Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Do people understand IARC's 2B categorization of RF fields from cell phones?
Wiedemann, Peter M; Boerner, Franziska U; Repacholi, Michael H.
Afiliação
  • Wiedemann PM; Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis (ITAS), Science Forum EMF, Berlin, Germany.
Bioelectromagnetics ; 35(5): 373-8, 2014 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24737130
In May 2011, the International Agency on Cancer in Research (IARC) issued an official statement concluding that cell phone usage was "possibly carcinogenic to humans." There have been considerable doubts that non-experts and experts alike fully understood what IARC's categorization actually meant, as "possibly carcinogenic" can be interpreted in many ways. The present study is based on an online survey indicating that both the characterization of the probability of carcinogenicity, as well as the description of the risk increase given in the IARC press release, was mostly misunderstood by study participants. Respondents also greatly overestimated the magnitude of the potential risk. Our study results showed that IARC needs to improve their scientific communications.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ondas de Rádio / Agências Internacionais / Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde / Telefone Celular / Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ondas de Rádio / Agências Internacionais / Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde / Telefone Celular / Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article