Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 221
Filtrar
1.
Am J Public Health ; 110(5): 631-635, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32191515

RESUMO

The passage of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 brought unprecedented changes in US workplaces, and the activities of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) have contributed to a significant reduction in work-related deaths, injuries, and illnesses. Despite this, millions of workers are injured annually, and thousands killed.To reduce the toll, OSHA needs greater resources, a new standard-setting process, increased civil and criminal penalties, full coverage for all workers, and stronger whistleblower protections. Workers should not be injured or made sick by their jobs. To eliminate work injuries and illnesses, we must remake and modernize OSHA and restructure the relationship of employers and workers with the agency and each other.This includes changing the expectation of what employers must do to protect workers and implementing a requirement that firms have a "duty of care" to protect all people who may be harmed by their activities. Only by making major changes can we ensure that every worker leaves work as healthy as they were when their work shift began.


Assuntos
Saúde Ocupacional/normas , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration/organização & administração , Local de Trabalho/normas , Acidentes de Trabalho/prevenção & controle , Governo Federal , Humanos , Doenças Profissionais/prevenção & controle , Exposição Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Saúde Ocupacional/legislação & jurisprudência , Gestão da Segurança/normas , Estados Unidos , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration/legislação & jurisprudência , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration/normas , Local de Trabalho/legislação & jurisprudência
2.
Am J Ind Med ; 63(7): 616-623, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32367510

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Noise exposure has long been an occupational health concern and has been an important area of focus of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) since its founding. Nevertheless, it remains unclear what effects OSHA's noise standards have had on employer efforts to reduce risks. Consequently, a review of OSHA noise standard violations was performed to clarify the violation trends between 1972 and 2019. METHODS: Using the OSHA Information System, researchers identified 119 305 violations involving four noise standards between 1972 and 2019: 29 CFR 1910.95, occupational noise exposure in general industry; 1926.52, occupational noise exposure in construction; 1926.101, hearing protection in construction, and 1904.10, recording criteria for cases involving occupational hearing loss. Violation frequencies of noise standard subparagraphs and relationships to factors such as industry differences were analyzed using descriptive statistics and t tests. RESULTS: The most commonly violated noise standard was 1910.95 in manufacturing. Such violations rose between 1972 and 1985 and then declined steadily. Whether in general industry or construction, four noise standards were most-frequently cited: lack of feasible administrative or engineering controls (1910.95[b] and 1926.52[d]) and inadequate hearing conservation program (1910.95[c] and 1926.52[b]). These violations were more highly penalized (mean = $1036.50) than other subparagraph violations (mean = $915.80). Programmed and unprogrammed inspections generated similar violation quantities except between 1980 and 1985, when programmed inspections exhibited a sharp spike in violations. CONCLUSION: The study identified trends in OSHA noise standard violations and possible explanations for those trends. The study findings can support development of more practical noise-exposure protection policy.


Assuntos
Indústrias/tendências , Ruído Ocupacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Exposição Ocupacional/normas , Saúde Ocupacional/tendências , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration/normas , Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído/epidemiologia , Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído/história , Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído/prevenção & controle , História do Século XX , História do Século XXI , Humanos , Indústrias/normas , Sistemas de Informação Administrativa , Ruído Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Doenças Profissionais/história , Doenças Profissionais/prevenção & controle , Exposição Ocupacional/história , Saúde Ocupacional/normas , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
3.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 41(4): 102507, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32354479

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine if high-powered air hand dryers produce sufficient noise to warrant concern over acoustic trauma as determined by federally established standards. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational field data collection SETTING: Urban and suburban community SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Using a NIOSH developed and calibrated soundmeter app, powered hand dryers were measured throughout two metropolitan areas. Ear level measurements were performed while drying wet hands. Recorded variables included average LAeq, Time-Weighted Average, Max and Peak Levels, Noise Dose, and Projected Dose according to NIOSH and OSHA standards, and all three major weighting networks (A, C, and Z). RESULTS: Fifty-four trials were performed at 27 locations. Average dryer run time was 28.9 s (range 14-45 s). Average LAeq (dBA), average maximum level (dBA), and average TWA (dBA) were 90.46 ± 5.32, 94.86 ± 5.73, 59.90 ± 6.80, respectively. The noise generated exceeded published manufacturer specifications. However, even with estimated cumulative daily exposure, the noise generated by these dryers did not exceed federal safety standards. CONCLUSIONS: Air-powered hand dryers produce noise output at a level that many would find subjectively uncomfortable with some brands/models consistently producing noise in excess of 90 dBA. Nonetheless, these dryers do not produce sound exceeding NIOSH standards for noise exposure.


Assuntos
Eletrônica/instrumentação , Exposição Ambiental/normas , Desinfecção das Mãos/instrumentação , Mãos , Ruído/efeitos adversos , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration/normas , Humanos , National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, U.S./normas , Estados Unidos
4.
J Occup Environ Hyg ; 17(4): 181-192, 2020 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32105559

RESUMO

Agricultural workers are exposed to heat stress due to spending significant amount of time outdoors. Risk information from mobile apps is more readily available for timely advice on risk management that is crucial in preventing severe acute illnesses and deaths, but its reliability is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of the OSHA-NIOSH Heat Safety Tool mobile app in providing accurate risk information to prevent heat-related illnesses among agricultural workers in eastern North Carolina. Wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT) indices were datalogged at two agricultural sites using heat stress monitors from April-August 2019 and were assigned to risk levels (minimal, low, moderate, high, extreme) by workload (light, moderate, heavy, very heavy) based on the ACGIH® Threshold Limit Values (TLVs®). Hourly heat index (HI) and its corresponding risk level were obtained using the app. Hourly HI-based risk level assignments were time-matched to their corresponding WBGT-based risk level assignments (682 pairs) and analyzed using cross-tabulation by determining the percentage of hourly WBGT-based risk level assignments ("gold standard") with the same hourly HI-based risk level assignments under different workloads, with a higher percentage indicating higher app reliability. Results showed that the app correctly identified 60-100% of minimal risk conditions, depending on workload type, but its reliability decreased as the heat stress risk condition and workload became more severe. The app identified the majority of low risk conditions for a moderate workload (74%) and moderate risk conditions for a light workload (94%) only, indicating limited use in these specific conditions, while the app identified 0% of either the high risk or extreme risk conditions at any workload type. It is concluded that the performance of the OSHA-NIOSH app in assessing occupational risk to heat stress is not protective of workers particularly for heavy and very heavy workloads, and that the use of the app for the assessment of occupational heat stress risk in agricultural settings is not recommended.


Assuntos
Doenças dos Trabalhadores Agrícolas/prevenção & controle , Agricultura/normas , Transtornos de Estresse por Calor/prevenção & controle , Aplicativos Móveis , National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, U.S./normas , Saúde Ocupacional/normas , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration/normas , Temperatura Alta/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Medição de Risco , Estados Unidos
5.
J Occup Environ Hyg ; 17(5): 207-219, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32275486

RESUMO

Because of the semi-volatile nature of diisocyanates (being airborne in both physical vapor and particulate phases), their high reactivity and low occupational exposure limits, diisocyanate exposure evaluation has been challenging for industrial hygienists and laboratories. The objective of this study was to compare the toluene diisocyanate (2,4 and 2,6 isomers, TDI) concentration measured by five methods in a flexible polyurethane foam factory using different collection or derivatization approaches. The methods used were: OSHA 42 modified (filter, 1-(2-pyridyl)piperazine) (OSHA), Asset EZ4-NCO (denuder and filter, dibutylamine) (Asset), Iso-Chek (double-filter, 9-(N-methylaminomethyl) anthracene and 1,2-methoxyphenylpiperazine), DAN (filter, 1,8-diaminonaphthalene), and CIP10 (centrifugation, 1,2-methoxyphenylpiperazine). Particle real-time monitoring for concentration and size distribution was performed in parallel to improve the understanding of the potential bias between methods. The comparison study was performed over 3 days, providing 18 replicates for each of the 5 methods. Isocyanate concentrations collected for each sampling method were compared using linear mixed effect modeling. Compared to OSHA, which yielded the highest concentrations overall, the Asset and DAN methods provided the smallest biases (-29% (95% CI [-52;-6]) and -45% (95% CI [-67;-23]), respectively), while the CIP10 and Iso-Chek methods provided the largest biases (-82% (95% CI [-105;-66]) and -96% (95% CI [-118;-75]), respectively). The substantial bias of Iso-Chek and CIP10 seemed to be explained by the predominance of TDI in the form of sub-micron particles that were inadequately captured by these two methods due to their sampling principle, which are particle filtration without derivatizing agent and centrifugation respectively. Asset and DAN performance seemed to decrease as the sampling time increased. While DAN's bias could be related to a reagent deficiency on the filter, the disparities between OSHA and Asset, both considered as reference methods, highlight the fact that the mechanisms of collection, derivation and extraction do not seem to be completely controlled. Finally, an upward trend has been observed between concentrations of particles below 300 nm in size and concentration levels of TDI. It has also been observed that TDI levels increased with the TDI foam index produced at the facility.


Assuntos
Poluentes Ocupacionais do Ar/análise , Exposição Ocupacional/análise , Exposição Ocupacional/normas , Poliuretanos/efeitos adversos , Poliuretanos/normas , Tolueno 2,4-Di-Isocianato/efeitos adversos , Tolueno 2,4-Di-Isocianato/análise , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration/normas , Adulto , Poluentes Ocupacionais do Ar/normas , Monitoramento Ambiental/métodos , Monitoramento Ambiental/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos
6.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 146(5): 3873, 2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31795647

RESUMO

Acoustic trauma (AT) is permanent hearing loss after a single noise exposure. A few human cases resulting from continuous, i.e., nonimpulsive noise, have been reported as reviewed by Ward [(1991). "Hearing loss from noise and music," presented at Audio Engineering Society, New York, October 4-8]. This paper updates that review by examining 11 cases in nine reports, from 1950 to 2006, with the intention of determining minimum exposures that may cause AT, including the potential risk of exposure to noise from magnetic resonance imaging machines. Diffuse-field related levels above 120 dBA for 10 s or more, or above 130 dBA for 2-3 s (values well above OSHA's unprotected exposure limits), can lead to AT. These cases appear to represent a susceptible fraction of the population, because much more intense exposures (e.g., 130 dBA for 32 min) have been tolerated by groups of volunteers who suffered only temporary threshold shifts. AT from continuous noise is unlikely to occur in OSHA-compliant hearing conservation programs, and probably rare enough in the general civilian population that clinical trials of drugs aimed at treating it are unlikely to be practical. AT from impulse noise, such as gunfire, which is specifically not the topic of the current work, is more amenable to clinical trials, especially in military settings.


Assuntos
Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído/etiologia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/efeitos adversos , Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído/tratamento farmacológico , Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Ruído Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Ruído Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Exposição Ocupacional/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estados Unidos , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration/normas
7.
Undersea Hyperb Med ; 46(4): 447-459, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31509901

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The mining and tunneling industries are historically associated with hazardous exposures that result in significant occupational health concerns. Occupational respiratory exposures causing pneumoconiosis and silicosis are of great concern, silicosis being non-curable. This work demonstrates that compressed-air workers (CAWs) performing tunnel hyperbaric interventions (HIs) may be at risk for hazards related to bentonite exposure, increasing the likelihood of developing harmful illnesses including cancer. Bentonite dust inhalation may result in respiratory levels of silica exceeding acceptable industrial hygiene standards. METHODS: A qualitative observational exposure assessment was conducted on CAWs while they were performing their HI duties. This was followed by quantitative data collection using personal and area air sample techniques. The results were analyzed and interpreted using standard industrial hygiene principles and guidelines from NIOSH and OSHA. RESULTS: Our work suggests bentonite dust exposure may be an emerging particulate matter concern among CAWs in the tunneling industry. Aerosolized bentonite particles may have potential deleterious effects that include pneumoconiosis and silicosis. Silicosis can result in the development of pulmonary carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: The modern tunneling industry and required hyperbaric interventional tasks represent a potential public health and occupational concern for CAWs. This paper introduces the modern tunneling industry and the duties of CAWs, the hazardous environment in which they perform their duties, and describes the risks and potential harmful health effects associated with these hazardous exposures.


Assuntos
Bentonita/toxicidade , Ar Comprimido , Materiais de Construção/toxicidade , Poeira , Arquitetura de Instituições de Saúde , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Poluentes Ocupacionais do Ar/química , Poluentes Ocupacionais do Ar/toxicidade , Bentonita/química , Indústria da Construção , Materiais de Construção/análise , Segurança de Equipamentos , Filtração/instrumentação , Humanos , Pressão , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Dispositivos de Proteção Respiratória , Estados Unidos , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration/normas
9.
Ann Occup Hyg ; 60(4): 432-52, 2016 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26732821

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The Integrated Management Information System (IMIS) is the largest multi-industry source of exposure measurements available in North America. However, many have suspected that the criteria through which worksites are selected for inspection are related to exposure levels. We investigated associations between exposure levels and ancillary variables in IMIS in order to understand the predictors of high exposure within an enforcement context. METHODS: We analyzed the association between nine variables (reason for inspection, establishment size, total amount of penalty, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) plan, OSHA region, union status, inspection scope, year, and industry) and exposure levels in IMIS using multimodel inference for 77 agents. For each agent, we used two different types of models: (i) logistic models were used for the odds ratio (OR) of exposure being above the threshold limit value (TLV) and (ii) linear models were used for exposure concentrations restricted to detected results to estimate percent increase in exposure level, i.e. relative index of exposure (RIE). Meta-analytic methods were used to combine results for each variable across agents. RESULTS: A total of 511,047 exposure measurements were modeled for logistic models and 299,791 for linear models. Higher exposures were measured during follow-up inspections than planned inspections [meta-OR = 1.61, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.44-1.81; meta-RIE = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.03-1.09]. Lower exposures were observed for measurements collected under state OSHA plans compared to measurements collected under federal OSHA (meta-OR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.73-0.92; meta-RIE = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.81-0.91). A 'high' total historical amount of penalty relative to none was associated with higher exposures (meta-OR = 1.54, 95% CI: 1.40-1.71; meta-RIE = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.13-1.23). CONCLUSIONS: The relationships observed between exposure levels and ancillary variables across a vast majority of agents suggest that certain elements of OSHA's process of selecting worksites for inspection influence the exposure levels that OSHA inspectors encounter. Nonetheless, given the paucity of other sources of exposure data and the lack of a more demonstrably representative data source, our study considers the use of IMIS data for the estimation of exposures in the broader universe of worksites in the USA.


Assuntos
Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Substâncias Perigosas/análise , Sistemas de Informação Administrativa/normas , Exposição Ocupacional/análise , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration/normas , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Modelos Logísticos , Exposição Ocupacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration/estatística & dados numéricos
10.
Am J Ind Med ; 59(2): 164-74, 2016 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26725335

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This article examines serious and fatal pneumatic nail gun (PNG) injury investigations for workplace, tool design, and human factors relevant to causation and resulting OS&H authorities' responses in terms of citations and penalties. METHODS: The U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) database of Fatality and Catastrophe Investigation Summaries (F&CIS) were reviewed (1985-2012) to identify n = 258 PNG accidents. RESULTS: 79.8% of investigations, and 100% of fatalities, occurred in the construction industry. Between 53-71% of injuries appear to have been preventable had a safer sequential trigger tool been used. Citations and monetary penalties were related to injury severity, body part injured, disabling of safety devices, and insufficient personal protective equipment (PPE). CONCLUSIONS: Differences may exist between construction and other industries in investigators interpretations of PNG injury causation and resulting citations/penalties. Violations of PPE standards were penalized most severely, yet the preventive effect of PPE would likely have been less than that of a safer sequential trigger.


Assuntos
Indústria da Construção/estatística & dados numéricos , Materiais de Construção/efeitos adversos , Falha de Equipamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Saúde Ocupacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Traumatismos Ocupacionais/mortalidade , Indústria da Construção/normas , Desenho de Equipamento , Segurança de Equipamentos/normas , Segurança de Equipamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Armas de Fogo , Humanos , Saúde Ocupacional/normas , Traumatismos Ocupacionais/etiologia , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration/normas , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration/estatística & dados numéricos
11.
Fed Regist ; 81(58): 16085-93, 2016 Mar 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27017630

RESUMO

On March 13, 2015, OSHA published in the Federal Register a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to revise its eye and face protection standards for general industry, shipyard employment, marine terminals, longshoring, and construction by updating the references to national consensus standards approved by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). OSHA received no significant objections from commenters and therefore is adopting the amendments as proposed. This final rule updates the references in OSHA's eye and face standards to reflect the most recent edition of the ANSI/International Safety Equipment Association (ISEA) eye and face protection standard. It removes the oldest-referenced edition of the same ANSI standard. It also amends other provisions of the construction eye and face protection standard to bring them into alignment with OSHA's general industry and maritime standards.


Assuntos
Dispositivos de Proteção dos Olhos/normas , Dispositivos de Proteção da Cabeça/normas , Saúde Ocupacional/normas , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration/normas , Consenso , Humanos , Estados Unidos
12.
Fed Regist ; 81(58): 16285-890, 2016 Mar 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27017634

RESUMO

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is amending its existing standards for occupational exposure to respirable crystalline silica. OSHA has determined that employees exposed to respirable crystalline silica at the previous permissible exposure limits face a significant risk of material impairment to their health. The evidence in the record for this rulemaking indicates that workers exposed to respirable crystalline silica are at increased risk of developing silicosis and other non-malignant respiratory diseases, lung cancer, and kidney disease. This final rule establishes a new permissible exposure limit of 50 micrograms of respirable crystalline silica per cubic meter of air (50 [mu]g/m\3\) as an 8-hour time-weighted average in all industries covered by the rule. It also includes other provisions to protect employees, such as requirements for exposure assessment, methods for controlling exposure, respiratory protection, medical surveillance, hazard communication, and recordkeeping. OSHA is issuing two separate standards--one for general industry and maritime, and the other for construction--in order to tailor requirements to the circumstances found in these sectors.


Assuntos
Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Exposição Ocupacional/legislação & jurisprudência , Saúde Ocupacional/legislação & jurisprudência , Saúde Ocupacional/normas , Dióxido de Silício/efeitos adversos , Silicose/etiologia , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration/normas , Poluentes Atmosféricos/efeitos adversos , Poluentes Atmosféricos/normas , Humanos , Pneumopatias/etiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/normas , Dispositivos de Proteção Respiratória , Silicose/prevenção & controle , Estados Unidos , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration/legislação & jurisprudência
15.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 72(3): 615-29, 2015 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25985714

RESUMO

The United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) maintains the Chemical Exposure Health Data (CEHD) and the Integrated Management Information System (IMIS) databases, which contain quantitative and qualitative data resulting from compliance inspections conducted from 1984 to 2011. This analysis aimed to evaluate trends in workplace asbestos concentrations over time and across industries by combining the samples from these two databases. From 1984 to 2011, personal air samples ranged from 0.001 to 175 f/cc. Asbestos compliance sampling data associated with the construction, automotive repair, manufacturing, and chemical/petroleum/rubber industries included measurements in excess of 10 f/cc, and were above the permissible exposure limit from 2001 to 2011. The utility of combining the databases was limited by the completeness and accuracy of the data recorded. In this analysis, 40% of the data overlapped between the two databases. Other limitations included sampling bias associated with compliance sampling and errors occurring from user-entered data. A clear decreasing trend in both airborne fiber concentrations and the numbers of asbestos samples collected parallels historically decreasing trends in the consumption of asbestos, and declining mesothelioma incidence rates. Although air sampling data indicated that airborne fiber exposure potential was high (>10 f/cc for short and long-term samples) in some industries (e.g., construction, manufacturing), airborne concentrations have significantly declined over the past 30 years. Recommendations for improving the existing exposure OSHA databases are provided.


Assuntos
Poluentes Ocupacionais do Ar/análise , Amianto/análise , Exposição Ocupacional/análise , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration/normas , Local de Trabalho/normas , Agricultura , Poluentes Ocupacionais do Ar/história , Poluentes Ocupacionais do Ar/normas , Amianto/história , Amianto/normas , Bases de Dados Factuais , Monitoramento Ambiental , História do Século XX , História do Século XXI , Indústrias , Exposição Ocupacional/história , Exposição Ocupacional/normas , Meios de Transporte , Estados Unidos
16.
Am J Ind Med ; 58(7): 780-7, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26010141

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Worker training is a core component of the OSHA Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response (HAZWOPER) standard, but few studies have considered what motivates managers to provide HAZWOPER training to employees or what they value in that training. METHODS: In 2012, four university-based programs conducted an exploratory survey of managers who sent employees to HAZWOPER courses. Results from 109 respondents were analyzed. RESULTS: Forty-two percent of respondents cited regulations as the most important reason to provide HAZWOPER training; many indicated they would provide less training if there were no standard in place. Three-quarters (74%) reported training had improved workplace conditions. Fewer than half said they were likely to involve trained employees in aspects of the organization's H&S program. DISCUSSION: Compliance with regulatory requirements is an important factor shaping managers' training delivery decisions. Managers recognize positive impacts of training. These impacts could be enhanced by further leveraging employee H&S knowledge and skills.


Assuntos
Resíduos Perigosos , Capacitação em Serviço/organização & administração , Gestão de Recursos Humanos , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration/normas , Local de Trabalho/psicologia , Adulto , Tomada de Decisões Gerenciais , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Humanos , Percepção , Estados Unidos , Local de Trabalho/normas
17.
J Occup Environ Hyg ; 12(3): 189-98, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25288024

RESUMO

Airborne biological hazards in hospitals require the use of respiratory protection. A well-implemented respiratory protection program can protect health care workers from these exposures. This study examines the relationship between written respiratory programs and reported practices in health care settings. Twenty-eight hospitals in Illinois and Minnesota were recruited to a study of respiratory protection programs and practices in acute care settings. Interviews were conducted with hospital managers, unit managers, and health care workers from departments where respirators are commonly required. Each hospital's written respiratory protection program was scored for the 11 elements required by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), using a standardized tool, for a maximum possible score of 22 (2 pts. per element). Twenty interview questions associated with program practices were also scored by percent correct responses. Written program scores ranged from 2-17 with an average of 9.2. Hospital and unit managers scored on average 82% and 81%, respectively, when compared to the OSHA standard; health care workers scored significantly lower, 71% (p < 0.001). Minnesota written program scores were not significantly higher than Illinois hospitals (p = 0.16), while all Illinois survey respondents scored higher than those in Minnesota (p < 0.001). There was no trend between written programs and interview responses. Written respiratory protection programs in the study sites did not provide the level of detail required OSHA. Interview responses representing hospital practices surrounding respiratory protection indicated that hospitals were aware of and following regulatory guidelines.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Exposição Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Dispositivos de Proteção Respiratória/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Pessoal de Saúde , Administração Hospitalar/normas , Hospitais , Humanos , Illinois , Minnesota , Autorrelato , Estados Unidos , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration/normas
18.
Am J Ind Med ; 57(10): 1133-43, 2014 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25099477

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Little empirical data exist to identify the reasons for underreporting in the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) non-fatal occupational injury and illness data. METHODS: We interviewed occupational injury and illness record keepers from Washington State establishments that participated in the 2008 BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses (SOII). Qualitative and quantitative methods were used to explore recordkeeping and business practices that may explain SOII's incomplete case capture compared with WC claims data. RESULTS: Most participants (90%) did not comply with OSHA recordkeeping regulations. Other factors including using workplace injury data to evaluate supervisors' or SOII respondent's job performance, recording injuries for a worksite that operates multiple shifts, and failing to follow SOII instructions were more common among establishments with unreported WC claims. CONCLUSION: Business practices that incentivize low injury rates, disorganized recordkeeping, and limited communication between BLS and survey respondents are barriers to accurate employer reports of work-related injuries and illnesses.


Assuntos
Prontuários Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Traumatismos Ocupacionais/epidemiologia , Vigilância em Saúde Pública/métodos , Coleta de Dados , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Prontuários Médicos/normas , Doenças Profissionais/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Ocupacionais/diagnóstico , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estados Unidos , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration/normas , Washington/epidemiologia
19.
New Solut ; 34(2): 133-146, 2024 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39086322

RESUMO

Ensuring the safety and health of workers in this country, who are employed at millions of workplaces that present a dizzying array of hazards, is daunting. Every day, workers are maimed or die from workplace injuries or occupational illnesses. Hence, government agencies must use all available means to ensure the laws intended to keep workers safe and healthy in their workplaces are maximally effective in accomplishing that purpose. This paper addresses this challenge through the lens of strategic enforcement. It examines how federal and state authority are designed to interact to ensure worker protection in this space, and focuses on what tools for deterring violations - many unrecognized or underutilized by worker safety agencies - are available to leverage the limited resources that inevitably constrain the agencies' reach. The forthcoming Part II will, among other things, showcase a number of noteworthy state and local initiatives that exceed the federal standard.


Assuntos
Saúde Ocupacional , Humanos , Saúde Ocupacional/legislação & jurisprudência , Saúde Ocupacional/normas , Estados Unidos , Local de Trabalho/legislação & jurisprudência , Local de Trabalho/normas , Gestão da Segurança/legislação & jurisprudência , Gestão da Segurança/normas , Gestão da Segurança/organização & administração , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration/normas , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration/legislação & jurisprudência , Acidentes de Trabalho/prevenção & controle , Acidentes de Trabalho/legislação & jurisprudência , Traumatismos Ocupacionais/prevenção & controle
20.
Crit Rev Toxicol ; 43(8): 632-60, 2013 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23863112

RESUMO

Silica or silicon dioxides (SiO2) are naturally occurring substances that comprise the vast majority of the earth's crust. Because of their prevalence and commercial applications, they have been widely studied for their potential to induce pulmonary fibrosis and other disorders. Historically, the focus in the workplace has been on the development of inflammation and fibrotic lung disease, the basis for promulgating workplace standards to protect workers. Crystalline silica (CS) polymorphs, predominantly quartz and cristobalite, are used in industry but are different in their mineralogy, chemistry, surface features, size dimensions and association with other elements naturally and during industrial applications. Epidemiologic, clinical and experimental studies in the literature historically have predominantly focused on quartz polymorphs. Thus, in this review, we summarize past scientific evaluations and recent peer-reviewed literature with an emphasis on cristobalite, in an attempt to determine whether quartz and cristobalite polymorphs differ in their health effects, toxicity and other properties that may dictate the need for various standards of protection in the workplace. In addition to current epidemiological and clinical reports, we review in vivo studies in rodents as well as cell culture studies that shed light on mechanisms intrinsic to the toxicity, altered cell responses and protective or defense mechanisms in response to these minerals. The medical and scientific literature indicates that the mechanisms of injury and potential causation of inflammation and fibrotic lung disease are similar for quartz and cristobalite. Our analysis of these data suggests similar occupational exposure limits (OELs) for these minerals in the workplace.


Assuntos
Exposição Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Quartzo/química , Dióxido de Silício/química , Animais , Células Cultivadas , Cristalização , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Humanos , Exposição por Inalação , Quartzo/toxicidade , Medição de Risco , Dióxido de Silício/toxicidade , Silicose/prevenção & controle , Níveis Máximos Permitidos , Estados Unidos , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration/normas , Local de Trabalho
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA