Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Disclosing harmful mammography errors to patients.
Gallagher, Thomas H; Cook, Andrea J; Brenner, R James; Carney, Patricia A; Miglioretti, Diana L; Geller, Berta M; Kerlikowske, Karla; Onega, Tracy L; Rosenberg, Robert D; Yankaskas, Bonnie C; Lehman, Constance D; Elmore, Joann G.
Afiliação
  • Gallagher TH; Department of Medicine, and Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington, 4311 11th Ave NE, Suite 230, Seattle, WA 98105, USA. thomasg@u.washington.edu
Radiology ; 253(2): 443-52, 2009 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19710002
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To assess radiologists' attitudes about disclosing errors to patients by using a survey with a vignette involving an error interpreting a patient's mammogram, leading to a delayed cancer diagnosis. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

We conducted an institutional review board-approved survey of 364 radiologists at seven geographically distinct Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium sites that interpreted mammograms from 2005 to 2006. Radiologists received a vignette in which comparison screening mammograms were placed in the wrong order, leading a radiologist to conclude calcifications were decreasing in number when they were actually increasing, delaying a cancer diagnosis. Radiologists were asked (a) how likely they would be to disclose this error, (b) what information they would share, and (c) their malpractice attitudes and experiences.

RESULTS:

Two hundred forty-three (67%) of 364 radiologists responded to the disclosure vignette questions. Radiologists' responses to whether they would disclose the error included "definitely not" (9%), "only if asked by the patient" (51%), "probably" (26%), and "definitely" (14%). Regarding information they would disclose, 24% would "not say anything further to the patient," 31% would tell the patient that "the calcifications are larger and are now suspicious for cancer," 30% would state "the calcifications may have increased on your last mammogram, but their appearance was not as worrisome as it is now," and 15% would tell the patient "an error occurred during the interpretation of your last mammogram, and the calcifications had actually increased in number, not decreased." Radiologists' malpractice experiences were not consistently associated with their disclosure responses.

CONCLUSION:

Many radiologists report reluctance to disclose a hypothetical mammography error that delayed a cancer diagnosis. Strategies should be developed to increase radiologists' comfort communicating with patients.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radiologia / Revelação da Verdade / Neoplasias da Mama / Mamografia / Erros de Diagnóstico Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2009 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radiologia / Revelação da Verdade / Neoplasias da Mama / Mamografia / Erros de Diagnóstico Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2009 Tipo de documento: Article