Feasibility of amlodipine besylate, chloroquine phosphate, dapsone, phenytoin, pyridoxine hydrochloride, sulfadiazine, sulfasalazine, tetracycline hydrochloride, trimethoprim and zonisamide in SyrSpend(®) SF PH4 oral suspensions.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of 10 commonly used active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) compounded in oral suspensions using an internationally used suspending vehicle (SyrSpend(®) SF PH4 liquid): (i) amlodipine, (as besylate) 1.0mg/mL; (ii) chloroquine phosphate,15.0 mg/mL; (iii) dapsone, 2.0 mg/mL; (iv) phenytoin, 15.0 mg/mL; (v) pyridoxine hydrochloride, 50.0 mg/mL; (vi) sulfadiazine, 100.0 mg/mL; (vii) sulfasalazine, 100.0 mg/mL; (viii) tetracycline hydrochloride, 25.0 mg/mL; (ix) trimethoprim, 10.0 mg/mL; and (x) zonisamide, 10.0 mg/mL. All suspensions were stored both at controlled refrigeration (2-8 °C) and controlled room temperature (20-25 °C). Feasibility was assessed by measuring the percent recovery at varying time points throughout a 90-day period. API quantification was performed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC-UV), via a stability-indicating method. Given the percentage of recovery of the APIs within the suspensions, the expiration date of the final products (API+vehicle) was at least 90 days for all suspensions with regard to both the controlled temperatures. This suggests that the vehicle is stable for compounding APIs from different pharmacological classes.

Influence of acetylator status on sulphasalazine efficacy and toxicity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

The influence of acetylator status on the therapeutic efficacy and the toxicity of sulphasalazine (SASP) was assessed in 106 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Changes of indices of disease activity after 6 months, and progression of erosions after 2 years of SASP treatment were similar in fast and slow acetylators. Incidence and nature of withdrawals and side-effects, and requirement for intra-articular steroid injections or combination therapy due to poor response to SASP were almost identical in the two groups. A significant increase of the hepatic enzyme aspartate transaminase was noted mainly in slow acetylators, but was not associated with clinical disease. These results suggest that acetylator status does not relate significantly to either the efficacy or the toxicity of SASP in RA. It is possible that hepatic metabolism is affected by SASP, particularly in slow acetylators, but this does not lead to clinically identifiable problems.

Response to sulfasalazine in rheumatoid arthritis: life table analysis of a 5-year followup.

Eighty-six patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with sulfasalazine were followed for 5 years, or until treatment was discontinued. At the end of 5 years, there was a 22% probability of successfully continuing treatment. Most adverse effects developed in the first 3 months of treatment. In 38 patients treatment was discontinued because of inefficacy. In 18 of these, a brief period of improvement was followed by clinical relapse. Twenty were regarded as having no useful response to sulfasalazine. The treatment continuation rate of 22% at 5 years is in marked contrast to the pessimistic longterm evaluations of second line drugs that have recently been reported.

Sulfasalazine treatment in juvenile chronic arthritis: an open study.

In an open study, the effect of sulfasalazine was evaluated in the treatment of juvenile chronic arthritis (JCA). Forty-one patients, i.e., 27 boys and 14 girls with JCA under 16 years of age, were included in the study. In all of them, treatment with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID) had been unable to control the disease. The patients were divided in 4 subgroups depending on the mode of onset and evolution (Type I = systemic onset, Type II = polyarticular form. Type IIIa and Type IIIb = pauciarticular form). Remission was achieved in 21 patients, significant improvement in 12. Status was unchanged in 4 patients and worsened in 3. In 5 patients side effects were observed, which forced interruption of treatment in 4. Sulfasalazine was stopped in 7 patients: for toxicity in 4 and for inefficacy in 3. In 7 other patients the treatment was terminated after a prolonged remission. These promising results must be confirmed in a double blind versus placebo study, preferably restricted to type III JCA.

The use of the disease activity score in the analysis of clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain how well the disease activity score discriminates drug from placebo treated patients. METHODS: Three placebo controlled trials in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were reanalyzed using the disease activity score: DAS = 0.53938 x SQRT (Ritchie index) + 0.06465 x (# swollen joints) + 0.330 x 1n (erythrocyte sedimentation rate) + 0.224. RESULTS: Patient groups receiving methotrexate, high dose D-penicillamine and sulfasalazine had the statistically greatest improvement vs placebo treated groups; patient groups receiving gold sodium thiomalate (GSTM) and low dose D-penicillamine also showed statistically significant improvement versus placebo treated groups. Patients receiving sulfasalazine or GSTM were deemed to benefit compared to placebo treated patients in this analysis, unlike the results presented in the initial analyses of this trial. CONCLUSION: The disease activity score is a simple and effective measure of inflammation that can discriminate between active drug and placebo treated patient groups. Use of this composite measure may improve analysis of clinical trials and also be applicable to clinical care.

The comparative efficacy and toxicity of second-line drugs in rheumatoid arthritis. Results of two metaanalyses.

We performed 2 metaanalyses of placebo-controlled and comparative clinical trials to examine the relative efficacy and toxicity of methotrexate (MTX), injectable gold, D-penicillamine (DP), sulfasalazine (SSZ), auranofin (AUR), and antimalarial drugs, the second-line drugs most commonly used to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA). For the efficacy study, we applied a set of inclusion criteria and focused on trials which provided information on tender joint count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, or grip strength. We found 66 clinical trials that contained 117 treatment groups of interest, and for each drug, we combined the treatment groups. For each outcome, results showed that AUR tended to be weaker than other second-line drugs. The results of the 3 outcome measures were synthesized into a composite measure of outcomes, and AUR was significantly weaker than MTX (P = 0.006), injectable gold (P less than 0.0001), DP (P less than 0.0001), and SSZ (P = 0.009) and was slightly, but not significantly, weaker than antimalarial agents (P = 0.11). We also found heterogeneity among antimalarial agents, in that patients treated with chloroquine did better than those treated with hydroxychloroquine. We found little difference in efficacy between MTX, injectable gold, DP, and SSZ. A power analysis showed that a trial should contain at least 170 patients per treatment group to successfully differentiate between more effective and less effective (e.g., AUR) second-line drugs. None of the reported interdrug comparative trials we reviewed were this large. For the toxicity study, our inclusion criteria captured RA trials which reported the proportion of patients who discontinued therapy because of drug toxicity and the total proportion who dropped out. We found 71 clinical trials that contained 129 treatment groups. The average proportion who dropped out and the average proportion who dropped out because of drug toxicity were computed for each drug. Overall, 30.2% of the patients in these trials dropped out; 50% of them did so because of drug toxicity. Injectable gold had higher toxicity rates (P less than 0.05) and higher total dropout rates (P less than 0.01) than any other drug; 30% of gold-treated patients dropped out because of side effects versus 15% of all trial patients. Antimalarial drugs and AUR had relatively low rates of toxicity; the rate for MTX was imprecise because of discrepancies between trials. Thus, of the commonly used second-line drugs, AUR is the weakest, and injectable gold is the most toxic. Agents introduced in the future will be compared with these drugs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)