Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pancreatectomy using the no-touch isolation technique followed by extensive intraoperative peritoneal lavage to prevent cancer cell dissemination: a pilot study.
Hirota, Masahiko; Shimada, Shinya; Yamamoto, Kenichiro; Tanaka, Eiji; Sugita, Hiroki; Egami, Hiroshi; Ogawa, Michio.
Afiliação
  • Hirota M; Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kumamoto University, Honjo, Kumamoto-city, Japan. mhirota@kaiju.medic.kumamoto-u.ac.jp
JOP ; 6(2): 143-51, 2005 Mar 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15767730
ABSTRACT
CONTEXT In pancreatic cancer, even for patients who have undergone curative resection (R0), survival analysis has revealed a poor survival rate due to cancer recurrence. Because the operation itself might have caused the dissemination of these cancer cells, the no-touch isolation technique and extensive intraoperative peritoneal lavage may be a potential operative procedure for improving the outcome. PATIENTS Eight patients treated by the no-touch isolation technique were compared with 10 patients treated using conventional techniques. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

Cancer cell detection rates in the portal venous blood, frequency of recurrence, and survival rate. We also analyzed the lymphatic fluid squeezed from the resected cancerous pancreatic tissue.

RESULTS:

In 5 out of 10 cases (50%) in the conventional procedure group, CEA mRNA was identified in the portal blood after tumor manipulation, while only 1 out of 8 cases (13%) in the no-touch isolation technique group was positive for portal CEA mRNA. All lymphatic fluid samples squeezed from the resected cancerous pancreatic tissue were positive (8/8) for CEA mRNA. The recurrence rate was 90% (9/10) in the conventional procedure group, and 38% (3/8) in the no-touch isolation technique group (P=0.043). In the conventional procedure group, hepatic metastasis, local recurrence, peritoneal dissemination, and extraabdominal recurrence were identified in 6 (60%), 4 (40%), 4 (40%), and 2 patients (20%), respectively. On the other hand, among the no-touch isolation technique group, recurrence was identified in 1 (13%), 1 (13%), 0 (0%), and 1 patient (13%), respectively. There was no peritoneal dissemination along with the decreased hepatic recurrence rate. Mean (+/-SEM) survival time was 21.2+/-5.8 months for the conventional procedure group and 41.5+/-5.6 months for the no-touch isolation technique group (P=0.018). The 3-year survival rate was 12.5+/-11.5% for the conventional procedure group and 75.0+/-21.7% for the no-touch isolation technique group.

CONCLUSION:

This study presented the potential of cancer dissemination during the intraoperative manipulation of tumors and its contribution to cancer recurrence, as well as the significance of the no-touch isolation technique and extensive intraoperative peritoneal lavage for pancreatic cancer surgery.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pancreatectomia / Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Lavagem Peritoneal / Período Intraoperatório / Recidiva Local de Neoplasia Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2005 Tipo de documento: Article
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pancreatectomia / Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Lavagem Peritoneal / Período Intraoperatório / Recidiva Local de Neoplasia Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2005 Tipo de documento: Article