Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 552
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Appl Physiol ; 121(1): 1-21, 2021 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33095376

RESUMO

Energy availability (EA) is defined as the amount of dietary energy available to sustain physiological function after subtracting the energetic cost of exercise. Insufficient EA due to increased exercise, reduced energy intake, or a combination of both, is a potent disruptor of the endocrine milieu. As such, EA is conceived as a key etiological factor underlying a plethora of physiological dysregulations described in the female athlete triad, its male counterpart and the Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport models. Originally developed upon female-specific physiological responses, this concept has recently been extended to males, where experimental evidence is limited. The majority of data for all these models are from cross-sectional or observational studies where hypothesized chronic low energy availability (LEA) is linked to physiological maladaptation. However, the body of evidence determining causal effects of LEA on endocrine, and physiological function through prospective studies manipulating EA is comparatively small, with interventions typically lasting ≤ 5 days. Extending laboratory-based findings to the field requires recognition of the strengths and limitations of current knowledge. To aid this, this review will: (1) provide a brief historical overview of the origin of the concept in mammalian ecology through its evolution of algebraic calculations used in humans today, (2) Outline key differences from the 'energy balance' concept, (3) summarise and critically evaluate the effects of LEA on tissues/systems for which we now have evidence, namely: hormonal milieu, reproductive system endocrinology, bone metabolism and skeletal muscle; and finally (4) provide perspectives and suggestions for research upon identified knowledge gaps.


Assuntos
Ingestão de Energia , Metabolismo Energético , Exercício Físico , Hormônios Gonadais/metabolismo , Medicina Esportiva/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Sistema Hipotálamo-Hipofisário/metabolismo , Sistema Hipotálamo-Hipofisário/fisiologia , Masculino , Medicina Esportiva/normas
2.
Am Fam Physician ; 103(9): 539-546, 2021 05 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33929170

RESUMO

The preparticipation physical evaluation (PPE) is a common reason for young athletes to see a primary care physician. An annual PPE is required by most state high school athletic associations for participation in school-based sports, although there is limited evidence to support its effectiveness for detecting conditions that predispose athletes to injury or illness. In 2019, the American Academy of Pediatrics, with representatives from the American Academy of Family Physicians and other organizations, published updated PPE recommendations (PPE5). According to the guideline, the general goals of the PPE are determining general physical and psychological health; evaluating for life-threatening or disabling conditions, including risk of sudden cardiac arrest and other conditions that may predispose the athlete to illness or injury; and serving as an entry point into the health care system for those without a medical home or primary care physician. The guideline recommends that the evaluation take place in the physician's office rather than in a group setting. The PPE should include a structured physical examination that focuses on the cardiovascular, musculoskeletal, and neurologic systems. Screening for depression, anxiety disorders, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder is also recommended. Clinicians should recognize any findings suggestive of the relative energy deficiency in sport syndrome. Additional consideration is required to address the needs and concerns of transgender athletes and athletes with physical and intellectual disabilities. Finally, guidelines have been published regarding return to play for athletes who have had COVID-19.


Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Medicina de Família e Comunidade/normas , Programas de Rastreamento , Pediatria/normas , Exame Físico , Medição de Risco , Medicina Esportiva/normas , Traumatismos em Atletas/prevenção & controle , Criança , Avaliação da Deficiência , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Programas de Rastreamento/organização & administração , Saúde Mental , Exame Físico/métodos , Exame Físico/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Volta ao Esporte/normas , Volta ao Esporte/tendências , Medição de Risco/métodos , Medição de Risco/normas , Fatores de Risco , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos
3.
Clin J Sport Med ; 31(5): 401-406, 2021 09 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32073477

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare cardiovascular screening policies of Australian elite sporting organizations. DESIGN: Online survey. SETTING: Elite/professional sports in Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Chief medical officers (CMOs) of elite/professional sports in Australia, including rugby union and league, cricket, tennis, Australian football, and cycling. ASSESSMENT OF VARIABLES: Survey questions about each sport's cardiac screening policy: which screening components were included [eg, history and physical (H&P), resting 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG)], whether screening was mandatory, whether the policy applied to elite junior and/or adult players, and which criteria were used to interpret ECGs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Which sports had a formal cardiac screening policy, which athletes the policy applied to, components of screening, ECG interpretation criteria used. RESULTS: Chief medical officers for 22/31 (71%) sports responded, representing >5000 athletes. Of these, 19/22 (86%) perform regular screening (100% H&P; 89% included ECG) with international cyclists also having routine echocardiograms and stress testing. Thirty-three percent of CMOs used the 2017 International Criteria for athlete ECG interpretation. Screening was mandatory with enforcement (26%), mandatory without enforcement (48%), and opt-out (26%). All screened adult elite athletes, and 68% screened junior elite athletes. Forty-two percent indicated athletes were required to pay for screening tests, and 63% required athletes to pay for follow-up tests. Almost all (94%) sports with a sports physician as the CMO screened athletes. CONCLUSIONS: Most sports have a screening policy, with reasonable uniformity of components. All included H&P, and almost all included ECG. Only one sport included an echocardiogram and stress test as a standard (international players only). Promoting the latest ECG interpretation criteria may reduce false-positives and cost. Future work should explore cardiac emergency plans, screening infrastructure, cost, and long-term follow-up.


Assuntos
Atletas , Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Programas de Rastreamento , Medicina Esportiva/normas , Esportes , Adulto , Austrália , Morte Súbita Cardíaca/prevenção & controle , Eletrocardiografia , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento/normas
4.
Int J Sports Med ; 42(9): 853-858, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33440443

RESUMO

The validation of a 4-domain PROM tailored to orthopedic sports medicine was performed through item generation, item scaling, validity and reliability testing, statistical analysis, as well as item reduction. Conbrach's alpha was used to verify item homogeneity, i. e. their accuracy or consistency. This PROM showed acceptable statistical accuracy and clinical applicability for a variety of surgical treatments, regardless of the anatomical injury sites. Moreover, this PROM considers the athletes' primary physical demands in an non-injured baseline condition, their motivation to continue sports practice and participation, and the influence of sports practice on their quality of life. This 4-domain PROM tailored for orthopedic sports medicine appears to be a valid tool to assess athletes and high-performing practitioners with sports injuries, recording their perception of injury, expectations of treatment; evaluation of postoperative care and treatment received, and perceived outcomes compared to their pre-injury status of physical demands in sports activity. The tool is unique, allowing direct comparisons between athletes' perception of pre-injury baseline, injury, treatment, and outcome. It will be a welcome adjunct to the sports medicine professional's tool box when assessing athlete's status and outcome after injury and intervention.


Assuntos
Traumatismos em Atletas/terapia , Ortopedia/normas , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Medicina Esportiva/normas , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Atletas , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade de Vida , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
5.
Br J Sports Med ; 54(10): 566-572, 2020 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32079603

RESUMO

Using an expert consensus-based approach, a rugby union Video Analysis Consensus (RUVAC) group was formed to develop a framework for video analysis research in rugby union. The aim of the framework is to improve the consistency of video analysis work in rugby union and help enhance the overall quality of future research in the sport. To reach consensus, a systematic review and Delphi method study design was used. After a systematic search of the literature, 17 articles were used to develop the final framework that described and defined key actions and events in rugby union (rugby). Thereafter, a group of researchers and practitioners with experience and expertise in rugby video analysis formed the RUVAC group. Each member of the group examined the framework of descriptors and definitions and rated their level of agreement on a 5-point agreement Likert scale (1: strongly disagree; 2: disagree; 3: neither agree or disagree; 4: agree; 5: strongly agree). The mean rating of agreement on the five-point scale (1: strongly disagree; 5: strongly agree) was 4.6 (4.3-4.9), 4.6 (4.4-4.9), 4.7 (4.5-4.9), 4.8 (4.6-5.0) and 4.8 (4.6-5.0) for the tackle, ruck, scrum, line-out and maul, respectively. The RUVAC group recommends using this consensus as the starting framework when conducting rugby video analysis research. Which variables to use (if not all) depends on the objectives of the study. Furthermore, the intention of this consensus is to help integrate video data with other data (eg, injury surveillance).


Assuntos
Traumatismos em Atletas/prevenção & controle , Futebol/lesões , Medicina Esportiva/métodos , Medicina Esportiva/normas , Gravação em Vídeo/normas , Técnica Delphi , Humanos , Estudos de Tempo e Movimento
6.
Br J Sports Med ; 54(22): 1365-1371, 2020 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32699001

RESUMO

Questionable research practices (QRPs) are intentional and unintentional practices that can occur when designing, conducting, analysing, and reporting research, producing biased study results. Sport and exercise medicine (SEM) research is vulnerable to the same QRPs that pervade the biomedical and psychological sciences, producing false-positive results and inflated effect sizes. Approximately 90% of biomedical research reports supported study hypotheses, provoking suspicion about the field-wide presence of systematic biases to facilitate study findings that confirm researchers' expectations. In this education review, we introduce three common QRPs (ie, HARKing, P-hacking and Cherry-picking), perform a cross-sectional study to assess the proportion of original SEM research that reports supported study hypotheses, and draw attention to existing solutions and resources to overcome QRPs that manifest in exploratory research. We hypothesised that ≥ 85% of original SEM research studies would report supported study hypotheses. Two independent assessors systematically identified, screened, included, and extracted study data from original research articles published between 1 January 2019 and 31 May 2019 in the British Journal of Sports Medicine, Sports Medicine, the American Journal of Sports Medicine, and the Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy We extracted data relating to whether studies reported that the primary hypothesis was supported or rejected by the results. Study hypotheses, methodologies, and analysis plans were preregistered at the Open Science Framework. One hundred and twenty-nine original research studies reported at least one study hypothesis, of which 106 (82.2%) reported hypotheses that were supported by study results. Of 106 studies reporting that primary hypotheses were supported by study results, 75 (70.8%) studies reported that the primary hypothesis was fully supported by study results. The primary study hypothesis was partially supported by study results in 28 (26.4%) studies. We detail open science practices and resources that aim to safe-guard against QRPs that bely the credibility and replicability of original research findings.


Assuntos
Exercício Físico , Pesquisa/normas , Medicina Esportiva/normas , Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Humanos , Projetos de Pesquisa/normas , Pesquisadores/normas
7.
Br J Sports Med ; 54(4): 208-215, 2020 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31537549

RESUMO

The following organisations endorsed this document: American Association of Neurological Surgeons, American Medical Society for Sports Medicine, American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine, American Osteopathic Academy of Sports Medicine, College Athletic Trainers' Society, Collegiate Strength and Conditioning Coaches Association, Congress of Neurological Surgeons, Korey Stringer Institute, National Athletic Trainers' Association, National Strength and Conditioning Association, National Operating Committee for Standards on Athletic Equipment, Sports Neuropsychology Society. The following organisation has affirmed the value of this document: American Academy of Neurology. The Second Safety in College Football Summit resulted in interassociation consensus recommendations for three paramount safety issues in collegiate athletics: (1) independent medical care for collegiate athletes; (2) diagnosis and management of sport-related concussion; and (3) year-round football practice contact for collegiate athletes. This document, the fourth arising from the 2016 event, addresses the prevention of catastrophic injury, including traumatic and non-traumatic death, in collegiate athletes. The final recommendations in this document are the result of presentations and discussions on key items that occurred at the summit. After those presentations and discussions, endorsing organisation representatives agreed on 18 foundational statements that became the basis for this consensus paper that has been subsequently reviewed by relevant stakeholders and endorsing organisations. This is the final endorsed document for preventing catastrophic injury and death in collegiate athletes. This document is divided into the following components. (1) Background-this section provides an overview of catastrophic injury and death in collegiate athletes. (2) Interassociation recommendations: preventing catastrophic injury and death in collegiate athletes-this section provides the final recommendations of the medical organisations for preventing catastrophic injuries in collegiate athletes. (3) Interassociation recommendations: checklist-this section provides a checklist for each member school. The checklist statements stem from foundational statements voted on by representatives of medical organisations during the summit, and they serve as the primary vehicle for each member school to implement the prevention recommendations. (4) References-this section provides the relevant references for this document. (5) Appendices-this section lists the foundational statements, agenda, summit attendees and medical organisations that endorsed this document.


Assuntos
Traumatismos em Atletas/mortalidade , Traumatismos em Atletas/prevenção & controle , Medicina Esportiva/normas , Aclimatação , Comportamento Competitivo , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/organização & administração , Futebol Americano/lesões , Política de Saúde , Humanos , Equipamento de Proteção Individual , Condicionamento Físico Humano , Medicina Esportiva/educação , Medicina Esportiva/organização & administração , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
8.
Br J Sports Med ; 54(19): 1157-1161, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32878870

RESUMO

SARS-CoV-2 is the causative virus responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic. This pandemic has necessitated that all professional and elite sport is either suspended, postponed or cancelled altogether to minimise the risk of viral spread. As infection rates drop and quarantine restrictions are lifted, the question how athletes can safely resume competitive sport is being asked. Given the rapidly evolving knowledge base about the virus and changing governmental and public health recommendations, a precise answer to this question is fraught with complexity and nuance. Without robust data to inform policy, return-to-play (RTP) decisions are especially difficult for elite athletes on the suspicion that the COVID-19 virus could result in significant cardiorespiratory compromise in a minority of afflicted athletes. There are now consistent reports of athletes reporting persistent and residual symptoms many weeks to months after initial COVID-19 infection. These symptoms include cough, tachycardia and extreme fatigue. To support safe RTP, we provide sport and exercise medicine physicians with practical recommendations on how to exclude cardiorespiratory complications of COVID-19 in elite athletes who place high demand on their cardiorespiratory system. As new evidence emerges, guidance for a safe RTP should be updated.


Assuntos
Betacoronavirus , Infecções por Coronavirus/complicações , Miocardite/diagnóstico , Pneumonia Viral/complicações , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Transtornos Respiratórios/diagnóstico , Volta ao Esporte/normas , Atletas , Biomarcadores/sangue , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Morte Súbita Cardíaca/prevenção & controle , Eletrocardiografia , Humanos , Miocardite/sangue , Miocardite/etiologia , Miocárdio/patologia , Necrose/etiologia , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/diagnóstico , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Transtornos Respiratórios/etiologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Medicina Esportiva/normas , Avaliação de Sintomas , Troponina/sangue
9.
Clin J Sport Med ; 30(3): 210-215, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32341287

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To update information regarding practice patterns of family physicians with a certificate of added qualifications (CAQ) in Sports Medicine (SM), because it has been over 10 years since the last comprehensive study. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of 2017 and 2018 American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM) Family Medicine Certification and SM CAQ examination registration practice demographic questionnaire data. SETTING: N/A. PARTICIPANTS: Family physicians with a CAQ in SM [sports medicine family physicians (SM-FPs)] and family physicians without a CAQ registering for the ABFM Family Medicine Certification or SM CAQ examinations. INTERVENTION: N/A. MAIN OUTCOMES: Self-reported time spent practicing SM, activities in SM, scope of practice, and practice setting. RESULTS: Sports medicine family physicians are predominately men (78.7%) and below 49 years (65.8%). Most SM-FPs spend 60% of their time or less practicing SM and the scope of practice of SM-FPs is only slightly narrower than that of their family physician counterparts without a CAQ. In addition, 92.8% of SM-FPs are practicing in an urban setting. CONCLUSIONS: The similarity of scope of practice for SM-FPs and family physicians without a CAQ and the time spent practicing SM by SM-FPs suggests that most SM-FPs are spending a significant amount of time continuing to practice their primary specialty. Sports medicine family physicians are largely attracted to urban practice settings, most likely because of the higher likelihood of employment opportunities. Finally, factors that may be dissuading women from entering the field of SM deserve further investigation.


Assuntos
Certificação , Médicos de Família/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicina Esportiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Médicos de Família/normas , Medicina Esportiva/normas , Estados Unidos
10.
Clin J Sport Med ; 30(5): e143-e146, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30358618

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with entry into primary care sports medicine (PCSM) fellowship programs. DESIGN: Primary care sports medicine fellowship directors (FDs) and fellowship faculty were surveyed regarding preferences for accepting applicants into their programs. SETTING: Survey study. PARTICIPANTS: Primary care sports medicine FDs and fellowship faculty. ASSESSMENT OF RISK FACTORS: Questions were designed to delineate factors [clinical experience, letters of recommendation (LOR), scholarship, service commitment, interview performance, etc] perceived to be associated with entry into PCSM fellowship (1-10 scale; 10 = highest value). Weighted mean ± SD were calculated for each question. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Determination of most valued factors for entry into PCSM fellowship. RESULTS: Responses were provided by 242/2332 (10.4%) of the American Medical Society for Sports Medicine members, including 77 of 175 (44%) FDs. The top 3 factors for entry into PCSM fellowships for all respondents were as follows: interview performance (9.17 ± 1.13), LOR from SM fellowship faculty (8.20 ± 1.67), and high school game/event coverage (7.83 ± 1.70). Musculoskeletal ultrasound experience (4.50 ± 2.23) and residency training in pediatrics (4.58 ± 2.54), internal medicine (4.48 ± 2.44), emergency medicine (4.44 ± 2.59), and physical medicine and rehabilitation (4.40 ± 2.83) received the lowest scores. CONCLUSIONS: Applicants seeking entry into SM fellowships should prioritize performance during interviews, LOR from SM fellowship faculty, and team game/event coverage experiences.


Assuntos
Bolsas de Estudo/normas , Seleção de Pessoal/normas , Medicina Esportiva/educação , Pessoal Administrativo , Correspondência como Assunto , Medicina de Emergência/educação , Docentes de Medicina , Humanos , Medicina Interna/educação , Internato e Residência , Entrevistas como Assunto , Sistema Musculoesquelético/diagnóstico por imagem , Pediatria/educação , Reabilitação/educação , Esportes , Medicina Esportiva/normas , Inquéritos e Questionários/estatística & dados numéricos , Ultrassonografia , Estados Unidos
11.
Clin J Sport Med ; 30(4): 283-290, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30893122

RESUMO

This AMSSM position statement update is directed toward health care providers of patients involved in sport and exercise. There have been significant advances in clinical and scientific research in the understanding of blood-borne pathogens (BBPs), and this update incorporates these advancements. This document is intended as a general guide to clinical practice based on the current state of evidence, while acknowledging the need for modification as new knowledge becomes available. Confirmed transmission of BBPs during sport is exceedingly rare. There are no well-documented reports of HIV, hepatitis C virus, or hepatitis D virus transmission during sport. There is also no evidence for universal testing for BBPs as a specific requirement for participation in sports. Competitive athletes and nonathletes should follow appropriate general public health agency recommendations for screening for BBPs, considering their individual risk factors and exposures. Standard (universal) precautions must be followed by those providing care to athletes. Exercise and athletic participation can help promote a healthy lifestyle for persons living with BBPs. Those with acute symptomatic BBP infection should limit exercise intensity based on their current health status. Education is the key tool for preventing BBP transmission. Research gaps include evaluation of the prevalence of BBP infections in competitive athletes, the effects of long-term, intense training on infected athletes, and the effects of BBP treatment therapies on performance.


Assuntos
Patógenos Transmitidos pelo Sangue , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis , Medicina Esportiva/normas , Comitês Consultivos , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Infecções por HIV/transmissão , Educação em Saúde , Hepatite B/epidemiologia , Hepatite B/prevenção & controle , Hepatite B/transmissão , Hepatite C/epidemiologia , Hepatite C/prevenção & controle , Hepatite C/transmissão , Hepatite D/epidemiologia , Hepatite D/prevenção & controle , Hepatite D/transmissão , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento/normas , Prevalência
12.
Curr Sports Med Rep ; 19(6): 232-234, 2020 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32516194

RESUMO

The American Medical Society for Sports Medicine (AMSSM) convened a group of experts to develop a Position Statement addressing the problem of sexual violence in sport. The AMSSM Sexual Violence in Sport Task Force held a series of meetings over 7 months, beginning in July 2019. Following a literature review, the task force used an iterative process and expert consensus to finalize the position statement. The objective of this position statement is to raise awareness of this critical issue among sports medicine physicians and to declare a commitment to engage in collaborative, multidisciplinary solutions to reduce sexual violence in sport.


Assuntos
Delitos Sexuais/prevenção & controle , Medicina Esportiva/normas , Esportes , Consenso , Humanos , Estados Unidos
13.
Curr Sports Med Rep ; 19(2): 45-49, 2020 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32028347

RESUMO

The recent explosion of wearable technology and the associated concerns prompted the International Federation of Sports Medicine (FIMS) to create a quality assurance standard for wearable devices, which provides commissioned testing of marketing claims and endorsement of commercial wearables that test favorably. An open forum as announced in the conference advertising was held at the Annual Meeting of the New England Regional Chapter of the American College of Sports Medicine (NEACSM) November 7 to 8, 2019, in Providence, Rhode Island, USA for attending NEACSM members to voice their input on the process. Herein, we report the proceedings. The round table participants perceived the quality assurance standard to be important, but identified some practical process challenges that included the broad scope and complexity of the device universe, the need for a multiphase testing pathway, and the associated fees for product evaluation. The participants also supported the evaluation of device data analysis, behavioral influences, and user experience in the overall evaluation. Looking forward, the FIMS quality assurance standard faces the challenge of balancing these broader perspectives with practical constraints of budget, facilities, time, and human resources.


Assuntos
Monitores de Aptidão Física/normas , Medicina Esportiva/normas , Esportes/normas , Dispositivos Eletrônicos Vestíveis/normas , Humanos , New England
14.
Curr Sports Med Rep ; 19(2): 58-69, 2020 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32028350

RESUMO

A preparticipation physical evaluation (PPE) is a requirement that many athletes must complete before participating in organized sports. Currently, the traditional musculoskeletal (MSK) portion of the PPE lacks robust evidence to support its ability to accurately predict those at greater risk for MSK injury. Functional movement testing has garnered attention for potential use in the PPE having shown some promise for greater sensitivity at identifying those at greater risk for MSK injury. Despite the widespread use of MSK PPE screening to identify athletes at greater risk for MSK injury, there is no significant evidence demonstrating that subsequent interventions result in decreased MSK injury.


Assuntos
Traumatismos em Atletas/prevenção & controle , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/prevenção & controle , Exame Físico/métodos , Medicina Esportiva/normas , Humanos
15.
Scand J Med Sci Sports ; 29(9): 1375-1382, 2019 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31059145

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Although both European (EACPR) and American (ACSM) Scientific Societies have devised cardiovascular protocols for the assessment of "middle-aged/older" individuals who are about to participate in sports or physical exercise, there are no data regarding the guidelines' sensitivity of these measures. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of different international screening protocols. METHODS: This observational cross-sectional study evaluated 525 subjects (80% males; median age 50 [35-85] years) seeking medical certification before participating in sports or regular exercise. The screening protocol consisted in completing a personal history profile, a physical examination, a resting ECG, a maximal exercise test, and, when required, additional instrumental evaluations. The effectiveness of the current EACPR as well as the former and new ACSM guidelines was thereby analyzed. RESULTS: The full screening protocol uncovered 100 previously undetected cardiovascular conditions (main pathologies detected: 21 coronary artery disease (CAD), 14 arterial hypertension, 38 complex arrhythmias). When the European guideline was used, 49% of these conditions went undetected, including 10 CAD. When the former American guideline was used, 29% (6 CAD) went undetected; when the recently updated edition was used, 50% including 11 CAD went undetected. CONCLUSION: The former ACSM guideline demonstrated a higher diagnostic sensitivity than the newer version and the EACPR guideline. Current screening protocols might be adapted for subjects performing high-intensity exercise due to their higher risk for cardiovascular and exercise-associated adverse events. The use of an incremental ECG-monitored maximal exercise test seems to improve these screening outcomes.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Teste de Esforço , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Medicina Esportiva/normas , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Arritmias Cardíacas/diagnóstico , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico , Estudos Transversais , Eletrocardiografia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Sociedades Médicas , Esportes
16.
Brain Inj ; 33(13-14): 1652-1659, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31526055

RESUMO

Primary objective: To describe and compare athletic trainer (AT) post-concussion driving management practices and opinions.Research design: Cross-sectional.Methods & procedures: A survey was sent via email to 8,723 ATs (10.8% response rate[945/8723]) to capture demographics, management practices, and opinions (agreement on a seven-point Likert scale). We used Kruskal-Wallis tests to compare the percentage of patients instructed to refrain from driving across the highest earned a degree, setting, and years certified (alpha = 0.05).Main outcomes & results: When asked whether they recommended patients with concussion refrain from driving, 58.5%(n = 553/945) of ATs responded "sometimes", 37.9%(n = 358/945) responded "always", and 3.6%(n = 34/945) responded "never". ATs responding "sometimes" or "always" estimated that they instruct 57.6 ± 37.6% of patients with concussion to refrain from driving. ATs most commonly: recommended that patients refrain from driving until symptom resolution(44.7%,n = 399/892); utilized their clinical exam (patient interview/history) to determine when a patient could resume driving(64.9%,n = 579/892); and provided instructions verbally(94.2%,n = 840/892). High school(60.5 ± 37.6%) and clinical ATs(66.5 ± 31.2%) trended toward higher percentages of patients they instruct to refrain from driving relative to college(52.3 ± 38.2%; χ2(2) = 5.92,p = .052).Conclusions: ATs recommend driving restrictions to some, but not all, patients with concussion. Overall, ATs recognize post-concussion driving dangers, but do not strongly endorse refraining from driving after a concussion. High school and clinical ATs may manage more adolescent novice drivers and, therefore, act more conservatively.


Assuntos
Atletas/psicologia , Traumatismos em Atletas/psicologia , Condução de Veículo/psicologia , Condução de Veículo/normas , Concussão Encefálica/psicologia , Medicina Esportiva/normas , Traumatismos em Atletas/complicações , Traumatismos em Atletas/reabilitação , Concussão Encefálica/complicações , Concussão Encefálica/reabilitação , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Competência Profissional/normas , Medicina Esportiva/educação , Medicina Esportiva/métodos , Inquéritos e Questionários
19.
Br J Sports Med ; 53(20): 1264-1267, 2019 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30954947

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The use of video to assist professional sporting bodies with the diagnosis of sport-related concussion (SRC) has been well established; however, there has been little consistency across sporting codes with regards to which video signs should be used, and the definitions of each of these signs. AIM: The aims of this study were to develop a consensus for the video signs considered to be most useful in the identification of a possible SRC and to develop a consensus definition for each of these video signs across the sporting codes. METHODS: A brief questionnaire was used to assess which video signs were considered to be most useful in the identification of a possible concussion. Consensus was defined as >90% agreement by respondents. Existing definitions of these video signs from individual sports were collated, and individual components of the definitions were assessed and ranked. A modified Delphi approach was then used to create a consensus definition for each of the video signs. RESULTS: Respondents representing seven sporting bodies (Australian Football League, Cricket Australia, Major League Baseball, NFL, NHL, National Rugby League, World Rugby) reached consensus on eight video signs of concussion. Thirteen representatives from the seven professional sports ranked the definition components. Consolidation and refinement of the video signs and their definitions resulted in consensus definitions for six video signs of possible concussion: lying motionless, motor incoordination, impact seizure, tonic posturing, no protective action-floppy and blank/vacant look. CONCLUSIONS: These video signs and definitions have reached international consensus, are indicated for use by professional sporting bodies and will form the basis for further collaborative research.


Assuntos
Traumatismos em Atletas/diagnóstico , Concussão Encefálica/diagnóstico , Medicina Esportiva/normas , Gravação em Vídeo , Consenso , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA