Prenatally diagnosed fetal conditions in the age of fetal care: does who counsels matter?
Am J Obstet Gynecol
; 206(5): 409.e1-11, 2012 May.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-22340943
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE:
We sought to characterize practices and attitudes of maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) and fetal care pediatric (FCP) specialists regarding fetal abnormalities. STUDYDESIGN:
This was a self-administered survey of 434 MFMs and FCPs (response rate MFM 60.9%; FCP 54.2%).RESULTS:
For Down syndrome (DS), congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), spina bifida MFMs were more likely than FCPs to support termination (DS 52% vs 35%, P < .001; CDH 49% vs 36%, P < .001; spina bifida 54% vs 35%, P < .001), and consider offering termination options as highly important (DS 90% vs 70%, P < .001; CDH 88% vs 69%, P < .001; spina bifida 88% vs 70%, P < .001). For DS only, MFMs were less likely than FCPs to think that pediatric specialist consultation should be offered prior to a decision regarding termination (54% vs 75%, P < .001). MFMs reported report higher termination rates among patients only for DS (DS 51% vs 21%, P < .001).CONCLUSION:
MFM and FCP specialists' counseling attitudes differ for fetal abnormalities.
Texto completo:
1
Coleções:
01-internacional
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Médicos
/
Diagnóstico Pré-Natal
/
Anormalidades Congênitas
/
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde
/
Aborto Eugênico
/
Aconselhamento Diretivo
/
Serviços de Saúde Materna
Tipo de estudo:
Diagnostic_studies
/
Prognostic_studies
/
Qualitative_research
/
Risk_factors_studies
Limite:
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
/
Middle aged
/
Pregnancy
Idioma:
En
Ano de publicação:
2012
Tipo de documento:
Article