Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship of levodopa with and without tolcapone in patients with Parkinson's disease.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of administration of the catechol-Omethyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor tolcapone on the concentration-effect relationship of levodopa in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease and on-off fluctuations. DESIGN: Nonblind single-group 2-period pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic study. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: 12 patients, mean age 59 years, with idiopathic Parkinson's disease and response fluctuations. METHODS: The pharmacokinetics [plasma concentrations of levodopa and 3-O-methyldopa (3-OMD)] and motor effects [global score of the Columbia University Rating Scale (CURSsigma)] of levodopa (plus the peripheral decarboxylase inhibitor benserazide 14) were determined for 4 consecutive dosage intervals (4 hours each, starting at 8.00am) in 12 patients before (day 1) and during (day 8) coadministration of tolcapone 100 mg 3 times daily for 7 days. RESULTS: Under tolcapone, exposure to levodopa [area under the plasma concentration-time for the dosage interval (AUCt)] observed for the separate doses increased by 1.6- to 2.2-fold, and peak plasma drug concentrations (Cmax) increased by 1.1 - to 2.1 -fold. 3-OMD concentrations at day 8 were reduced to about 20% of the values at day 1. At baseline (day 1, before the first levodopa dose), CURSsigma averaged 40 +/- 10 points. After the first levodopa dose. CURSsigma declined to 20 +/- 9 points. At day 8. the predose CURSsigma decreased to a final score of 31 +/-13 points, and the maximal decline after the first levodopa dose was to a final score of 16 +/- 8 points. Population analysis (NONMEM) of the concentration-effect relationship of levodopa according to a sigmoidal Emax model and over all dosage intervals did not show differences in levodopa responsiveness with or without tolcapone. The population mean of the 50% effective concentration (EC50) of levodopa was 1350 microg/L with an standard error of the population parameter estimate of 18% adding tolcapone treatment as a covariate did not significantly change the population fit. Circadian influences on levodopa respon- siveness were not evaluable by the NONMEM model due to overparametrisation, but visual inspection of plotted data did not suggest differences in the concentration-effect relationship between the 4 consecutive dosage intervals on days 1 and 8. CONCLUSIONS: The gain in clinical improvement with levodopa under tolcapone can be fully explained by tolcapone-induced changes of peripheral levodopa pharmacokinetics. We suggest that this interaction study, performed in patients and using clinical data, excludes any central effects of tolcapone or any inhibiting effect of 3-OMD on levodopa permeation through the blood-brain barrier, which otherwise would have led to a decrease in the EC50 of levodopa.