Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Underestimation of airflow obstruction among young adults using FEV1/FVC <70% as a fixed cut-off: a longitudinal evaluation of clinical and functional outcomes.
Cerveri, I; Corsico, A G; Accordini, S; Niniano, R; Ansaldo, E; Antó, J M; Künzli, N; Janson, C; Sunyer, J; Jarvis, D; Svanes, C; Gislason, T; Heinrich, J; Schouten, J P; Wjst, M; Burney, P; de Marco, R.
Afiliação
  • Cerveri I; Division of Respiratory Diseases, IRCCS San Matteo Hospital Foundation, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Thorax ; 63(12): 1040-5, 2008 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18492741
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Early detection of airflow obstruction is particularly important among young adults because they are more likely to benefit from intervention. Using the forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) to forced vital capacity (FVC) (FEV(1)/FVC) <70% fixed ratio, airflow obstruction may be underdiagnosed. The lower limit of normal (LLN), which is statistically defined by the lower fifth percentile of a reference population, is physiologically appropriate but it still needs a clinical validation.

METHODS:

To evaluate the characteristics and longitudinal outcomes of subjects misidentified as normal by the fixed ratio with respect to the LLN, 6249 participants (aged 20-44 years) in the European Community Respiratory Health Survey were examined and divided into three groups (absence of airflow obstruction by the LLN and the fixed ratio; presence of airflow obstruction only by the LLN; presence of airflow obstruction by the two criteria) for 1991-1993. LLN equations were obtained from normal non-smoking participants. A set of clinical and functional outcomes was evaluated in 1999-2002.

RESULTS:

The misidentified subjects were 318 (5.1%); only 45.6% of the subjects with airflow obstruction by the LLN were also identified by the fixed cut-off. At baseline, FEV(1) (107%, 97%, 85%) progressively decreased and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (slope 7.84, 6.32, 5.57) progressively increased across the three groups. During follow-up, misidentified subjects had a significantly higher risk of developing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and a significantly higher use of health resources (medicines, emergency department visits/hospital admissions) because of breathing problems than subjects without airflow obstruction (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

Our findings show the importance of using statistically derived spirometric criteria to identify airflow obstruction.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Obstrução das Vias Respiratórias Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2008 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Obstrução das Vias Respiratórias Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2008 Tipo de documento: Article