Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Self-reported neighborhood safety and nonadherence to treatment regimens among patients with type 2 diabetes.
Billimek, John; Sorkin, Dara H.
Afiliação
  • Billimek J; Health Policy Research Institute, Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, 100 Theory, Suite 110, Irvine, CA 92697-5800, USA. jbillime@uci.edu
J Gen Intern Med ; 27(3): 292-6, 2012 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21935749
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Few studies have explored the association between neighborhood characteristics and adherence to diabetes self-management behaviors, and none have examined the influence of neighborhood safety on adherence to treatment regimens among patients with diabetes.

OBJECTIVE:

To assess whether neighborhood safety is associated with self-reports of technical quality of care and with nonadherence to diabetes treatment regimens.

DESIGN:

A cross-sectional analysis of a population-based sample of California adults responding to the 2007 California Health Interview Survey. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the association of self-reported neighborhood safety with technical quality of care and treatment nonadherence, adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics, barriers to access to care, and health status.

PARTICIPANTS:

Adults with type 2 diabetes currently receiving medical treatment. MAIN

MEASURES:

Patient-reported neighborhood safety, performance of recommended processes of care by provider, treatment nonadherence (patient delays in filling prescriptions and obtaining needed medical care). KEY

RESULTS:

Self-reported neighborhood safety was not associated with process measures of technical quality of care, but was associated with treatment nonadherence. Specifically, compared to those who report living in a safe neighborhood, a higher proportion of patients living in unsafe neighborhoods reported delays in filling a prescription for any reason (21.9% vs. 12.8%, aOR = 1.69, 95%CI 1.19, 2.40) and delays in filling a prescription due to cost (12.2% vs. 6.8%, aOR = 1.63, 95%CI 1.02, 2.62).

CONCLUSIONS:

Contextual factors, such as neighborhood safety, may contribute to treatment nonadherence in daily life, even when the technical quality of care delivered in the clinic is not diminished.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Autocuidado / Características de Residência / Nível de Saúde / Cooperação do Paciente / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Segurança do Paciente Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2012 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Autocuidado / Características de Residência / Nível de Saúde / Cooperação do Paciente / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Segurança do Paciente Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2012 Tipo de documento: Article