Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Evaluation of an articulated spacer for two-stage reimplantation for infected total knee arthroplasty: 28 cases]. / Tolérance et efficacité d'une entretoise articulée dans les reprises en deux temps de prothèses de genou infectées: série rétrospective de 28 prothèses.
Souillac, V; Costes, S; Aunoble, S; Langlois, V; Dutronc, H; Chauveaux, D.
Afiliação
  • Souillac V; Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique, Hôpital Pellegrin, CHU de Bordeaux, place Amélie-Raba-Léon, 33076 Bordeaux Cedex.
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot ; 92(5): 485-9, 2006 Sep.
Article em Fr | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17088742
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY Two-stage reimplantation remains the most popular solution for infected total knee arthroplasty. We have used articulated spacers since their introduction in 2000. We evaluated tolerance, joint motion under general anesthesia before reimplantation and also the infectious and functional long-term outcome. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

Between June 2000 and April 2003, we implanted an articulated spacer in 28 patients who required revision of their total knee arthroplasty. Postoperatively, contact weight bearing was allowed with unlimited knee motion depending on pain control. Mean time between implant removal and reimplantation was eight weeks (range 6-16 weeks).

RESULTS:

There was one dislocation due to excessive play between the two components. Passive joint motion before reimplantation was 53 degrees (range 5-80 degrees ). At last follow-up, 24 patients were free of overt infection and all antibiotic regimens had been discontinued for at least 20 months (20-48 months). Two patients required a second two stage revision. One had an arthrodesis and in one only suppressive antibiotic therapy was possible.

DISCUSSION:

Spacer removal appears easy at reimplantation. Good knee flexion (greater than 40 degrees in ten patients and greater than 60 degrees in eight) facilitated exposure, avoiding the need for tilting of the tibial tuberosity in seven patients. Functional and infectious outcomes were similar to those reported in the literature.

CONCLUSION:

The spacer appears to improve patient comfort between the two operations. It also facilitates the reimplantation procedure because of the easier exposure and greater knee flexion compared with a mono-bloc spacer or an external fixator. There must however be enough bone stock to hold the articulated spacer in place.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese / Artroplastia do Joelho / Prótese do Joelho Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: Fr Ano de publicação: 2006 Tipo de documento: Article
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese / Artroplastia do Joelho / Prótese do Joelho Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: Fr Ano de publicação: 2006 Tipo de documento: Article