Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Pain behaviour indicator scale (ESCID) application in severe non-communicative trauma patients receiving mechanical ventilation]. / Aplicación de la Escala de conductas indicadoras de dolor (ESCID) en el paciente con trauma grave no comunicativo y ventilación mecánica.
López López, C; Murillo Pérez, M A; Torrente Vela, S; Cornejo Bauer, C; García Iglesias, M; Orejana Martín, M; Morales Sánchez, C; Cuenca Solanas, M; Alted López, E.
Afiliação
  • López López C; UCI de Trauma y Emergencias, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, España. Electronic address: candelas.lopez@salud.madrid.org.
Enferm Intensiva ; 24(4): 137-44, 2013.
Article em Es | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24140448
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To assess pain in non-communicative patients with severe trauma undergoing mechanical ventilation prior to, during and after tracheal suctioning, mobilization and wound care. MATERIAL AND

METHOD:

A prospective and observational study from October to December 2011 was performed. Study variables were ESCID scale and monitoring of vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, and respiratory rate). Data were gathering 5 minutes before, during and 15 minutes after the 3 procedures. The nursing evolutive report recorded pain assessment, administration and effectiveness of the analgesia. Descriptive analysis of variables included Student's T test/ANOVA for multivariate analysis with SPSS 17.0.

RESULTS:

A hundred eighty four observations 46.8% tracheal suctioning, 38.5% mobilization and 14.7% wound care were performed in 29 patients. ESCID score was 0.4±1 before, 3.4±2.7 during and 0.4±1 after for wound care; 0.4±1.1 before, 3.6±2.2 during and 1.1±0.5 for tracheal suctioning; 0.5±1.1 before, 3±2.8 during and 0.2±0.8 after for mobilization. These increased significantly during the performance of the 3 procedures before-during/during-after P=.000. All the hemodynamic variables were significantly modified during mobilization and tracheal suctioning before-during/during-after P=.000, with the exception of the cures that only affected respiratory rate. 27% of the procedures received analgesia 9% received it before, 15% during and 3.2% after, with more analgesia being required for the wound care (33.3%). The data collected in the nursing report on the evaluation of pain/effectiveness of the analgesia showed 20.66%.

CONCLUSION:

An increase on the ESCID score was observed while performing the procedures.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Respiração Artificial / Ferimentos e Lesões / Medição da Dor Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: Es Ano de publicação: 2013 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Respiração Artificial / Ferimentos e Lesões / Medição da Dor Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: Es Ano de publicação: 2013 Tipo de documento: Article