Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
English-learning one- to two-year-olds do not show a consonant bias in word learning.
Floccia, Caroline; Nazzi, Thierry; Delle Luche, Claire; Poltrock, Silvana; Goslin, Jeremy.
Afiliação
  • Floccia C; University of Plymouth,UK.
  • Nazzi T; University Paris Descartes,France.
  • Delle Luche C; University of Plymouth,UK.
  • Poltrock S; University Paris Descartes,France.
  • Goslin J; University of Plymouth,UK.
J Child Lang ; 41(5): 1085-114, 2014 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23866758
ABSTRACT
Following the proposal that consonants are more involved than vowels in coding the lexicon (Nespor, Peña & Mehler, 2003), an early lexical consonant bias was found from age 1;2 in French but an equal sensitivity to consonants and vowels from 1;0 to 2;0 in English. As different tasks were used in French and English, we sought to clarify this ambiguity by using an interactive word-learning study similar to that used in French, with British-English-learning toddlers aged 1;4 and 1;11. Children were taught two CVC labels differing on either a consonant or vowel and tested on their pairing of a third object named with one of the previously taught labels, or part of them. In concert with previous research on British-English toddlers, our results provided no evidence of a general consonant bias. The language-specific mechanisms explaining the differential status for consonants and vowels in lexical development are discussed.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Desenvolvimento da Linguagem Limite: Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Desenvolvimento da Linguagem Limite: Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article