RESUMO
Growing consumption is both necessary to end extreme poverty1and one of the main drivers of greenhouse gas emissions2, creating a potential tension between alleviating poverty and limiting global warming. Most poverty reduction has historically occurred because of economic growth3-6, which means that reducing poverty entails increasing not only the consumption of people living in poverty but also the consumption of people with a higher income. Here we estimate the emissions associated with the economic growth needed to alleviate extreme poverty using the international poverty line of US $2.15 per day (ref. 7). Even with historical energy- and carbon-intensity patterns, the global emissions increase associated with alleviating extreme poverty is modest, at 2.37 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent per year or 4.9% of 2019 global emissions. Lower inequality, higher energy efficiency and decarbonization of energy can ease this tension further: assuming the best historical performance, the emissions for poverty alleviation in 2050 will be reduced by 90%. More ambitious poverty lines require more economic growth in more countries, which leads to notably higher emissions. The challenge to align the development and climate objectives of the world is not in reconciling extreme poverty alleviation with climate objectives but in providing sustainable middle-income standards of living.
Assuntos
Dióxido de Carbono , Desenvolvimento Econômico , Política Ambiental , Aquecimento Global , Gases de Efeito Estufa , Pobreza , Dióxido de Carbono/análise , Desenvolvimento Econômico/estatística & dados numéricos , Desenvolvimento Econômico/tendências , Aquecimento Global/prevenção & controle , Aquecimento Global/estatística & dados numéricos , Gases de Efeito Estufa/análise , Renda , Pobreza/prevenção & controle , Pobreza/estatística & dados numéricos , Política Ambiental/legislação & jurisprudência , Política Ambiental/tendênciasRESUMO
Poverty is an important social determinant of health that is associated with increased risk of death1-5. Cash transfer programmes provide non-contributory monetary transfers to individuals or households, with or without behavioural conditions such as children's school attendance6,7. Over recent decades, cash transfer programmes have emerged as central components of poverty reduction strategies of many governments in low- and middle-income countries6,7. The effects of these programmes on adult and child mortality rates remains an important gap in the literature, however, with existing evidence limited to a few specific conditional cash transfer programmes, primarily in Latin America8-14. Here we evaluated the effects of large-scale, government-led cash transfer programmes on all-cause adult and child mortality using individual-level longitudinal mortality datasets from many low- and middle-income countries. We found that cash transfer programmes were associated with significant reductions in mortality among children under five years of age and women. Secondary heterogeneity analyses suggested similar effects for conditional and unconditional programmes, and larger effects for programmes that covered a larger share of the population and provided larger transfer amounts, and in countries with lower health expenditures, lower baseline life expectancy, and higher perceived regulatory quality. Our findings support the use of anti-poverty programmes such as cash transfers, which many countries have introduced or expanded during the COVID-19 pandemic, to improve population health.
Assuntos
Mortalidade da Criança , Países em Desenvolvimento , Mortalidade , Pobreza , Adulto , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Mortalidade da Criança/tendências , COVID-19/economia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Países em Desenvolvimento/economia , Pobreza/economia , Pobreza/prevenção & controle , Pobreza/estatística & dados numéricos , Expectativa de Vida , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Saúde Pública/métodos , Saúde Pública/estatística & dados numéricos , Saúde Pública/tendências , Mortalidade/tendênciasRESUMO
Social capital-the strength of an individual's social network and community-has been identified as a potential determinant of outcomes ranging from education to health1-8. However, efforts to understand what types of social capital matter for these outcomes have been hindered by a lack of social network data. Here, in the first of a pair of papers9, we use data on 21 billion friendships from Facebook to study social capital. We measure and analyse three types of social capital by ZIP (postal) code in the United States: (1) connectedness between different types of people, such as those with low versus high socioeconomic status (SES); (2) social cohesion, such as the extent of cliques in friendship networks; and (3) civic engagement, such as rates of volunteering. These measures vary substantially across areas, but are not highly correlated with each other. We demonstrate the importance of distinguishing these forms of social capital by analysing their associations with economic mobility across areas. The share of high-SES friends among individuals with low SES-which we term economic connectedness-is among the strongest predictors of upward income mobility identified to date10,11. Other social capital measures are not strongly associated with economic mobility. If children with low-SES parents were to grow up in counties with economic connectedness comparable to that of the average child with high-SES parents, their incomes in adulthood would increase by 20% on average. Differences in economic connectedness can explain well-known relationships between upward income mobility and racial segregation, poverty rates, and inequality12-14. To support further research and policy interventions, we publicly release privacy-protected statistics on social capital by ZIP code at https://www.socialcapital.org .
Assuntos
Status Econômico , Amigos , Renda , Capital Social , Mobilidade Social , Adulto , Criança , Relações Comunidade-Instituição , Conjuntos de Dados como Assunto , Status Econômico/estatística & dados numéricos , Mapeamento Geográfico , Humanos , Renda/estatística & dados numéricos , Pobreza/estatística & dados numéricos , Racismo , Mídias Sociais/estatística & dados numéricos , Mobilidade Social/estatística & dados numéricos , Apoio Social , Estados Unidos , VoluntáriosRESUMO
Estimates of global economic damage caused by carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions can inform climate policy1-3. The social cost of carbon (SCC) quantifies these damages by characterizing how additional CO2 emissions today impact future economic outcomes through altering the climate4-6. Previous estimates have suggested that large, warming-driven increases in energy expenditures could dominate the SCC7,8, but they rely on models9-11 that are spatially coarse and not tightly linked to data2,3,6,7,12,13. Here we show that the release of one ton of CO2 today is projected to reduce total future energy expenditures, with most estimates valued between -US$3 and -US$1, depending on discount rates. Our results are based on an architecture that integrates global data, econometrics and climate science to estimate local damages worldwide. Notably, we project that emerging economies in the tropics will dramatically increase electricity consumption owing to warming, which requires critical infrastructure planning. However, heating reductions in colder countries offset this increase globally. We estimate that 2099 annual global electricity consumption increases by about 4.5 exajoules (7 per cent of current global consumption) per one-degree-Celsius increase in global mean surface temperature (GMST), whereas direct consumption of other fuels declines by about 11.3 exajoules (7 per cent of current global consumption) per one-degree-Celsius increase in GMST. Our finding of net savings contradicts previous research7,8, because global data indicate that many populations will remain too poor for most of the twenty-first century to substantially increase energy consumption in response to warming. Importantly, damage estimates would differ if poorer populations were given greater weight14.
Assuntos
Dióxido de Carbono/economia , Mudança Climática/economia , Mudança Climática/estatística & dados numéricos , Fontes Geradoras de Energia/economia , Fontes Geradoras de Energia/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Temperatura , Ar Condicionado/economia , Ar Condicionado/estatística & dados numéricos , Ciclo do Carbono , Dióxido de Carbono/metabolismo , Eletricidade , Calefação/economia , Calefação/estatística & dados numéricos , História do Século XXI , Atividades Humanas , Pobreza/economia , Pobreza/estatística & dados numéricos , Ciências SociaisRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Black Americans are exposed to higher annual levels of air pollution containing fine particulate matter (particles with an aerodynamic diameter of ≤2.5 µm [PM2.5]) than White Americans and may be more susceptible to its health effects. Low-income Americans may also be more susceptible to PM2.5 pollution than high-income Americans. Because information is lacking on exposure-response curves for PM2.5 exposure and mortality among marginalized subpopulations categorized according to both race and socioeconomic position, the Environmental Protection Agency lacks important evidence to inform its regulatory rulemaking for PM2.5 standards. METHODS: We analyzed 623 million person-years of Medicare data from 73 million persons 65 years of age or older from 2000 through 2016 to estimate associations between annual PM2.5 exposure and mortality in subpopulations defined simultaneously by racial identity (Black vs. White) and income level (Medicaid eligible vs. ineligible). RESULTS: Lower PM2.5 exposure was associated with lower mortality in the full population, but marginalized subpopulations appeared to benefit more as PM2.5 levels decreased. For example, the hazard ratio associated with decreasing PM2.5 from 12 µg per cubic meter to 8 µg per cubic meter for the White higher-income subpopulation was 0.963 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.955 to 0.970), whereas equivalent hazard ratios for marginalized subpopulations were lower: 0.931 (95% CI, 0.909 to 0.953) for the Black higher-income subpopulation, 0.940 (95% CI, 0.931 to 0.948) for the White low-income subpopulation, and 0.939 (95% CI, 0.921 to 0.957) for the Black low-income subpopulation. CONCLUSIONS: Higher-income Black persons, low-income White persons, and low-income Black persons may benefit more from lower PM2.5 levels than higher-income White persons. These findings underscore the importance of considering racial identity and income together when assessing health inequities. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.).
Assuntos
Poluição do Ar , Suscetibilidade a Doenças , Desigualdades de Saúde , Material Particulado , Grupos Raciais , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Idoso , Humanos , Poluentes Atmosféricos/efeitos adversos , Poluentes Atmosféricos/análise , Poluição do Ar/efeitos adversos , Poluição do Ar/análise , Poluição do Ar/estatística & dados numéricos , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Suscetibilidade a Doenças/economia , Suscetibilidade a Doenças/epidemiologia , Suscetibilidade a Doenças/etnologia , Suscetibilidade a Doenças/mortalidade , Exposição Ambiental/efeitos adversos , Exposição Ambiental/análise , Exposição Ambiental/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Material Particulado/efeitos adversos , Material Particulado/análise , Pobreza/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Raciais/estatística & dados numéricos , Grupos Raciais/estatística & dados numéricos , Classe Social , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Brancos/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In February 2022, Massachusetts rescinded a statewide universal masking policy in public schools, and many Massachusetts school districts lifted masking requirements during the subsequent weeks. In the greater Boston area, only two school districts - the Boston and neighboring Chelsea districts - sustained masking requirements through June 2022. The staggered lifting of masking requirements provided an opportunity to examine the effect of universal masking policies on the incidence of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) in schools. METHODS: We used a difference-in-differences analysis for staggered policy implementation to compare the incidence of Covid-19 among students and staff in school districts in the greater Boston area that lifted masking requirements with the incidence in districts that sustained masking requirements during the 2021-2022 school year. Characteristics of the school districts were also compared. RESULTS: Before the statewide masking policy was rescinded, trends in the incidence of Covid-19 were similar across school districts. During the 15 weeks after the statewide masking policy was rescinded, the lifting of masking requirements was associated with an additional 44.9 cases per 1000 students and staff (95% confidence interval, 32.6 to 57.1), which corresponded to an estimated 11,901 cases and to 29.4% of the cases in all districts during that time. Districts that chose to sustain masking requirements longer tended to have school buildings that were older and in worse condition and to have more students per classroom than districts that chose to lift masking requirements earlier. In addition, these districts had higher percentages of low-income students, students with disabilities, and students who were English-language learners, as well as higher percentages of Black and Latinx students and staff. Our results support universal masking as an important strategy for reducing Covid-19 incidence in schools and loss of in-person school days. As such, we believe that universal masking may be especially useful for mitigating effects of structural racism in schools, including potential deepening of educational inequities. CONCLUSIONS: Among school districts in the greater Boston area, the lifting of masking requirements was associated with an additional 44.9 Covid-19 cases per 1000 students and staff during the 15 weeks after the statewide masking policy was rescinded.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Política de Saúde , Máscaras , Serviços de Saúde Escolar , Precauções Universais , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Incidência , Pobreza/estatística & dados numéricos , Instituições Acadêmicas/legislação & jurisprudência , Instituições Acadêmicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudantes/legislação & jurisprudência , Estudantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Política de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Máscaras/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Saúde Escolar/legislação & jurisprudência , Serviços de Saúde Escolar/estatística & dados numéricos , Categorias de Trabalhadores/legislação & jurisprudência , Categorias de Trabalhadores/estatística & dados numéricos , Precauções Universais/legislação & jurisprudência , Precauções Universais/estatística & dados numéricos , Massachusetts/epidemiologia , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/legislação & jurisprudência , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: In the United States, 10.2% households (HH) report child food insecurity. We assessed associations between metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MASLD) and food insecurity among the adolescents in the United States. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was performed using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2017-2018. Food insecurity was assessed by the US Department of Agriculture Child Food Security Survey Module. MASLD was defined by transient elastography. RESULTS: Among 771 adolescents (aged 12-18 years) (mean age 14.7 years; 52.5% male; 50.9% White, 12.7% Black, 24.4% Hispanic, and 12.1% other), 9.8% reported food insecurity; MASLD prevalence of 10.12% (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.13%-13.20%) affecting 4.27 million adolescents; and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease prevalence of 10.77% (95% CI 7.76-13.78) affecting 4.52 million adolescents. There was near-perfect concordance between MASLD and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (Cohen's κ coefficient of 0.971, 95% CI 0.946-0.996). The prevalence of MASLD was greater among food-insecure adolescents vs food-secure ones (17.4% vs 9.4%) and adolescents living with a low HH income vs those with a higher HH income (15.0% vs 7.2%) and living with a head of HH with a lower education level vs one with a higher education level (18.0% vs 8.2%) ( P < 0.05). The fully adjusted model showed that compared with adolescents living in a higher HH income, food-insecure adolescents living in low income HH had a 3-fold greater risk (odds ratio [OR] 3.25, 1.31-8.08) of having MASLD, while food-secure adolescents living in low-income HH had no increased risk (OR 1.58, 0.85-2.93, P = 0.139). The fully adjusted odds of having MASLD was elevated by +163% with the presence of HTN (OR 2.63, 1.02-6.78), +241% with being Hispanic (OR 3.41, 1.36-8.56), and +138% with being male (OR 2.38, 1.20-4.75). In addition, a 1-unit increase in BMI was associated with 25% increase in the odds of having MASLD (OR 1.25, 1.17-1.33) among US adolescents. DISCUSSION: Food insecurity is associated with MASLD among US low-income adolescents especially Hispanic male individuals with obesity and hypertension. Policies addressing inequities are needed.
Assuntos
Insegurança Alimentar , Hepatopatia Gordurosa não Alcoólica , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Humanos , Masculino , Adolescente , Feminino , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Hepatopatia Gordurosa não Alcoólica/epidemiologia , Criança , Prevalência , Pobreza/estatística & dados numéricos , Escolaridade , Fatores de Risco , Renda/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
PURPOSE: The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is the largest integrated healthcare system in the U.S. While preventive healthcare services are high priority in the VHA, low-income U.S. Veterans experience adverse life circumstances that may negatively impact their access to these services. This study examined lifetime prevalence as well as demographic, socioeconomic, military-specific, and clinical correlates of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among low-income U.S. Veterans ≥ 50 years of age. METHODS: Cross-sectional data on 862 participants were analyzed from the 2021-2022 National Veteran Homeless and Other Poverty Experiences study. RESULTS: Overall, 55.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 51.3-59.3%) reported ever-receiving CRC-screening services. In a multivariable logistic regression model, never-receivers of CRC screening were twice as likely to reside outside of the Northeast, and more likely to be married (odds ratio [OR] = 1.86, 95% CI 1.02, 3.37), have BMI < 25 kg/m2 [vs. 25- < 30 kg/m2] (OR = 1.75, 95% CI 1.19, 2.58), or ≥ 1 chronic condition (OR = 1.46, 95% CI 1.06, 2.02). Never-receivers of CRC screening were less likely to be female (OR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.29, 0.96), aged 65-79y [vs. ≥ 80y] (OR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.40, 0.92), live in 5 + member households (OR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.13, 0.86), disabled (OR = 0.45, 0.22, 0.92), with purchased health insurance (OR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.33, 0.98), or report alcohol-use disorder (OR = 0.10, 95% CI 0.02, 0.49) and/or HIV/AIDS (OR = 0.28, 95% CI 0.12, 0.68). CONCLUSION: Nearly 55% of low-income U.S. Veterans reported ever screening for CRC. Variations in CRC-screening behaviors according to veteran characteristics highlight potential disparities as well as opportunities for targeted behavioral interventions.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Pobreza , Veteranos , Humanos , Neoplasias Colorretais/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Veteranos/estatística & dados numéricos , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Pobreza/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Prevalência , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Previous studies have shown that individuals living in areas with persistent poverty (PP) experience worse cancer outcomes compared to those living in areas with transient or no persistent poverty (nPP). The association between PP and melanoma outcomes remains unexplored. We hypothesized that melanoma patients living in PP counties (defined as counties with ≥ 20% of residents living at or below the federal poverty level for the past two decennial censuses) would exhibit higher rates of incidence-based melanoma mortality (IMM). METHODS: We used Texas Cancer Registry data to identify the patients diagnosed with invasive melanoma or melanoma in situ (stages 0 through 4) between 2000 and 2018 (n = 82,458). Each patient's PP status was determined by their county of residence at the time of diagnosis. RESULTS: After adjusting for demographic variables, logistic regression analyses revealed that melanoma patients in PP counties had statistically significant higher IMM compared to those in nPP counties (17.4% versus 11.3%) with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.35 (95% CI 1.25-1.47). CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the relationship between persistent poverty and incidence-based melanoma mortality rates, revealing that melanoma patients residing in counties with persistent poverty have higher melanoma-specific mortality compared to those residing in counties with transient or no poverty. This study further emphasizes the importance of considering area-specific socioeconomic characteristics when implementing place-based interventions to facilitate early melanoma diagnosis and improve melanoma treatment outcomes.
Assuntos
Melanoma , Pobreza , Humanos , Melanoma/mortalidade , Melanoma/epidemiologia , Texas/epidemiologia , Feminino , Incidência , Masculino , Pobreza/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Idoso , Sistema de Registros , Adulto Jovem , Neoplasias Cutâneas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Cutâneas/epidemiologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Disparities in oral cavity and pharyngeal cancer based on race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status have been reported, but the impact of living within areas that are persistently poor at the time of diagnosis and outcome is unknown. This study aimed to investigate whether the incidence, 5-year relative survival, stage at diagnosis, and mortality among patients with oral cavity and pharyngeal cancers varied by persistent poverty. METHODS: Data were drawn from the SEER database (2006-2017) and included individuals diagnosed with oral cavity and pharyngeal cancers. Persistent poverty (at census tract) is defined as areas where ≥ 20% of the population has lived below the poverty level for ~ 30 years. Age-adjusted incidence and 5-year survival rates were calculated. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the association between persistent poverty and advanced stage cancer. Cumulative incidence and multivariable subdistribution hazard models were used to evaluate mortality risk. In addition, results were stratified by cancer primary site, sex, race/ethnicity, and rurality. RESULTS: Of the 90,631 patients included in the analysis (61.7% < 65 years old, 71.6% males), 8.8% lived in persistent poverty. Compared to non-persistent poverty, patients in persistent poverty had higher incidence and lower 5-year survival rates. Throughout 10 years, the cumulative incidence of cancer death was greater in patients from persistent poverty and were more likely to present with advanced-stage cancer and higher mortality risk. In the stratified analysis by primary site, patients in persistent poverty with oropharyngeal, oral cavity, and nasopharyngeal cancers had an increased risk of mortality compared to the patients in non-persistent poverty. CONCLUSION: This study found an association between oral cavity and pharyngeal cancer outcomes among patients in persistent poverty indicating a multidimensional strategy to improve survival.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Bucais , Neoplasias Faríngeas , Pobreza , Programa de SEER , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Neoplasias Faríngeas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Faríngeas/mortalidade , Incidência , Neoplasias Bucais/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Bucais/mortalidade , Pobreza/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Taxa de Sobrevida , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto , Disparidades nos Níveis de SaúdeRESUMO
AIMS: The aim of the study was to estimate the effect of household relative poverty on the risk of diabetic ketoacidosis at diagnosis of children with type 1 diabetes using an international standard measurement of relative poverty. METHODS: A national population-based retrospective study was conducted. The Swedish National Diabetes Register (NDR) was linked with data from Sweden's public statistical agency (Statistics Sweden). Children who were diagnosed with new-onset type 1 diabetes in the period of 2014-2019 were common identifiers. The definition of diabetic ketoacidosis was venous pH <7.30 or a serum bicarbonate level <18 mmol/L. The exposure variable was defined according to the standard definition of the persistent at-risk-of-poverty rate used by the statistical office of the European Union (Eurostat) and several other European public statistical agencies. Univariate and multi-variable analyses were used to calculate the effect of relative poverty on the risk of diabetic ketoacidosis. RESULTS: Children from households with relative poverty had a 41% higher risk of diabetic ketoacidosis (1.41, CI 1.12-1.77, p = 0.004) and more than double the risk of severe diabetic ketoacidosis (pH <7.10) (RR 2.10, CI 1.35-3.25, p = 0.001), as compared to children from households without relative poverty. CONCLUSIONS: Relative poverty significantly increases the risk of diabetic ketoacidosis at onset of type 1 diabetes in children, even in a high-income country with publicly reimbursed health care.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Cetoacidose Diabética , Pobreza , Humanos , Cetoacidose Diabética/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicações , Criança , Suécia/epidemiologia , Feminino , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pré-Escolar , Pobreza/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Fatores de Risco , Lactente , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMO
Objectives. To evaluate the effects of a comprehensive traffic safety policy-New York City's (NYC's) 2014 Vision Zero-on the health of Medicaid enrollees. Methods. We conducted difference-in-differences analyses using individual-level New York Medicaid data to measure traffic injuries and expenditures from 2009 to 2021, comparing NYC to surrounding counties without traffic reforms (n = 65 585 568 person-years). Results. After Vision Zero, injury rates among NYC Medicaid enrollees diverged from those of surrounding counties, with a net impact of 77.5 fewer injuries per 100 000 person-years annually (95% confidence interval = -97.4, -57.6). We observed marked reductions in severe injuries (brain injury, hospitalizations) and savings of $90.8 million in Medicaid expenditures over the first 5 years. Effects were largest among Black residents. Impacts were reversed during the COVID-19 period. Conclusions. Vision Zero resulted in substantial protection for socioeconomically disadvantaged populations known to face heightened risk of injury, but the policy's effectiveness decreased during the pandemic period. Public Health Implications. Many cities have recently launched Vision Zero policies and others plan to do so. This research adds to the evidence on how and in what circumstances comprehensive traffic policies protect public health. (Am J Public Health. 2024;114(6):633-641. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307617).
Assuntos
Acidentes de Trânsito , Medicaid , Pobreza , Ferimentos e Lesões , Humanos , Acidentes de Trânsito/estatística & dados numéricos , Cidade de Nova Iorque/epidemiologia , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto , Ferimentos e Lesões/epidemiologia , Ferimentos e Lesões/prevenção & controle , Pobreza/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Segurança , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controleRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Adults with cancer have higher rates of comorbidity compared to those without cancer, with excess burden in people from lower socioeconomic status (SES). Social deprivation, based on geographic indices, broadens the focus of SES to include the importance of "place" and its association with health. Further, social support is a modifiable resource found to have direct and indirect effects on health in adults with cancer, with less known about its impact on comorbidity. PURPOSE: We prospectively examined associations between social deprivation and comorbidity burden and the potential buffering role of social support. METHODS: Our longitudinal sample of 420 adults (Mage = 59.6, SD = 11.6; 75% Non-Hispanic White) diagnosed with cancer completed measures at baseline (~6 months post-diagnosis) and four subsequent 3-month intervals for 1 year. RESULTS: Adjusting for age, cancer type, and race/ethnicity, we found a statistically significant interaction between social support and the effect of social deprivation on comorbidity burden (ß = -0.11, pâ =â 0.012), such that greater social support buffered the negative effect of social deprivation on comorbidity burden. CONCLUSION: Implementing routine screening for social deprivation in cancer care settings can help identify patients at risk of excess comorbidity burden. Clinician recognition of these findings could trigger a referral to social support resources for individuals high on social deprivation.
This study examines the complex interplay among neighborhood-level deprivation, social support, and comorbidity burden in adults diagnosed with cancer. We know that individuals with cancer often face health challenges, especially those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds. This research expands the scope beyond just income or education level to include the impact of "place" or social deprivation on health outcomes. The study followed 420 adults diagnosed with cancer over the course of a year, examining how social deprivation and social support influenced their comorbidity burden. Interestingly, findings suggest that social support can act as a buffer against the negative effects of social deprivation on comorbidity burden. These results highlight the importance of considering not only just medical treatment but also the social context in which patients live when managing cancer care. Identifying patients at risk of increased comorbidity burden due to social deprivation and providing them with appropriate social support resources could significantly improve their overall health.
Assuntos
Comorbidade , Neoplasias , Apoio Social , Humanos , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/psicologia , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Estudos Longitudinais , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto , Classe Social , Pobreza/estatística & dados numéricos , Efeitos Psicossociais da DoençaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Approximately 33 million people suffer catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) from surgery and/or anesthesia costs. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate catastrophic and impoverishing expenditure associated with surgery and anesthesia in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). METHODS: We performed a systematic review of all studies from 1990 to 2021 that reported CHE in LMICs for treatment of a condition requiring surgical intervention, including cesarean section, trauma care, and other surgery. RESULTS: 77 studies met inclusion criteria. Tertiary facilities (23.4%) were the most frequently studied facility type. Only 11.7% of studies were conducted in exclusively rural health-care settings. Almost 60% of studies were retrospective in nature. The cost of procedures ranged widely, from $26 USD for a cesarean section in Mauritania in 2020 to $74,420 for a pancreaticoduodenectomy in India in 2018. GDP per capita had a narrower range from $315 USD in Malawi in 2019 to $9955 USD in Malaysia in 2015 (Median = $1605.50, interquartile range = $1208.74). 35 studies discussed interventions to reduce cost and catastrophic expenditure. Four of those studies stated that their intervention was not successful, 18 had an unknown or equivocal effect on cost and CHE, and 13 concluded that their intervention did help reduce cost and CHE. CONCLUSIONS: CHE from surgery is a worldwide problem that most acutely affects vulnerable patients in LMICs. Existing efforts are insufficient to meet the true need for affordable surgical care unless assistance for ancillary costs is given to patients and families most at risk from CHE.
Assuntos
Países em Desenvolvimento , Gastos em Saúde , Humanos , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Países em Desenvolvimento/economia , Países em Desenvolvimento/estatística & dados numéricos , Doença Catastrófica/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Pobreza/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although global poverty rates have declined in the last decade, the fall in the Asia-Pacific region has been slow relative to the rest of the world. Poverty continues to be a major cause of poor maternal and newborn health, and a barrier to accessing timely antenatal care. Papua New Guinea has one of the highest poverty rates and some of the worst maternal and neonatal outcomes in the Asia-Pacific region. Few studies have investigated equity in antenatal care utilization in this setting. We explored equity in antenatal care utilization and the determinants of service utilization, which include a measure of multidimensional poverty in Papua New Guinea. METHODS: To explore the association between poverty and antenatal care utilization this study uses data from a ten-cluster randomized controlled trial. The poverty headcount, average poverty gap, adjusted poverty headcount, and multidimensional poverty index of antenatal clinic attendees are derived using the Alkire-Foster method. The distribution of service utilization is explored using the multidimensional poverty index, followed by multivariate regression analyses to evaluate the determinants of service utilization. RESULTS: The poverty headcount was 61.06%, the average poverty gap 47.71%, the adjusted poverty headcount 29.13% and the average multidimensional poverty index was 0.363. Further, antenatal care utilization was regressive with respect to poverty. The regression analyses indicated that older women; being a widow (small number of widows (n = 3) asserts interpreting result with caution); or formally employed increase the likelihood of accessing antenatal care more often in pregnancy. Travelling for over an hour to receive care was negatively associated with utilization. CONCLUSION: This study indicated high levels of multidimensional poverty in PNG and that ANC utilization was regressive; highlighting the need to encourage pregnant women, especially those who are economically more vulnerable to visit clinics regularly throughout pregnancy.
Assuntos
Pobreza , Cuidado Pré-Natal , Humanos , Papua Nova Guiné , Feminino , Cuidado Pré-Natal/estatística & dados numéricos , Pobreza/estatística & dados numéricos , Gravidez , Estudos Transversais , Adulto , Adulto Jovem , Adolescente , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Despite many efforts to provide children with legal existence over the last decades, 1 in 4 children under the age of 5 (166 million) do not officially exist, with limited possibility to enjoy their human rights. In Latin America and the Caribbean, Haiti has one of the highest rates of undocumented births. This study aimed to analyze the prevalence and the determinant factors of undocumented childhood in Haiti. METHODS: For analysis of undocumented childhood and related socioeconomic determinants, data from the 2016/17 Haiti demographic and health survey were used. The prevalence and the associated factors were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the binary logistic regression model. RESULTS: The prevalence of undocumented childhood in Haiti was 23% (95% CI: 21.9-24.0) among children under-five. Among the drivers of undocumented births, mothers with no formal education (aOR = 3.88; 95% CI 2.21-6.81), children aged less than 1 year (aOR = 20.47; 95% CI 16.83-24.89), children adopted or in foster care (aOR = 2.66; 95% CI 1.67-4.24), children from the poorest regions like "Artibonite" (aOR = 2.19; 95% CI 1.63-2.94) or "Centre" (aOR = 1.51; 95% CI 1.09-2.10) or "Nord-Ouest" (aOR = 1.61; 95% CI 1.11-2.34), children from poorest households (aOR = 6.25; 95% CI 4.37-8.93), and children whose mothers were dead (aOR = 2.45; 95% CI 1.33-4.49) had higher odds to be undocumented. CONCLUSION: According to our findings, there is an institutional necessity to bring birth documentation to underprivileged households, particularly those in the poorest regions where socioeconomic development programs are also needed. Interventions should focus on uneducated mothers who are reknown for giving birth outside of medical facilities. Therefore, an awareness campaign should be implemented to influence the children late-registering behavior.
Assuntos
Imigrantes Indocumentados , Humanos , Haiti , Feminino , Lactente , Prevalência , Pré-Escolar , Masculino , Adulto , Imigrantes Indocumentados/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Adolescente , Modelos Logísticos , Adulto Jovem , Recém-Nascido , Pobreza/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Air pollution affects residents' health to varying extents according to differences in socioeconomic status. However, there has been a lack of research on whether air pollution contributes to unfair health costs. METHODS: In this research, data from the China Labour Force Dynamics Survey are matched with data on PM2.5 average concentration and precipitation, and the influence of air pollution on the health expenditures of residents is analysed with econometric methods involving a two-part model, instrument variables and moderating effects. RESULTS: The findings reveal that air pollution significantly impacts Chinese residents' health costs and leads to low-income people face health inequality. Specifcally, the empirical evidence shows that air pollution has no significant influence on the probability of residents' health costs (ß = 0.021, p = 0.770) but that it increases the amount of residents' total outpatient costs (ß = 0.379, p < 0.006), reimbursed outpatient cost (ß = 0.453, p < 0.044) and out-of-pocket outpatient cost (ß = 0.362, p < 0.048). The heterogeneity analysis of income indicates that low-income people face inequality due to health cost inflation caused by air pollution, their total and out-of-pocket outpatient cost significantly increase with PM2.5 (ß = 0.417, p = 0.013; ß = 0.491, p = 0.020). Further analysis reveals that social basic medical insurance does not have a remarkable positive moderating effect on the influence of air pollution on individual health inflation (ß = 0.021, p = 0.292), but supplementary medical insurance for employees could reduce the effect of air pollution on low-income residents' reimbursed and out-of-pocket outpatient cost (ß=-1.331, p = 0.096; ß=-2.211, p = 0.014). CONCLUSION: The study concludes that air pollution increases the amount of Chinese residents' outpatient cost and has no significant effect on the incidence of outpatient cost. However, air pollution has more significant impact on the low-income residents than the high-income residents, which indicates that air pollution leads to the inequity of medical cost. Additionally, the supplementary medical insurance reduces the inequity of medical cost caused by air pollution for the low-income employees.
Assuntos
Poluição do Ar , Gastos em Saúde , Seguro Saúde , Humanos , China , Poluição do Ar/efeitos adversos , Seguro Saúde/economia , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Masculino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Material Particulado/efeitos adversos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/economia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pobreza/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Studies examining profit suggest that former tobacco farmers do as well or better than current tobacco farmers. Research has yet to examine the relationship among current and former tobacco farmers, poverty, and receipt of government social assistance. This type of research is critical to understanding the direct and indirect subsidization of tobacco growing. This study analyzed tobacco farmers' poverty levels and receipt of government social assistance programs. AIMS AND METHODS: We designed and conducted an original four-wave economic survey of current and former tobacco farming households in Indonesia between 2016 and 2022. We then used descriptive analysis and probit regression for panel data to estimate the relationship between tobacco farming and poverty status. RESULTS: Tobacco farmers' per capita income and poverty rates vary across years. The poverty rate was significantly higher in the year with a higher-than-normal rainfall as it negatively affected farming outcomes. During this year, the poverty rate among current tobacco farmers was also higher than that of former tobacco farmers. Regression estimates from the panel data confirm the association between tobacco farming and the likelihood of being poor. We also found a high share of current tobacco farmers who receive government social assistance programs, such as cash transfer programs and a universal healthcare program. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show high poverty rates-particularly during bad farming years-and high rates of government social assistance among tobacco farmers. The high rates of government assistance among tobacco farmers living in poverty show that the government is indirectly subsidizing the tobacco industry.
Assuntos
Fazendeiros , Pobreza , Indonésia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Fazendeiros/estatística & dados numéricos , Pobreza/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Masculino , Adulto , Programas Governamentais/economia , Programas Governamentais/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Pública/estatística & dados numéricos , Renda/estatística & dados numéricos , Nicotiana , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Smoking households in Indonesia diverted a significant share of their budget to tobacco. Tobacco expenditure is deemed unproductive, as it crowds out resources from essential commodities and increases health care expenditure driven by tobacco-induced diseases. Therefore, despite having adequate resources, some smoking families in Indonesia may spend less on basic needs, which inadvertently puts their standard of living below the poverty line. AIMS AND METHODS: Employing data from 2021 (March) Indonesia's Socioeconomic Survey (SUSENAS), this research aims to quantify the impoverishing effect of tobacco consumption in Indonesia, considering spending on tobacco and tobacco-attributable health care costs as unproductive expenditure. The de facto headcount poverty rate and poverty gap index are calculated by removing tobacco expenditures and tobacco-attributable health care expenditures from the household's total spending. RESULTS: Accounting for unproductive spending related to tobacco use, Indonesia's headcount poverty ratio in March 2021 would rise by 3.22 percentage points, equivalent to an additional 8.75 million people living below the poverty line. In addition, the poverty gap index would increase by 0.77 percentage points. The impoverishment effect of tobacco is larger among rural populations than their urban counterparts. Moreover, the impoverishment is mainly driven by direct tobacco spending rather than tobacco-attributable health care expenditure. CONCLUSIONS: Significant portions of Indonesia's population are exposed to secondary poverty because of tobacco use. A high level of cigarette spending among smoking households is the major source of the impoverishing effect of tobacco use. IMPLICATIONS: The study provides quantitative evidence of the true cost of smoking in Indonesia, where the de facto number of the poor population after accounting for tobacco-related spending is higher than what is published in the official statistics. The findings of this study support tobacco control policies in Indonesia, particularly to effectively reduce tobacco use and mitigate the impoverishing impact of tobacco use on low-income households.
Assuntos
Pobreza , Uso de Tabaco , Indonésia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Pobreza/estatística & dados numéricos , Uso de Tabaco/economia , Uso de Tabaco/epidemiologia , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Masculino , População Rural/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , População Urbana/estatística & dados numéricos , Características da FamíliaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose with this study is to examine the socioeconomic outcomes associated with chronic kidney disease not related to well-known risk factors (CKDnt) in four communities in Chichigalpa, Nicaragua that are home to a substantial number of sugarcane workers. METHODS: We employed a cluster-based systematic sampling design to identify differences in outcomes between those households affected directly by CKDnt and those that are not. RESULTS: Overall, we find that approximately one-third of households surveyed had a household member diagnosed with CKDnt. 86% of CKDnt households reported that the head of the household had been without work for the last 6 months or more, compared with 53% of non-CKDnt households. Non-CKDnt households took in more than double the earnings income on average than CKDnt households ($C52 835 and $C3120, respectively). Nonetheless, on average, CKDnt households' total income exceeded that of non-CKDnt households due to Nicaragua's national Instituto Nicaraguense de Seguridad Social Social Security payments to CKDnt households, suggestive of a substantial economic burden on the state resulting from the disease. Households headed by widows or widowers who are widowed as a result of CKDnt demonstrate distinct deficits in total income when compared with either non-widowed households or to households widowed by causes other than CKDnt. CONCLUSIONS: Despite strong similarities in terms of demographic characteristics and despite residing in the same communities with similar access to the available resources, households experiencing CKDnt exhibit distinct and statistically significant differences in important socioeconomic outcomes when compared to non-CKDnt households.