Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prognostic analysis of salvage esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: the importance of lymphadenectomy.
Wang, Shaohua; Tachimori, Yuji; Hokamura, Nobukazu; Igaki, Hiroyasu; Nakazato, Hidetsugu; Kishino, Takayoshi.
Afiliação
  • Wang S; Division of Esophageal Surgery, Department of Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Thoracic Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
  • Tachimori Y; Division of Esophageal Surgery, Department of Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. Electronic address: ytachimo@ncc.go.jp.
  • Hokamura N; Division of Esophageal Surgery, Department of Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Igaki H; Division of Esophageal Surgery, Department of Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Nakazato H; Division of Esophageal Surgery, Department of Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Kishino T; Division of Esophageal Surgery, Department of Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 147(6): 1805-11, 2014 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24521950
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The objective of this study was to review the prognostic factors for increased survival after salvage esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous carcinoma and determine the importance of lymphadenectomy from a prognostic view.

METHODS:

Clinical data for all patients from January 1999 to December 2012 who underwent salvage esophagectomy for residual tumor or tumor recurrence after definitive chemoradiotherapy were retrospectively collected. Survival was determined and prognostic factors were analyzed with univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS:

Survival after 1, 3, and 5 years postoperatively was 74.4%, 39.8%, and 29.5%, respectively. The independent predictive factors for increased postoperative survival were tumor recurrence rather than residual tumor as the indication for salvage surgery (P < .001; odds ratio [OR], 0.292); complete tumor resection (P < .001; OR, 4.520); N category (P = .089; OR, 1.304); M category (P = .081; OR, 2.215), and total mediastinal dissection with 15 or more dissected mediastinal lymph nodes (P = .034; OR, 0.546).

CONCLUSIONS:

Salvage indications of recurrence, earlier disease, and complete tumor resection are related to longer survival. The total area of mediastinal dissection with a sufficient number of dissected mediastinal lymph nodes improves survival. Additional neck dissection does not add benefit. The optimal procedure for lymph node dissection in salvage esophagectomy should be established in future studies.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Esofágicas / Carcinoma de Células Escamosas / Terapia de Salvação / Esofagectomia / Quimiorradioterapia / Excisão de Linfonodo Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Esofágicas / Carcinoma de Células Escamosas / Terapia de Salvação / Esofagectomia / Quimiorradioterapia / Excisão de Linfonodo Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article