Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Optic nerve sheath diameter measurement techniques: examination using a novel ex-vivo porcine model.
Nusbaum, Derek M; Antonsen, Erik; Bockhorst, Kurt H; Easley, R Blaine; Clark, Jonathan B; Brady, Kenneth M; Kibler, Kathleen K; Sutton, Jeffrey P; Kramer, Larry; Sargsyan, Ashot E.
Afiliação
  • Nusbaum DM; Department of Internal Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 7703, USA. nusbaum@bcm.edu
  • Antonsen E; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Bockhorst KH; University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston, TX, USA.
  • Easley RB; Department of Internal Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 7703, USA.
  • Clark JB; Department of Internal Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 7703, USA.
  • Brady KM; Department of Internal Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 7703, USA.
  • Kibler KK; Department of Internal Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 7703, USA.
  • Sutton JP; National Space Biomedical Research Institute, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Kramer L; University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston, TX, USA.
  • Sargsyan AE; Wyle Science, Technology and Engineering Group, Houston, TX, USA.
Aviat Space Environ Med ; 85(1): 50-4, 2014 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24479259
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Ultrasound (U/S) and MRI measurements of the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) have been proposed as intracranial pressure measurement surrogates, but these methods have not been fully evaluated or standardized. The purpose of this study was to develop an ex-vivo model for evaluating ONSD measurement techniques by comparing U/S and MRI measurements to physical measurements.

METHODS:

The left eye of post mortem juvenile pigs (N = 3) was excised and the subdural space of the optic nerve cannulated. Caliper measurements and U/S imaging measurements of the ONSD were acquired at baseline and following 1 cc saline infusion into the sheath. The samples were then embedded in 0.5% agarose and imaged in a 7 Tesla (7T) MRI. The ONSD was subsequently measured with digital calipers at locations and directions matching the U/S and direct measurements.

RESULTS:

Both MRI and sonographic measurements were in agreement with direct measurements. U/S data, especially axial images, exhibited a positive bias and more variance (bias 1.318, 95% limit of agreement 8.609) compared to MRI (bias 0.3156, 95% limit of agreement 2.773). In addition, U/S images were much more dependent on probe placement, distance between probe and target, and imaging plane.

CONCLUSIONS:

This model appears to be a valid test-bed for continued scrutiny of ONSD measurement techniques. In this model, 7T MRI was accurate and potentially useful for in-vivo measurements where direct measurements are not available. Current limitations with ultrasound imaging for ONSD measurement associated with image acquisition technique and equipment necessitate further standardization to improve its clinical utility.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Nervo Óptico Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Animals Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Nervo Óptico Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Animals Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article