being more frequently used. Randomized clinical trials are needed to assess if the observed variations in outcomes may be drug-related effects or due to confounders.

Empirical meropenem versus piperacillin/tazobactam for adult patients with sepsis (EMPRESS) trial: Protocol.

BACKGROUND: Piperacillin/tazobactam may be associated with less favourable outcomes than carbapenems in patients with severe bacterial infections, but the certainty of evidence is low. METHODS: The Empirical Meropenem versus Piperacillin/Tazobactam for Adult Patients with Sepsis (EMPRESS) trial is an investigator-initiated, international, parallel-group, randomised, open-label, adaptive clinical trial with an integrated feasibility phase. We will randomise adult, critically ill patients with sepsis to empirical treatment with meropenem or piperacillin/tazobactam for up to 30 days. The primary outcome is 30-day all-cause mortality. The secondary outcomes are serious adverse reactions within 30 days; isolation precautions due to resistant bacteria within 30 days; days alive without life support and days alive and out of hospital within 30 and 90 days; 90- and 180-day all-cause mortality and 180-day health-related quality of life. EMPRESS will use Bayesian statistical models with weak to somewhat sceptical neutral priors. Adaptive analyses will be conducted after follow-up of the primary outcome for the first 400 participants concludes and after every 300 subsequent participants, with adaptive stopping for superiority/inferiority and practical equivalence (absolute risk difference <2.5%-points) and response-adaptive randomisation. The expected sample sizes in scenarios with no, small or large differences are 5189, 5859 and 2570 participants, with maximum 14,000 participants and ≥99% probability of conclusiveness across all scenarios. CONCLUSIONS: EMPRESS will compare the effects of empirical meropenem against piperacillin/tazobactam in adult, critically ill patients with sepsis. Due to the pragmatic, adaptive design with high probability of conclusiveness, the trial results are expected to directly inform clinical practice.

Impact of antimicrobial stewardship implementation on the antibiotic use and susceptibility in a Japanese long-term care hospital.

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial use (AMU) is closely related to the emergence of antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) bacteria. Meanwhile, long-term care hospitals (LTCHs) have been pointed out to be important reservoirs for AMR. However, evidence illustrating the association between AMU and AMR in LTCHs is lacking compared to that of acute care hospitals. METHODS: We evaluated the impact of an antimicrobial stewardship (AS) program implementation, in a LTCH on AMU and antibiotic susceptibility between three periods: the pre-AS-period (pre-AS); the first period after AS implementation (post-AS 1), in which initiated recommendation the blood culture collection and definitive therapy by AS team; and the second period (post-AS 2), implementation of a balanced use of antibiotics was added. RESULTS: After the AS implementation, a significant increase in the number of blood cultures collected was observed. Conversely, the AMU of piperacillin-tazobactam (PIPC/TAZ), which has activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, was increased and occupied 43.0% of all injectable AMU in post-AS 1 compared with that in pre-AS (35.5%). In the post-AS 2 period, we analyzed the %AUD and recommended hospital-wide PIPC/TAZ sparing; this resulted in the significant reduction in %AUD of PIPC/TAZ, which was associated with improved susceptibility of P. aeruginosa to PIPC/TAZ. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that AS programs aimed at implementing antibiotic sparing may lead to improve AMR, highlighting the necessity of correcting overuse of a single class of antibiotics and usefulness of AMU monitoring in the LTCH setting.

Comparative effectiveness of cefmetazole versus carbapenems and piperacillin/tazobactam as initial therapy for bacteremic acute cholangitis: A retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Carbapenems and piperacillin/tazobactam (PIPC/TAZ) are commonly used as the initial therapy to treat extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales in acute cholangitis. However, the overuse of these antibiotics contributes to the spread of antimicrobial resistance. Cefmetazole (CMZ) is stable to hydrolysis by ESBLs, so it may be an alternative to carbapenems and PIPC/TAZ. However, the effectiveness of CMZ compared with that of carbapenems and PIPC/TAZ as the initial therapy for acute cholangitis is unknown. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a university hospital between April 1, 2014, and December 31, 2022. Patients with bacteremic acute cholangitis who received CMZ, carbapenems, or PIPC/TAZ as the initial therapy were included. The patients were divided into a CMZ group and a carbapenems or PIPC/TAZ (CP) group to compare patient outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 99 patients (54 in the CMZ group and 45 in the CP group) were analyzed. The baseline characteristics of the patients were similar and 30-day mortality did not differ between groups (4% vs. 7%, P = 0.66). However, the CMZ group had a shorter length of stay (LOS) (8 days vs. 15 days, P < 0.001) and lower mean antibiotic cost (98.92 USD vs. 269.49 USD, P < 0.001) than the CP group. CONCLUSIONS: In bacteremic acute cholangitis, initial therapy with CMZ may contribute to a shorter LOS and lower antibiotic costs than treatment with carbapenems and PIPC/TAZ, without worsening patient outcomes.

Efficacy of cefmetazole in immunocompetent patients with uncomplicated colonic diverticulitis: A propensity score matching analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of colonic diverticulitis is increasing in Japan. Although antimicrobial chemotherapy is a treatment option, Japanese guidelines for diverticulosis do not recommend any antibiotic in particular and antibiotic selection is left to the discretion of the prescribing physician, who often selects antibiotics with anti-pseudomonal activity. Therefore, this study compared the efficacy of cefmetazole (CMZ) with that of tazobactam/piperacillin (TAZ/PIPC) in hospitalized Japanese immunocompetent patients with uncomplicated colonic diverticulitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included Japanese immunocompetent patients hospitalized for colonic diverticulitis between April 2019 and March 2022. Participants were divided into the CMZ and TAZ/PIPC groups. After propensity score matching, the intergroup differences in clinical outcomes, including adverse events, mortality, and re-admission rate, were ascertained. RESULTS: During the study period, 142 Japanese patients were hospitalized with community-onset colonic diverticulitis; 124 of these patients were immunocompetent. Of the 124 patients, 42 were excluded, and the CMZ and TAZ/PIPC groups comprised 62 and 20 patients, respectively. After propensity score matching, there were 16 patients in each group. There was no significant intergroup difference in the mortality and re-admission rates; however, the incidence of liver dysfunction was significantly higher (p = 0.018) in the TAZ/PIPC group. CONCLUSION: In patients with colonic diverticulitis, CMZ therapy should be selected because of the adequate clinical outcomes and lower incidence of adverse events, as this would reduce broad-spectrum antibiotic use and minimize antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

Exposure levels and target attainment of piperacillin/tazobactam in adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit: a prospective observational study.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the exposure and the pharmacodynamic target attainment of piperacillin/tazobactam (PTZ) in adult critically ill patients. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study in the intensive care unit (ICU) of the Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal (a Level I trauma centre in Montreal, QC, Canada) between January 2021 and June 2022. We included patients aged 18 yr or older admitted to the ICU who received PTZ by intravenous administration. Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected, and clinical scores were calculated. On study day 1 of antimicrobial therapy, three blood samples were collected at the following timepoints: one hour after PTZ dose administration and at the middle and at the end of the dosing interval. The sampling schedule was repeated on days 4 and 7 of therapy if possible. Samples were analyzed by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography with diode array detector to determine the total piperacillin concentration. Middle- and end-of-interval concentrations were used for target attainment analyses, and were defined as a concentration above the minimal inhibitory concentration of 16 mg·L-1, corresponding to the breakpoint of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were recruited and 202 blood samples were analyzed. The most prevalent dose was 3/0.375 g every six hours (n = 50/73 doses administered, 68%) with a 30-min infusion. We observed marked variability over the three sampling timepoints, and the median [interquartile range] piperacillin concentrations at peak, middle of interval, and end of interval were 109.4 [74.0-152.3], 59.3 [21.1-74.4], and 25.3 [6.8-44.6] mg·L-1, respectively. When assessing target attainment, 37% of patients did not reach the efficacy target of a trough concentration of 16 mg·L-1. The majority of patients who were underexposed were patients with normal to augmented renal clearance. CONCLUSION: In this prospective observational study of adult ICU patients receiving intravenous PTZ, a large proportion had subtherapeutic concentrations of piperacillin. This was most notable in patients with normal to augmented renal clearance. More aggressive dosage regimens may be required for this subpopulation to ensure attainment of efficacy targets.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: L'objectif de cette étude était d'évaluer l'exposition et l'atteinte des cibles pharmacodynamiques de la pipéracilline/tazobactam (PTZ) chez la patientèle adulte aux soins intensifs. MéTHODES: Nous avons réalisé une étude observationnelle prospective dans l'unité de soins intensifs (USI) de l'Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal (un centre de traumatologie de niveau 1 à Montréal, QC, Canada) entre janvier 2021 et juin 2022. Nous avons inclus les patient·es adultes âgé·es de 18 ans ou plus admis·es à l'USI ayant reçu de la PTZ par administration intraveineuse. Les caractéristiques démographiques et cliniques ont été recueillies, et les scores cliniques ont été calculés. Au jour 1 de la thérapie antimicrobienne, trois échantillons sanguins ont été prélevés aux moments suivants : 1 h après l'administration de la dose de PTZ, au milieu et à la fin de l'intervalle d'administration. Le calendrier d'échantillonnage a été répété aux jours 4 et 7 de la thérapie si possible. Les échantillons ont été analysés par chromatographie liquide à ultra-haute performance avec détecteur à diodes pour déterminer la concentration totale de pipéracilline. Les concentrations du milieu et de fin d'intervalle ont été utilisées pour les analyses d'atteinte de cible, définie comme une concentration supérieure à la concentration minimale inhibitrice de 16 mg·L-1, associée aux Enterobacteriaceae et au Pseudomonas aeruginosa. RéSULTATS: Quarante-trois patient·es ont été recruté·es et 202 échantillons sanguins ont été analysés. La dose la plus prévalente était une dose de 3/0,375 g aux 6 h (n = 50/73 doses administrées, 68 %) avec une perfusion sur 30 min. Nous avons observé une variabilité marquée aux trois temps de prélèvement, et les concentrations médianes [intervalle interquartile] de pipéracilline au pic, au milieu et à la fin de l'intervalle étaient respectivement de 109,4 [74,0-152,3], 59,3 [21,1-74,4] et 25,3 [6,8-44,6] mg·L−1. Lors de l'évaluation de l'atteinte de la cible, 37 % des patient·es n'ont pas atteint la cible d'efficacité d'une concentration de 16 mg·L−1 à la fin de l'intervalle posologique. La majorité des patient·es sous-exposé·es étaient des personnes dont la clairance rénale était normale ou augmentée. CONCLUSION: Dans cette étude observationnelle prospective de patient·es adultes aux soins intensifs recevant de la PTZ par voie intraveineuse, une grande proportion de patient·es présentait des concentrations sous-thérapeutiques de pipéracilline. Ceci était plus marqué chez les patient·es ayant une clairance rénale normale ou augmentée. Des schémas posologiques plus agressifs pourraient être nécessaires pour cette sous-population afin de favoriser l'atteinte des cibles d'efficacité.

In complicated UTI or pyelonephritis, cefepime-enmetazobactam increased success vs. piperacillin-tazobactam at 14 d.

SOURCE CITATION: Kaye KS, Belley A, Barth P, et al. Effect of cefepime/enmetazobactam vs piperacillin/tazobactam on clinical cure and microbiological eradication in patients with complicated urinary tract infection or acute pyelonephritis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2022;328:1304-14. 36194218.

Piperacillin/tazobactam-induced sudden severe thrombocytopenia in a patient with a pressure ulcer: a case report.

The standard treatment for an infected pressure ulcer (PU) with osteomyelitis is debridement, wound coverage and antibiotic administration. However, systemic administration of antibiotics in patients with osteomyelitis is controversial, and the optimal treatment duration for chronic osteomyelitis has not been standardised. We report a case of sudden severe thrombocytopenia induced by piperacillin/tazobactam (PIPC/TAZ) in a patient with PU-related osteomyelitis. A 57-year-old male patient with paraplegia, using a wheelchair full-time, presented to our plastic surgery department with infection of a stage IV hard-to-heal ischial PU. We surgically debrided the necrotising tissue and raised an ipsilateral biceps femoris musculocutaneous propeller flap for wound coverage. Polymicrobial infections, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, were detected in the bone biopsy sample; therefore, systemic PIPC/TAZ was administered for the osteomyelitis. Unexpectedly, during the next 12 days of antibiotic administration, the patient's platelet count acutely dropped to 1×103/µl over three days. Based on a series of examinations, PIPC/TAZ was suspected to be the most likely cause of the severe thrombocytopenia. After drug discontinuation, the thrombocytopenia gradually improved. PIPC/TAZ is one of the most widely used antibiotic combinations in the plastic surgery field; it is conventionally administered for hard-to-heal wounds such as PUs and diabetic foot. The present case suggests that surgeons must take special precautions for patients undergoing PIPC/TAZ treatment. In this report, PIPC/TAZ-induced thrombocytopenia and the efficacy of antibiotic treatment for PU-related osteomyelitis are discussed in light of the available literature.

Antibiotic Treatment in Complicated Appendicitis: Can It Be Optimized?

BACKGROUND: The management of complicated appendicitis is inconclusive. Guidelines have not been established for the use of personalized antibiotic treatment. OBJECTIVES: To investigate specific risk factors to consider during the initial first-choice antibiotic therapy in children with complicated appendicitis. METHODS: This study included all pediatric patients younger than 18 years of age who underwent a laparoscopic appendectomy during 2012-2022 at a single tertiary medical center. RESULTS: In total, 300 pediatric patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy due to complicated appendicitis. The patients were treated with ceftriaxone + metronidazole (CM). For 57 (19%) patients, the empirical treatment was changed to tazobactam/piperacillin (TP) due to resistant bacteria or clinical deterioration. The presence of generalized peritonitis during surgery and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels above 20 mg/L at admission were identified as risk factors for changing the antibiotic regimen from CM to TP. CONCLUSIONS: Generalized peritonitis and CRP > 20 gr/L were highly correlated with changing the antibiotic regimen to TP. For such patients, initial treatment with TP may result in clinical improvement and shorter hospitalization.