Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Risk factors for early colonoscopic perforation include non-gastroenterologist endoscopists: a multivariable analysis.
Bielawska, Barbara; Day, Andrew G; Lieberman, David A; Hookey, Lawrence C.
Afiliação
  • Bielawska B; Gastrointestinal Diseases Research Unit, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
  • Day AG; Clinical Research Centre, Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
  • Lieberman DA; Division of Gastroenterology, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, Oregon.
  • Hookey LC; Gastrointestinal Diseases Research Unit, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: hookeyl@hdh.kari.net.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 12(1): 85-92, 2014 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23891916
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND &

AIMS:

Bowel perforation is a rare but serious complication of colonoscopy. Its prevalence is increasing with the rapidly growing volume of procedures performed. Although colonoscopies have been performed for decades, the risk factors for perforation are not completely understood. We investigated risk factors for perforation during colonoscopy by assessing variables that included sedation type and endoscopist specialty and level of training.

METHODS:

We performed a retrospective multivariate analysis of risk factors for early perforation (occurring at any point during the colonoscopy but recognized during or immediately after the procedure) in adult patients by using the Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative National Endoscopic Database. Risk factors were determined from published articles. Additional variables assessed included endoscopist specialty and years of experience, trainee involvement, and sedation with propofol.

RESULTS:

We identified 192 perforation events during 1,144,900 colonoscopies from 85 centers entered into the database from January 2000-March 2011. On multivariate analysis, increasing age, American Society of Anesthesia class, female sex, hospital setting, any therapy, and polyps >10 mm were significantly associated with increased risk of early perforation. Colonoscopies performed by surgeons and endoscopists of unknown specialty had higher rates of perforation than those performed by gastroenterologists (odds ratio, 2.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-3.08). Propofol sedation did not significantly affect risk for perforation.

CONCLUSIONS:

In addition to previously established risk factors, non-gastroenterologist specialty was found to affect risk for perforations detected during or immediately after colonoscopy. This finding could result from differences in volume and style of endoscopy training. Further investigation into these observed associations is warranted.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Competência Profissional / Colonoscopia / Perfuração Intestinal Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Competência Profissional / Colonoscopia / Perfuração Intestinal Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article