Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Slow-transit constipation with concurrent upper gastrointestinal dysmotility and its response to transcutaneous electrical stimulation.
Yik, Yee Ian; Clarke, Melanie C C; Catto-Smith, Anthony G; Robertson, Val J; Sutcliffe, Jonathan R; Chase, Janet W; Gibb, Susan; Cain, Timothy M; Cook, David J; Tudball, Coral F; Hutson, John M; Southwell, Bridget R.
Afiliação
  • Yik YI; F Douglas Stephens Surgical Research and Gut Motility Laboratories, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, 3052, Australia. yiyik@um.edu.my
Pediatr Surg Int ; 27(7): 705-11, 2011 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21373802
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) speeds up colonic transit in children with slow-transit constipation (STC). This study examined if concurrent upper gastrointestinal dysmotility (UGD) affected response to TES.

METHODS:

Radio-nuclear transit studies (NTS) were performed before and after TES treatment of STC as part of a larger randomised controlled trial. UGD was defined as delayed gastric emptying and/or slow small bowel transit. Improvement was defined as increase of ≥1 Geometric Centre (median radiotracer position at each time [small bowel = 1, toilet = 6]).

RESULTS:

Forty-six subjects completed the trial, 34 had NTS after stimulation (21 M, 8-17 years, mean 11.3 years; symptoms >9 years). Active stimulation increased transit in >50% versus only 25% with sham (p = 0.04). Seventeen children also had UGD. In children with STC and either normal upper GI motility (NUGM) and UGD, NTS improved slightly after 1 month (57 vs. 60%; p = 0.9) and more after 2 months (88 vs. 40%; p = 0.07). However, mean transit rate significantly increased with NUGM, but not UGD (5.0 ± 0.2 3.6 ± 0.6, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION:

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation was beneficial for STC, with response weakly associated with UGD. As measured by NTS, STC children with NUGM responded slightly more, but with significantly greater increased transit compared to those with UGD. Higher numbers are needed to determine if the difference is important.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Trânsito Gastrointestinal / Estimulação Elétrica Nervosa Transcutânea / Colo / Constipação Intestinal Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2011 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Trânsito Gastrointestinal / Estimulação Elétrica Nervosa Transcutânea / Colo / Constipação Intestinal Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2011 Tipo de documento: Article