Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Endovascular versus surgical treatment in subarachnoid haemorrhage: Cost analysis]. / Costes del tratamiento endovascular frente al quirúrgico en hemorragia subaracnoidea aneurismática.
Horcajadas Almansa, Angel; Jouma Katati, Majed; Román Cutillas, Ana; Jorques Infante, Ana; Cordero Tous, Nicolás.
Afiliação
  • Horcajadas Almansa A; Servicio de Neurocirugía, Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, España. Electronic address: angel.horcajadas@gmail.com.
  • Jouma Katati M; Servicio de Neurocirugía, Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, España.
  • Román Cutillas A; Servicio de Neurocirugía, Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, España.
  • Jorques Infante A; Servicio de Neurocirugía, Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, España.
  • Cordero Tous N; Servicio de Neurocirugía, Hospital Neurotraumatológico. Jaén, España.
Neurocirugia (Astur) ; 26(1): 13-22, 2015.
Article em Es | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25126710
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To analyse costs of endovascular versus surgical treatment in 80 patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH). MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

We analysed data on 80 consecutive patients with aSAH between January 2010 and June 2011. Endovascular treatment was used in 57 patients and surgical in 23 patients. Demographic (gender and age) and clinical data (Hunt-Hess and Fisher scales), length of stay (ICU and ward) and results at 6 months (Glasgow outcome scale,[GOS]) were collected. Costs including stay, follow-up, complications and retreatments were calculated.

RESULTS:

Age was higher in the endovascular group (statistically significant). There were no differences between the 2 groups in Hunt-Hess and Fisher scales. Results at 6 months were also similar, although slightly better in the surgical group. Length of stay was longer in surgical patients, both in ICU (mean 1.4 days) and ward (1.7 days). Hospitalisation length was also related to age and Hunt-Hess and Fisher scales. Costs from embolisation devices, follow-up and retreatment (12% in this series) made final endovascular treatment 4.1% more expensive than surgical treatment (€35,835 versus €34,404). Endovascular procedure (including retreatments) was 110% more expensive than surgical treatment (€8,015 versus €3,817).

CONCLUSIONS:

There are no differences between the 2 treatments in terms of morbidity and mortality. Stability of surgical treatment was higher than that of endovascular, with better occlusion and lower retreatment rates. Endovascular treatment is more expensive in ruptured aneurysms, principally due to embolisation device costs, long-term follow-up and retreatments, in retreatments, in spite of shorter hospital stay. In incidental aneurysms, which usually need shorter hospitalisation, differences between the 2 treatments could be even larger.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Hemorragia Subaracnóidea / Custos e Análise de Custo / Procedimentos Endovasculares Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: Es Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Hemorragia Subaracnóidea / Custos e Análise de Custo / Procedimentos Endovasculares Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: Es Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article