Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Does increased sunlight exposure work as a strategy to improve vitamin D status in the elderly: a cluster randomised controlled trial.
Sambrook, P N; Cameron, I D; Chen, J S; Cumming, R G; Durvasula, S; Herrmann, M; Kok, C; Lord, S R; Macara, M; March, L M; Mason, R S; Seibel, M J; Wilson, N; Simpson, J M.
Afiliação
  • Sambrook PN; Institute of Bone and Joint Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. sambrook@med.usyd.edu.au
Osteoporos Int ; 23(2): 615-24, 2012 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21369788
ABSTRACT

SUMMARY:

Sunlight exposure by improving vitamin D status could be a simple public health strategy in reducing falls among frail elder people. In a randomised controlled trial, adherence to sunlight exposure was low (median adherence, 26%) and no effect of increased UV exposure on falls risk was observed (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.06, P = 0.73).

INTRODUCTION:

This study aimed to determine whether increased sunlight exposure was effective to improve vitamin D status and reduce falls in the elderly.

METHODS:

In a cluster randomised controlled trial (NCT00322166 at ClinicalTrials.gov), 602 residents aged 70 or more (mean age, 86.4 years; 71% female) were recruited from 51 aged care facilities in Northern Sydney, Australia. Participants were randomised by facility to receive either increased sunlight exposure (additional 30-40 min/day in the early morning) with (UV+) or without (UV) calcium supplementation (600 mg/day) or neither (control) for a year. The co-primary endpoints were change in serum 25 hydroxy vitamin D (25OHD) and falls incidence after 12 months.

RESULTS:

Adherence to sunlight exposure was low (median adherence, 26%; IQR, 7%-45%). Serum 25OHD levels were low at baseline (median, 32.9 nmol/L) and increased only slightly depending on the number of sunlight sessions attended over 12 months (P = 0.04). During the study, 327 falls occurred in 111 (54%) subjects in the control group, 326 falls in 111 (58%) subjects in the UV only group and 335 falls in 108 (52%) subjects in the UV+ group. By intention-to-treat analysis, there was no significant effect of increased UV exposure on falls risk (IRR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.76-1.48; P = 0.73). However, in 66 participants who attended ≥130 sessions per year (adherence, ≥50% of 260 sessions-five per week), falls were significantly reduced (IRR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.31-0.88; P = 0.01) compared with the control group.

CONCLUSIONS:

Increased sunlight exposure did not reduce vitamin D deficiency or falls risk in frail older people. This public health strategy was not effective most likely due to poor adherence to the intervention.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Deficiência de Vitamina D / Acidentes por Quedas / Helioterapia Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2012 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Deficiência de Vitamina D / Acidentes por Quedas / Helioterapia Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2012 Tipo de documento: Article