Motivations and objections to implement a spondyloarthritis integrated care pathway. A qualitative study with primary care physicians.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Previous to the development of a clinical pathway (CP) for early spondyloarthritis (SpA), a qualitative study was performed to know the attitude of primary care physicians (PCP) with respect to CP implementation. METHODS: 5 discussion groups (2 in Madrid, 2 in Barcelona and 1 in Sevilla) and 3 interviews in Bilbao, were performed. PCP with different profiles were included. Groups and interviews were carried out by experts on qualitative methodology. RESULTS: PCP know little about CP. Motivations of professionals to work on a SpA CP were to improve patients care, availability of a specialist consultant, possibility of learning and doing research, remuneration, and professional recognition. Objections to CP implementation were extra work, excessive bureaucracy, absence of a specialist consultant, computer difficulties, and no remuneration. SpA knowledge by PCP was defective. PCP associated the term «spondylitis¼ with osteoarthritis, low-back pain, ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis. They only referred patients to the rheumatologist to confirm the diagnosis, when patients complained and when treatment was ineffective. CONCLUSIONS: For an optimal CP implementation, the following is deemed necessary 1) a practical, simple program that eases the interaction with the rheumatologist without an increase on the PCP work load; 2) to provide continuous feedback by the specialist and 3) to provide knowledge on SpA to PCP.