Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Fistula first, graft on arterialized vein second.
Galzerano, Giuseppe; Giubbolini, Michele; Setacci, Francesco; de Donato, Gianmarco; Sirignano, Pasqualino; Messina, Gabriele; Cappelli, Alessandro; Setacci, Carlo.
Afiliação
  • Galzerano G; Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, University of Siena, Siena, Italy galzerano.giuseppe@gmail.com.
  • Giubbolini M; Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
  • Setacci F; Department of Surgery "P. Valdoni", Sapienza University of Rome, Roma, Italy.
  • de Donato G; Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
  • Sirignano P; Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
  • Messina G; Departement of Molecular and Development Medicine, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
  • Cappelli A; Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
  • Setacci C; Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Vascular ; 23(3): 265-9, 2015 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24996932
OBJECTIVES: Arterovenous grafts (AVGs) present a feasible solution for creating a vascular access in patients who are unsuitable for autogenous fistula (AVF). The aim of this study is to assess the prevention rate of vein stenosis, placing a graft on an arterialized vein (GAV) instead of an anastomized AVG in a native vein (GNV). METHODS: This was a cohort study conducted from January 2009 to November 2012. All consecutive patients who underwent AVG in our institution were included. All patients requiring a secondary intervention were also referred to our centre. Patients underwent ultrasound follow up at first and the every month. A Kaplan-Meier method was used; a Log-rank test was used to identify whether significant difference existed between GAV and GNV (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Forty-six grafts were placed. Twenty patients had arterialized receiving veins (group A), while 26 patients received an AVG immediately because they lacked autogenous veins suitable for fistula (group B).The average follow-up period was 16.1 months (range 0-41). The group A 41 months-patency rate was 84.3%, while group B was 43.7% (p = 0.06). Secondary patency was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Vein arterialization seems to prevent venous stenosis improving AVG-patency rate. More data are needed; however, the borderline p value encourages new studies.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Veias / Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica / Fístula / Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular / Falência Renal Crônica Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Veias / Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica / Fístula / Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular / Falência Renal Crônica Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article