[Prognosis of epidermoid anal carcinoma regression after conservative treatment]. / Prognoz regressii opukholi pri konservativnoi terapii épidermoidnogo raka anal'nogo kanala.

ABSTRACT

The prospective study was concerned with definition of the clinical and therapeutic factors behind poor response of anal cancer to radio- (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Out of 64 female and 8 male patients at the mean age of 57 (33-81), thirty six had split-course of 60-65 Gy (RT), twenty--60-65 Gy, 5-FU and mitomycin C (CRT) and eighteen--up to 55-65 Gy (1.5 Gy--session 1, 1.0 Gy--session 2) (hyper-fractionated RT) plus 5-FU, for squamous cell anal carcinoma. There was no endorectal ultrasound evidence of perirectal lymph node involvement (uN0) T1-2uN-M0 (n=46), T3-4uN0M0 (n=11), uN1 or N2-3 (groin or endorectal ultrasound T1-2uN-M0 (n=46), T3-4uN0M0 (n=11), uN1 or N2-3 (groin metastases) were detected in 7 patients T1-2uN1-2M0 (n=7), T3-4N1-3M0 (n=10). Endorectal ultrasound staging (ERUS) used a linear 7.5 MHz transducer. The uTNM system was devised on the basis of tumor invasion parameters. There were no tumors confined to the subendothelial layer of the anal canal (uT1); 24 (32.4%) tumors were confined to the internal anal sphincter (uT2); 19 (25.7%) invaded the external anal sphincter (uT3) and 31 (41.9%)--levator ani (uT4). All carcinomas T4 (n=9) corresponded to the uT4 category. Only T-stage and tumor invasion (uT) proved significant prognostic variables. Complete response of T1-2 was 79.2%, T3-4--33.3% (p=0.0003); uT2--95.8%, uT3--68.4%, and uT4--41.9% (except T4) (p=0.0001). In multivariate logistic analysis, uT alone appeared an independent variable (p=0.015). ERUS uTNM staging is more effective in prognosis for RT and CRT and, therefore, should be recommended for preliminary management of epidermoid anal carcinoma.