Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an independent predictive factor irrespective of simplified breast cancer intrinsic subtypes: a landmark and two-step approach analyses from the EORTC 10994/BIG 1-00 phase III trial.
Bonnefoi, H; Litière, S; Piccart, M; MacGrogan, G; Fumoleau, P; Brain, E; Petit, T; Rouanet, P; Jassem, J; Moldovan, C; Bodmer, A; Zaman, K; Cufer, T; Campone, M; Luporsi, E; Malmström, P; Werutsky, G; Bogaerts, J; Bergh, J; Cameron, D A.
Afiliação
  • Bonnefoi H; Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Université de Bordeaux, INSERM U916, Bordeaux, France h.bonnefoi@bordeaux.unicancer.fr.
  • Litière S; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels.
  • Piccart M; Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
  • MacGrogan G; Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Université de Bordeaux, INSERM U916, Bordeaux, France.
  • Fumoleau P; Centre George-François Leclerc, Dijon.
  • Brain E; Ensemble Hospitalier de L'Institut Curie, Hopital René Huguenin, St-Cloud.
  • Petit T; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg.
  • Rouanet P; Centre Val D'Aurelle-Paul Lamarque, Montpellier, France.
  • Jassem J; Medical University, Gdansk, Poland.
  • Moldovan C; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France.
  • Bodmer A; Geneva University Hospital, Geneva Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern.
  • Zaman K; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Cufer T; Institute of Oncology, Ljubljana University Clinic Golnik, Golnik, Slovenia.
  • Campone M; Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest (ICO), Centre René Gauducheau, Nantes Centre Paul Papin, Angers.
  • Luporsi E; Centre Alexis Vautrin, Nancy, France.
  • Malmström P; Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund Skåne Department of Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund.
  • Werutsky G; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels.
  • Bogaerts J; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels.
  • Bergh J; Swedish Breast Cancer Group (SweBCG), Stockholm Department of Oncology, Karolinska Institutet, Radiumhemmet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Cameron DA; Cancer Services, Edinburgh University Anglo-Celtic Cooperative Oncology Group (ACCOG), Edinburgh, UK.
Ann Oncol ; 25(6): 1128-36, 2014 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24618153
BACKGROUND: Pathological complete response (pCR) following chemotherapy is strongly associated with both breast cancer subtype and long-term survival. Within a phase III neoadjuvant chemotherapy trial, we sought to determine whether the prognostic implications of pCR, TP53 status and treatment arm (taxane versus non-taxane) differed between intrinsic subtypes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive either six cycles of anthracycline-based chemotherapy or three cycles of docetaxel then three cycles of eprirubicin/docetaxel (T-ET). pCR was defined as no evidence of residual invasive cancer (or very few scattered tumour cells) in primary tumour and lymph nodes. We used a simplified intrinsic subtypes classification, as suggested by the 2011 St Gallen consensus. Interactions between pCR, TP53 status, treatment arm and intrinsic subtype on event-free survival (EFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS) were studied using a landmark and a two-step approach multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Sufficient data for pCR analyses were available in 1212 (65%) of 1856 patients randomized. pCR occurred in 222 of 1212 (18%) patients: 37 of 496 (7.5%) luminal A, 22 of 147 (15%) luminal B/HER2 negative, 51 of 230 (22%) luminal B/HER2 positive, 43 of 118 (36%) HER2 positive/non-luminal, 69 of 221(31%) triple negative (TN). The prognostic effect of pCR on EFS did not differ between subtypes and was an independent predictor for better EFS [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.40, P < 0.001 in favour of pCR], DMFS (HR = 0.32, P < 0.001) and OS (HR = 0.32, P < 0.001). Chemotherapy arm was an independent predictor only for EFS (HR = 0.73, P = 0.004 in favour of T-ET). The interaction between TP53, intrinsic subtypes and survival outcomes only approached statistical significance for EFS (P = 0.1). CONCLUSIONS: pCR is an independent predictor of favourable clinical outcomes in all molecular subtypes in a two-step multivariate analysis. CLINICALTRIALSGOV: EORTC 10994/BIG 1-00 Trial registration number NCT00017095.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Carcinoma Ductal de Mama / Terapia Neoadjuvante Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Carcinoma Ductal de Mama / Terapia Neoadjuvante Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article