[Superiority of modified method in urine drainage for hypospadias repair: a 20 years' experience with 864 cases].
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi
; 91(46): 3278-80, 2011 Dec 13.
Article
em Zh
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-22333150
OBJECTIVE: To explore an ideal urine drainage method and new urethral secretions of hypospadias repair. METHODS: The authors retrospectively analyzed 864 cases of hypospadias undergoing hypospadias repair and different post-operative urine drainages. The patients were divided into 5 groups based on the methods of urine drainage. RESULTS: The rates of such complications as cystospasm, infection of incisional wound and urinary fistula were as follows: modified method group: 2.86%, 3.33%, 1.90%; 3-tube method group: 10.77%, 11.54%, 8.46%; He's method group: 20.89%, 15.04%, 9.75%; traditional method group: 36.25%, 41.25%, 37.50%; 1-tube method group: 56.47%, 58.82%, 48.23%. The modified method was significantly better than all the other four methods (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: As an ideal drainage method of urine and new urethral secretions of hypospadias repair, the modified method boosts the success ratio of hypospadias repair.
Buscar no Google
Coleções:
01-internacional
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Uretra
/
Drenagem
/
Hipospadia
Tipo de estudo:
Observational_studies
Limite:
Adolescent
/
Adult
/
Child
/
Child, preschool
/
Humans
/
Infant
/
Male
Idioma:
Zh
Ano de publicação:
2011
Tipo de documento:
Article