Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Gastro-esophageal reflux disease symptoms and demographic factors as a pre-screening tool for Barrett's esophagus.
Liu, Xinxue; Wong, Angela; Kadri, Sudarshan R; Corovic, Andrej; O'Donovan, Maria; Lao-Sirieix, Pierre; Lovat, Laurence B; Burnham, Rodney W; Fitzgerald, Rebecca C.
Afiliação
  • Liu X; MRC Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Wong A; MRC Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Kadri SR; MRC Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Corovic A; MRC Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • O'Donovan M; Department of Histopathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Lao-Sirieix P; MRC Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Lovat LB; University College London Hospital (UCLH), London, United Kingdom.
  • Burnham RW; Queen's Hospital, Romford, Essex, United Kingdom.
  • Fitzgerald RC; MRC Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
PLoS One ; 9(4): e94163, 2014.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24736597
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Barrett's esophagus (BE) occurs as consequence of reflux and is a risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma. The current "gold-standard" for diagnosing BE is endoscopy which remains prohibitively expensive and impractical as a population screening tool. We aimed to develop a pre-screening tool to aid decision making for diagnostic referrals. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

FINDINGS:

A prospective (training) cohort of 1603 patients attending for endoscopy was used for identification of risk factors to develop a risk prediction model. Factors associated with BE in the univariate analysis were selected to develop prediction models that were validated in an independent, external cohort of 477 non-BE patients referred for endoscopy with symptoms of reflux or dyspepsia. Two prediction models were developed separately for columnar lined epithelium (CLE) of any length and using a stricter definition of intestinal metaplasia (IM) with segments ≥ 2 cm with areas under the ROC curves (AUC) of 0.72 (95%CI 0.67-0.77) and 0.81 (95%CI 0.76-0.86), respectively. The two prediction models included demographics (age, sex), symptoms (heartburn, acid reflux, chest pain, abdominal pain) and medication for "stomach" symptoms. These two models were validated in the independent cohort with AUCs of 0.61 (95%CI 0.54-0.68) and 0.64 (95%CI 0.52-0.77) for CLE and IM ≥ 2 cm, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

We have identified and validated two prediction models for CLE and IM ≥ 2 cm. Both models have fair prediction accuracies and can select out around 20% of individuals unlikely to benefit from investigation for Barrett's esophagus. Such prediction models have the potential to generate useful cost-savings for BE screening among the symptomatic population.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Esôfago de Barrett / Refluxo Gastroesofágico Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Esôfago de Barrett / Refluxo Gastroesofágico Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article