Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Stress analysis of different configurations of 3 implants to support a fixed prosthesis in an edentulous jaw
Silva-Neto, Joao Paulo da; Pimentel, Marcele Jardim; Neves, Flavio Domingues das; Consani, Rafael Leonardo Xediek; Santos, Mateus Bertolini Fernandes dos.
Afiliação
  • Silva-Neto, Joao Paulo da; Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Piracicaba Dental School. Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology. Piracicaba. BR
  • Pimentel, Marcele Jardim; Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Piracicaba Dental School. Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology. Piracicaba. BR
  • Neves, Flavio Domingues das; Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Piracicaba Dental School. Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology. Piracicaba. BR
  • Consani, Rafael Leonardo Xediek; Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Piracicaba Dental School. Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology. Piracicaba. BR
  • Santos, Mateus Bertolini Fernandes dos; Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Piracicaba Dental School. Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology. Piracicaba. BR
Braz. oral res ; 28(1): 67-73, Jan-Feb/2014. tab, graf
Article em En | LILACS | ID: lil-696994
Biblioteca responsável: BR1.1
ABSTRACT
This study's aims was to evaluate the stress distribution in a mandibular implant-supported prosthesis and peri-implant bone considering implant quantity, diameter and position using linear 3-D finite element analysis. Models of an anterior jaw comprised 4 groups according to implant quantity, diameter, and position control group C, 5 regular implants; R, 3 regular implants; W, 3 wide implants; and DTR, 3 regular implants with the distal ones tilted 30º distally. The cantilever was loaded with an axial load of 50 N. Data was evaluated using von Mises stress on implants and maximum principal stress and microstrain on the bone. The W group showed the lowest value of maximum principal stress in peri-implant bone of the loaded side (4.64 MPa) when compared to C (5.27 MPa), DTR (5.94 MPa), and R (11.12 MPa). Lower stress values in the loaded implants were observed in the experimental groups when compared to the C group. However, the unloaded implants presented opposite results. All the screws of the W group presented lower stress values when compared to the C group. However, the R and DTR groups presented an increase in stress values with the exception of the loaded screw. A reduction in the number of implants associated with wider implants reduced the stress in the bone and prosthetic components.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: LILACS Assunto principal: Arcada Edêntula / Planejamento de Prótese Dentária / Prótese Dentária Fixada por Implante / Análise do Estresse Dentário Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: LILACS Assunto principal: Arcada Edêntula / Planejamento de Prótese Dentária / Prótese Dentária Fixada por Implante / Análise do Estresse Dentário Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article