Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
EBUS-centred versus EUS-centred mediastinal staging in lung cancer: a randomised controlled trial.
Kang, Hyo Jae; Hwangbo, Bin; Lee, Geon-Kook; Nam, Byung-Ho; Lee, Hyun-Sung; Kim, Moon Soo; Lee, Jong Mog; Zo, Jae Ill; Lee, Hee Seok; Han, Ji-Youn.
Afiliação
  • Kang HJ; Center for Lung Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, , Goyang, Korea.
Thorax ; 69(3): 261-8, 2014 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24172712
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The impact of procedure sequence and primary procedure has not been studied in the combined application of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in lung cancer staging.

METHODS:

In a randomised controlled trial, 160 patients with histologically confirmed or strongly suspected potentially operable non-small cell lung cancer were enrolled (Group A, n=80, EBUS-centred; Group B, n=80, EUS-centred). EBUS-TBNA and EUS-FNA with an ultrasound bronchoscope were used as the first procedures in Groups A and B, respectively, and secondary procedures (EUS-FNA in Group A, EBUS-TBNA in Group B) were added.

RESULTS:

Diagnostic values were evaluated in 148 patients (74 in each group). In Groups A and B the diagnostic accuracy (93.2% (95% CI 87.5% to 99.0%) vs 97.3% (95% CI 93.6% to 101.0%), p=0.245) and sensitivity (85.3% (95% CI 68.9% to 95.0%) vs 92.0% (95% CI 74.0% to 99.0%), p=0.431) in detecting mediastinal metastasis were not statistically different. In Group A, adding EUS-FNA to EBUS-TBNA did not significantly increase the accuracy (from 91.9% to 93.2%, p=0.754) or sensitivity (from 82.4% to 85.3%, p=0.742). In group B, adding EBUS-TBNA to EUS-FNA increased the accuracy (from 86.5% to 97.3%, p=0.016) and sensitivity (from 60.0% to 92.0%, p=0.008). There were no intergroup differences in procedure time, cardiorespiratory parameters during procedures, complications or patient satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS:

Using a combination of EBUS-TBNA and EUS-FNA in mediastinal staging, we found that diagnostic values and patient satisfaction were not different between the EBUS-centred and EUS-centred groups. However, the necessity for EBUS-TBNA following EUS suggests that EBUS-TBNA is a better primary procedure in endoscopic mediastinal staging of potentially operable lung cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT01385111.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas / Endossonografia / Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas / Endossonografia / Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article