Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A geometric index to differentiate abnormal from normal septal wall motion on cardiac MRI.
Secchi, Francesco; Resta, Elda Chiara; Giardino, Antonello; Di Leo, Giovanni; Bandera, Francesco; Guazzi, Marco; Sardanelli, Francesco.
Afiliação
  • Secchi F; IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Radiology Unit, San Donato Milanese, Italy francesco.secchi@grupposandonato.it.
  • Resta EC; Università degli Studi di Milano, Scuola di Specializzazione in Radiodiagnostica, Milan, Italy.
  • Giardino A; Università degli Studi di Milano, Scuola di Specializzazione in Radiodiagnostica, Milan, Italy.
  • Di Leo G; IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Radiology Unit, San Donato Milanese, Italy.
  • Bandera F; IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Unit of Cardiology, San Donato Milanese, Italy.
  • Guazzi M; IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Unit of Cardiology, San Donato Milanese, Italy.
  • Sardanelli F; IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Radiology Unit, San Donato Milanese, Italy Università degli Studi di Milano, Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Milan, Italy.
Acta Radiol ; 56(5): 545-51, 2015 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24847135
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The definition of abnormal septal wall motion (SWM) is usually performed on a subjective visual assessment with cardiac MR (CMR).

PURPOSE:

To quantify SWM using a geometric index and to compare this index to the visual inspection in patients with or without abnormal SWM. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

Cine CMR images of 100 consecutive patients were retrospectively assessed for visual evaluation of SWM and calculation of a convexity septal index (CSI) on mid-ventricular short-axis images, defined as b/a (a = minimal distance from anterior to posterior ventricular junctions; b = maximal distance from septum to a), obtained in end-systole (ES) and end-diastole (ED). Cohen κ, Bland-Altman method, Kruskall-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, Jonckheere-Terpstra, and Spearman statistics were used to compare the two methods.

RESULTS:

At visual evaluation, 73 patients had normal SWM (group A), nine abnormal SWM at ES (group B), and 18 at ES and ED (group C). Median CSI for group A was significantly higher (ES = 0.23, ED = 0.25) than those for group B and C (0.10-0.15) (P < 0.001). Inter-reader reproducibility of visual evaluation was high (κ = 0.841, P < 0.001) while that for CSI was 77%. Average time for visual analysis was 3 min, for quantitative analysis 4 min.

CONCLUSION:

CSI is a simple and reproducible way to quantify SWM. ED CSI seems to be sensitive in detecting abnormal SWM in patients with apparently normal SWM at visual evaluation.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Cardiopatias / Septos Cardíacos Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Cardiopatias / Septos Cardíacos Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article