Assessment of the necessity of uterine artery embolization during suction and curettage for caesarean scar pregnancy: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Uterine artery embolization (UAE) followed by suction and curettage is a common conservative treatment for caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP), but the advantages of suction and curettage alone are underestimated due to the lack of standards for selecting appropriate cases for which this approach would be applicable. We sought to identify indicators with which to assess the need for UAE during suction and curettage. METHODS: The prospective cohort consisted of 105 women diagnosed with CSP in Peking Union Medical College Hospital between January 2016 and September 2018 who were followed up until 60 days after surgery. The main outcome was the therapy used, and secondary outcomes included recovery, bleeding, surgery time, length of hospital stay, and total cost. RESULTS: We found that ß-human chorionic gonadotropin (ß-hCG) levels were significantly lower (P < 0.05), foetal cardiac activity was significantly lower (P < 0.05), the myometrial layer was significantly thicker (P < 0.05), expenditures were lower and lengths of hospital stay were shorter in patients who received suction and curettage alone (the non-UAE group) than in those who received UAE followed by suction and curettage (the UAE+ group). In addition, for CSP patients, UAE might be less necessary when the myometrial thickness is ≥2 mm and the gestational sacmeasures ≤5 cm, and suction and curettage alone may be safer for these patients. CONCLUSION: Suction and curettage alone is a more suitable option than UAE followed by suction and curettage because the former carries a lower cost, shorter length of hospital stay, and lower risk of adverse events. Regarding risk factors, patients with a lower uterine segment thickness ≥ 2 mm and a gestational mass diameter ≤ 5 cm have an increased probability of being successfully treated with suction and curettage alone.

Prior Uterine Evacuation and the Risk of Short Cervical Length: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether a prior uterine evacuation procedure is associated with an increased risk of short cervical length (≤20 mm) in women without prior spontaneous preterm birth. METHODS: This work was a retrospective cohort study from January 2012 to December 2014 of singletons without prior spontaneous preterm birth with cervical length screening between 18 weeks and 23 weeks 6 days. Women with a prior miscarriage/abortion were excluded if management (medical, surgical, or expectant) was not specified. Prior uterine evacuation was defined as dilation and curettage or dilation and evacuation of a spontaneous or induced abortion. The primary outcome was the risk of short cervical length (≤20 mm) among women with and without 1 of more prior uterine evacuations at any gestational age, assessed by the odds ratio and adjusted odds ratio for confounders. RESULTS: Of 2672 women included, 714 (27%) had at least 1 prior uterine evacuation. The overall incidence of short cervical length in the cohort was 1% (n = 27). Women with at least 1 prior uterine evacuation were more likely to be African American (64% versus 41%; P < .001), smoke (14% versus 8%; P < .001), have a higher body mass index (mean ± SD, 28.1 ± 7.1 versus 26.8 ± 7.1 kg/m2 ; P < .001), and have had prior full-term delivery (60% versus 41%; P < .001). Women with at least 1 prior uterine evacuation had a significantly higher incidence of short cervical length (2% versus 0.7%; P = .003; odds ratio, 2.99 [95% confidence interval, 1.40-6.40]). After adjustment for confounders, prior uterine evacuation remained a source of increased risk of short cervical length (adjusted odds ratio, 2.63 [95% confidence interval, 1.19-5.80]). CONCLUSIONS: Although the overall incidence of short cervical length is low (1%-2%), women with at least 1 prior uterine evacuation have at least a 2-fold increased risk of a short second-trimester cervical length compared to women without a prior uterine evacuation.

Trends in the Management of Nonviable Pregnancies of Unknown Location in the United States.

BACKGROUND: When managing a nonviable pregnancy of unknown location (PUL), a debate has emerged in the literature whether to perform uterine curettage for definitive diagnosis of pregnancy location or administer methotrexate for a presumed ectopic pregnancy. The purpose of this study is to describe the treatment patterns when managing a PUL. METHODS: A prospective, anonymous Internet based-electronic survey of PUL case scenarios was administered to a random sample of physicians across the United States. RESULTS: A total of 214 physicians responded. When presented with a PUL by ultrasound and a ßhCG measurement of 3,270 mIU/mL, which is above the discriminatory level, 88.3% (188) would choose an additional ßhCG measurement before recommending any intervention. When presented with a PUL by ultrasound and serial ßhCG measurements demonstrating an inappropriate trend for a viable gestation, 36.5% would offer uterine curettage and 31.3% would offer methotrexate. Resident and private clinicians had a fourfold lower adjusted odds of choosing uterine curettage compared to academic physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our findings, there does not appear to be a consensus regarding the management of a PUL.

Standardizing Second-Trimester Medical Termination: Effects on Clinical Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate length of induction and postdelivery complications before and after implementation of a standardized approach to second-trimester medical termination of pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of all women undergoing medical termination of pregnancy between 130/7 and 266/7 weeks of gestation at a single, academic institution from July 1, 2012, through June 30, 2015. The primary outcome was the time from the start of induction of labor to delivery of the fetus. Postdelivery complications including the need for dilation and curettage (D&C), blood transfusion, and readmission to the hospital were secondary outcomes of interest. RESULTS: A total of 62 women met inclusion criteria; 38 before and 24 after the intervention. There were no differences in measured baseline characteristics (p > 0.05). There was a significant decrease in induction time after the intervention (12.3 compared with 8.6 hours, p = 0.031). There was no significant difference in rates of D&C or other measured complications (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Implementation of a standardized clinical guideline for second-trimester medical termination was associated with a decrease in length of induction. There was no significant difference in need for D&C or postdelivery complications; however, we were underpowered for these secondary outcomes.

The impact of introducing medical management on conservative and surgical management for early pregnancy miscarriage.

BACKGROUND: Medical management of miscarriage allows women to avoid the risks associated with surgical intervention. In 2011 the early pregnancy assessment service (EPAS) at the Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH) in Sydney, Australia introduced medical management of miscarriage with single-dose 800 µg vaginal misoprostol. AIMS: We sought to investigate the impact of the introduction of medical management had on the proportion of women having surgery and conservative management and to examine the success and complication rates of medical management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We undertook a retrospective cohort study that included all women diagnosed with a miscarriage from 12 months prior to and 18 months after the introduction of medical management. Successful management was defined as the absence of retained products of conception or endometrial thickness less than 15 mm on ultrasound at two weeks. The change in management choices over time, the success rates and complication rates were measured. RESULTS: Of 1102 women in the final analysis, 446 were in Group A (before medical management) and 656 in Group B (after medical management). Primary surgical procedures fell significantly for missed miscarriages from 68 to 48% (P < 0.001) and primary conservative management reduced for incomplete miscarriages (63-44%; P = 0.01). Overall 89 of 108 (82.4%) patients managed medically had a resolution within two weeks. One in ten presented with a complication. DISCUSSION: The introduction of medical management led to a statistically significant reduction in the proportion of women undergoing primary surgical management of missed miscarriage. Success and complication rates were similar to other studies.

Dilatation and curettage increases the risk of subsequent preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

STUDY QUESTION: Could dilatation and curettage (D&C), used in the treatment of miscarriage and termination of pregnancy, increase the risk of subsequent preterm birth? SUMMARY ANSWER: A history of curettage in women is associated with an increased risk of preterm birth in a subsequent pregnancy compared with women without such history. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: D&C is one of the most frequently performed procedures in obstetrics and gynaecology. Apart from the acknowledged but relatively rare adverse effects, such as cervical tears, bleeding, infection, perforation of the uterus, bowel or bladder, or Asherman syndrome, D&C has been suggested to also lead to an increased risk of preterm birth in the subsequent pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: In the absence of randomized data, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort and case-control studies. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: We searched OVID MEDLINE and OVID EMBASE form inception until 21 May 2014. We selected cohort and case-control studies comparing subsequent preterm birth in women who had a D&C for first trimester miscarriage or termination of pregnancy and a control group of women without a history of D&C. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: We included 21 studies reporting on 1 853 017 women. In women with a history of D&C compared with those with no such history, the odds ratio (OR) for preterm birth <37 weeks was 1.29 (95% CI 1.17; 1.42), while for very preterm birth the ORs were 1.69 (95% CI 1.20; 2.38) for <32 weeks and 1.68 (95% CI 1.47; 1.92) for <28 weeks. The risk remained increased when the control group was limited to women with a medically managed miscarriage or induced abortion (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.10; 1.28). For women with a history of multiple D&Cs compared with those with no D&C, the OR for preterm birth (<37 weeks) was 1.74 (95% CI 1.10; 2.76). For spontaneous preterm birth, the OR was 1.44 (95% CI 1.22; 1.69) for a history of D&C compared with no such history. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: There were no randomized controlled trials comparing women with and without a history of D&C and subsequent preterm birth. As a consequence, confounding may be present since the included studies were either cohort or case-control studies, not all of which corrected the results for possible confounding factors. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This meta-analysis shows that D&C is associated with an increased risk of subsequent preterm birth. The increased risk in association with multiple D&Cs indicates a causal relationship. Despite the fact that confounding cannot be excluded, these data warrant caution in the use of D&C for miscarriage and termination of pregnancy, the more so since less invasive options are available. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This study was funded by ZonMw, a Dutch organization for Health Research and Development, project number 80-82310-97-12066.

Decreasing Diagnostic Hysteroscopy Performed in the Operating Room: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

OBJECTIVES: At our institution, diagnostic hysteroscopy (DH), often combined with uterine curettage, commonly has been performed in the main OR with the patient under general anaesthesia. Our objective was to create targeted interventions aimed at decreasing the number of DHs performed in the OR by 75% over one year. METHODS: This quality improvement initiative had a quasi-experimental (time-series) design. To obtain baseline numbers of DHs performed each month, we conducted a retrospective chart audit at a university teaching hospital. We implemented the following three groups of interventions: (1) staff education and case review, (2) accessible sonohysterography, and (3) an operative hysteroscopy education program. Procedures were tracked prospectively over a 12-month intervention period and an additional 12-month maintenance period. RESULTS: One hundred eleven DHs were performed at baseline. During the intervention period, 33 DHs were performed, a 70% reduction from baseline. This resulted in related savings of $126 984 and 12.5 surgical days. In the final quarter of the intervention period, there was an 81% reduction in the number of DHs with adequate preoperative evaluation compared with baseline. Twenty DHs were performed in the maintenance period, an 82% reduction from baseline. The absolute number of complications from DH remained constant during the study period. CONCLUSION: Carefully planned and targeted interventions to change the culture at our institution decreased the number of DHs performed in the main OR. These initiatives improved patient care, saved costs, and improved OR utilization. Long-term follow-up showed maintenance of the improvements in the year subsequent to the interventions.

Uterine rupture in pregnancy: two case reports and review of literature.

Rupture of a gravid uterus is an obstetric emergency. Risks factors include a scarred uterus but also spontaneous rupture of an un- scarred uterus during pregnancy is possible. The authors present two cases of a spontaneous complete uterine rupture during pregnancy. The first case had only a past history of dilatation and curettage for abortion; the second case had a past history of dilatation and curettage for abortion and a monolateral laparoscopic salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy. They presented with abdominal pain and after ultrasound scan, uterine ruptures were diagnosed. These cases show that there should be a high index of suspicious of uterine rupture in a gravid woman with a history of curettage for the possible presence of misunderstood uterine scar and in women with a past history of salpingectomy with or without corneal resection. Appropriate counseling and close follow-up might help to avoid such obstetrical catastrophes. To provide more insight into the possible risk factors for prelabor uterine rupture in pregnancy, a literature review was performed.

Uterine artery Doppler in the management of early pregnancy loss: a prospective, longitudinal study.

BACKGROUND: The pharmacological management of early pregnancy loss reduced substantially the need for dilation and curettage. However, prognostic markers of successful outcome were not established. Thus the major purpose of this study was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the uterine artery pulsatility (PI) and resistance (RI) indices to detect early pregnancy loss patients requiring dilation and curettage after unsuccessful management. METHODS: A cohort prospective observational study was undertaken to include women with early pregnancy loss, ≤ 12 weeks of gestation, managed with mifepristone (200 mg) and misoprostol (1600 µg) followed by PI and RI evaluation of both uterine arteries 2 weeks after. At this time, in 173/315 patients, incomplete miscarriage was diagnosed. Among them, 32 underwent uterine dilatation and curettage at 8 weeks of follow-up. RESULTS: The cut-off points for the uterine artery PI and RI, leading to the maximum values of sensitivity (69.5%, CI95%: 61.5%-76.5% and 75.0%, CI95%: 57.9%-86.8%, respectively) and specificity (75.0%, CI95%: 57.9%-86.8% and 65.6%, CI95%: 48.3%-79.6%, respectively), for the discrimination between the women who needed curettage from those who resolved spontaneously were 2.8 and 1, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The potential usefulness of uterine artery Doppler evaluation to predict the need for uterine curettage in patients submitted to medical treatment for early pregnancy loss was demonstrated.

Microwave endometrial ablation after endometrial curettage for the management of heavy menstrual bleeding.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the eticacy of microwave endometrial ablation after endometrial curettage, in selected patients with heavy menstrual bleeding. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-two premenopausal women with heavy menstrual bleeding underwent microwave endometrial ablation at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the University of Patras Medical School. All patients did not respond to previous medical treatment, had completed their childbearing, and did not desire future fertility. The authors chose endometrial curettage rather than hormonal pretreatment (GnRH analogs, danazol) for endometrial preparation. Posttreatment follow up protocol included physical and ultrasonographic evaluation at three, six, nine, and 12 months for the first year and yearly after. RESULTS: The authors had no cases of uterine perforation, thermal injury to adjacent organs, and infection or sepsis. During follow up, there was a gradual decrease in amenorrhea rate (90.6% - 68.8%) and in satisfaction rate (90.6% - 71.9%). Moreover during follow up, eight women underwent to total abdominal hysterectomy. Among them, seven women had uterine myomas and one woman had adenomyosis. CONCLUSIONS: Endometrial preparation with endometrial curettage seems to be a good alternative to hormonal pretreatment. It has the advantage of avoiding delays, side effects, and cost of hormonal pretreatment. Moreover, microwave endometrial ablation after endometrial curettage is successful and highly acceptable.

Induction of labor compared to dilation and evacuation for postmortem analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the ability to obtain autopsy and cytogenetics after midtrimester termination. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of women undergoing termination, via induction or dilation and evacuation (D&E), at 16 0/7-23 6/7 weeks was performed. Exclusion criteria were elective termination, preterm labor, PPROM, and no autopsy or cytogenetic exam performed. The ability to obtain cytogenetics and autopsy as well as complications rates were compared between the two groups with Chi-square tests. RESULTS: Of the 469 women who met the inclusion criteria, 158 had an induction and 312 had a D&E. The induction of labor group had higher mean gestational ages, p < 0.01. Successful autopsy was more likely in the induction group, 94.3%, versus D&E group, 34.7%, p = 0.01. There was no difference in ability to obtain cytogenetics between the two groups, 89.1% in the induction group, and 92.3% in D&E group, p = 0.4. There was a difference in the total complication rates between the groups, 9.8% (26) in the induction versus 6.4% (20) in the D&E group, p < 0.01; however, there was no difference in major complications. CONCLUSIONS: Midtrimester terminations by induction were more likely to have successful autopsies when compared with D&E. The ability to obtain cytogenetics was similar regardless of termination mode.

The third stage of labor: a study of outcomes in the second trimester of pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the length of the third stage of labor in second trimester pregnancies, to determine the rate of complications such as hemorrhage or infection, and to determine the ideal timing for delivery of the placenta in these pregnancies. STUDY DESIGN: A review of 121 consecutive vaginal deliveries between 16 and 27 gestational weeks was performed. Length of the third stage of labor was determined, as well as the composite endpoint of need for manual or instrumented removal of the placenta, or development of chorioamnionitis or endometritis. RESULTS: Women who delivered at < 23 weeks' gestational age had a significantly longer length of the third stage of labor than did women who delivered at > or = 23 weeks' gestational age (47 minutes vs. 11 minutes, p < 0.01) and were more likely to have chorioamnionitis (30.6% vs. 12.5%, p < 0.05). A third stage of labor > 30 minutes was associated with an increase in manual or instrumented delivery of the placenta (49.0% vs. 14.9%, p < 0.002), a greater decrease in hemoglobin (-1.6 g/dL vs. -0.8% g/dL, p < 0.01), and a higher rate of chorioamnionitis (35.8% vs. 13.6%, p < 0.01). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed optimal timing for delivery of the placenta is < 60 minutes. CONCLUSION: Midtrimester deliveries are at increased risk of retained placenta and chorioamnionitis. The optimal timing for placenta delivery is < 60 minutes.

Histopathological findings of endometrial specimens in abnormal uterine bleeding.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of different histopathological findings obtained from dilatation and curettage (D&C) specimens in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB). METHODS: In a retrospective review of 591 specimens, the included subjects were all women with AUB who underwent D&C between 2002 and 2006 in Be'sat Hospital, Tehran, Iran. The pathological diagnoses were analyzed in four groups from normal to malignant endometrium. The pathological groups were evaluated for patients' characteristics including demographic data and medical history. RESULTS: The majority of patients (61.6%) were in the 41-50 year age group. Totally, 81.4% of patients had normal pathology. The disordered proliferative endometrium/polyps, hyperplasia, and malignant pathology were found in 15.4, 2.5, and 0.7% of specimens, respectively. The abnormal pathologies were seen more among patients with postmenopausal status, nulli-/primigravid women, and those with hypertension, diabetes, hypothyroidism, and polycystic ovary syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: The proliferative endometrium and secretory endometrium were the most common histopathological observations in AUB patients in our region, and except normal endometrium, disordered proliferative endometrium was the most common cause of AUB.

Impact of first-trimester mechanical cervical dilatation during curettage on maternal and neonatal outcomes: A retrospective comparative study.

OBJECTIVE: Earlier studies have indicated a potential link between dilatation and curettage (D&C) and subsequent preterm delivery, possibly attributed to cervical damage. This study examines outcomes in pregnancies subsequent to first-trimester curettage with and without cervical dilatation. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on women who conceived after undergoing curettage due to a first trimester pregnancy loss. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of the subsequent pregnancy were compared between two groups: women who underwent cervical dilatation before their curettage and those who had curettage without dilatation. The primary outcome assessed was the rate of preterm delivery at the subsequent pregnancy, and secondary outcomes included other adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Univariate analysis was performed, followed by multiple logistic regression models to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Among the 1087 women meeting the inclusion criteria during the study period, 852 (78.4 %) underwent first-trimester curettage with cervical dilatation, while 235 (21.6 %) opted for curettage only. No significant maternal or neonatal different outcomes were noted between the study groups, including preterm delivery (5.5 % vs. 3.5 %, p = 0.16), fertility treatments, placental complications, and mode of delivery. However, deliveries following D&C were associated with higher rates of small for gestational age neonates (7.6 % vs. 3.8 %, p = 0.04). Multivariate analysis revealed that cervical dilation before curettage was not significantly linked to preterm delivery [adjusted odds ratio 0.64 (0.33-1.26), p = 0.20]. CONCLUSION: The use of cervical dilatation during a curettage procedure for first trimester pregnancy loss, does not confer additional risk of preterm delivery. Further studies are needed to reinforce and validate these results.

Concordance between hysteroscopic impression and endometrial histopathological diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of hysteroscopic impression for diagnosing benign and malignant endometrial pathology. METHOD: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study involving case records of 412 patients who underwent hysteroscopy with diagnostic dilatation and curettage (D&C) at the University of Malaya Medical Centre from January 2009 to August 2011, and cases with records of previous hysteroscopies (2007-2008). Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values, likelihood ratios (LR) and post-test probabilities of hysteroscopy were calculated. D&C was set as the 'gold standard'. RESULTS: Hysteroscopy and histology results were concordant in 366 (88.8%) subjects. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were high exceeding 80%. Moderate sensitivity for endometrial hyperplasia (64.4%, 95% CI=49.8%-76.8%) with moderate PPV for malignancy (62.1%, 95% CI=44.0%-77.3%) due to misdiagnosing hyperplasia as malignant was observed. PPV for leiomyoma was reduced (83.3%, 95% CI=60.8%-94.2%) despite 100% sensitivity, due to D&C false negatives. High positive LR (>10) and low negative LR (<0.2) were observed generally except for endometrial hyperplasia (0.36). Hysteroscopy had moderate positive post-test probability for malignancy (0.62) but effective in ruling out malignancy (negative post-test probability=0.00). CONCLUSION: Hysteroscopy is accurate for diagnosing focal and malignant endometrial pathology but only moderate for hyperplasia. Endometrial sampling is recommended for all cases especially when suspecting hyperplasia or malignancy.

Surgical and medical second trimester abortion in South Africa: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: A high percentage of abortions performed in South Africa are in the second trimester. However, little research focuses on women's experiences seeking second trimester abortion or the efficacy and safety of these services.The objectives are to document clinical and acceptability outcomes of second trimester medical and surgical abortion as performed at public hospitals in the Western Cape Province. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of women undergoing abortion at 12.1-20.9 weeks at five hospitals in Western Cape Province, South Africa in 2008. Two hundred and twenty women underwent D&E with misoprostol cervical priming, and 84 underwent induction with misoprostol alone. Information was obtained about the procedure and immediate complications, and women were interviewed after recovery. RESULTS: Median gestational age at abortion was earlier for D&E clients compared to induction (16.0 weeks vs. 18.1 weeks, p < 0.001). D&E clients reported shorter intervals between first clinic visit and abortion (median 17 vs. 30 days, p < 0.001). D&E was more effective than induction (99.5% vs. 50.0% of cases completed on-site without unplanned surgical procedure, p < 0.001). Although immediate complications were similar (43.8% D&E vs. 52.4% induction), all three major complications occurred with induction. Early fetal expulsion occurred in 43.3% of D&E cases. While D&E clients reported higher pain levels and emotional discomfort, most women were satisfied with their experience. CONCLUSIONS: As currently performed in South Africa, second trimester abortions by D&E were more effective than induction procedures, required shorter hospital stay, had fewer major immediate complications and were associated with shorter delays accessing care. Both services can be improved by implementing evidence-based protocols.

Management of Cervical Ectopic Pregnancy with Small-Caliber Hysteroscopy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Cervical ectopic pregnancy is one of the rarest forms of ectopic pregnancy. We present a single center case series of 10 cases of cervical ectopic pregnancy, where 3 patients underwent small-caliber hysteroscopy as a single treatment method. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of women treated at our medical center with the diagnosis of cervical ectopic pregnancy from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2020. Patient characteristics, medical history, obstetric history, diagnostic methods were collected. Small-caliber hysteroscopy treatment was performed in 3 patients and 7 patients underwent dilation and curettage (D&C). RESULTS: We identified 10 patients diagnosed with cervical ectopic pregnancy who were treated at our center. Ultrasonography was used to diagnose all cervical ectopic pregnancies Three patients underwent small-caliber hysteroscopy as a single treatment option, while D&C was performed in 7 patients. Patients who underwent small-caliber hysteroscopy had a median gestational age at diagnosis of 7 weeks and initial ßHCG < 10,000 mIU/mL. These patients had shorter hospital stay and a lower estimated blood loss than patients who underwent D&C. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, small-caliber hysteroscopy is a safe and effective single treatment option for cervical ectopic pregnancy, but requires a skilled and experienced gynecologist.

Conception rates after medical versus surgical evacuation of early miscarriage.

OBJECTIVE: To compare short-term fertility rates after medical and surgical management of early miscarriage. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING: Academic tertiary-care medical center. PATIENT(S): A total of 203 patients were enrolled between June 2017 and May 2018, comprising 106 surgical evacuations and 97 medical evacuations. INTERVENTION(S): Either surgical or medical evacuation of the uterine cavity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Conception rates 6 months after miscarriage. RESULT(S): Conception rates 6 months after miscarriage among women who had attempted to become pregnant were similar between the medically and surgically evacuated groups (68.0% vs. 65.1%). There were no significant differences in background characteristics between the groups, apart from younger age and earlier gestational age among the medically treated group. There was no difference in the proportion of women using assisted reproductive technologies between the medically and surgically managed groups (15.5% vs. 12.6%, respectively). The median time-to-conception was 4 ± 2 months in both groups. Cumulative pregnancy rate 12 months after pregnancy loss, live birth rate, and repeat miscarriage rate also were similar between groups. CONCLUSION(S): Modality of uterine evacuation after early miscarriage does not affect short-term fertility outcomes.

Conservatively treated endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia/cancer: Risk of intrauterine synechiae.

INTRODUCTION: To determine whether progestin type or number of dilation and curettage procedures (D&Cs) were associated with intrauterine synechiae (IS) or pregnancy outcomes in patients conservatively treated for endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) or endometrial cancer (EC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated patients conservatively treated for EIN or EC from 2000 to 2017 at an academic center. IS were identified hysteroscopically. We calculated proportions for categorical variables and tested associations between D&C number, progestin, and pregnancy outcomes using Pearson chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests. A post-hoc power analysis indicated sufficient power to detect livebirth. RESULTS: We analyzed 54 patients, 15 with EIN (28 %) and 39 with EC (72 %), with a mean age of 34 ± 1.2 years. Progestin treatment types included megestrol acetate (MA) (n = 24), MA with levonorgestrel intrauterine device (LngIUD) (n = 10), MA followed by LngIUD (n = 3), and LngIUD alone (n = 6). Mean number of D&Cs was 3.9 ± 0.9. Overall, 53 subjects underwent hysteroscopy; 10 (19 %) had IS. When D&Cs were grouped into 0-2, 3-4 and ≥5, each increase in D&C group had a 2.9 higher odds of IS (OR: 2.91, p = 0.04, CI: 1.05-10.02). LngIUD was associated with a nonsignificant 46 % decrease in the odds of IS (OR: 0.54, p = 0.66, CI: 0.08-2.87). Twenty-two women attempted pregnancy; 14 women achieved a total of 20 pregnancies and 9 women had total of 15 livebirths (41 % livebirth rate). The number of D&Cs and progestin treatment type were not associated with pregnancy outcomes. DISCUSSION: Among 54 patients conservatively treated for EC/EIN, nearly 20 % developed IS. However, hysteroscopic and/or fertility treatments may improve pregnancy outcomes.

Safety of late second-trimester pregnancy termination by laminaria dilatation and evacuation in patients with previous multiple cesarean sections.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether there is an increased perioperative risk in termination of late second-trimester pregnancy after multiple cesarean sections by laminaria dilatation and evacuation. STUDY DESIGN: During the period between January 2002 and June 2008, 636 consecutive patients underwent late second-trimester (17-24 weeks) pregnancy terminations by dilatation and evacuation. Patients were divided into 3 subgroups: those with no previous cesarean section (n = 545), those with 1 previous cesarean section (n = 59), and those with several previous cesarean sections (n = 32). RESULTS: There were no significant differences in major perioperative complications, such as anesthetic complications, need for blood transfusion, and cervical lacerations comparing the 3 subgroups. Importantly, there were neither cases of uterine perforation nor retained products of conception in the 3 subgroups. CONCLUSION: Late second-trimester pregnancy termination after multiple cesarean sections by laminaria dilatation and evacuation is probably not associated with an increased perioperative risk. Larger studies are needed to empower this study.