Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 8.000
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Br J Dermatol ; 190(5): 751-757, 2024 Apr 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38061005

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Occupational exposure to metals such as nickel, chromium and cobalt can be associated with contact dermatitis, which can adversely affect an individual's health, finances and employment. Despite this, little is known about the incidence of metal-related occupational contact dermatitis over prolonged periods of time. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the medically reported trends in the incidence of work-related contact dermatitis attributed to nickel, chromium and cobalt in the UK. METHODS: Incidence and trends in cases of occupational contact dermatitis caused by nickel, chromium or cobalt between 1996 and 2019 (inclusive), reported to the EPIDERM surveillance scheme, were investigated and compared with trends in the incidence of occupational contact dermatitis attributed to agents other than the aforementioned metals. A sensitivity analysis restricting the study cohort to cases attributed to only one type of metal was also conducted. RESULTS: Of all cases reported to EPIDERM during the study period, 2374 (12%) were attributed to nickel, chromium or cobalt. Cases predominantly comprised females (59%), with a mean (SD) age (males and females) of 38 (13) years. Cases were most frequently reported in manufacturing, construction, and human health and social activity industries. The most frequently reported occupations were hairdressing, and sales and retail (assistants, cashiers and checkout operators). The highest annual incidence rate of contact dermatitis was observed in females (2.60 per 100 000 persons employed per year), with the first and second peak seen in those aged 16-24 and ≥ 65 years, respectively. A statistically significant decrease in the incidence of occupational contact dermatitis attributed to metals over the study period was observed for all occupations (annual average change -6.9%, 95% confidence interval -7.8 to -5.9), with much of the decrease occurring between 1996 and 2007. Similar findings were obtained in the sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Over a period of 24 years, there has been a statistically significant decline in the incidence of metal-related occupational contact dermatitis in the UK. This could be attributed not only to improvements in working conditions, which have reduced metal exposure, but could also be due to the closure of industries in the UK that might have generated cases of contact dermatitis owing to metal exposure.


Assuntos
Dermatite Alérgica de Contato , Dermatite Ocupacional , Exposição Ocupacional , Masculino , Feminino , Humanos , Níquel , Cobalto/análise , Cromo , Dermatite Ocupacional/epidemiologia , Ocupações , Reino Unido/epidemiologia , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/epidemiologia
2.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 90(2): 319-327, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37879460

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Isothiazolinones are a common cause of allergic contact dermatitis. OBJECTIVE: To examine the prevalence of positive patch test reactions to isothiazolinones from 2017-2020 and characterize isothiazolinone-allergic (Is+) patients compared with isothiazolinone nonallergic (Is-) patients. METHODS: Retrospective cross-sectional analysis of 9028 patients patch tested to methylchloroisothiazolinone (MCI)/methylisothiazolinone (MI) 0.02% aqueous, MI 0.2% aqueous, benzisothiazolinone (BIT) 0.1% petrolatum, and/or octylisothiazolinone (OIT) 0.025% petrolatum. Prevalence, reaction strength, concurrent reactions, clinical relevance, and source of allergens were tabulated. RESULTS: In total, 21.9% (1976/9028) of patients had a positive reaction to 1 or more isothiazolinones. Positivity to MI was 14.4% (1296/9012), MCI/MI was 10.0% (903/9017), BIT was 8.6% (777/9018), and OIT was 05% (49/9028). Compared with Is-, Is+ patients were more likely to have occupational skin disease (16.5% vs 10.3%, P <.001), primary hand dermatitis (30.2% vs 19.7%, P <.001), and be >40 years (73.1% vs 61.9%, P <.001). Positive patch test reactions to >1 isothiazolinone occurred in 44.1% (871/1976) of Is+ patients. Testing solely to MCI/MI would miss 47.3% (611/1292) of MI and 60.1% (466/776) of BIT allergic reactions. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective cross-sectional study design and lack of follow-up data. CONCLUSION: Sensitization to isothiazolinones is high and concurrent sensitization to multiple isothiazolinone allergens is common.


Assuntos
Dermatite Alérgica de Contato , Dermatite Ocupacional , Tiazóis , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/epidemiologia , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Dermatite Ocupacional/epidemiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/etiologia , Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , América do Norte , Testes do Emplastro/efeitos adversos , Vaselina , Conservantes Farmacêuticos/efeitos adversos
3.
Occup Environ Med ; 81(3): 122-128, 2024 Mar 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38378263

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Self-reported hand eczema was previously found under-reported as an occupational disease to the authorities among Danish hairdressers graduating from 1985 to 2007. This study investigates whether self-reported hand eczema among Danish hairdressers graduating from 2008 to 2018 is under-reported as an occupational disease to the authorities. METHODS: A cross-sectional study on all Danish hairdressers graduating from 2008 to 2018 was conducted. The participants were identified using information from the Danish Hairdressers' and Beauticians' Union. In May 2020, a self-administered survey on hand eczema was sent to all hairdressers. RESULTS: A response rate of 30.7% (1485/4830) was obtained. The lifetime prevalence of self-reported hand eczema was 40.1%, and 84.1% of hairdressers with hand eczema believed it to be occupational of whom 27.0% answered it was reported as an occupational disease to the authorities. Of hairdressers believing their hand eczema was occupational, consulting a doctor and answering it was reported as an occupational disease, 94.4% had consulted a dermatologist. The main reason for not reporting was 'I would probably not gain anything from it anyway' (40.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Based on hairdressers' perception, occupational hand eczema still seems to be an under-reported disease which may lead to underestimation of the problem and impair prevention, diagnosis and treatment.


Assuntos
Dermatite Ocupacional , Eczema , Dermatoses da Mão , Exposição Ocupacional , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Eczema/epidemiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/epidemiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/etiologia , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Percepção , Dermatoses da Mão/epidemiologia , Dermatoses da Mão/etiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos
4.
Acta Derm Venereol ; 104: adv27985, 2024 Mar 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38501841

RESUMO

Timely intervention reduces the risk of a poor prognosis in hand eczema, making early recognition of symptoms important in high-risk professions. However, limited data exist regarding the ability of cleaners and healthcare workers to recognize hand eczema. The aim of this study was to examine cleaners' and healthcare workers' ability to recognize hand eczema in clinical photographs and to assess the severity of the disease. Cleaners and healthcare workers completed a questionnaire consisting of 16 questions and participated in a structured interview referring to a validated photographic severity guide for chronic hand eczema, which comprised clinical photographs of hand eczema at varying levels of severity. Eighty cleaners and 201 healthcare workers (total N = 281) participated in the study. The rates of correctly identified hand eczema in clinical photographs (cleaners/ healthcare workers) were: 41.2%/57.7% (mild hand eczema), 81.2%/92.0% (moderate hand eczema), 85.0%/94.5% (severe hand eczema) and 82.5%/97.0% (very severe hand eczema). The proficiency of healthcare workers in recognizing hand eczema was significantly higher than that of cleaners. The results indicate that a large proportion of cleaners and healthcare workers fail to recognize mild hand eczema in clinical photographs. Healthcare workers had higher success rates in recognizing hand eczema in all severity categories. Symptom underestimation may lead to under-reporting of the true prevalence of hand eczema, with consequent loss of opportunities for prevention.


Assuntos
Dermatite Ocupacional , Eczema , Dermatoses da Mão , Humanos , Dermatite Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Dermatite Ocupacional/epidemiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Eczema/diagnóstico , Eczema/epidemiologia , Pessoal de Saúde , Fotografação , Inquéritos e Questionários , Dermatoses da Mão/diagnóstico , Dermatoses da Mão/epidemiologia , Dermatoses da Mão/prevenção & controle
5.
Contact Dermatitis ; 90(3): 291-298, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38043569

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Due to limited availability of commercial test preparations, patch testing patient's own material (POM) is of great importance to diagnose occupational allergic contact dermatitis. OBJECTIVES: To assess the quality of performance and documentation of patch testing with POM in patients with suspected occupational skin diseases (OSD) in Germany. METHODS: Retrospective-prospective analysis of protocols of patch tests with POM was conducted between 2013 and 2021 in patients with suspected OSD and submitted to statutory accident insurance institutions. Assessments were done by predefined criteria. RESULTS: Three thousand and four patch tests with POM from 460 patients were included. A full description of the POM was provided in 73.3% of all tests. The test concentration, test vehicle and pH value were documented in 74.3%, 70.5% and 42.2% of tests, for which the respective parameters were considered relevant. One hundred and sixty-one positive reactions to POM were documented. In 72%, sufficient patch testing with commercial test substances was conducted to investigate the positive reaction. In 30.4%, consecutive patch testing of all ingredients of the POM was done. CONCLUSIONS: The results not only show considerable shortcomings mainly in documentation but also to some extent performance of patch tests with POM in patients with suspected OSD in Germany.


Assuntos
Dermatite Alérgica de Contato , Dermatite Ocupacional , Humanos , Testes do Emplastro/métodos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Seguro de Acidentes , Dermatite Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Dermatite Ocupacional/etiologia , Alemanha , Alérgenos
6.
Contact Dermatitis ; 90(5): 466-469, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38146793

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: 2-Hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) was added to the European baseline series (EBS) in 2019. Few recent data are available on the frequency and relevance of positive reactions to this hapten. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the frequency and relevance of positive patch tests to HEMA in the EBS in a university hospital in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective study in patients with positive patch tests to HEMA investigated between June 2019 and August 2023. RESULTS: Of 2927 consecutive patients, 88 (79 women and 9 men; 3.0%) had a positive reaction to HEMA. The prevalence in women was 3.9%, in men 1.0%. Forty-three (49%) reactions were judged to be of current clinical relevance and 21 (24%) of past relevance. In this group of 64 patients with relevant reactions, 18 (28%) had occupational contact with (meth)acrylate-containing products, of who 11 (61%) were nail stylists. In 46 patients with non-occupational allergic contact dermatitis, 31 (67%) had allergic reactions to nail cosmetics. Glues and glue-containing products accounted for 22% of the materials causing allergic contact dermatitis and dental products for 8%. CONCLUSIONS: Allergic reactions to HEMA are very frequent in women investigated in Amsterdam. Nearly two thirds of cases were caused by nail cosmetics.


Assuntos
Cosméticos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato , Dermatite Ocupacional , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/epidemiologia , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Testes do Emplastro/métodos , Metacrilatos/efeitos adversos , Acrilatos/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Dermatite Ocupacional/epidemiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/etiologia
7.
Contact Dermatitis ; 90(1): 66-73, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37828279

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: While many studies have reported on occupational allergic contact dermatitis amongst dental personnel, studies on the relevance of patch testing in dental patients are scarce. OBJECTIVES: To determine the frequency and clinical relevance of contact allergy in patients with intra- and perioral complaints. METHODS: A total of 360 patients with intra- and perioral complaints suspected of having a contact allergy were patch-tested with the dental allergen series, European Baseline Series, and extended Amsterdam Baseline Series at Amsterdam University Medical Centers between January 2015 and November 2021. RESULTS: A total of 285 patients (79.2%) had a positive patch test reaction for either one (18.6%) or multiple allergens (60.6%). Sodium tetrachloropalladate was the most sensitising allergen with 98 patients (27.2%) testing positive, followed by nickel sulphate (23.3%), methylisothiazolinone (15.6%), and fragrance mix I (14.2%). Clinical relevance was found in 68 of 208 patients (32.7%), with patients having one (15.4%) or multiple (17.3%) patch test reactions clinically relevant to their (peri)oral complaints. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically relevant patch test reactions were frequently seen in dental patients. Although this study provides us with a better understanding on the frequency and clinical relevance of contact allergy in dental patients, further studies are needed to confirm our results.


Assuntos
Dermatite Alérgica de Contato , Dermatite Ocupacional , Humanos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/epidemiologia , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Relevância Clínica , Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Dermatite Ocupacional/epidemiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/etiologia , Testes do Emplastro/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos
8.
Contact Dermatitis ; 90(3): 273-279, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38164086

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The growing popularity of nail techniques based on acrylates has led to a higher frequency of sensitization in both nail technicians and users. OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to assess cases of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) caused by acrylates in individuals with occupational or non-occupational exposure to nail techniques. METHODS: A preliminary study was conducted on 30 patients with ACD caused by acrylates in nail techniques, who were patch tested from September 2022 to March 2023 at the First Department of Dermatology and Venereology of Andreas Syggros Hospital, Athens, Greece. RESULTS: Thirty female patients with ACD to acrylates were documented (15 users and 15 nail technicians and users). The most common allergens were: 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA), 2-hydroxypropyl methacrylate (HPMA) and ethyleneglycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA), which tested positive in all 30 patients (100.0%). Twenty patients (66.7%) had been exposed to dental procedures involving acrylates, before the onset of ACD. Nail technicians exhibited extensive skin lesions, 40.0% experienced ACD within the first year of work and 13.3% during their professional practice. Three of them (20.0%) had to discontinue their work. CONCLUSION: Acrylates have been identified as potent allergens, necessitating the implementation of safety measures for the use of these chemicals in nail techniques.


Assuntos
Cosméticos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato , Dermatite Ocupacional , Humanos , Feminino , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Acrilatos/efeitos adversos , Projetos Piloto , Grécia , Testes do Emplastro/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Metacrilatos/efeitos adversos , Alérgenos , Cosméticos/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Ocupacional/complicações
9.
Contact Dermatitis ; 90(2): 143-152, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37752672

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Occupational contact dermatitis (OCD) is a common occupational disease. Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a known risk factor for OCD. OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of previously diagnosed AD among young workers with recognized OCD and assess its impact on OCD prognosis. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study. A questionnaire was sent to 6251 workers with recognized OCD who were under 35 years at notification (response rate: 47%). Of the respondents, 2392 answered a question about previous doctor-diagnosed AD and were included in the study. Eczema severity, occupational consequences and quality of life were examined using statistical analyses comparing workers with and without previously diagnosed AD. RESULTS: The prevalence of previously diagnosed AD was 41.8% (95% CI: 39.8-43.8). Women had a higher AD prevalence, and workers with AD reported OCD at a younger age. Workers with AD reported more frequent and severe eczema symptoms and had a higher risk of OCD negatively affecting job and occupation choices. Health-related quality of life was more adversely affected in workers with AD. CONCLUSIONS: AD significantly impacts severity and has long-term consequences for young people with OCD. Targeted prevention strategies need to be developed.


Assuntos
Dermatite Alérgica de Contato , Dermatite Atópica , Dermatite Ocupacional , Eczema , Humanos , Feminino , Adolescente , Dermatite Atópica/epidemiologia , Dermatite Atópica/complicações , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/epidemiologia , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos , Dermatite Ocupacional/epidemiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/etiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Eczema/complicações
10.
Contact Dermatitis ; 90(1): 32-40, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37795841

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Allergic contact allergy and dermatitis are frequently reported among epoxy-exposed workers. OBJECTIVES: To determine the risk of dermatitis associated with epoxy exposure. METHODS: We followed 825 epoxy-exposed and 1091 non-exposed blue-collar workers, and 493 white-collar workers of a Danish wind turbine blade factory during 2017-2022 with linked data from national health registers on diagnoses, patch testing, or fillings of prescriptions for topical corticosteroids. Incidence rate ratios of dermatitis or a first-time topical corticosteroid prescription were estimated with Poisson regression using non-exposed blue-collar workers as reference. We similarly estimated incidence rate ratios for the duration of epoxy exposure and current epoxy exposure. RESULTS: Epoxy-exposed blue-collar workers showed a dermatitis incidence rate of 2.1 per 100 000 person days, a two-fold increased risk of dermatitis and a 20% increased risk of filling a prescription for topical corticosteroids. Incidence rate ratios were higher during early exposure and declined with further exposure for both outcomes. White-collar workers had generally lower risks. CONCLUSION: We observed an increased risk of dermatitis following epoxy exposure confirming previous case reports and cross-sectional studies emphasizing the need for intensified focus on preventive efforts for this group of workers.


Assuntos
Dermatite Alérgica de Contato , Dermatite Ocupacional , Exposição Ocupacional , Humanos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/epidemiologia , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Dermatite Ocupacional/epidemiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/etiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Seguimentos , Estudos Transversais , Resinas Epóxi/efeitos adversos , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Testes do Emplastro/efeitos adversos , Sistema de Registros , Corticosteroides/efeitos adversos
11.
Contact Dermatitis ; 90(3): 253-261, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38038148

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ethylenediamine dihydrochloride is a versatile aliphatic amine found in numerous medications and industrial compounds and is a known sensitiser. The sensitization prevalence is affected by geographical and socio-cultural factors. OBJECTIVES: The objectives are to analyse the temporal trend of sensitization to ethylenediamine dihydrochloride in northeastern Italy and to investigate associations with occupations. METHODS: Between 1996 and 2021, 30 629 patients with suspected allergic contact dermatitis were patch tested with the Triveneto baseline series. Individual characteristics were collected through a standardised questionnaire. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of ethylenediamine dihydrochloride sensitization was 1.29% with percentages similar in both sexes. We observed a significant decreasing trend over time (p < 0.001), yielding a sensitization prevalence <1% in recent years. Among departments, residence in Pordenone area was protective for sensitization. No significant associations were observed with specific occupations. We found significant associations between ethylenediamine dihydrochloride sensitization and being 26-35 years old (odds ratio [OR], 1.47; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05-2.08), and sensitization for many haptens, such as paraben mix (OR, 5.3; 95% CI: 3.3-8.5), epoxy resin (OR, 5.1; 95% CI: 3.0-8.7), neomycin sulphate and mercaptobenzothiazole. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed a downward time trend of ethylenediamine dihydrochloride sensitization in northeastern Italian population and pointed to an update of the Triveneto baseline series.


Assuntos
Dermatite Alérgica de Contato , Dermatite Ocupacional , Etilenodiaminas , Masculino , Feminino , Humanos , Adulto , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/epidemiologia , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/epidemiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/etiologia , Testes do Emplastro , Itália/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Alérgenos
12.
Contact Dermatitis ; 90(3): 280-290, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38052587

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Occupational contact dermatitis (OCD) is a prevalent, often chronic disease that poses a risk for job loss and decreased quality of life. In Germany, a multi-step prevention programme emphasising early detection and highly specialised multidisciplinary treatment has been implemented with great success. OBJECTIVES: To examine the effectiveness of a Danish-adapted version of the German prevention effort on OCD severity, quality of life and occupational consequences at 3-month follow-up. METHODS: Randomised, controlled trial. Participants were recruited after the first referral from General Practitioner to Dermatologist with suspected OCD. The intervention group (IG) received a Danish-adapted, multidisciplinary intervention, while the control group (CG) navigated the Danish healthcare system without interference from the study. OCD severity, occupational consequences and quality of life were assessed at 3-month follow-up using self-reported questionnaires. RESULTS: A statistically significant decrease in the severity of eczema was found at 3-month follow-up in the IG compared to the CG. The IG were statistically significantly more likely to have seen a dermatologist at 3-month follow-up. Higher treatment level in the IG was indicated by the results but was not statistically significant. No significant difference was found in quality of life or occupational consequences. CONCLUSIONS: These initial findings suggest that early and specialised treatment of OCD improves OCD prognosis.


Assuntos
Dermatite Alérgica de Contato , Dermatite Ocupacional , Humanos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/prevenção & controle , Seguimentos , Qualidade de Vida , Dermatite Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Dermatite Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Dinamarca/epidemiologia
13.
Contact Dermatitis ; 90(4): 331-342, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38186085

RESUMO

Healthcare workers (HCWs) are considered a high-risk group for developing hand eczema (HE), mainly owing to wet work and contact with allergens at work. To meta-analyse the prevalence and incidence of HE in HCWs, as well as mapping the prevalence of atopic dermatitis (AD) and HE severity in HCWs. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses 2020 guidelines. Published literature from 2000 to 2022 was eligible based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. A total of 18 studies were included. Pooled life-time, 1-year and point prevalence of self-reported HE in HCWs was 33.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 28.3-38.6), 27.4% (95% CI: 19.3-36.5) and 13.5% (95% CI: 9.3-18.4), respectively. AD prevalence was 15.4% (95% CI: 11.3-19.9). Overall, the majority of HCWs reported mild HE. One included study assessed HE incidence reporting 34 cases/1000 person years. Most studies scored low-moderate using the New Ottawa Scale and the pooled point prevalence data showed broad CIs. In conclusion, the high prevalence of HE in HCWs underlines the increased risk and need for preventive measures for this professional group. There is, however, a need of further standardized high-quality studies.


Assuntos
Dermatite Ocupacional , Dermatoses da Mão , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Dermatoses da Mão/epidemiologia , Dermatoses da Mão/etiologia , Prevalência , Dermatite Ocupacional/epidemiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/etiologia , Incidência , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Eczema/epidemiologia , Dermatite Atópica/epidemiologia
14.
Contact Dermatitis ; 91(2): 91-103, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38812248

RESUMO

Patch testing is the only clinically applicable diagnostic method for Type IV allergy. The availability of Type IV patch test (PT) allergens in Europe, however, is currently scarce. This severely compromises adequate diagnostics of contact allergy, leading to serious consequences for the affected patients. Against this background, the European Society of Contact Dermatitis (ESCD) has created a task force (TF) (i) to explore the current availability of PT substances in different member states, (ii) to highlight some of the unique characteristics of Type IV vs. other allergens and (iii) to suggest ways forward to promote and ensure availability of high-quality patch testing substances for the diagnosis of Type IV allergies throughout Europe. The suggestions of the TF on how to improve the availability of PT allergens are supported by the ESCD, the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, and the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology and intend to provide potential means to resolve the present medical crisis.


Assuntos
Alérgenos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato , Dermatite Ocupacional , Testes do Emplastro , Humanos , Testes do Emplastro/métodos , Europa (Continente) , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Dermatite Ocupacional/etiologia , Sociedades Médicas , Comitês Consultivos
15.
Contact Dermatitis ; 91(3): 212-221, 2024 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38956835

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Isocyanates are used as starting materials of polyurethane (PU) products. They are relatively important occupational skin sensitizers. OBJECTIVES: To analyse results of a large isocyanate patch test series of 19 isocyanate test substances and 4,4'-diaminodiphenylmethane (MDA), a marker of 4,4'-diphenylmethane diisocyanate (MDI) hypersensitivity. METHODS: Test files were screened for positive reactions in the isocyanate series. Patients with positive reactions were analysed for occupation, exposure and diagnosis. RESULTS: In 2010-2019, 53 patients had positive reactions in the series (16% of 338 patients tested). MDA, the well-established screening substance for MDI allergy, was positive in 30 patients, an in-house monomeric MDI test substance in 23 patients and 3 different polymeric MDI test substances in 19-21 patients. We diagnosed 16 cases of occupational allergic contact dermatitis (OACD) from MDI including 3 pipe reliners. Hexamethylene-1,6-diisocyanate (HDI) oligomers in paint hardeners caused 5 cases of OACD, more cases than 2,4-toluene diisocyanate (TDI; n = 3) and isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI; n = 1) put together. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous studies, polymeric MDI test substances were not superior to a monomeric MDI. Pipe reliners may get sensitised not only by epoxy products and acrylates but also by MDI in hardeners of PU pipe coatings. HDI oligomers were the second most important causes of OACD after MDI.


Assuntos
Dermatite Alérgica de Contato , Dermatite Ocupacional , Isocianatos , Testes do Emplastro , Humanos , Isocianatos/efeitos adversos , Testes do Emplastro/métodos , Dermatite Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Dermatite Ocupacional/etiologia , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Feminino , Masculino , Adulto , Poliuretanos/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Compostos de Anilina
16.
Contact Dermatitis ; 90(2): 116-125, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37735996

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Rubber accelerators are used in the production of rubber gloves and may cause contact allergy. OBJECTIVES: To estimate long-term trend and prevalence of contact allergy to rubber accelerators for a 30-year period in Denmark, high-risk occupations, and exposures. METHODS: Data from all patients with contact dermatitis consecutively patch tested at the department of Skin and Allergy Gentofte hospital with the rubber accelerators from the European baseline series (EBS) from 1990 to 2019, were analysed. Further, patients under suspicion of rubber accelerator contact allergy were additionally patch-tested with rubber accelerators from the specialised rubber series from 2005 to 2019 and these were additional extracted. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of contact allergy to one or more of the rubber accelerators from the EBS series was 2.7% with a significant decline in the first 12-years, followed by a stable frequency in the past 18-years. Associations with occupational contact dermatitis, hand dermatitis, and leg/foot dermatitis were found. Wet-work occupations were most often affected and gloves the most frequent exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Contact allergy to one or more of the rubber accelerators from the EBS is frequent and has been unchanged for several decades, which calls for prevention.


Assuntos
Dermatite Alérgica de Contato , Dermatite Ocupacional , Eczema , Hipersensibilidade ao Látex , Humanos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/epidemiologia , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Borracha/efeitos adversos , Testes do Emplastro/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Ocupacional/etiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/complicações , Hipersensibilidade ao Látex/epidemiologia , Eczema/epidemiologia , Eczema/complicações , Dinamarca/epidemiologia
17.
Contact Dermatitis ; 91(2): 104-111, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38845162

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Most studies investigating the prevalence of hand eczema (HE) in professional cleaners use self-reported questionnaire-based data. However, no validation studies of self-reporting of HE among professional cleaners have previously been conducted. OBJECTIVES: To investigate (1) the point prevalence of self-reported HE, (2) the point prevalence of HE estimated by physical examination of the hands and (3) the sensitivity and specificity of self-reporting of HE compared with the diagnosis based on physical examination among professional cleaners. METHODS: Professional cleaners at three different hospitals in Region Zealand were invited to fill out a questionnaire. The point prevalence of self-reported HE was estimated based on questions from the Nordic Occupational Skin Questionnaire. After completing the questionnaire, each cleaner underwent a physical examination of the hands by a dermatologist on the same day. RESULTS: In total, 234 cleaners were invited to participate in the study, and 224 (response rate = 96.0%) agreed to take part. Based on the self-reported questionnaires, 5.3% (n = 12) of the cleaners had current HE. Based on an examination by a physician, 19.2% (n = 43) of the cleaners had current HE. The sensitivity of self-reported HE was found to be 28.0%, while the specificity was found to be 100.0%. The positive predictive value was found to be 100.0%, while the negative predictive value was 85.0%. CONCLUSION: The true point prevalence of HE among professional cleaners is underestimated when based on self-reporting.


Assuntos
Dermatite Ocupacional , Eczema , Dermatoses da Mão , Autorrelato , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Humanos , Dermatoses da Mão/epidemiologia , Dermatoses da Mão/diagnóstico , Dermatite Ocupacional/epidemiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Prevalência , Eczema/epidemiologia , Eczema/diagnóstico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos e Questionários , Exame Físico , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/epidemiologia
18.
Contact Dermatitis ; 90(6): 574-584, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38501375

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Professional ice hockey players may contract irritant and allergic contact dermatitis. AIMS: To investigate the presence of contact allergy (CA) in professional ice hockey players in Sweden. METHODS: Ten teams from the two top leagues were assessed for potential occupational exposure to sensitizers. Exactly 107 players were patch tested with an extended baseline series and a working series, in total 74 test preparations. The CA rates were compared between the ice hockey players and controls from the general population and dermatitis patients. RESULTS: One out of 4 players had at least one contact allergy. The most common sensitizers were Amerchol L 101, nickel and oxidized limonene. CA was as common in the ice hockey players as in dermatitis patients and significantly more common than in the general population. Fragrances and combined sensitizers in cosmetic products (fragrances + preservatives + emulsifier) were significantly more common in ice hockey players compared with the general population. CONCLUSION: The possible relationship between CA to fragrances and cosmetic products on the one hand and the presence of dermatitis on the other should be explored further.


Assuntos
Dermatite Alérgica de Contato , Dermatite Ocupacional , Hóquei , Testes do Emplastro , Humanos , Suécia/epidemiologia , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/epidemiologia , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Adulto , Masculino , Dermatite Ocupacional/etiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/epidemiologia , Níquel/efeitos adversos , Adulto Jovem , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Cosméticos/efeitos adversos , Perfumes/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Limoneno/efeitos adversos
19.
Contact Dermatitis ; 91(1): 38-44, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38561321

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Artificial nail modelling systems (ANMS) pose a significant risk for nail stylists and their clients regarding acrylate sensitization, which might jeopardize the use of acrylate-containing medical devices. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the frequency of artificial nail practices among female healthcare workers (HCWs) compared with controls and assess ANMS-related side effects. METHODS: In this comparative, cross-sectional, single-centre study, a face-to-face interview with 200 female HCWs and 200 age-matched female dermatology patients (controls) was conducted regarding the use of ANMS between March and November 2023. RESULTS: Among 400 participants (median age: 25), 85 (21.3%) have applied ANMS at least once. The prevalence of ANMS application was significantly higher in HCWs (n = 54/200, 27%) compared with controls (n = 31/200, 15.5%) (p < 0.05). Long-lasting nail polish was the most commonly preferred technique (n = 82/85, 96.5%). ANMS were mainly performed in nail studios by nail stylists (n = 79/85, 92.9%), while three participants were using home kits. Nail brittleness was the most frequently reported side effect (n = 19/85, 22.4%). No case of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) was detected. CONCLUSIONS: The popularity of ANMS among young female HCWs is growing. This striking trend might further put these individuals not only at risk of medical device-related adverse events but also occupational ACD.


Assuntos
Acrilatos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato , Dermatite Ocupacional , Pessoal de Saúde , Unhas , Humanos , Feminino , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/epidemiologia , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Acrilatos/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Ocupacional/etiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/epidemiologia , Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Adulto Jovem , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
20.
Contact Dermatitis ; 91(1): 45-53, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38602297

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) from rubber glove usage is usually caused by rubber additives such as the accelerators. However, in analyses of the suspected gloves, ordinary rubber allergens are not always found. Accelerator-free rubber gloves are available, but some patients with accelerator allergy do not tolerate them and might also be patch test positive to them. OBJECTIVES: To identify and chemically characterize a new allergen, 2-cyanoethyl dimethyldithiocarbamate (CEDMC), in rubber gloves. We describe two patient cases: patient 1 that led us to the identification of CEDMC and patient 2 with occupational ACD caused by CEDMC. METHODS: The patients were examined with patch testing including baseline and rubber series, and their own rubber gloves. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used for chemical analysis of rubber gloves. The allergen was synthesized and identified by nuclear magnetic resonance, mass spectrometry and infrared spectrometry, and tested on patient 2. RESULTS: CEDMC was identified by HPLC in a nitrile glove associated with hand eczema in patient 1. Patient 2 whose nitrile gloves contained CEDMC was patch test positive to CEDMC. CONCLUSIONS: CEDMC is a new contact allergen in nitrile gloves and probably forms during vulcanization from residual monomer acrylonitrile and rubber additives.


Assuntos
Dermatite Alérgica de Contato , Dermatite Ocupacional , Luvas Protetoras , Nitrilas , Testes do Emplastro , Humanos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Luvas Protetoras/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Ocupacional/etiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Nitrilas/efeitos adversos , Dimetilditiocarbamato/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Dermatoses da Mão/induzido quimicamente , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Alérgenos/análise , Adulto , Cromatografia Líquida de Alta Pressão , Ditiocarb/efeitos adversos , Ditiocarb/química
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA