Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Findings from the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists' 2008 assessment of state reportable and nationally notifiable conditions in the United States and considerations for the future.
Jajosky, Ruth; Rey, Araceli; Park, Meeyoung; Aranas, Aaron; Macdonald, Steven; Ferland, Lisa.
Afiliação
  • Jajosky R; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, USA. raj3@cdc.gov
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 17(3): 255-64, 2011.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21591479
ABSTRACT
CONTEXT The State Reportable Conditions Assessment (SRCA) is an annual assessment of reporting requirements for reportable public health conditions. The Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have gained valuable experience in developing a centralized repository of information about reportable conditions across US states and territories.

OBJECTIVE:

This study examines the reporting status in states of nationally notifiable conditions used to inform public health and national surveillance initiatives.

DESIGN:

Conditions included in SRCA are updated annually by using a Web-based tool created by the CSTE.

SETTING:

SRCA information for 2008 was reported from all US states, 2 cities, and 4 territories.

PARTICIPANTS:

Respondents included state or territorial epidemiologists (or designees) for reporting jurisdictions. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURE:

Conditions were classified as explicitly reportable, implicitly reportable, or not reportable. RESULTS were tabulated to determine reporting statistics for the conditions nationwide.

RESULTS:

The SRCA included 101 conditions recommended for national notification 93 (92%) were infectious conditions, and 8 (8%) were other (noninfectious or crosscutting) conditions. Of nationally notifiable infectious conditions, 61 (66%) were explicitly reportable in 90% or more jurisdictions; only 2 (25%) noninfectious or crosscutting nationally notifiable conditions were explicitly reportable in 90% or more jurisdictions. Furthermore, 3 nationally notifiable infectious conditions were explicitly reportable in less than 70% of jurisdictions.

CONCLUSIONS:

Although most nationally notifiable conditions were explicitly reportable, we found that many of these conditions have implicit reporting authority in states. As notifiable condition surveillance moves toward an informatics-driven approach, automated electronic case-detection systems will need explicit information about what conditions are reportable. Future work should address the feasibility of standardizing the format of reportable disease lists and nomenclature used to facilitate data aggregation and interpretation across states.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Vigilância da População / Doenças Transmissíveis / Notificação de Doenças Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2011 Tipo de documento: Article
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Vigilância da População / Doenças Transmissíveis / Notificação de Doenças Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2011 Tipo de documento: Article