Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A randomized comparison of drug-eluting balloon versus everolimus-eluting stent in patients with bare-metal stent-in-stent restenosis: the RIBS V Clinical Trial (Restenosis Intra-stent of Bare Metal Stents: paclitaxel-eluting balloon vs. everolimus-eluting stent).
Alfonso, Fernando; Pérez-Vizcayno, Maria Jose; Cárdenas, Alberto; García Del Blanco, Bruno; Seidelberger, Bernhard; Iñiguez, Andrés; Gómez-Recio, Manuel; Masotti, Mónica; Velázquez, M Teresa; Sanchís, Juan; García-Touchard, Arturo; Zueco, Javier; Bethencourt, Armando; Melgares, Rafael; Cequier, Angel; Dominguez, Antonio; Mainar, Vicente; López-Mínguez, José R; Moreu, José; Martí, Vicens; Moreno, Raúl; Jiménez-Quevedo, Pilar; Gonzalo, Nieves; Fernández, Cristina; Macaya, Carlos.
Afiliação
  • Alfonso F; Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: falf@hotmail.com.
  • Pérez-Vizcayno MJ; Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
  • Cárdenas A; Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
  • García Del Blanco B; Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Seidelberger B; Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain.
  • Iñiguez A; Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain.
  • Gómez-Recio M; Hospital Universitario de Torrecárdenas, Almería, Spain.
  • Masotti M; Hospital Universitario Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Velázquez MT; Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
  • Sanchís J; Hospital Universitario Clínico de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
  • García-Touchard A; Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
  • Zueco J; Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain.
  • Bethencourt A; Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
  • Melgares R; Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain.
  • Cequier A; Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Dominguez A; Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain.
  • Mainar V; Hospital Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
  • López-Mínguez JR; Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina Badajoz, Badajoz, Spain.
  • Moreu J; Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Salud Toledo, Toledo, Spain.
  • Martí V; Hospital Universitario Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Moreno R; Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
  • Jiménez-Quevedo P; Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
  • Gonzalo N; Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
  • Fernández C; Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
  • Macaya C; Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 63(14): 1378-86, 2014 Apr 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24412457
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

This study sought to compare the efficacy of drug-eluting balloons (DEB) with that of everolimus-eluting stents (EES) in patients with bare-metal stents (BMS) in-stent restenosis (ISR).

BACKGROUND:

Treatment of patients with ISR remains a challenge.

METHODS:

This was a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial comparing DEB with EES in patients with bare-metal stents (BMS) in-stent restenosis (ISR). The primary endpoint was the minimal lumen diameter at 9 months' follow-up.

RESULTS:

A total of 189 patients with BMS-ISR from 25 Spanish sites were included (95 were allocated to DEB and 94 to EES). Procedural success was achieved in all patients. At late angiography (median 249 days; 92% of eligible patients), patients in the EES arm had a significantly larger minimal lumen diameter (2.36 ± 0.6 mm vs. 2.01 ± 0.6 mm, p < 0.001; absolute mean difference 0.35 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.16 to 0.53) and a lower percent of diameter stenosis (13 ± 17% vs. 25 ± 20%, p < 0.001). However, late loss (0.04 ± 0.5 mm vs. 0.14 ± 0.5 mm, p = 0.14) and binary restenosis rate (4.7% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.22) were very low and similar in both groups. Clinical follow-up (median 365 days) was obtained in all (100%) patients. Occurrences of the combined clinical outcome measure (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization; 6% vs. 8%; hazard ratio [HR] 0.76; 95% CI 0.26 to 2.18, p = 0.6) and the need for target vessel revascularization (2% vs. 6%; HR 0.32 95% CI 0.07 to 1.59, p = 0.17) were similar in the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

In patients with BMS-ISR, both DEB and EES provided excellent clinical results with a very low rate of clinical and angiographic recurrences. However, compared with DEB, EES provide superior late angiographic findings. (Restenosis Intra-stent of Bare Metal Stents Paclitaxel-eluting Balloon vs. Everolimus-eluting Stent [RIBS V]; NCT01239953).
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Angioplastia Coronária com Balão / Estenose Coronária / Reestenose Coronária / Stents Farmacológicos / Metais Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Angioplastia Coronária com Balão / Estenose Coronária / Reestenose Coronária / Stents Farmacológicos / Metais Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article