Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 1.419
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
N Engl J Med ; 388(21): 1942-1955, 2023 May 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37224196

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: An effective, affordable, multivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine is needed to prevent epidemic meningitis in the African meningitis belt. Data on the safety and immunogenicity of NmCV-5, a pentavalent vaccine targeting the A, C, W, Y, and X serogroups, have been limited. METHODS: We conducted a phase 3, noninferiority trial involving healthy 2-to-29-year-olds in Mali and Gambia. Participants were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive a single intramuscular dose of NmCV-5 or the quadrivalent vaccine MenACWY-D. Immunogenicity was assessed at day 28. The noninferiority of NmCV-5 to MenACWY-D was assessed on the basis of the difference in the percentage of participants with a seroresponse (defined as prespecified changes in titer; margin, lower limit of the 96% confidence interval [CI] above -10 percentage points) or geometric mean titer (GMT) ratios (margin, lower limit of the 98.98% CI >0.5). Serogroup X responses in the NmCV-5 group were compared with the lowest response among the MenACWY-D serogroups. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 1800 participants received NmCV-5 or MenACWY-D. In the NmCV-5 group, the percentage of participants with a seroresponse ranged from 70.5% (95% CI, 67.8 to 73.2) for serogroup A to 98.5% (95% CI, 97.6 to 99.2) for serogroup W; the percentage with a serogroup X response was 97.2% (95% CI, 96.0 to 98.1). The overall difference between the two vaccines in seroresponse for the four shared serogroups ranged from 1.2 percentage points (96% CI, -0.3 to 3.1) for serogroup W to 20.5 percentage points (96% CI, 15.4 to 25.6) for serogroup A. The overall GMT ratios for the four shared serogroups ranged from 1.7 (98.98% CI, 1.5 to 1.9) for serogroup A to 2.8 (98.98% CI, 2.3 to 3.5) for serogroup C. The serogroup X component of the NmCV-5 vaccine generated seroresponses and GMTs that met the prespecified noninferiority criteria. The incidence of systemic adverse events was similar in the two groups (11.1% in the NmCV-5 group and 9.2% in the MenACWY-D group). CONCLUSIONS: For all four serotypes in common with the MenACWY-D vaccine, the NmCV-5 vaccine elicited immune responses that were noninferior to those elicited by the MenACWY-D vaccine. NmCV-5 also elicited immune responses to serogroup X. No safety concerns were evident. (Funded by the U.K. Foreign, Commonwealth, and Development Office and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03964012.).


Assuntos
Epidemias , Nível de Saúde , Meningite , Vacinas Meningocócicas , Vacinas Conjugadas , Humanos , Gâmbia/epidemiologia , Mali/epidemiologia , Vacinas Conjugadas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Conjugadas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Conjugadas/uso terapêutico , Vacinas Meningocócicas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Meningocócicas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Meningocócicas/uso terapêutico , Pré-Escolar , Criança , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Imunogenicidade da Vacina , Injeções Intramusculares , Meningite/epidemiologia , Meningite/prevenção & controle , Epidemias/prevenção & controle
2.
Lancet ; 403(10425): 459-468, 2024 02 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38281499

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Randomised controlled trials of typhoid conjugate vaccines among children in Africa and Asia have shown high short-term efficacy. Data on the durability of protection beyond 2 years are sparse. We present the final analysis of a randomised controlled trial in Malawi, encompassing more than 4 years of follow-up, with the aim of investigating vaccine efficacy over time and by age group. METHODS: In this phase 3, double-blind, randomised controlled efficacy trial in Blantyre, Malawi, healthy children aged 9 months to 12 years were randomly assigned (1:1) by an unmasked statistician to receive a single dose of Vi polysaccharide conjugated to tetanus toxoid vaccine (Vi-TT) or meningococcal capsular group A conjugate (MenA) vaccine. Children had to have no previous history of typhoid vaccination and reside in the study areas for inclusion and were recruited from government schools and health centres. Participants, their parents or guardians, and the study team were masked to vaccine allocation. Nurses administering vaccines were unmasked. We did surveillance for febrile illness from vaccination until follow-up completion. The primary outcome was first occurrence of blood culture-confirmed typhoid fever. Eligible children who were randomly assigned and vaccinated were included in the intention-to-treat analyses. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03299426. FINDINGS: Between Feb 21, 2018, and Sept 27, 2018, 28 130 children were vaccinated; 14 069 were assigned to receive Vi-TT and 14 061 to receive MenA. After a median follow-up of 4·3 years (IQR 4·2-4·5), 24 (39·7 cases per 100 000 person-years) children in the Vi-TT group and 110 (182·7 cases per 100 000 person-years) children in the MenA group were diagnosed with a first episode of blood culture-confirmed typhoid fever. In the intention-to-treat population, efficacy of Vi-TT was 78·3% (95% CI 66·3-86·1), and 163 (129-222) children needed to be vaccinated to prevent one case. Efficacies by age group were 70·6% (6·4-93·0) for children aged 9 months to 2 years; 79·6% (45·8-93·9) for children aged 2-4 years; and 79·3% (63·5-89·0) for children aged 5-12 years. INTERPRETATION: A single dose of Vi-TT is durably efficacious for at least 4 years among children aged 9 months to 12 years and shows efficacy in all age groups, including children younger than 2 years. These results support current WHO recommendations in typhoid-endemic areas for mass campaigns among children aged 9 months to 15 years, followed by routine introduction in the first 2 years of life. FUNDING: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.


Assuntos
Febre Tifoide , Vacinas Tíficas-Paratíficas , Vacinas Conjugadas , Humanos , Febre Tifoide/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Tíficas-Paratíficas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Tíficas-Paratíficas/imunologia , Pré-Escolar , Vacinas Conjugadas/administração & dosagem , Lactente , Masculino , Feminino , Método Duplo-Cego , Malaui , Criança , Eficácia de Vacinas , Salmonella typhi/imunologia , Vacinas Meningocócicas/administração & dosagem
3.
Int Immunol ; 36(8): 393-404, 2024 Jul 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38536954

RESUMO

Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is caused by Neisseria meningitidis, with the main serogroups responsible for the disease being A, B, C, W, X, and Y. To date, several vaccines targeting N. meningitidis have been developed albeit with a short-lived protection. Given that MenW and MenB are the most common causes of IMD in Europe, Turkey, and the Middle East, we aimed to develop an outer membrane vesicle (OMV) based bivalent vaccine as the heterologous antigen source. Herein, we compared the immunogenicity, and breadth of serum bactericidal activity (SBA) assay-based protective coverage of OMV vaccine to the X serotype with existing commercial meningococcal conjugate and polysaccharide (PS) vaccines in a murine model. BALB/c mice were immunized with preclinical batches of the W + B OMV vaccine, either adjuvanted with Alum, CpG ODN, or their combinations, and compared with a MenACYW conjugate vaccine (NimenrixTM, Pfizer), and a MenB OMV-based vaccine (Bexsero®, GSK), The immune responses were assessed through enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and SBA assay. Antibody responses and SBA titers were significantly higher in the W + B OMV vaccine when adjuvanted with Alum or CpG ODN, as compared to the control groups. Moreover, the SBA titers were not only significantly higher than those achieved with available conjugated ACYW vaccines but also on par with the 4CMenB vaccines. In conclusion, the W + B OMV vaccine demonstrated the capacity to elicit robust antibody responses, surpassing or matching the levels induced by licensed meningococcal vaccines. Consequently, the W + B OMV vaccine could potentially serve as a viable alternative or supplement to existing meningococcal vaccines.


Assuntos
Compostos de Alúmen , Infecções Meningocócicas , Vacinas Meningocócicas , Camundongos Endogâmicos BALB C , Neisseria meningitidis , Oligodesoxirribonucleotídeos , Animais , Vacinas Meningocócicas/imunologia , Vacinas Meningocócicas/administração & dosagem , Camundongos , Neisseria meningitidis/imunologia , Compostos de Alúmen/administração & dosagem , Oligodesoxirribonucleotídeos/imunologia , Oligodesoxirribonucleotídeos/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Infecções Meningocócicas/prevenção & controle , Infecções Meningocócicas/imunologia , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/farmacologia , Anticorpos Antibacterianos/imunologia , Anticorpos Antibacterianos/sangue , Imunogenicidade da Vacina , Membrana Externa Bacteriana/imunologia
4.
Sex Transm Dis ; 51(6): 381-387, 2024 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38403294

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Gonorrhea's rapid development of antimicrobial resistance underscores the importance of new prevention modalities. Recent evidence suggests that a serogroup B meningococcal vaccine may be partially effective against gonococcal infection. However, the viability of vaccination and the role it should play in gonorrhea prevention are an open question. METHODS: We modeled the transmission of gonorrhea over a 10-year period in a heterosexual population to find optimal patterns of year-over-year investment of a fixed budget in vaccination and screening programs. Each year, resources could be allocated to vaccinating people or enrolling them in a quarterly screening program. Stratifying by mode (vaccination vs. screening), sex (male vs. female), and enrollment venue (background screening vs. symptomatic visit), we consider 8 different ways of controlling gonorrhea. We then found the year-over-year pattern of investment among those 8 controls that most reduced the incidence of gonorrhea under different assumptions. A compartmental transmission model was parameterized from existing literature in the US context. RESULTS: Vaccinating men with recent symptomatic infection, which selected for higher sexual activity, was optimal for population-level gonorrhea control. Given a prevention budget of $3 per capita, 9.5% of infections could be averted ($299 per infection averted), decreasing gonorrhea sequelae and associated antimicrobial use by similar percentages. These results were consistent across sensitivity analyses that increased the budget, prioritized incidence or prevalence reductions in women, or lowered screening costs. Under a scenario where only screening was implemented, just 5.5% of infections were averted. CONCLUSIONS: A currently available vaccine, although only modestly effective, may be superior to frequent testing for population-level gonorrhea control.


Assuntos
Gonorreia , Programas de Rastreamento , Vacinação , Humanos , Gonorreia/prevenção & controle , Gonorreia/epidemiologia , Gonorreia/economia , Masculino , Feminino , Programas de Rastreamento/economia , Vacinação/economia , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/imunologia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Incidência , Adulto , Vacinas Meningocócicas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Meningocócicas/economia , Heterossexualidade
5.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 73(33): 708-714, 2024 Aug 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39173168

RESUMO

Based on safety and efficacy data, vaccinations are the best defense to protect persons and communities from serious vaccine-preventable diseases. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommends routine vaccination of adolescents aged 11-12 years with three vaccines including tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis vaccine; quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine; and human papillomavirus vaccine. CDC analyzed data from the 2023 National Immunization Survey-Teen for 16,658 adolescents aged 13-17 years (born during January 2005-December 2010) to assess vaccination coverage in 2023, recent trends in coverage by birth year, and trends in coverage by eligibility for the Vaccines for Children (VFC) program and birth year. In 2023, coverage with all routine vaccines recommended for adolescents was similar to coverage in 2022. Vaccination coverage among VFC-eligible adolescents was generally stable during the COVID-19 pandemic, except for a decrease in the percentage of VFC-eligible adolescents who were up to date with HPV vaccination by age 13 years among those born in 2010 compared with those born in 2007. Whereas coverage differences were found between VFC-eligible and non-VFC-eligible adolescents before the COVID-19 pandemic, coverage was similar among the most recent birth years in the survey. Providers should make strong recommendations for all routine vaccines and review adolescent vaccination records to verify if adolescents are up to date with all recommended vaccines.


Assuntos
Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Cobertura Vacinal , Humanos , Adolescente , Estados Unidos , Cobertura Vacinal/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Masculino , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Meningocócicas/administração & dosagem
6.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 1771, 2024 Jul 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38961431

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In the United States (US), three types of vaccines are available to prevent invasive meningococcal disease (IMD), a severe and potentially fatal infection: quadrivalent conjugate vaccines against serogroups A, C, W, Y (MenACWY), and monovalent vaccines against serogroup B (MenB) as well as a newly licensed pentavalent vaccine (MenABCWY) protecting against serogroup A, B, C, W, and Y. The CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) routinely recommends MenACWY vaccine for all 11- to 12-year-olds with a booster dose at 16 years. MenB vaccination is recommended based on shared clinical decision-making (SCDM) for 16- to 23-year-olds. Recently, the pentavalent meningococcal vaccine (MenABCWY) was recommended by the ACIP. Meningococcal vaccine uptake is suboptimal across the country, particularly among individuals with lower socioeconomic status (SES), despite these recommendations. The objective of the spatial analyses was to assess the relationship between stocking of MenACWY and MenB vaccines, area-level SES, and state-level policies. METHODS: The number of MenACWY and MenB doses stocked by vaccinators was obtained from IQVIA and the CDC's Vaccine for Children (VFC) program and compiled into a county-level dataset from 2016 to 2019. SES, as measured using the CDC's Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), state-level school recommendations, and universal purchasing programs were among the main county-level covariates included to control for factors likely influencing stocking. Data were stratified by public and private market. Bayesian spatial regression models were developed to quantify the variations in rates of stocking and the relative rates of stocking of both vaccines. RESULTS: After accounting for county-level characteristics, lower SES counties tended to have fewer doses of MenB relative to MenACWY on both public and private markets. Lower SES counties tended to have more supply of public vs. private doses. Universal purchasing programs had a strong effect on the markets for both vaccines shifting nearly all doses to the public market. School vaccination strategy was key for improving stocking rates. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the results show that MenACWY has greater stock relative to MenB across the US. This difference is exacerbated in vulnerable areas without school entry requirements for vaccination and results in inequity of vaccine availability. Beyond state-level policy and SES differences, SCDM recommendations may be a contributing factor, although this was not directly assessed by our model.


Assuntos
Infecções Meningocócicas , Vacinas Meningocócicas , Humanos , Vacinas Meningocócicas/administração & dosagem , Estados Unidos , Infecções Meningocócicas/prevenção & controle , Criança , Adolescente , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde
7.
J Behav Med ; 47(3): 446-457, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38581595

RESUMO

Awareness and uptake of the meningitis vaccine remains low among marginalized groups, such as Latino men who have sex with men (LMSM), potentially due to structural and psychosocial barriers in accessing preventative healthcare. The current study explored awareness and uptake of meningitis vaccines among a group of LMSM (N = 99) living in South Florida. A three-pronged variable selection approach was utilized prior to conducting regression models (linear and logistic). Overall, 48.5% of the participants reported little to no knowledge about meningitis vaccines, and 20.2% reported being vaccinated. Living with HIV (OR = 10.48) and time since outbreak (OR = 1.03) were significant predictors of meningitis vaccine uptake. No significant correlates of meningitis vaccine awareness were identified. More research is needed to identify other important factors associated with meningitis vaccine awareness and uptake among LMSM, a multiple marginalized group.


Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Meningite , Vacinas Meningocócicas , Humanos , Masculino , Surtos de Doenças , Florida , Hispânico ou Latino/psicologia , Homossexualidade Masculina , Meningite/prevenção & controle , Vacinação , Vacinas Meningocócicas/administração & dosagem
8.
Epidemiol Infect ; 151: e98, 2023 06 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37259803

RESUMO

Country-wide social distancing and suspension of non-emergency medical care due to the COVID-19 pandemic will undoubtedly have affected public health in multiple ways. While non-pharmaceutical interventions are expected to reduce the transmission of several infectious diseases, severe disruptions to healthcare systems have hampered diagnosis, treatment, and routine vaccination. We examined the effect of this disruption on meningococcal disease and vaccination in the UK. By adapting an existing mathematical model for meningococcal carriage, we addressed the following questions: What is the predicted impact of the existing MenACWY adolescent vaccination programme? What effect might social distancing and reduced vaccine uptake both have on future epidemiology? Will catch-up vaccination campaigns be necessary? Our model indicated that the MenACWY vaccine programme was generating substantial indirect protection and suppressing transmission by 2020. COVID-19 social distancing is expected to have accelerated this decline, causing significant long-lasting reductions in both carriage prevalence of meningococcal A/C/W/Y strains and incidence of invasive meningococcal disease. In all scenarios modelled, pandemic social mixing effects outweighed potential reductions in vaccine uptake, causing an overall decline in carriage prevalence from 2020 for at least 5 years. Model outputs show strong consistency with recently published case data for England.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Infecções Meningocócicas , Vacinas Meningocócicas , Neisseria meningitidis , Adolescente , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Inglaterra , Infecções Meningocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Meningocócicas/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Meningocócicas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Meningocócicas/efeitos adversos , Pandemias , Vacinação , Vacinas Combinadas , Vacinas Conjugadas
9.
BMC Public Health ; 23(1): 933, 2023 05 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37221575

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Men who have sex with men (MSM) have suboptimal uptake of human papillomavirus (HPV) and meningococcal vaccines. This study examines barriers and facilitators to HPV and meningococcal vaccination among MSM in a large, racially/ethnically diverse, and medically underserved U.S. region. METHODS: In 2020, we conducted five focus groups with MSM living in the Inland Empire, California. Participants discussed (1) their knowledge about and attitudes toward HPV, meningococcal disease, and related vaccines; and (2) factors that would encourage or discourage vaccine uptake. Data were systematically analyzed to identify salient barriers and facilitators to vaccination. RESULTS: Participants (N = 25) had a median age of 29. Most were Hispanic (68%), self-identified as gay (84%), and had college degrees (64%). Key barriers to vaccination included: (1) limited awareness and knowledge about HPV and meningococcal disease, (2) reliance on mainstream healthcare providers for vaccine information, (3) stigma and reluctance to disclose sexual orientation, (4) uncertainty about health insurance coverage and vaccine costs, and (5) distance and time required to access vaccines. Key facilitators to vaccination were: (1) vaccine confidence, (2) perceived severity of HPV and meningococcal disease, (3) bundling vaccination into routine healthcare, and (4) pharmacies as vaccination sites. CONCLUSIONS: Findings highlight opportunities for HPV and meningococcal vaccine promotion, including targeted education and awareness campaigns for MSM, LGBT inclusivity training for healthcare providers, and structural interventions to improve vaccine accessibility.


Assuntos
Homossexualidade Masculina , Papillomavirus Humano , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Humanos , Masculino , Homossexualidade Masculina/psicologia , Vacinas Meningocócicas/administração & dosagem , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Grupos Focais , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Estigma Social , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Estados Unidos , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Seguro Saúde
10.
PLoS Pathog ; 16(10): e1008882, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33007046

RESUMO

Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B (MenB) is the leading cause of meningococcal meningitis and sepsis in industrialized countries, with the highest incidence in infants and adolescents. Two recombinant protein vaccines that protect against MenB are now available (i.e. 4CMenB and MenB-fHbp). Both vaccines contain the Factor H Binding Protein (fHbp) antigen, which can bind the Human Factor H (fH), the main negative regulator of the alternative complement pathway, thus enabling bacterial survival in the blood. fHbp is present in meningococcal strains as three main variants which are immunologically distinct. Here we sought to obtain detailed information about the epitopes targeted by anti-fHbp antibodies induced by immunization with the 4CMenB multicomponent vaccine. Thirteen anti-fHbp human monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) were identified in a library of over 100 antibody fragments (Fabs) obtained from three healthy adult volunteers immunized with 4CMenB. Herein, the key cross-reactive mAbs were further characterized for antigen binding affinity, complement-mediated serum bactericidal activity (SBA) and the ability to inhibit binding of fH to live bacteria. For the first time, we identified a subset of anti-fHbp mAbs able to elicit human SBA against strains with all three variants and able to compete with human fH for fHbp binding. We present the crystal structure of fHbp v1.1 complexed with human antibody 4B3. The structure, combined with mutagenesis and binding studies, revealed the critical cross-reactive epitope. The structure also provided the molecular basis of competition for fH binding. These data suggest that the fH binding site on fHbp v1.1 can be accessible to the human immune system upon immunization, enabling elicitation of human mAbs broadly protective against MenB. The novel structural, biochemical and functional data are of great significance because the human vaccine-elicited mAbs are the first reported to inhibit the binding of fH to fHbp, and are bactericidal with human complement. Our studies provide molecular insights into the human immune response to the 4CMenB meningococcal vaccine and fuel the rationale for combined structural, immunological and functional studies when seeking deeper understanding of the mechanisms of action of human vaccines.


Assuntos
Anticorpos/imunologia , Antígenos de Bactérias/metabolismo , Proteínas de Bactérias/metabolismo , Meningite Meningocócica/imunologia , Vacinas Meningocócicas/administração & dosagem , Neisseria meningitidis/imunologia , Adulto , Anticorpos/sangue , Antígenos de Bactérias/imunologia , Proteínas de Bactérias/imunologia , Fator H do Complemento/imunologia , Fator H do Complemento/metabolismo , Humanos , Meningite Meningocócica/metabolismo , Meningite Meningocócica/microbiologia , Meningite Meningocócica/prevenção & controle
11.
MMWR Recomm Rep ; 69(9): 1-41, 2020 09 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33417592

RESUMO

This report compiles and summarizes all recommendations from CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) for use of meningococcal vaccines in the United States. As a comprehensive summary and update of previously published recommendations, it replaces all previously published reports and policy notes. This report also contains new recommendations for administration of booster doses of serogroup B meningococcal (MenB) vaccine for persons at increased risk for serogroup B meningococcal disease. These guidelines will be updated as needed on the basis of availability of new data or licensure of new meningococcal vaccines. ACIP recommends routine vaccination with a quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MenACWY) for adolescents aged 11 or 12 years, with a booster dose at age 16 years. ACIP also recommends routine vaccination with MenACWY for persons aged ≥2 months at increased risk for meningococcal disease caused by serogroups A, C, W, or Y, including persons who have persistent complement component deficiencies; persons receiving a complement inhibitor (e.g., eculizumab [Soliris] or ravulizumab [Ultomiris]); persons who have anatomic or functional asplenia; persons with human immunodeficiency virus infection; microbiologists routinely exposed to isolates of Neisseria meningitidis; persons identified to be at increased risk because of a meningococcal disease outbreak caused by serogroups A, C, W, or Y; persons who travel to or live in areas in which meningococcal disease is hyperendemic or epidemic; unvaccinated or incompletely vaccinated first-year college students living in residence halls; and military recruits. ACIP recommends MenACWY booster doses for previously vaccinated persons who become or remain at increased risk.In addition, ACIP recommends routine use of MenB vaccine series among persons aged ≥10 years who are at increased risk for serogroup B meningococcal disease, including persons who have persistent complement component deficiencies; persons receiving a complement inhibitor; persons who have anatomic or functional asplenia; microbiologists who are routinely exposed to isolates of N. meningitidis; and persons identified to be at increased risk because of a meningococcal disease outbreak caused by serogroup B. ACIP recommends MenB booster doses for previously vaccinated persons who become or remain at increased risk. In addition, ACIP recommends a MenB series for adolescents and young adults aged 16-23 years on the basis of shared clinical decision-making to provide short-term protection against disease caused by most strains of serogroup B N. meningitidis.


Assuntos
Infecções Meningocócicas/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Meningocócicas/administração & dosagem , Adolescente , Adulto , Comitês Consultivos , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Esquemas de Imunização , Lactente , Infecções Meningocócicas/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Vacinas Conjugadas/administração & dosagem , Adulto Jovem
12.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 70(35): 1183-1190, 2021 Sep 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34473682

RESUMO

The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommends that adolescents aged 11-12 years routinely receive tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap); meningococcal conjugate (MenACWY); and human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines. Catch-up vaccination is recommended for hepatitis B (HepB); hepatitis A (HepA); measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR); and varicella (VAR) vaccines for adolescents whose childhood vaccinations are not current. Adolescents are also recommended to receive a booster dose of MenACWY vaccine at age 16 years, and shared clinical decision-making is recommended for the serogroup B meningococcal vaccine (MenB) for persons aged 16-23 years (1). To estimate coverage with recommended vaccines, CDC analyzed data from the 2020 National Immunization Survey-Teen (NIS-Teen) for 20,163 adolescents aged 13-17 years.* Coverage with ≥1 dose of HPV vaccine increased from 71.5% in 2019 to 75.1% in 2020. The percentage of adolescents who were up to date† with HPV vaccination (HPV UTD) increased from 54.2% in 2019 to 58.6% in 2020. Coverage with ≥1 dose of Tdap, ≥1 dose (and among adolescents aged 17 years, ≥2 doses) of MenACWY remained similar to coverage in 2019 (90.1%, 89.3%, and 54.4% respectively). Coverage increased for ≥2 doses of HepA among adolescents aged 13-17 years and ≥1 dose of MenB among adolescents aged 17 years. Adolescents living below the federal poverty level§ had higher HPV vaccination coverage than adolescents living at or above the poverty level. Adolescents living outside a metropolitan statistical area (MSA)¶ had lower coverage with ≥1 MenACWY and ≥1 HPV dose, and a lower proportion being HPV UTD than adolescents in MSA principal cities. In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted routine immunization services. Results from the 2020 NIS-Teen reflect adolescent vaccination coverage before the COVID-19 pandemic. The 2020 NIS-Teen data could be used to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on catch-up vaccination but not on routine adolescent vaccination because adolescents included in the survey were aged ≥13 years, past the age when most routine adolescent vaccines are recommended, and most vaccinations occurred before March 2020. Continued efforts to reach adolescents whose routine medical care has been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic are necessary to protect persons and communities from vaccine-preventable diseases and outbreaks.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche Acelular/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Meningocócicas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/administração & dosagem , Cobertura Vacinal/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Comitês Consultivos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Esquemas de Imunização , Masculino , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Vacinas Conjugadas/administração & dosagem
13.
Value Health ; 24(1): 86-90, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33431158

RESUMO

In the last 5 years, guidelines have been developed for performing cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) for the economic evaluation of vaccination programs against infectious diseases. However, these cost-effectiveness guidelines do not provide specific guidance for including the value of reducing the risk of rare but potentially catastrophic health outcomes, such as mortality or long-term sequelae. Alternative economic evaluation methods, including extended CEA, the impact inventory, cost-benefit analyses, willingness to pay or the value of a statistical life, to capture the value of this risk reduction could provide more complete estimates of the value of vaccination programs for diseases with potentially catastrophic health and nonhealth outcomes. In this commentary, using invasive meningococcal disease as an example, we describe these alternative approaches along with examples to illustrate how the benefits of vaccination in reducing risk of catastrophic health outcomes can be valued. These benefits are not usually captured in CEAs that only include population benefits estimated as the quality-adjusted life-years gained and reduced costs from avoided cases.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício/métodos , Infecções Meningocócicas/economia , Infecções Meningocócicas/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Meningocócicas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Meningocócicas/economia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Humanos , Infecções Meningocócicas/epidemiologia , Modelos Econômicos , Morbidade , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Comportamento de Redução do Risco
14.
Value Health ; 24(1): 91-104, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33431159

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of 4CMenB infant vaccination in England comprehensively considers the broad burden of serogroup B invasive meningococcal disease (MenB IMD), which has not been considered, or was only partially considered in previous CEAs. METHODS: A review of previous MenB vaccination CEAs was conducted to identify aspects considered in the evaluation of costs and health outcomes of the disease burden of MenB IMD. To inform the model structure and comprehensive analysis, the aspects were grouped into 5 categories. A stepwise analysis was conducted to analyze the impact of each category, and the more comprehensive consideration of disease burden, on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). RESULTS: MenB IMD incidence decreased by 46.0% in infants and children 0-4 years old within 5 years after introduction of the program. Stepwise inclusion of the 5 disease burden categories to a conventional narrow CEA setting reduced the ICER from £360 595 to £18 645-that is, considering the impact of all 5 categories, 4CMenB infant vaccination is cost-effective at a threshold of £20 000 per QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS: When considering comprehensively the MenB IMD burden, 4CMenB infant vaccination can be cost-effective, a finding contrary to previous CEAs. This analysis allows policy decision-makers globally to infer the impact of current disease burden considerations on the cost-effectiveness and the comprehensive assessment necessary for MenB IMD. Although this comprehensive CEA can help inform decision making today, it may be limited in capturing the full disease burden and complex interactions of health and economics of MenB IMD.


Assuntos
Infecções Meningocócicas/prevenção & controle , Infecções Meningocócicas/psicologia , Vacinas Meningocócicas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Meningocócicas/economia , Pré-Escolar , Comportamento do Consumidor , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Análise Custo-Benefício , Eficiência , Inglaterra/epidemiologia , Gastos em Saúde , Humanos , Lactente , Infecções Meningocócicas/economia , Infecções Meningocócicas/epidemiologia , Modelos Econômicos , Neisseria meningitidis Sorogrupo B , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida
15.
BMC Neurol ; 21(1): 232, 2021 Jun 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34162337

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The internet has made significant contributions towards health education. Analyzing the pattern of online behavior regarding meningitis and vaccinations may be worthwhile. It is hypothesized that the online search patterns in meningitis are correlated with its number of cases and the search patterns of its related vaccines. METHODS: This was an infodemiological study that determined the relationship among online search interest in meningitis, its worldwide number of cases and its associated vaccines. Using Google Trends™ Search Volume Indices (SVIs), we evaluated the search queries "meningitis," "pneumococcal vaccine," "BCG vaccine," "meningococcal vaccine" and "influenza vaccine" in January 2021, covering January 2008 to December 2020. Spearman rank correlation was used to determine correlations between these queries. RESULTS: The worldwide search interest in meningitis from 2008 to 2020 showed an average SVI of 46 ± 8.8. The most searched topics were symptoms, vaccines, and infectious agents with SVIs of 100, 52, and 39, respectively. The top three countries with the highest search interest were Ghana, Kazakhstan, and Kenya. There were weak, but statistically significant correlations between meningitis and the BCG (ρ = 0.369, p < 0.001) and meningococcal (ρ = 0.183, p < 0.05) vaccines. There were no statistically significant associations between the number of cases, influenza vaccine, and pneumococcal vaccine. CONCLUSION: The relationships among the Google SVIs for meningitis and its related vaccines and number of cases data were inconsistent and remained unclear. Future infodemiological studies may expand their scopes to social media, semantics, and big data for more robust conclusions.


Assuntos
Bases de Dados Factuais , Serviços de Informação/estatística & dados numéricos , Meningite/patologia , Vacinas Meningocócicas/administração & dosagem , Vacina BCG/administração & dosagem , Países Desenvolvidos , Países em Desenvolvimento , Carga Global da Doença , Humanos , Serviços de Informação/tendências , Masculino , Meningite/epidemiologia , Meningite/prevenção & controle
16.
Epidemiol Infect ; 149: e50, 2021 02 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33541457

RESUMO

Vaccination remains the best strategy to reduce invasive meningococcal disease. This study evaluated an investigational tetanus toxoid-conjugate quadrivalent meningococcal vaccine (MenACYW-TT) vs. a licensed tetanus toxoid-conjugate quadrivalent meningococcal vaccine (MCV4-TT) (NCT02955797). Healthy toddlers aged 12-23 months were included if they were either meningococcal vaccine-naïve or MenC conjugate (MCC) vaccine-primed (≥1 dose of MCC prior to 12 months of age). Vaccine-naïve participants were randomised 1:1 to either MenACYW-TT (n = 306) or MCV4-TT (n = 306). MCC-primed participants were randomised 2:1 to MenACYW-TT (n = 203) or MCV4-TT (n = 103). Antibody titres against each of the four meningococcal serogroups were measured by serum bactericidal antibody assay using the human complement. The co-primary objectives of this study were to demonstrate the non-inferiority of MenACYW-TT to MCV4-TT in terms of seroprotection (titres ≥1:8) at Day 30 in both vaccine-naïve and all participants (vaccine-naïve and MCC-primed groups pooled). The immune response for all four serogroups to MenACYW-TT was non-inferior to MCV4-TT in vaccine-naïve participants (seroprotection: range 83.6-99.3% and 81.4-91.6%, respectively) and all participants (seroprotection: range 83.6-99.3% and 81.4-98.0%, respectively). The safety profiles of both vaccines were comparable. MenACYW-TT was well-tolerated and demonstrated non-inferior immunogenicity when administered to MCC vaccine-primed and vaccine-naïve toddlers.


Assuntos
Vacinas Meningocócicas/imunologia , Toxoide Tetânico/imunologia , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Finlândia , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Infecções Meningocócicas/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Meningocócicas/administração & dosagem , Tétano/prevenção & controle , Toxoide Tetânico/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Combinadas
17.
J Clin Pharm Ther ; 46(4): 1109-1116, 2021 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33768562

RESUMO

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Patient information leaflets (PILs) or Patient Leaflets (PLs) formally accompany dispensed medicines and are intended to provide the patient with information on how to use the medicine safely. To date, there have been no studies that have examined the readability of meningococcal vaccine patient-facing information, including information contained within the vaccine PIL. Given the role of pharmacists in presenting PILs to patients, it was, therefore, the aim of this study to quantitatively analyse the readability of Patient Leaflets, which accompany licensed meningococcal vaccines in the UK and US and to compare PILs to vaccine pharmaceutical manufacturers' summary of product characteristics (SPC), as well as other patient-facing vaccine-related information. METHODS: Five sources of meningococcal vaccine information were examined for the licensed meningococcal vaccines in the UK (Bexsero, Menveo, Menitorix, Trumenba, Nimenrix & NeisVac-C) and in the United States (Bexsero, Menveo, Trumenba, Menactra, Menomune-A/C/Y/W-135, Menquadfi), including as follows: (i) SPC (Electronic Medicines Compendium, UK), (ii) Package Insert (FDA; USA), (iii) Patient Leaflet (Electronic Medicines Compendium, UK), (iv) Vaccine pharmaceutical websites and (v) government web resources. Readability was examined employing 10 readability metrics, including the Flesch Reading Ease and the Flesch-Kincaid Grade level. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The information source with the greatest readability scores was the UK Patient Leaflet, which had a mean Flesch Reading Ease score of 58.1 and a mean Flesch-Kincaid Grade score of 7.3, followed by the US Department of Health & Human Services patient-facing website for vaccines (55.9 & 8, respectively), followed by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Vaccine Information Statement (47.3 & 9.4, respectively). Pharmaceutical patient-facing websites for meningococcal vaccines had mean scores of 44.6 and 9.9, respectively. When compared with UK Patient Leaflets, pharmaceutical websites were statistically different with poorer readability with both Flesch Reading Ease and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level indices (p = 0.02 & p = 0.04, respectively). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Pharmaceutical meningococcal vaccine PILs were easily read and had statistically significant good readability scores in comparison with vaccine SPCs and US Package Inserts, pharmaceutical product websites and other government patient-facing meningococcal vaccine information. Preparation of patient-facing materials of a complex topic, such as describing meningococcal vaccines, is difficult to accomplish. Although there is a plurality of sources of information through websites and social media, PILs are one of the few sources that are provided directly to patients. This underpins the potential importance of PILs and the importance of their readability. Adoption of readability calculators and scrutiny of materials for their readability will help authors develop materials with improved understanding for vaccine recipients, potentially leading to improved health literacy and vaccine uptake. Renewed efforts should be sought to promote the information within the PIL, thereby maximizing the value of this resource with vaccine recipients, their carers and family.


Assuntos
Compreensão , Letramento em Saúde/normas , Infecções Meningocócicas/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Meningocócicas/administração & dosagem , Folhetos , Informação de Saúde ao Consumidor/normas , Indústria Farmacêutica/normas , Humanos , Reino Unido , Estados Unidos , Vacinas Conjugadas
18.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 115(21): 5510-5515, 2018 05 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29735685

RESUMO

In the African meningitis belt, a region of sub-Saharan Africa comprising 22 countries from Senegal in the west to Ethiopia in the east, large epidemics of serogroup A meningococcal meningitis have occurred periodically. After gradual introduction from 2010 of mass vaccination with a monovalent meningococcal A conjugate vaccine, serogroup A epidemics have been eliminated. Starting in 2013, the northwestern part of Nigeria has been affected by yearly outbreaks of meningitis caused by a novel strain of serogroup C Neisseria meningitidis (NmC). In 2015, the strain spread to the neighboring country Niger, where it caused a severe epidemic. Following a relative calm in 2016, the largest ever recorded epidemic of NmC broke out in Nigeria in 2017. Here, we describe the recent evolution of this new outbreak strain and show how the acquisition of capsule genes and virulence factors by a strain previously circulating asymptomatically in the African population led to the emergence of a virulent pathogen. This study illustrates the power of long-read whole-genome sequencing, combined with Illumina sequencing, for high-resolution epidemiological investigations.


Assuntos
Epidemias , Meningite Meningocócica/epidemiologia , Vacinas Meningocócicas/administração & dosagem , Neisseria meningitidis/isolamento & purificação , Proteínas Virais/genética , Virulência/genética , África Ocidental/epidemiologia , Antígenos de Bactérias/genética , Antígenos de Bactérias/imunologia , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica , Humanos , Meningite Meningocócica/microbiologia , Meningite Meningocócica/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Meningocócicas/imunologia , Neisseria meningitidis/classificação , Neisseria meningitidis/genética , Neisseria meningitidis/imunologia , Vigilância da População , Análise Espaço-Temporal
19.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 26(3): 454-462, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32091358

RESUMO

Emergency vaccination programs often are needed to control outbreaks of meningococcal disease caused by Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B (MenB) on college campuses. Such campaigns expend multiple campus and public health resources. We conducted a randomized, controlled, multicenter, observer-blinded trial comparing immunogenicity and tolerability of an accelerated vaccine schedule of 0 and 21 days to a longer interval of 0 and 60 days for 4-component MenB vaccine (MenB-4C) in students 17-25 years of age. At day 21 after the first MenB-4C dose, we observed protective human serum bactericidal titers >4 to MenB strains 5/99, H44/76, and NZ 98/254 in 98%-100% of participants. Geometric mean titers increased >22-fold over baseline. At day 180, >95% of participants sustained protective titers regardless of their vaccine schedule. The most common adverse event was injection site pain. An accelerated MenB-4C immunization schedule could be considered for rapid control of campus outbreaks.


Assuntos
Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Infecções Meningocócicas/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Meningocócicas/administração & dosagem , Neisseria meningitidis Sorogrupo B/imunologia , Estudantes , Adolescente , Serviços de Saúde do Adolescente , Adulto , Canadá/epidemiologia , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Esquemas de Imunização , Masculino , Universidades , Vacinação , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA