Development and validation of a new outcome score in subglottic stenosis.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We prospectively evaluated a clinical and endoscopic score, the tracheal endoscopic clinical score (TECS), developed as a disease-specified outcome measure in adult patients undergoing operation for subglottic stenosis. We also performed a retrospective chart review to identify preoperative and intraoperative risk factors for worse TECS. METHODS: The TECS includes endoscopic (vocal cord and glottic function, anastomotic healing, and patency) and interview (respiration, voice, swallow) variables, and was administered at 6-month follow-up. Endoscopic and subjective domains were weighted to obtain a continuous TECS index ranging from 0 (best) to 1 (worse). The TECS and preoperative variables relationships were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: We collected data (January 2009 to December 2010) from 30 patients (mean age, 48.3±19 years) undergoing subglottic resection and primary reconstruction. Stenosis etiology was postintubation (n=8), idiopathic (n=2), tracheostomy (n=18), and malignant (n=2). Surgery included Pearson operation with (n=7) or without (n=23) a Liberman-Mathisen cricoplasty. Mean length of resected trachea was 30.5±13.5 mm, and mean hospital stay was 7.4 days. Mortality rate was 1 patient (3.3%). The univariate analysis showed positive correlation between 6-month TECS and degree of stenosis (McCaffrey and Cotton scale 0 to 4) stage 4, tracheostomy or T-tube at surgery, bottleneck-type transition stenosis, and resection length. At multivariate analysis, the presence of tracheostomy, bottleneck-type transition stenosis and resection length were indicators of worse postoperative functional result. CONCLUSIONS: The TECS seems to be a valid and simple instrument to identify preoperative variables predicting worse results and to assess postoperative outcome. Validation on larger series is necessary.