Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Complications after bladder augmentation in children
Molina, Carlos Augusto Fernandes; Lima, Gilson José de; Cassini, Marcelo Ferreira; Andrade, Murilo Ferreira de; Facincani, Inalda; Tucci Júnior, Silvio.
Afiliação
  • Molina, Carlos Augusto Fernandes; University of São Paulo. Ribeirão Preto Medical School. Department of Surgery and Anatomy. BR
  • Lima, Gilson José de; University of São Paulo. Ribeirão Preto Medical School. Department of Surgery and Anatomy. BR
  • Cassini, Marcelo Ferreira; University of São Paulo. Ribeirão Preto Medical School. Department of Surgery and Anatomy. BR
  • Andrade, Murilo Ferreira de; University of São Paulo. Ribeirão Preto Medical School. Department of Surgery and Anatomy. BR
  • Facincani, Inalda; University of São Paulo. Ribeirão Preto Medical School. Department of Surgery and Anatomy. BR
  • Tucci Júnior, Silvio; University of São Paulo. Ribeirão Preto Medical School. Department of Surgery and Anatomy. BR
Acta cir. bras ; Acta cir. bras;31(supl.1): 8-12, 2016. tab
Article em En | LILACS | ID: lil-779767
Biblioteca responsável: BR1.1
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Bladder augmentation is an effective surgical procedure for increasing bladder capacity and reducing pressure on the urinary system. It is indicated for patients with anomalies such as spina bifida, myelomeningocele, urethral valve and bladder exstrophy, who progress with low tolerance of medication. CASES This was a retrospective study conducted on pediatric patients submitted to bladder augmentation from 2000 to 2011.

RESULTS:

34 patients aged 4 to 17 years were submitted to bladder augmentation, 30 of them with an ileal loop and 4 with a ureter.A continent urinary shunt was performed in 16 patients, the Mitrofanoff conduit was associated in 15, and the Macedo technique was used in one. Mean follow-up was 34.35 months (1 to 122 months). Mean creatinine was 1.5 ng/ml (0.4 to 7.5 ng/ml) preoperatively and 1.78 ng/ml postoperatively. Three patients required a renal transplant during follow-up. There was improvement or resolution of vesicoureteral reflux in 83.5% of the kidneys on the right and in 75% on the left. Bladder capacity increased, on average, from 152.5 ml to 410 ml. The main complications were vesical lithiasis in 3 patients and conduit perforation in one.

CONCLUSION:

Bladder augmentation showed good results in this series, preserving renal function in most of the patients.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: LILACS Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos / Doenças da Bexiga Urinária Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: LILACS Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos / Doenças da Bexiga Urinária Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article