Continuous versus interrupted suture techniques of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) has traditionally been a source of significant morbidity and potential mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Both patient-derived and technical factors contribute to pancreatic anastomotic failure. The continuous suture duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) described previously is associated with a low rate of POPF. The aim of the present study was to observe whether the new technique would effectively reduce the POPF rate in comparison with conventional interrupted suture duct-to-mucosa PJ. METHODS: Data on 255 consecutive patients, who underwent the two methods of PJ after standard PD by one group of surgeons between 2006 and 2013, were collected retrospectively from a prospective database. The primary end point was the POPF rate. The risk factors of POPF were investigated by using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients received continuous suture PJ and 135 underwent interrupted suture PJ. Rate of POPF for the entire cohort was 12.5%. There were 9 fistulas (7.5%) in the continuous anastomosis group and 23 fistulas (17%) in the interrupted anastomosis group (P = 0.022). The rates of major complications (Clavien grades 3-5) were less in the continuous anastomosis group (5%) compared with the interrupted anastomosis group (13.3%) (P = 0.023). The greatest risk factor for a POPF was pancreatic duct diameter POPF developed in only 3 patients (3.6%) with large pancreatic ducts (≥ 3 mm) and in 29 patients (16.9%) with small pancreatic ducts (<3 mm). There were four postoperative (in-hospital) deaths (both in the interrupted anastomosis group); two of which had POPF as the proximate cause of death, followed by bleeding and sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: The continuous suture duct-to-mucosa PJ effectively reduces the POPF rate after PD in comparison with interrupted anastomosis. The results confirm increased POPF rates in patients with pancreatic duct diameter <3 mm compared with pancreatic duct diameter ≥ 3 mm.