Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Calcium antagonist lacidipine slows down progression of asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis: principal results of the European Lacidipine Study on Atherosclerosis (ELSA), a randomized, double-blind, long-term trial.
Zanchetti, Alberto; Bond, M Gene; Hennig, Michael; Neiss, Albrecht; Mancia, Giuseppe; Dal Palù, Cesare; Hansson, Lennart; Magnani, Bruno; Rahn, Karl-Heinz; Reid, John L; Rodicio, Josè; Safar, Michel; Eckes, Lothar; Rizzini, Paolo.
Afiliação
  • Zanchetti A; University of Milan, Ospedale Maggiore, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy. zanchett@mailserver.unimi.it
Circulation ; 106(19): 2422-7, 2002 Nov 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12417537
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Most cardiovascular events associated with hypertension are complications of atherosclerosis. Some antihypertensive agents influence experimental models of atherosclerosis through mechanisms independent of blood pressure lowering. METHODS AND

RESULTS:

The European Lacidipine Study on Atherosclerosis (ELSA) was a randomized, double-blind trial in 2334 patients with hypertension that compared the effects of a 4-year treatment based on either lacidipine or atenolol on an index of carotid atherosclerosis, the mean of the maximum intima-media thicknesses (IMT) in far walls of common carotids and bifurcations (CBM(max)). This index has been shown by epidemiological studies to be predictive of cardiovascular events. A significant (P<0.0001) effect of lacidipine was found compared with atenolol, with a treatment difference in 4-year CBM(max) progression of -0.0227 mm (intention-to-treat population) and -0.0281 mm (completers). The yearly IMT progression rate was 0.0145 mm/y in atenolol-treated and 0.0087 mm/y in lacidipine-treated patients (completers, 40% reduction; P=0.0073). Patients with plaque progression were significantly less common, and patients with plaque regression were significantly more common in the lacidipine group. Clinic blood pressure reductions were identical with both treatments, but 24-hour ambulatory systolic/diastolic blood pressure changes were greater with atenolol (-10/-9 mm Hg) than with lacidipine (-7/-5 mm Hg). No significant difference between treatments was found in any cardiovascular events, although the relative risk for stroke, major cardiovascular events, and mortality showed a trend favoring lacidipine.

CONCLUSION:

The greater efficacy of lacidipine on carotid IMT progression and number of plaques per patient, despite a smaller ambulatory blood pressure reduction, indicates an antiatherosclerotic action of lacidipine independent of its antihypertensive action.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Di-Hidropiridinas / Bloqueadores dos Canais de Cálcio / Doenças das Artérias Carótidas / Hipertensão / Anti-Hipertensivos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2002 Tipo de documento: Article
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Di-Hidropiridinas / Bloqueadores dos Canais de Cálcio / Doenças das Artérias Carótidas / Hipertensão / Anti-Hipertensivos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2002 Tipo de documento: Article