Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of luteal-phase support on endometrial microRNA expression following controlled ovarian stimulation.
Zhao, Yulian; Zacur, Howard; Cheadle, Chris; Ning, Ning; Fan, Jinshui; Vlahos, Nikos F.
Afiliação
  • Zhao Y; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Lutherville, MD, USA. zhao1@jhmi.edu
Reprod Biol Endocrinol ; 10: 72, 2012 Sep 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22950660
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Studies suggested that microRNAs influence cellular activities in the uterus including cell differentiation and embryo implantation. In assisted reproduction cycles, luteal phase support, given to improve endometrial characteristics and to facilitate the implantation process, has been a standard practice. The effect of different types of luteal phase support using steroid hormones in relation to endometrial miRNA profiles during the peri-implantation period has not seen described. This study was designed to evaluate the expression of miRNAs during the luteal phase following controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF and the influence of different luteal phase support protocols on miRNA profiles.

METHODS:

The study was approved by the Johns Hopkins Hospital Institutional Review Board. Endometrial biopsies were obtained on the day of oocyte retrieval from 9 oocyte donors (group I). An additional endometrial biopsy was obtained 3-5 days later (Group II) after the donors were randomized into three groups. Group IIa had no luteal-phase support, group IIb had luteal support with micronized progesterone (P), and Group IIc had luteal support with progesterone plus 17-beta-estradiol (P + E). Total RNA was isolated and microarray analysis was performed using an Illumina miRNA expression panel.

RESULTS:

A total of 526 miRNAs were identified. Out of those, 216 miRNAs were differentially regulated (p < 0.05) between the comparison groups. As compared to the day of retrieval, 19, 11 and 6 miRNAs were differentially regulated more than 2 fold in the groups of no support, in the P support only, and in the P + E support respectively, 3-5 days after retrieval. During the peri-implantation period (3-5 days after retrieval) the expression of 33 and 6 miRNAs increased, while the expression of 3 and 0 miRNAs decreased, in the P alone and in the P + E group respectively as compared to the no steroid supplementation group.

CONCLUSION:

Luteal support following COS has a profound influence on miRNA profiles. Up or down regulation of miRNAs after P or P + E support suggest a role(s) of luteal support in the peri-implantation uterus in IVF cycles through the regulation of associated target genes.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Indução da Ovulação / Regulação para Baixo / Regulação para Cima / Manutenção do Corpo Lúteo / MicroRNAs / Endométrio / Fase Luteal Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2012 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Indução da Ovulação / Regulação para Baixo / Regulação para Cima / Manutenção do Corpo Lúteo / MicroRNAs / Endométrio / Fase Luteal Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2012 Tipo de documento: Article